A guide to very very big numbers. This video covers googol, tetration, hyperoperations, Graham's number and TREE(3). Enjoy!
Пікірлер: 289
@AGuideToInterestingStuff13 күн бұрын
Several quick notes: Yes, I am aware of SSCG(3) and Rayo's number but I thought that the video would drag on a little. There are several minor errors with the visuals. Specifically at 3:19 where it says that 65536 is 2 tetrated to 5 rather than 2 tetrated to 4 and at 6:31 where it shows TREE(10^10) when I say "TREE(googol)" when it should show TREE(10^100) When talking about graham's number, I said that g0 was 3 hexated to 3 but actually that's g1 and g0 isn't really a thing. I excluded infinity because I intend to make another video covering exclusively infinities. Sorry about the music being a little too loud. Edit: Yes, everyone. I am writing a script for a sequel. You can stop mentioning SSCG(3), Rayo's number, BIG FOOT, the fast-growing hierarchy, etc...
@Xnoob54511 күн бұрын
Have you heard of the DaVinci number, made by DV103
@Nikewertz__11 күн бұрын
Infinity is an idea of something which does not have an end, not a number. That is another reason why no one should mention infinity as a largest number in their video about googology.
@AGuideToInterestingStuff11 күн бұрын
@@Nikewertz__ Precisely, though infinity does serve as a sort of sister mathematical branch to googology so one could still assume I would cover it, which is why I gave another explanation as to why it's not covered.
@Nikewertz__11 күн бұрын
@@AGuideToInterestingStuff I forgot to mention the Fast Growing Hierarchy, which uses infinite ordinals to create unfathomably large numbers.
@DavidMuri-lm5vy10 күн бұрын
@@AGuideToInterestingStuff Also how are numbers that are as great as or greater than 10^1060 even usable, or calculatable? Because the highest number that computer systems can ever understand is 10^1054 after that going one value higher than that number will make the computer round it out to either "Nan" (which stands for not a number,) or the computer will round the number out to Infinity, So how did we even discover these numbers? 🧐🧐🧐🧐🧐🧐
@qwarty_gd10 күн бұрын
Remember, every giant number in this video is closer to 0 than it is closer to infinity
@griffinthegreat48734 күн бұрын
It is the number of numbers it’s not on the number line you and I use
@hunterchichester57202 күн бұрын
It is on mine tho @@griffinthegreat4873
@Judy-of-JudylandКүн бұрын
@@griffinthegreat4873yes, it is. It's just after all the finite numbers (Before too if it's unsigned).
@oboo122511 күн бұрын
"we cannot meet giants, but we may glimpse them on the horizon, and bask in their radiance" is such a fire line
@AGuideToInterestingStuff11 күн бұрын
Thank you very much! I write short stories in my spare time alongside making videos so I like trying to be a little eloquent in my scripts.
@oboo122511 күн бұрын
@@AGuideToInterestingStuff oh nice!
@AlvogInsidetuber2 күн бұрын
Yes
@whentheskittlesfightback9 күн бұрын
"hey you want TREE(3) chips" "what" and then they were crushed under the unfathomable mass of an impossible number of chips
@AGuideToInterestingStuff9 күн бұрын
This has no right to be as funny as it is.
@gregg87218 күн бұрын
That amount of chips would have so much mass that it would probably collapse the universe into a singularity
@AGuideToInterestingStuff8 күн бұрын
@@gregg8721 I am now tempted to make a video looking at what would happen if there were actually TREE(3) chips.
@gregg87218 күн бұрын
I would 100% watch that Also a bit of unrequested feedback, the video was really great but the audio mixing was a touch off, I found it a bit hard at times to understand what you’re saying over the music. Just lower the volume of the music and maybe raise your mic volume a bit and it should be fine :)
@AGuideToInterestingStuff8 күн бұрын
@@gregg8721 Thanks for the feedback! I 100% agree. I'll make sure to improve the audio balancing on my next video.
@Nikewertz__11 күн бұрын
-Hello! Can I have f_10(10(↑10)10) Bottles of water, please. -Man, what are you talking about...
@robinpinar96914 күн бұрын
"can I get large number garden number bottles"
@lawaataling14 күн бұрын
Could I have TREE(3) croissants, please? Keep the change
@claireirish821212 күн бұрын
Of course! This is a supermarket, these croissants are at isle TREE(540) pentated to 8
@Aredpikmin11 күн бұрын
That would be $TREE(4).
