6ft 4 I believe!

PS l played one of these Les Pauls at the weekend at Guitar Guitar in Newcastle. It was an utterly fabulous guitar. Secondhand, so a tad cheaper, but at £8.5k, still WAY too expensive for me, sad to say.😢😢😢

The Reverb site would be a good starting point.

😆😆😆

Wow I didn't know they were Cnc, thats great, I hate inconsistent shaped guitars.

Murphy talked about this in his interview with Anderton's last year. He said that originally they were using razor blades to replicate finish checking but have since improved their methods by exposing the finish the extreme temperature changes which causes it to check more naturally. Of course, this has made the process more expensive but it looks more convincing.

@@opinionhaver574 Sorry, but I think exposing the finish to extreme hot/cold temperature is in reality a far less time consuming task & less expensive process than attempting an aging process by hand. Consequently, the cost of Murphy lab guitars should be cheaper rather than more expensive.

I recently bought the ultra-light aged version of that guitar and it stays in tune like a dream!

@@DDWyss cool what do you mean a dream ?

@@stephenfell4338 I mean it stays in tune very well. As well as any of my other guitars.

That’s been my biggest concern as well. Otherwise a Collings city limits would work.

ZZ Top Just Got Paid

@@Billywagner22 thanks

Epiphone les paul Custom pro is best Alternative For à Price i got one 2014 model and is Awesome with Probucker Pick-ups

that's why u make the history

@@metroecco7908 I can do that with a guitar that costs way less than that bud like my 97 epiphone sg. It cost 70 quid and looks the tits. Sounds great too. I love how these look and I appreciate the artistry involved but I just think Gibson can't keep charging insane money for guitars 95 percent of players can't afford . There slogan is play authentic which is ludicrous considering this is anything but an authentic 59 Les Paul

@WaurufEx I agree. It seems Gibson's best efforts are aimed at collectors and investors, not regular musos who want to play them lots and need a top quality instrument for sensible money. I suspect their QC issues might be down to their best craftspersons going to the Custom Shop, which left a lack of expertize at Gibson USA and a staff that is reportedly not happy. That is always going to affect quality (I was a production manager and a QA before that in a different industry and saw how quality of staff affects quality of product -- how well you pay people and treat them does too). No wonder regular income people hate on them. Original Series helped show they give a sh!t about regular players, but since then it seems all about the fancy pants stuff for collectors and price gouging investors who flip the limited runs etc. Did Gibson not learn their lesson? What's more, on that Trogly fella's channel he just reviewed a $20K Korina Flying V. He said it felt like a dud to play, plus the Hendrix SG was not that great. Quite damning I think and I am usually one that goes into bat for Gibson defending them from all the unfair nonsense out there, because I have liked the guitars since my first one in 1986 (until the most recent one). My new Gibson is not quite right though. A SG Standard '61. Original Series. The neck will not settle down. I have to keep adjusting the truss rod. My guess is the wood is still a little green, or is playing up due to Auckland being far more humid than Nashville. It was almost unplayable at first. If not for the 15% discount I would have returned it. I am still not not sure if it is a keeper. It was great sounding and playing when I finally got the neck right and I was really enjoying it, but a week later and it has shifted again. I'll give it a year or so to see if it comes right. It might be a quirk of SGs and the skinny mahogany necks. Just a tiny bit too much relief messes up the tone and playing feel by a lot. I am not sure why. I need an expert luthier type to explain. P.S. They have those '60s style reflector knobs. A reflector fell out of one yesterday and I had to glue it back in. WTF? So much for made in the USA means high quality huh. BS propaganda I think. My made in China Laney IRT Studio was rock solid built like a tank. No issues for about four years until i sold it to buy a nice Plexi replica build (I regret selling it now). I was really surprised at the Mexican Strat I got about 18 months ago. Pups, trem, and tuners are kind of meh, but I love the neck profile and fret work on it. So comfy for both speed and bending. I do not know about the rest of the guitar, but that neck is a keeper (2016 model maple neck). Everybody who tried it is wowed by how nice the neck is. Tuning sucks though. Way worse than my Gibson guitars. Fender never get slagged of for sh!tty tuning like Gibson do though. I wonder why? I wonder if it comes from the PRS camp. I remember when they first hit the market. The headstock shape was supposed to solve a design problem that Mr PRS was claiming another big brand beginning with G has. A problem nobody seemed to mention previously (it can be a problem is the nut is not right, but other than that they stay in tune well in my experience). Waffling on in comments. Yeah, that means I am procrastinating about getting off my ass and getting stuff done. Cheers lol

@WaurufEx 100 percent. I picked up a 59 epiphone outfit and although I consider that expensive for an epiphone it was perfect. I've never seen a perfect epiphone for years but this was. It also made every gibson under 5k look like it was the cheaper model. I bought a Gibson finally after a 35 year wait and I took It back 4 days later. I'm pretty devastated as it was my dream to own one.