Right? The film industry spent who knows how much developing panavision widescreen cinematography for movie theaters, then we all get high definition widescreen TVs, and now we all have cameras in our pockets that we can shoot near-Hollywood quality hi-def widescreen video on that would look amazing viewed full screen on said TVs, and what does everyone do…? I just don’t get it.

@@rihamy2nd Agreed. I never shoot video in portrait but I think a lot of people do because it's physically easier to hold the phone that way. It's time phone manufacturers added a lens rotation function so that users can hold the phone vertically while shooting a landscape video.

@@rihamy2nd Samsung has already solved this problem with this TV, vertical tv "Samsung Sero"

Rare depending on where you live.... see these massive beasts all the time

@@bettybetty2112 I'm certainly not going to buy a special rotating TV because some people are too lazy to rotate their phone to take a video!

I'm glad nobody was hurt too, but some of those passengers may never fly again. lol.

@@ferolcat2009 there were no passengers on the plane, it was a cargo plane.

@@dfg-rg3pd I was referrng to the ones that carried pasengers as well as the others who still had crew.

@@ferolcat2009 Oh ok 👍

Not sure the bird feels the same way.

Wow that's bad....have an upvote!

Well that's just great. A song I haven't had stuck in my head for 40 years...until now. I looked up the lyrics. Imagine my relief when I learned that my 10 year old ears had misheard the next line as "400 children". 🤣 Take your damned upvote!

Bravo sir, bravo.

The old ones are the best😂

🤣🤣

An empowered one!

That is what a feminist wheel looks like! 😂

It belongs to the streets!

I see the truth is spreading! Shout out to all of the red pill content creators!

Lol 😅🤣🤣

One wheel is missing at boeing.

@@andrasdudas8226 Boeing does not own that aircraft...

@@davidoldham1946 Thats The Atlas Air DreamLifter prob

@@andrasdudas8226 tbf that wheel did a pretty big boeing when it hit the ground

@@davidoldham1946 they are owned and maintained by Boeing and flown by Atlas.

pilots*

@@milk_cool please point out where the word pilots fits into the original comment

@@James-rc6qq Isn't it obvious? "That *pilots CRJ made it easily, seeing skipped half the runway on a no flap landing"

@@James-rc6qq I meant it's pilots who landed the plane

@@tiny_toilet such an unnecessary adition😂

It looks like he should have gone around as it was an extremely long landing. It floated for ages!

How impressive was the max brakes and reverse thrust stop, didn't realise a plane that size could stop that quickly. Kudos to the pilot for getting it down in one piece.

Terrible landing. Floated halfway down the runway and only managed to stop 1000’ from the end. He should’ve gone around.

@@BobanVagene Have you ever done a flaps-0 landing?

@@bendriscoll302 I’ve done a bunch. I used to be a manufactures test pilot. Also I did 6 in a GV serial 505 in 2014 and 2015. And that was a screwed up no flap landing. Do you have any questions ?

Not wrong aye

sponsored by aerosucre 😂

@@g_pazzini 🤣🤣🤣

@@g_pazzini underrated 😂😂😂😂

It looks like he came in at an angle to the runway and tried to correct it instead of going around.

@@Nilguiri the way they maintained that bank angle after the strike wasn't great either

That wasn't *quite* a stabilised approach. Good lord!

@@McLarenKeith This was a great example of why setting up a stabilised approach is essential.

"this runway is short but it sure is wide... or is it sideways?"

Judging by the smoke, I suspect some sort of mechanical failure. But, it's not impossible some goon doing a half assed job didn't torgue something up to spec!

@@bmused55 I thought the smoke was from the brake dust as the flight crew lock the wheels up before retracting them? My office at O'Hare is right by the departure end of 10L and I see this happen a lot, minus the wheels dropping, of course, lol.

@@ChicagoAirportSpotter yeah, could be that. Seemed a bit too white for brake dust, imo. But until we see the inevitable report, we're all just guessing :)

Bearing failure. Its fairly common. And no lug nuts, just an axle nut that was over torqued.

@@ChicagoAirportSpotter What a cool office view!

im more concerning about that CRJ That blew over the ENTIRE TDZ, continued to execute the landing and then damn near actually made wheels down on the OPPOSITE side just a couple hundred feet from the opposite sides TDZ!!! That should have been a GO AROUND - flat out

I wonder where the wheel ended up. That weight and that speed, it could have gone a very long way and some airports are very close to populated areas.

@@harryvanhoo7235 I worked at Anchorage Int'l Airport for 26 years. I was there for literally tens of thousands of takeoffs, and twice wheels fell off. Both times it was a 747 caused by wheel bearing failures. Both times the tire bounced a long ways and got close to road ways, but fortunately, nobody was hit. It took four of us to lift the rouge wheel in to the back of a pickup truck and return it to the owner.