@DaniDy0111 күн бұрын
No worries just walk TREE(TREE(g60)))^^^^^^^^^^^3 miles left and you'll find the croissants.
@ishu422711 күн бұрын
Oh just make sure you don't slip in the puddle TREE(TREE(g45))^^^3 miles from here, we accidentally knocked over TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(60^^^^^^^^g69))))^^^^^^^^g64 bottles of water, each containing TREE(g64) ounces of water each
@thechosenone740011 күн бұрын
Sure, just go to aisle TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(g65)))) and make sure you don’t knock over the newly made section, it is still under construction and you will be get a TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(g(g(g(291))))))))$ fine for breaking it, and also that’ll be TREE(g(20572))$ hexated to a googolplex sir
@gameplaysh613513 күн бұрын
You may have science on your side, but you'll never beat that one kid at the playground.
@AGuideToInterestingStuff13 күн бұрын
No one can ever defeat the kid who just adds 1.
@Micotube-z5q11 күн бұрын
@@AGuideToInterestingStuff +2
@bruhaccountsidk_211 күн бұрын
@@Micotube-z5q +3
@Quarkazone10 күн бұрын
@@AGuideToInterestingStuffjust say i
@InfiniXCat9 күн бұрын
@@AGuideToInterestingStuffthe kid that adds 2
@KarddydaboardyOrBLOXYGN10 күн бұрын
“Hey look, theres a TREE(3)” Tree?, i dont see any trees “no, TREE(3)” ohhhh.
@scmtuk36627 күн бұрын
Now, Rayo's number _is_ obviously big. But it's still less than the number of years until Nintendo announces a new F-Zero game.
I’d imagine this’d come with that Thanos-beatboxing sound effect but with Agustín Rayo in MIT’s big number duel.
@teraforma_worldbuilding14 күн бұрын
I am learning so much math 💀
@NotNochos11 күн бұрын
Amazing video, but the music was a little loud. Maybe lower it some. Awesome video, great explanation of TREE
@AGuideToInterestingStuff11 күн бұрын
Thank you! And thank you for your feedback as well, I'll try to improve the audio balancing next time.
@SoupEarthOfficial11 күн бұрын
I smell UNDERRATED
@jeiemtco4 күн бұрын
*gasp* SOUP!? YO WHAT’S UPPP!!!
@brianbroyles43188 күн бұрын
TREE(3) JINXS that one kid, Tree(3)+1
@robinpinar96914 күн бұрын
TREE(3)+1 basically equals TREE(3)
@Reset-u5x6 күн бұрын
TREE(10000000): HAHAHA ∞: shut up
@myyoga8spa11 күн бұрын
You just blow my mind. I’m glad I ran into your video ❤
@Audisknfj2 күн бұрын
Rayo’s number gets mentioned a lot here, and I would like to bring up some fun properties of Rayo’s function used to construct such number The function grows linearly when the input value is small: with 10 first order set theory symbols you can write 1, with 30 you can write 2. Seems slow right? This is not the case however as it grows faster. By 300 you have the function growing at the rate of multiplication, by 340 you have it grow at the rate of exponentiation, and by 400 the rate becomes tetration. And we’re not talking about the actual value of Rayo’s function; no, this is just a lower bound. If I remember correctly, RAYO(380) is at least greater than 2^65536 By the time you reach 7400, Rayo’s function grows so fast that it is almost certainly possible that the value is greater than S(2^65536-1), S() is a function that is growing faster than ANY COMPUTABLE FUNCTION, faster than G, faster than Tree, and so on And Rayo’s number has the input set at a googol. The number would certainly be so big that the number would not only lose its meaning, but any number or symbols or machines that can enclose an iota of its being will certainly collapse into a black hole, for there isn’t close to enough information to store the concept of Rayo’s number
@jasonzawtun13 күн бұрын
TREE(3) to SSCG(3) to Rayo's Number. Rayo's number the biggest number ever defined so Infinity. Rayo's Number ↑↑↑ 5 = MY NUMBER!!!!!!!!!!
@AGuideToInterestingStuff13 күн бұрын
I was thinking of mentioning Rayo's number, actually but I felt like the video was getting too long. Same story with SSCG(3). As for infinity, I actually have an entire sequel planned about different infinities.
@Xnoob54511 күн бұрын
Where LNGN and DaVinci number
@AGuideToInterestingStuff11 күн бұрын
@@Xnoob545 As with the others, they were cut for the sake of time, but a sequel is definitely a possibility.
