I disagree as well spoken as the young man was it seems to me that he was trying to push his inability to find truth on Cliff I think Cliff explain it as best as he could his journey is his own and he clearly didn't find what he was looking for with Buddhism.

@@codeblood2000 cliffs did explain it the best he could without a doubt as he always does, but I believe he missed the young man's point. Therefore rendering cliffe explanation as good as it was, useless to the man because he needed to be argued to differently.

​@@levimalone4433 I also disagree. I think Cliffe showed a great example of getting to the root of the problem, which was the young student seemed to be searching for an "umph", a gut feeling, as an indication of knowing with 100% certainty something is true. Cliffe explained that 1) it's not possible to have 100% certainty in anything, hence why we follow where the evidence points to. But the student brushed that to the side; 2) feelings can be deceptive and don't always tell you the truth about reality. I understand how the student feels as I came from a place before putting my faith in Christ that I've got to feel something first before I can put my faith in Christ. So I'd go on, seeking for the feeling rather than Jesus Christ Himself. But by the grace of God I was brought low and realised my need for Christ, and it was then I was surprised by joy when God showed His love and mercy on me a sinner, deserving of His wrath and justice. He showed me that He delights in being in relationship with us despite us turning away from Him, and it is in Him where all goodness comes from, including the good feeling I perhaps was searching for. Now I don't know the student enough to say much, but it's clear that feelings are most important to him when it comes to knowing the truth. But to stare at the hard historical facts about Jesus's and humble yourself before them may not necessarily give you that positive feeling - at least I don't know anyone who has been excited about humbling themselves before Jesus before coming to know Him. But we have to start with what the evidence points to no matter how we feel and work through the hard details, and by God's grace we will find the satisfaction of knowing the truth as the "Truth shall set you free".

This student needs to research the historical evidence of Jesus's resurrection and he will find it is unreputable!

LOL yes

She looks exactly like Jennifer Aniston. I almost believe that it was her.

blaby4ever lol

He’s arrogant and bashful, trying to disguise it as “curiosity”

@@hollowmatic Most people are. No hate. Just truth. Second truth. I hate those that share my own flaws. It irks me so bad, and yet I must control who I can. Me. You aren't wrong though. He so is. This ploy is common to mankind. Be better and learn from him. God Bless.

@@mackdmara I hear you… what really gets me, is when people deny God, yet He literally performed miracles for me and my loved ones today! No matter where we are, He has us in His care. Yet they want us to believe He doesn’t exist… yeah right 😂

@@hollowmatic True, true. Still, What I know is not common knowledge. Also it it easy to claim providence for coincidence. Still, I get the feeling that even with miracles (like Christ's rising), people like him are likely to maintain doubt. I understand it, but it is a pity.

@@mackdmara it really is. A free ticket, and it only requires us to acknowledge and follow Him… sad indeed to see many openly reject Him

His Son

I thought it was his brother

That in itself is wrong. For somebody to walk up to a believer and say “show me a sign” is blasphemous, offensive and on their part VERY dangerous. You don’t challenge God to prove Himself, but instead humble yourself to experience Him… that guy who calls himself agnostic was ignorant and prideful. To say he doesn’t want to believe in God but wants to see proof of Him is highly offensive to God the Creator. He’s a lost being… he’s asking for a miracle of some sort like the romans did to Jesus at the crucifixion. I’m not attacking you btw, I’m quite upset with his ridiculous argument and audacity and calling him out for what he’s doing

@@hollowmatic It's alright, I understood. But they don't even know what being blasphemous is, let alone do they seem to register their offense. It's the mind of a lost soul, ignorant and without truth

@@OkayMaybeImDoneNow... true.. but still, they cannot deny that they weren’t introduced or told about His name on that final day. I pray for their sakes, they get to know Him before then… everybody can’t go though

@@hollowmatic that's true

He wants his own personal miracle, which only happens when God gives him a new heart when he accepts the salvation through Jesus Christ. He is asking for bread without going to the bakery.

The point is hypocrisy. "I'm going to go visit a brothel and but if my wife sleeps with other men for money, I'll kill her."

