eh not impressed with the idea of kids being the new ghostbusters - kinda cliche

@@kellymulderino7156 I can see where you’re coming from

@@JosephBernal82 even grown men handling those proton packs was physically challenging - i just dont buy small kids using them. even egon said in GB2 a proton pack is no toy :)

@@kellymulderino7156 that’s true. You are right about that. I’ve read those proton packs in the movie are about 30 pounds at minimum. I think I read Bill Murray talking about that. Maybe I’m mistaken but aren’t there new proton packs in Afterlife? I read they’re supposed to be lighter and a little smaller in scale. I could be wrong about that

@@JosephBernal82 oh maybe not sure

Wow was it really that good? :D

@@RetrodudeG yea, it really was!

I would say they did hiim justice

@@PeterZeeke and hopefully about to do him a lot more justice

Remember when people used to make movies and actually release them? Lucky for us they had time to film the sequel which releases the very next day

@@johnfoord6325 Dang, that feels like so long ago that even Pepperidge Farms doesn't even remember it.

Ghostbusters

Good point lol

Yo, right? When Ivan was like, "You're going to make me start crying," I literally said out loud, "Go ahead my man, we're all crying with you."

Right? And just the fact he pretty much said there's an extra scene after the credits.... by saying you want to stay till the end of the credits and that its a crime if you dont

@Shannon Hunter ...what makes that bs reboot even sadder? ...Bill Murray made a cameo..... :(

@foxy the joker fox Who called you a name on this thread? I only see myself and others maligning the movie itself. You can like it if you want, I really don't. You seem to be implying some ill-intent that I don't see here at least.

@foxy the joker fox ...so ....."Ghostbusters fandom toxic as fuck since fans like myself cant like both movies including the reboot without being called names" but literally start out by namecalling...'basement dwelling troll' i believe was the comment. The 'Toxicity' is apparent when you decide to acknowledge that YOU are the one perpetuating it. You can like whatever movies you like....but a bad movie is still just a bad movie.

@foxy the joker fox *Sigh* I'm sure there's a portion of people that are being toxic about that movie, but...my honest thoughts? It just wasn't good. Loud and obnoxious does not equal funny in Ghostbusters. I wanted to like it when it came out...really, I did. Not to mention it came out on my birthday. I was excited much like I am for this movie (not as much, though) but when I finally saw it...it disappointed me. If you like it, that's great. I'm glad someone can appreciate that movie and see something myself and others don't see in it, but calling someone a toxic basement dwelling troll just because they don't like the same movie you like is very rude and hypocritical. Or, y'know, the pot calling the kettle black.

@@pokemon200016 My thoughts exactly. 👍

right on! I had no idea he did Jennifer's Body, and as campy as it was, that was the best acting Megan Fox had ever pulled out of herself

@@andrewlee3037 he didn't direct Jennifer's Body

@@pirates12343 , well then, cancel that comment, LOL!

How awesome would it be to have the Lego firehouse next to the Lego farmhouse!

Don't forget the video game

Respect for not spoiling it

Yup. Fun film, BTW.

Let it go. Everyone else has moved on.

@@jackdubz4247 Actually, the cast of that movie still have not moved on and still complaining that movie failed due to toxic males

They already retconned that in the first trailer. "There hasn't been a ghost sighting in over 30 years..."

Holtzman was the best part of that movie .

2016 was in its own universe.

I noticed the soundtrack had ET the theme

Ok… now that I’ve seen the film (and loved it!)… some follow-up… Someone please tell me, when did “fan service” become a bad thing for Hollywood? Who were the idiots in tinsel town that made fans and their love for the originals a bad thing, not to be pursued? Ghostbusters Afterlife is EVERYTHING a fan of that series could ever want from a new film being made 37 years after the original! How is that a bad thing? The end of this film is just sheer happiness!!! Jason Reitman did give us fans a “love letter”, and we should be thankful for it! Such a wonderful film!!! I got instantly choked up, too (with tears), the instant I saw his hand…. You know what I am referencing if you’ve seen the film. That was one of the coolest, most loving, and most sincere moments I’ve seen in a film like this, and it totally caught me off guard! The way they did this was with complete class! And McKenna Grace!!! She was brilliant!

That's down to whoever edited and uploaded the video not the recording but yeah, I'm on full and it's like mice are talking at times

I'd say this movie could at least be more better if not decent enough to be alot better than Paul Feigs version of Ghostbusters at least from my stand point.

I'm predicting a top secret ending rick moranis cameo

The clip was the entire movie actually.

We saw the whole movie so no, unfortunately you have to wait until Nov 🥲

Why spoil the fun we have at least a little of a month to go. I wanna be surprised.

It’s March. Well you called it…except for Egon. The movie was fun. The end was EXTREMELY well done, I thought.

I agree, he just didn't sound like himself, and once side of his face seemed to be drooping.

They planted a cornfield before filming...therefore planned ahead. Plant-ed ahead? Corny, I know. XDD

@@pokemon200016 ohhhh! Lol

It's not Ghostbusters 3, as that would be the original team fighting ghosts. This is a passing of the torch to a newer team, so I get the subtitle.

@@Votesaxon07Reviews It's the 3rd int he series. It is 3.. Also, it's pretty much known that the OG (3 left) will take part as Ghostbusters in this film.

I refer to it as GB3. That's what it is. That subtitle is only there because that garbage came out out in 2016. I think calling it that would be better and just show how insigificant that shit is.

@@John231984 Actually, it has more to do with the 2009 video game that a large part of the fandom consider to be GB3 (Dan Akroyd has said it is GB3 but there's been no official statement about whether that's canon or not). Now, if the game is actually GB3 in terms of lore, then that would make Afterlife GB4. But since the game wasn't actually titled GB3, that would create a lot of confusion for the casual audience as, from their perspective, GB2016 is the third GB movie released, even though it has nothing to do with the previous two or Afterlife. It would be equally confusing to them to call Afterlife GB3 as they would inevitably ask questions like, "Didn't we already have a GB3 5 years ago?" Even for dedicated fans of the franchise, numbering Afterlife as either 3 or 4 after the game would be confusing and somewhat controversial as fans who consider the game to be GB3 would hate the movie being called GB3, and the other fans who don't consider the game to be canon would reject the movie if it were called GB4, So the easiest and least confusing option for everyone is to drop the numbers all together. This way, casuals can accept or reject GB2016 as they see fit, and assuming Afterlife doesn't directly contradict or severely retcon too much from the game, fans can do the same for the video game's inclusion or rejection from the timeline.

@@Dargonhuman Please break up your paraghraps. I'm aware of the game. And I know what Dan said. But it's still not an official movie. As for casual goers, as I said they aren't calling it that because of that abomination. But this is GB3. It's alrady been cleared up a while ago that this ignores the game. And please, titles have been way more confusing with movies then that. At the end of the day this is Ghostbusters 3. The video game isn't canon here and it's not a film. And the reboot doesn't count. This is the third film.

Wait for the DVD, I guess.

You'd have to wait for it to come to video/rental. That or try to find a showtime if you can, that is less likely to have people in the theater. Wait a few weeksafter it comes out.

If you were there at NYCC, I believe the answer was "immediately afterwards"

You’re high.

The early reviews that have it at 86% on rotten tomatoes?

Ivan alone I would have loved to see. He belongs there. Jason I would as well. I'm suprised no OG team is there. We already know they play in the movie and suit up again, so come on. No Dan Akroyd at least.