Apologies for the mistake

Yeah just ask war thunder

​@@johnhemryjson8673 haha yeah just ask war thunder players they know those sorts of things!

@@andreyoung8732 well they leak the documents most of the time

@@marshalljulie3676 yes so we know it very well

Yes agreed 👍

@@Aitelly Shilka caliber is not 14.5 mm but 23 mm.

Eh. Most AA ammunition in WW2 also work that way.

@Teochewtuahang The difference is the microsecond targeting ability by utilizing multiple onboard computers, radars, and thermal systems that are integrated together. WW2 AA rounds relied on proximity fuses and the "Gunners' Ability to Predict" aircraft location. The "Gunners' Ability to Predict" has been replaced by multiple sensors (radars & thermal) used in conjunction with multiple threaded on-board computers to determine the aircraft location. That calculated location is determined multiple times per second and fed into the targeting system and 35mm round itself. All this happens in real time.

@@Teochewtuahang Not at all. WW2 AA guns worked with a time fuse that was set by purely guesswork by the gunners

Syrian rebels pretty much use their shilkas as a self propelled autocannon

​@@localdrugseller6431light armour, infantry & low flying aircraft. A shortage of air threats & effective against ground targets it's no wonder used in direct fire support.

Yes agreed we missed that

@@Aitelly you also misspelled "Siemens"....

Yes agreed per round per barrel we missed that

👍 Ok will do after we finished a few tanks ahead in our pipeline

Siemens provides "slightly" more than that. Things like Trains (ICE) or even until recently nuclear power plants. And just about anything industrial and electrical from tiny to gigantic. It is massive and one of Germanys biggest companies. Think german General Electric. Also the unit of electrical conductivity is "Siemens" after it's founder, a pioneer of electrifying industry.

Thank you very much! We are going to deliver even beeter Quality next.

@@Aitelly Best way is to read against the names if they're written correctly, like Siemens

@Rei thanks we tried our best. But next week we are going to do better. We are going inside the Abrams Tank

Next we are going to make it better this was an old video we made about 9 months ago. So please Subscribe for next week's video

Thanks @Mangle Hipper great to see you again

Thanks 🙏👍

Honestly we haven't heard about it.

Thanks Roshan

Thanks 🙏👍

Thanks

Yes there is the "Flakpanzer Gepard with Stinger" (a bit disappointed by the naming here), having a twin Stinger system mounted to the right cannon. So, if you see a picture with stingers mounted to the left cannon, it is a fake.

They tested a version with rockets, that's right. But it didn' t entered production...

The missile "cousin" of the Gepard is called the Roland. It uses either the same Leopard 1 chassis or is mounted on a truck. It was phased out by the German armed forces in 2005.

@@xXxxXx-br4rj It didn't enter* production. In fact it did, the Roland system existed alongside the Gepard, both systems have been put out of service years ago now, though.

Why is it so special I was wondering why the $16 million price tag

@@Aitelly well it got newer upgrades resulting its price higher, Russia already have a more effective system and more mobile called Pantsir-S1. it can fire on the move but it recommended to fire in static since the recoils are quite strong bcs it use Kamaz truck as its chassis

yes, tunguska is more like CIWS or C-RAM. Instead with gepard, he is more on par with Centurion CRAM and Oerlikon Skyshield

Tungiska has short anti air missiles too that's far superior to what this can offer.

@@Aitelly it is really the toned down version of the Pantsir system. Same guns, cheaper missiles and radar, smaller, with shorter range and tracked mobility. Shalka-23-4 modernization with upgraded radar and strella missiles is what is comparable to the Gepard. The modernization of Shalka-23-4 is better than Gepard but only shoots 23mm rounds.

Thanks

Apologies for the mistake

You want to have sexual intercourse with it.

Yes will finish the Abrams the Challenger 2 thanks as well as the T90 tank so will start from there

The Germans* never* should have* decomissioned ... But good they did. That system is awfully expensive, its radar is outdated and it's a nightmare to maintain.