@@Malhaloc both wrong but comparing torturous murder to stealing a Apple when you’re starving.

@@Malhaloc and I would not give the same jail sentence to a teenager who tried a drug once versus someone who was selling to kids in a predatory fashion.

No

Technology is completely engineering and intelligent design, improving something through a process of intelligence, it definitely is not a process of random mutation over millions of years. Seeing evolution as ultimately worthy causes people to see it everywhere even when it is obvious it doesn’t apply.

@@boltrooktwo evolution is not random mutation it is the advancement of the best solution, like science

@@bubbaluv6487 Science is believing what some self proclaimed experts interpret from evidence. Its plain as getting someone else to think for you instead of reasoning with the evidence yourself. Some scientists just produce extrapolation and science fiction. There are many science textbooks and papers that claim naturalist evolution is chance random mutation over millions of years by natural selection. Creatures and plants don't have a mechanism to predict the needs of an environment or ecosystem to survive, you would need an intelligent overseeing mind to coordinate and design it or life would die out before an unintelligent process figured it out.

@@boltrooktwo rubbish, science builds on concepts that have been proven correct through observation, experimentation, trial and a rigorous peer review process, the best thinking like the best creatures and plants survives, it's creationism that relies on the acceptance of a statement unchallenged by debate

@@bubbaluv6487 Who does this peer review process, what are their names, and what is their claim to credibility? “Rigorous peer review” is just another empty science slogan that all blind followers of Scientism can produce whenever they don’t present real evidence. There is nothing observable, testable, or repeatable in the claims of evolution for the origin of life. What basis of value do human beings have if they have an unintelligent undirected process for their origin? The logical conclusions of the rationality of your worldview is a valueless world if what we came from is nothing. Intelligence exists and has value for its ability to create order and there are plenty of observable, repeatable tests for that. You still treat yourself and others as if you have value but tell me why, what is the basis and origin of human value? Because nothing, blind physics, and coincidental chemical reactions don’t cut it.

Why would Cliff bring up scripture at a time like this when the guy clearly said he read the Bible and didn't get that experience 🤷🏾‍♂️

@@pess4643 many people who have claimed to have read the Bible are lying

bonnie43uk sure he could

I think it would be a great idea Olia. I can see lots of advantages, and hardly any downsides. And for a skeptic like me, it would almost certainly convince me of God. I don't see much proof of God in my life, so having Superman turn up occasionally, flying down from the sky to prevent disasters would be amazing. Imagine if those terrorists who flew those planes into the Twin towers were thwarted by Superman, just as they were moments from hitting the building, Superman appears out of the sky, and grabs the plane, and gently lowers it to the ground, then the same for the other plane. Afterwards he could tell everyone, he works for Jesus, then he flies off. Seeing something with your own eyes is much better evidence than hearing it from other people. I have never seen any miraculous occurrences, and I am very very skeptical they happen. Jesus, we are told performed lots of miracles during his adult life ( i wonder if he performed any as a kid?, that would be cool) but we don't have any verifiable solid proof they actually happened. Yes, we have the gospels, but they were written by his supporters, how do we know if they were telling the truth? I'm a skeptic, and I'm not convinced. But, I would be convinced if Superman was flying around defying the laws of gravity saving people.. that would be very convincing to me. Sorry for the gaps, I'm typing this on word pad, and not quite sure how to get the text even, ha, I'm useless with technology :-)

Bonnie is there really a lack of evidence for you that God exists or is it the suppression of evidence by you that God exists? People dismiss and suppress evidence all the time in everyday life and that's the reason I ask. I hope you are having a great day :)

Hi Tanner, no I don't believe I am suppressing any evidence of God, certainly not consciously. If I find credible evidence I will adjust my thinking. What for you is the best evidence of God Tanner?, thanks, I'm having a wonderful day so far :-)

bonnie43uk We'll Jesus is the original super hero. I saw that on a t-shirt ;o)

bubba luv but no morality without God. and you know this

What if my moral compass says it's okay to murder babies? I don't see how morals have anything to do with self preservation. People with no morals walk among us daily.

​@@jelly7310 many horrors have been committed in the name of self preservation