@jasonzawtun11 күн бұрын
@@Xnoob545Huh?
@Nikewertz__11 күн бұрын
@@jasonzawtun LNGN (Large Number Garden Number) is a number that was meant to be the largest number, but it is ill-defined so Rayo's Number is the largest "defined" number.
@hannoii13 күн бұрын
and still all those numbers are closer to 0 than ∞
@AGuideToInterestingStuff13 күн бұрын
Infinity is crazy.
@sonicwaveinfinitymiddwelle855512 күн бұрын
and still infinity is closer to 0 than all uncountable cardinals
@Nikewertz__11 күн бұрын
FAST GROWING HIERARCHY
@AGuideToInterestingStuff11 күн бұрын
@@Nikewertz__ Worry not! I plan on covering them in the infinity video (because you can't reach numbers like The Feferman-Schütte ordinal without one)
@robinpinar96914 күн бұрын
@@sonicwaveinfinitymiddwelle8555and still it's closer to 0 than absolute infinity
@aradnoobh.748310 күн бұрын
I love the music. It makes the video so epic!
@doyoureallyneedaname13 күн бұрын
Can I have tree(3)? You meant 3 trees right Right...?
@rohamcodm311711 күн бұрын
Crazy how every number and shapes where made by himself
@nesquickyt4 күн бұрын
Agustín Rayo: hold my beer
@R5O_63O89 күн бұрын
Wholly underrated... I expected it to have a couple of thousands of subscriber with all of those transitions and hooking me into thay content. Those demonstrations were also on point. I believe you'll have a very succesful career in KZfaq in the near-future, given such pristine quality of work os assured. There are some mistakes here, you have mentioned them in the comments yourself, but, hey, people learn from mistakes. A master has made a multitude of more mistakes than the beginner has tried. You got this. Edit: Oh yeah, the music was fire too, very on-spot music that goes with the video.
@AGuideToInterestingStuff9 күн бұрын
Thank you very much! I'm always trying to improve.
@user-mm7ul5ng2l13 күн бұрын
great video however 65536 is 2 tertiated to 4 not 5.
@AGuideToInterestingStuff13 күн бұрын
Oh, so it is. My mistake. Sorry about that.
@robinpinar96913 күн бұрын
@@AGuideToInterestingStuff2^^5 is approximately 10^20000
@alphax47859 күн бұрын
The thing I like about TREE is that you don't need ANY underlying mathematics beyond early grade school to understand the rules unlike pretty much every other 'big' number.
@AlbySilly6 күн бұрын
I mean 1000000 isn't too hard to grasp as a 1920x1080 screen has a little over 2M pixels. But this video did make me realize how big a googol (as well as googolplex 'n googolplexian) actually is
@penfriendz2 күн бұрын
I'm a little bit disappointed that you didn't go into the limits of computation in such a video. There are functions out there which are equal to a certain number but it's unprovable what number they're equal to.
@paulinalevina96905 күн бұрын
3 plus 3=6 3 cubed=27 3 exponent=
@JustAPersonWhoComments9 күн бұрын
As a TREE(TREE(TREE...), I can conclude that this number is way bigger than Graham's
@Boxx423410 күн бұрын
And still, these numbers are nowhere near infinity. They are closer to 0 than to infinity.
@svz59909 күн бұрын
because infinity isn't even a number? its a size/amount of numbers on the number line
@Boxx42349 күн бұрын
@@svz5990 infinity is KIND of a number
@UltraEgoCell8 күн бұрын
No it isn't @@Boxx4234
@raphaelbajet75837 күн бұрын
@@Boxx4234like saying a bird is KIND OF a lizard bc they both lay eggs. Like, nah
@Boxx42347 күн бұрын
@@raphaelbajet7583 fine but vsauce said that infinity is kind of a number but whatever
@mincraft6724 күн бұрын
this is what i want to learn in a math lesson
@user-mh8vq9vb9l2 күн бұрын
I actually CAN grasp googol so jokes on you!
@AGuideToInterestingStuff2 күн бұрын
Very impressive, though I doubt it, unless of course, you can visualise more things than there are particles in the universe.
@SuryaBudimansyah10 күн бұрын
Nah I feel like around 1990s is big enough, also the best decade
@MrPillowStudios5 күн бұрын
My brain is literally zoning out and daydreaming, your video is fine though.