Your heart was literally in your mouth? You should get that looked at!

@LGWasher1200 I do, yes. Do you? Obviously not. And I'm still waiting for you to make your point.

@LGWasher1200 Seek help.

@LGWasher1200 do you know how to use KZfaq

It’s not easy when they’re landing at that high of a speed, they’re trying to land it as softly as possible too because without flaps they have to force the nose down more

Oh look, an armchair pilot! Pro tip if you ever become a professional: Try landing with a Vref of plus 180 knots without stalling it or bouncing around and risking a runway excursion. The CRJ-pilots made a first class landing as its extremely likely that you will make a balked landing or bounce like crazy at such high speeds. So they keep it in ground effect to let it settle more on its own, and thus balance the risk out (making sure to have sufficient runway remaining, while at the same time not forcing it down and thereby risk loosing directional control).

@MrGyngve. : your comment is quite the demonstration of an inexperienced unprofessional pilot. That no-flap was crap - if a FSDO guy in the U.S. saw it, he would have violated you. It’s not a 180kt Vref; range is about 155-170kts - more likely Vref was about 165. Anyone with any experience saw the float coming at 100-75’ when they rotated a little more! That’s a BIG no-no in every jet I’ve flown, especially the CRJ200! And you don’t hold it off in ground effect - that’s how you lose control. Control effectiveness decreases with airspeed - hence the reason the inputs get larger. As you continue to hold it off, the wing could stall resulting in it dropping onto the runway - that’s how you lose control!. If you’re on-speed, it will set right into the runway smoothly, yet firm. I had to do several until they figured out that deice fluid was getting past a flap drive seal causing flap failures. You’re welcome to say what you want, as I have. But armchair pilot isn’t one term that applies here.

@@sx300pilot5 No you dingbat, what is the matter with you all? You are the armchair pilots who dont get shit. Their MANEUVERING might be bad, but I differentiate between sim sessions (where of course youd be faulted for staying in ground effect for too long and not firmly getting mains down) AND a real life EMERGENCY. And once they did use up rwy, nothing in the aftermath indicates overheated brakes, which means that from their POV it was reasonable to use as much RWY as possible. What I see in this comments section is a bunch of BS. People here claimin to be test pilots who thinks every pilot is above average, or (self-acclaimed) SAR Heli pilots who trash talks the job they did. I never said it was an amazing feat of piloting skills, but I sure as heck would be careful with handing out critique based on SPOV on an airport I have never flown to, or a situational awareness I know nothing about. This is WHY test pilots aint the standard for the performance table in any Class A machine..

they should have NEVER committed that landing...... blew the entire TDZ, and then made contact in literally just couple hundred feet of the OPPOSITE SIDE TDZ

They actually found the wheel later.

@ArchPlayz yeah, that one went way over your head.

Indeed.

Haha I'm sure he will cover this soon in one of his videos

All 10 minutes of flight!

@@effervescentrelief It travels up to 80mph and uses 245Wh/mile, which means that its 12kWh battery gives it 49 miles of range. At 80mph, that's around 37 minutes. Assuming a bit of a buffer there, say 30 minutes, which is plenty for most short range work. No idea where you got 10 minutes from, or did you just pull that out of your butt?

@@effervescentrelief eek i'm scared of change and the future.

@@ledsalesoz where’s the nearest charging power?

My thoughts exactly although the Chile one was very scary. Imagine people with no pilot training buying those things and taking to the skies. I hope they regulate their sales and those who buy them into the ground.

@@vialactea5549 You can't even buy small drones without licenses, this will probably be as regulated as a Cessna, if not more because of it's VTOL capability

All four are operated and maintained by Atlas Air.

I think one of the tire is exploded that caused another tire dropped out of the plane.

Haters got to hate. The plane is not owned by Boeing.

@@M167A1 operated by Atlas, owned and maintained by Boeing.

@@davidoldham1946 they are owned and maintained by Boeing. Operated by Atlas.

Not if the aircraft is maintained on the centreline of the ILS localizer!

@@Nilguiri If the approach is not stabilized then the Capt wud simply go fr a go around much before, won't strike a wingtip to ground to realize he's going the wrong way..

@@joydasgupta9445 Yes, that is what they should have done. I was just answering the OP's question.

Chill, it wasn't that good

I thought it was pretty good, too, Ana's Aviation! 😊✈✈✈

yeah, after they ROYALLY fucked up

Reminds me of the whale in the The Hitchhikers Guide.

I can´t wait until we have metal boxes moving around at high speeds, that requires 60% of the total area in a city and polluting the air with fumes and noise....oh wait.

@@se-kmg355 We should be focusing on snake-like metal boxes that move lots of people at once while wasting less fuel and making less noise... oh wait

So glad you clarified that, me being a Canadian! 😊

I see what tou did there. 😜

a lot of us have been asking, myself included and there is no response even in his private patreon section.