@@einundsiebenziger5488 i dont know Man. Vs Drone War the best and Most effective Tool we get, the Ukraines said. And thats what i was thinking. We should make a new Version if the Gepard, better and easier to Maintain but on the same Principe. And it seems Drone War is the thing atm…

More coming next week

Thanks 🙏👍

0:33, 2:56 "This tank is operated by a crew of three people. A commander, a driver and a loader." 3:35 "This is the hatch shared by the commander and the gunner." hm... Also some more corrections and details: The gunner is sitting on the right and the commander sitting on the left side of the turret. That thing on top of the left side periscope is a (removable) remote control the commander can use to turn and aim the turret when standing and looking out of the opened hatch. It also has some optics with a small zoom as far as I remember. Fire control computer is sitting in the back, behind the gunner and commander. It takes almost the whole space of the turret behind the crew. In front are only displays and controls. There is nothing transfered to the tracking radar. The gunner sees the search radar pings on a screen and marks any target there. Then the tracking radar is activated, opens up and tries to get a lock on the marked target which can fail and needs to be checked by the gunner. The IFF is signaled by a small box if the target is identified as friend or foe, but the gunner always uses optical reconnisance (through the periscope) to validate the target. Then the gunner can pull the trigger (push actually) and open fire. Also the search radar is really only for searching the sky, the tracking is only done with the tracking radar. Hence the names. And aditionally, the search radar can stay down/off when there is radar data transfered over radio, from a big radar somewhere else or from awacs. Source: I was a gepard gunner. (some time ago so I don't know the newest upgrades. But I don't think things changed that much.) But all in all a nice video. Keep it up. Edit: Bit nitpicking, but you would never shoot on a target moving away from you (as depicted in some parts of the video here).

Awesome 👍

Thanks for the support 🙏👍

Yes agreed 23 mm

The new one is the Skyranger

Noted we can do the Wiesel

Thanks 🙏👍

Obviously you are wrong Gepard effective shooting range is 5.5 km (3.4 mi)not 2 or 3 km as you said.

you seem to know the difference between active and passive radar ? not ?

They also used Tunguska's current price while for the other they stated the cost from the time they were put into service which was in the 1970s.

Wrong Gepard can also have missiles but Ukraine needs it now for protecting its infrastructure and cities so it is much more cost effective. Gepard is more precise and more deadly and still cheaper.

@@jamesmorrison4976 You obviously don´t know the difference between max range and effective range. And you should not leave your political inclinations dictate your opinion of weapon systems. The Tunguska radar is vastly superior to the Gepard.

These are the new Rounds AHEAD rounds so as per the company they are programmed through Software. But they have a price tag

T90 will come in a few. Weeks currently modeling it

@@Aitelly thanks man, keep up the good work.

Thanks 🙏👍

Thanks 🙏👍

I agree 110% we can even think this "thing" cannot distinguish friends from ennemies, we would all laught to see Shilkas or tunguska on russians side. Germans sent 30 Guépards with only 6000 rounds at start ( to show it's useless ?) ammos just rebuilt in ... Swiss. 30 units 4 km range on 900km front is a joke.Only logical use for 🇺🇦I think is demining or use it like serbians did with Shilka against troops ( civilians in Serbia). This guepards in Ukraine are totaly outdated ( optronics) just good to say "we gave tons.." bad joke.😒

That's the plan! Thank You

Abrams- Challenger 2- T90 This time we will be making the interior also.

Thanks 🙏👍

The german Gepard A2 version was upgraded to airburst (ahaed) ammo in late ´90/early 20´ along with a digital fire control system. This is now the problem in ammunition supply, because german stocks are empty and it is only produced in switzerland, who denie supplying countries in war.

@@J150278HC thats not correct. Here is a list of use amunition: HE / HE-T / FAPDS / HVAPDS / UEB-T / DM28 Manöver / DM20 Ex

compatible*, integrate*, German*, ammunition*

@@J150278HC in Switzerland*, which* denies* supplying ...

Thanks 🙏👍

Can you give us a proper brief.

Honestly-Just to get views.

@@Aitelly thank you for the prompt and honest reply :) You've got great animations, keep it up!

it's junk!

🙃

Always welcome

its a machine cannon - not a machine gun...