@Kiririll57911 күн бұрын
4:40 actually TREE(3) is the biggest number that was used in any mathematical proof (for Kruskal's three theorem), Graham's number is just more well-known
@AGuideToInterestingStuff11 күн бұрын
That's exactly why I said "At the time of its imagination": because numbers like TREE(3) came along later to steal its crown.
@Kiririll57911 күн бұрын
@@AGuideToInterestingStuff Ok! English is not my main language, so I can misunderstand some things
@LightningShiva12 күн бұрын
Your video is really captivating but just a little suggestion is to tone down the music a bit, its a bit hard to hear what is being said.
@AGuideToInterestingStuff2 күн бұрын
A few other people said that as well, thanks. I'll make sure the next video's have a bit better balancing.
@newspacia10 күн бұрын
amazing content, subscribed :)
@user-pc5ln1rc2p10 күн бұрын
Can't believe you didn't even touch on the fast growing hierarchy.
@AGuideToInterestingStuff10 күн бұрын
I know, I know. I'll have to make a sequel.
@xbox360online2 күн бұрын
Wait until i pull 10^10^100↑↑↑↑10^10^100↑↑↑↑TREE(Rayo's number) THAT IS TOO BIG IT IS GONNA BE MY NUMBER NOW.
@bruhaccountsidk_211 күн бұрын
this video is so underrated u deserve a like + sub bro
@inpatol32045 күн бұрын
Nice video
@Baburun-Sama11 күн бұрын
Something Higher than TREE(3) is SSCG(3)
@AGuideToInterestingStuff11 күн бұрын
As I mentioned in the pinned comment, I omitted it for the sake of time and engagement.
@ukdavepianomanКүн бұрын
Indeed, SSCG(3) is much greater than TREE(TREE(TREE.....TREE(3)....))) where the number of TREEs is TREE(3). It's mind-boggling.
@minor_locrian74 күн бұрын
I counted to 10000 once(You should've added Rayo's number too).
@ArenGunesBasturk-xj3ioКүн бұрын
The universe has more than that
@AGuideToInterestingStuffКүн бұрын
The whole universe might but we will never know. The observable universe, however, is almost unanimously agreed to have around 10^80 particles.
@hakuruyu11 күн бұрын
counted to like 3000 while trying to get some sleep
@AGuideToInterestingStuff11 күн бұрын
Impressive.
@shophaune229810 күн бұрын
Small thing, but isn't 3^^^^3 =g1 in the sequence, not g0? (For graham's number)
@ESeth-xb5cu10 күн бұрын
Boogol is 10 with 100 (^) and with a ten at the end of the number
@arandomaltaccount013 күн бұрын
my favorite number is on the exact opposite side of the spectrum, Okojo Ermine Number and since you made a video about numbers, what's your favorite?
@AGuideToInterestingStuff13 күн бұрын
Oh, that's an excellent question. There are lot's of good ones but I'm going to have to go with the old favourite: Phi. I feel like my answer might vary from day to day, though.
@Nikewertz__11 күн бұрын
The golden ratio (or phi) is an interesting and mysterious number! It is one of my favorites too!
@X3m.Gaming7 күн бұрын
everyone gangsta till BHO pulls up
@rngesus669 күн бұрын
I'm so curious about this TREE(3) number that I often search the internet for a page/picture where every tree is drawn that can be made. I still haven't found anything.
@AGuideToInterestingStuff8 күн бұрын
Unfortunately, there are more possible trees than there are plank lengths in the observable universe so we couldn't possibly list them all, but you can always try with a pencil and paper and draw your own trees. It's quite fun, actually.
@rngesus668 күн бұрын
@@AGuideToInterestingStuff I bet it would be fun, if I understood the rules. I understand the ,,Nth tree can only have N seeds" I understand the ,,trees can't contain previous ones" but no matter how many videos I watch about this I don't understand the common ancestor rule.
@AGuideToInterestingStuff8 күн бұрын
@@rngesus66 My apologies, allow me to attempt to explain it again because, you're right, I think I might have done a bit of a lackluster job in the video. For one tree to contain another, you don't really need to understand the common ancestor rule, simply imagine taking out parts of the tree. If we had a simple straight-line tree that went A--B--B then we couldn't make one that was A--B--A--B because we could remove the second A to make the first tree. I find that that's the most helpful way to think about it.
@djthompson42368 күн бұрын
Absolute everything
@MoisesVecinal20247 күн бұрын
5:23 Bro it's that our geometry
@julesharris63836 күн бұрын
Do a video on first order oodle theory and BIG FOOT
@12fretter9 күн бұрын
Another channel where they think music MUST be louder than the spoken word. Tree(Irritating)
@AGuideToInterestingStuff9 күн бұрын
Since you asked so kindly: You are using the lowercase tree function, not as fast growing as the uppercase tree function or TREE function. Since irrational numbers don't work with tree, those letter Is in "Irritating" along with all the other letters. This could be rewritten as tree((3i)2r)(2t)ang) In all seriousness though, a passive aggressive comment probably isn't the best way to get a person to listen to you. Instead, try respectfully pointing out the issue, it's crazy how much nicer you come across.
@Manisphesto10 күн бұрын
Wait until you see g65.
@lmfao612512 күн бұрын
sick video! the music was pretty cool also at 3:15, don't power towers work by working out the highest power first instead of the lowest, so instead of 2^2^2^2^2 = 4^2^2^2 = 16^2^2 = 256^2 = 65536, it would be 2^2^2^2^2 = 2^2^2^4 = 2^2^16 = 2^65536 ≈ 2×10¹⁹²⁷⁸? i could be wrong, but this is a way more way of interpreting power towers to make much bigger numbers lol anyway, nice video once again, i liked the narration 👍
@AGuideToInterestingStuff12 күн бұрын
Thanks very much and thank you for pointing out that mistake, you're 100% correct. I think what happened is that I accidentally put 2 tetrated to 4 rather than 2 tetrated to 5 but, by a quirk of the maths, it comes out to equal the same as 2 tetrated to 5 if you calculate the power tower from the top. Thank you again for your kind words and for discovering that error which is now mentioned in the pinned comment.
@ishu422711 күн бұрын
To interpret power towers that way, i'd personally parenthesis them, as so: 2^(2^(2^(2^2)))
@ygyubonou5 күн бұрын
TREE(3) is nothing compared to the two gods (infinity and… ABSOLUTE INFINITY)
@user-jr2df8iy8i13 күн бұрын
could I have rayos number pizza slices
@AGuideToInterestingStuff13 күн бұрын
That might take a while to bake but I'll try my best.
@user-jr2df8iy8i11 күн бұрын
@@AGuideToInterestingStuff TYSMSMSM FOR REPLYING TO ME
@user-jr2df8iy8i11 күн бұрын
How about googolplex?
@bruhaccountsidk_211 күн бұрын
yeah can i also get SSCG(308)^^^TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(3) cups of coke
@user-jr2df8iy8i10 күн бұрын
How about googolplex pizza slices Is that fine? ☺️ And please stop deleting my comments angry emoji 😠
@Ruddy-RuddyКүн бұрын
Nice! Subbed!
@Geometrydash2229420 сағат бұрын
The world of numbers starts with one! What should I do with it? can it be used in game creation codes? Have you seen what is on the clock? After 12 comes 1, there are also "units of time" like: minute, hour, day, and someone else knows: second. But what's next? After all, the day does not go on indefinitely, they only repeat themselves. A MONTH! What's it? And yes, this is again a unit of time, if you add up 12 months, you get a year, and out of 100 years there will be a century, I'll tell you that people on average live 74 years at the moment. So what are we going to do with such a small but useful unit? the number "two" is a new universe, numbers begin after it, even hundreds, even thousands, but there is a number and more... I present to your attention... A million! This number is not so close to infinity, but even far away, people in the 17th 18th 19th 20th century invented a bunch of numbers, some of them are even difficult to pronounce, if you thought that infinity is a number, then no, it's not a number, because you can't count up to this number, and don't try, even with God it won't work, it seems you have a question "why did you come up with infinity?", everything is simple, people couldn't make a normal number and made your infinity, and then we have many more questions. Chapter two. Multiplication, division, numbers to a power, tetration. What are we going to do with the numbers? And I'll throw the chips in the trash so that some homeless guy eats the chips. So what about the numbers, and the scrambled eggs? I ate the scrambled eggs, but the numbers are fine. No jokes. Did you know what multiplication is? We learned this at school, how much is 2+2? If you said 4, then you are right, but how much is 9×6? well, of course 54, it's not difficult, but here are the following questions... Pull the notebook out of your pocket, but why do you need a notebook? How much is 2 in a Cube? Viewer: of course it's eight! Me: that's right, but how much is 6^3? Audience: 216, easy! Any more questions? I'm out of thoughts... Chapter 3: The Mafia. Hey, hey, fool, what kind of mafia? What kind of control is this? Who put the mafia in here? I didn't seem to play it, some kid is looking at me, what are you doing here? Child: and I have a *mate* on you, do you know what the mafia is? Mafia top. Me: then I'm *mate* again, I don't care about you. You fool. Mafia of that, sports pillow. mafia... Chapter 69420: The Mafia is the best. I'm saving you right now... chapter, not chapter; 9292291. You're going to die! Roll the dice! Child: so what? Wait, no! *disappear* I finally got rid of the kid, phew.
As mentioned in the pinned comment, a sequel is on the way!
@Unofficial2048tiles5 күн бұрын
Ive counted to like 1100 or something before
@guynamedfrancis6 күн бұрын
uncountable infinity is theoretically infinite cause.. where do you start? 0.0000001?, 0.00000000000000001?, 0.000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001? and even if you reach the next number, you have to do it again and theres no limit on how many zeros there can be
@AGuideToInterestingStuff6 күн бұрын
Exactly. Unreachable infinity is larger than anything else in this video (infinitely larger)
@nicholasgoodwin-n7z3 күн бұрын
Just letting people know numbers like big foot and sasquatch and the big garden number cant be visualised compared messed with or calculated even with supercomputers they are not big numbers they are not huge either they are virtually impossibly big and would shrink multiverses into black holes that are unfathomably big and that is not even close to the lower bound of their sizes.
@peliqueirolaza098 күн бұрын
I just don’t understand how the function TREE produces finite numbers. Like, it just doesn’t get in my head, I don’t understand it. They should be infinite right?
@AGuideToInterestingStuff8 күн бұрын
It is confusing because it definitely does seem like it would be infinite but there is a proof that shows otherwise. The idea of the proof, if I understand it correctly, is that the maximum tree size only grows by 1 but at the same time the amount of trees you're not allowed to make is also growing. Eventually you'll have made every single tree possible that doesn't contain another. I totally get what you're saying though because it really does seem like it should be infinite.
@peliqueirolaza098 күн бұрын
@@AGuideToInterestingStuff thanks for explaining, i'll keep researching about it because it really is a fascinating topic for me
@craigclaggett310211 күн бұрын
everyone forgets about 9 to be used in every digit. or even repeating 9 decimals
@AGuideToInterestingStuff11 күн бұрын
Unfortunately, that actually doesn't get very far. To get a number larger than even something like Googolplex, you would need more 9s than there are atoms in the observable universe so it's a little impractical. Also, I think the video would have been a little boring if it were only 9s.
@tiyenin8 күн бұрын
3:06 I don't even have to do the math to know that 2 to the tetration of 5 is WAY more than 5 figures. I still will, though. 2tet2: 16 2tet3: 2^16=65536 See?
@AGuideToInterestingStuff8 күн бұрын
Yes, as I mentioned in the pinned comment, I accidentally put 2 ^^ 4 instead. Sorry about that!
@canalminigenio2 күн бұрын
Tree(tree(3))
@Swingylad11 күн бұрын
Can i have TREE(TREE(78^Graham’s Number)) school pizzas? I swear the school pizzas where i am are GODLY
@AGuideToInterestingStuff11 күн бұрын
You'll have to ask the cafeteria, unfortunately.
@turtleDev329 күн бұрын
73 i'd say is a pretty large number
@AGuideToInterestingStuff8 күн бұрын
73 was far too large to fit into this video.
@xinzhou9766 күн бұрын
tree game = funni
@chesterdeguzman67897 күн бұрын
SSCG:🗿
@user-yq5ct5yu1y6 күн бұрын
1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128, 256, 512 subs! Gg
@rigelungad292611 күн бұрын
Yeah um i want TREE(TREE(TREE(3) MORE PARTS?
@wolfingtoniii87208 күн бұрын
Hexton 3^tree(tree…}tree(tree…}tree(10^^^^^^^100^^^^^^^9999^^^^3377)^1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000(decillion) By: KZfaqr Wolfingtoniii8720 the Arch Duke of the Kingdom of Puppi Island(this is how it’s spelled).
@CompanionCube10 күн бұрын
💯>>>
@sushmapalimar2837 күн бұрын
2:10 10^80 = 100 quinvigintillion
@Trufflo_11 күн бұрын
very cool video, love your editing style. This video seems a little bit simular to math genius. I do admit you did make the video more entertaining, but you might need to check if your video is original or not.
@AGuideToInterestingStuff11 күн бұрын
Thank you! I hadn't watched the video before you mentioned this but, now that I have, I see what you mean. Rest assured that I will graciously take the video down if Digital Genius requests.
@Trufflo_11 күн бұрын
@@AGuideToInterestingStuff Yo! Thanks for replying :) I'm not on digital genius's team or anything btw, i just watched both the videos pretty close together. All good, and great video :)
@user-dt7mz5bz7z10 күн бұрын
if you know... 1 stud needs about 0 seconds to climb it. but THAT breaks the rule because you didnt climb IT, so, only 3 studs or more is allowed, but, what if ITS negative? you will fall. -1 and more is allowedd also... how many seconds does it need to climb TREE(3) studs?
@user-dt7mz5bz7z10 күн бұрын
pin me
@AGuideToInterestingStuff9 күн бұрын
@@user-dt7mz5bz7z I'm afraid I can't because I already have a pinned comment that's sort of more important.
@user-dt7mz5bz7z9 күн бұрын
@@AGuideToInterestingStuff hey well thats from roblox, studs ARE from roblox. so, does that mean it now?
@AGuideToInterestingStuff9 күн бұрын
@@user-dt7mz5bz7z Well, no. I'm sorry but your comment is just not as important to have pinned as the one which goes over important notes.
@Skivv57 күн бұрын
Tree(graham's number) tetrated by Tree(graham's number) tetrated by Tree(graham's number) tetrated by Tree(graham's number) tetrated by Tree(graham's number) tetrated by Tree(graham's number) tetrated by Tree(graham's number) tetrated by Tree(graham's number) tetrated by Tree(graham's number) tetrated by Tree(graham's number) tetrated by Tree(graham's number) tetrated by Tree(graham's number) tetrated by Tree(graham's number) tetrated by Tree(graham's number) tetrated by Tree(graham's number) tetrated by a whole lot.
@samuelmalcolm51216 күн бұрын
Less than Tree(Graham's number+1)
@danshi24794 күн бұрын
tree (omega) is TOO BIG
@c猫t11 күн бұрын
a small youtuber
@ToDCreal11 күн бұрын
what about SSCG(3) and SCG(12)
@AGuideToInterestingStuff11 күн бұрын
As mentioned in the pinned comment, I omitted them for the sake of time.
@dccisco951511 күн бұрын
@@AGuideToInterestingStuffmake a part 2
@AGuideToInterestingStuff11 күн бұрын
@@dccisco9515 Not a bad idea at all. Perhaps I will.
@viviana57873 күн бұрын
and rayo(10^100)
@null620010 күн бұрын
The largest number is: limit of n as n -> inf
@AGuideToInterestingStuff10 күн бұрын
The point of this video was simply to highlight some interesting large numbers, not to 'win' by finding the highest one possible.
@frank_033Күн бұрын
What about loader’s number???
@AGuideToInterestingStuff12 сағат бұрын
As stated in the pinned comment, I didn't include any more numbers simply for the sake of time and having a consistent 'narrative' so to speak that raps up at a good point.
@NachoManWithThePlan8 күн бұрын
googolplexian: •_•
@cristianmazzei923011 күн бұрын
BIG FOOT
@AGuideToInterestingStuff11 күн бұрын
I forgot about BIG FOOT, actually. Thank you for reminding me. Perhaps I'll mention it in a sequel.
@cristianmazzei923011 күн бұрын
@@AGuideToInterestingStuff No problem
@CompanionCube10 күн бұрын
music is a bit too loud, can barely hear you sometimes
@AGuideToInterestingStuff9 күн бұрын
Sorry about that
@ukdavepianomanКүн бұрын
Agree...music is very intrusive. Sometimes it's like TREE(3) compared to G64
@Andree123783 күн бұрын
Googolplex 💀 tree 3 ☠️☠️☠️☠️☠️
@djthompson42368 күн бұрын
Absolute infinity
@user-fp4gl8ox6m18 сағат бұрын
What about sky’s number limit (S)2=(S22)^3^^^^^F^T
@AGuideToInterestingStuff12 сағат бұрын
As the pinned comment says, all other numbers were omitted for the sake of time but may appear in a sequel.