Yeah, sorry for the waste of time. Jordan should know better!

It's how social media works . Very surprised Jordan is still allowed on these platforms 🤔

Same

Same

... That makes sense, Jordan is the King of the Word Salad and just as hard to parse connecting details from ! ...

My generation was in university in the late 80s and early 90s. We really thought we were going to make a huge dent in pollution and the need to destroy the planets resources.......then China happened.

You’re talking nonsense

I am disappointed. They certainly could have phrased their criticism is a more respectful manner. But, I have an extra decade of maturity on a lot of those students. I just hope we can find a solution to all of this mess. It's such a beautiful planet.

@@forrestl5597 look I'm french and I was wondering if in the UK students just behaved like that usually but that doesn't seem to be the case. In France we won't ever do that especially in prestigious schools because we know how much we suck compared to the different teachers

Climate change has become almost like an ideology, if you show people the inconvenient truth on how to actually make a difference, they'll just dismiss you and try to discredit you too.

When it comes to climate change, just like Trump, questions about them are not asked out of trying to learn, they are asked because they are trying to ‘gotcha’, essentially they have been indoctrinated by their professors

Exactly! Sit down and shut up!!!! And just let me handle that money for you

As a totalitarian communist, I prefer blocking all major roads and the underground in London beating my drum.

Yep, that would be far better. Lenin would agree.

You are wrong 100% to be a totalitarian communist. Better dead than red.

He simply put his tail between his legs and agreed with them...

Praxis71 No I think he handled it well. You don’t have to be a Ben Shapiro or Milo Yiannopoulos type of aggressive provocatour (btw just to be clear I don’t support the censoring or deplatforming of neither of those individuals in any way) to hold the line. I think Bjorn was being reasonable, he didn’t really give in any of his points, he was just being constructive.

@@Praxis71 not sure you were listening.

And western countries getting into insurmountable debt, forever slaves to the international bank cartels and subject to perpetual blackmail and extortion. That's the endgame, really.

Smug faces, each of them with a mobile phone welded to one hand and a plastic bottle of drinking water in the other.

I agree with your assesment of the students. But Bjørn Lomborg IS wrong. I trust that Bjørn Lomborg is right that a carbon tax needs to be about the same for all and global for it to be effective. But I disagree with this view that we get more out of investing in solving other problems than climate change. CO2 is a problem of persistent pollution which is filling the whole atmosphere. When my mom was born in 1950 the CO2 concentration was at 325ppm Now its at about 410ppm and is projected to reach 1000ppm by 2100 assuming business as usual. The accepted EU limit for how high CO2 is allowed to get in indoor environments is 1000ppm. This is insanity. You just can't let that happen to the whole planet. Sorry. We have to deal with this problem no matter how expensive it may be.

@@patricklincoln5942 what in your life have you changed can you do with 2 hours electricity a day?

@@bejentle7774: Nice of you to ask. I have cut meat from my diet (with the exception of fish on occasion). Fish are at the low end when it comes to contribution to green house gases from meats. I have cut milk from my diet unless it is going to get thrown out. I have reduced but not excluded completely my consumption of dairy. I wish I could say that I don't fly. But I am flying to the upcoming COP in Santiago to cohost a show that Stuart Scott does (he has cancer and needs someone to step in). I am also going to hold a talk in Washington state and California. During my talks I will be talking about how we need to reduce flights drastically (so I will see if the trip is more benefit than damage; if I can convince people to not fly or fly less, then there will no doubt be benefit). I rarely drive my kia picanto. I bicycle to and from work. Driving when it happens tends only to happen in the weekend. In my household (I am married and have 3 children), we keep our electricity consumption down to 8 kilowatt hours per day. I had my children when I trusted humanity will solve its problems. I don't trust that anymore, and wouldn't have had more than 1 kid had I known how severe the situation was back then when I choose to have children. I buy things second hand and I buy food that is as local as possible. I want to avoid emissions from transport of goods. I often skip showers to save on water and I try to maximize on the consumption of the food that is grown in our garden just outside our house. These are among the lifestyle changes I have made to try to minimize my carbon footprint. This is separate from the changes in my life that have made as a climate activist. I have joined Citizens Climate Lobby (the Danish chapter here in Denmark) and I am a core team member at www.ScientistsWarning.org. I teach math a school where I am trying to get my students to agree that they don't want to fly for fieldtrips and I have managed to get our local municipality here in Guldborgsund municipality in Denmark to divest from fossil fuels. I authored a blog www.2savehumanity.com, where I recommended 6 tools that all citizens should take to heart to avoid the worst of human caused climate change. Please feel free to ask questions if you have any more. Sincerely Patrick Lincoln

The morale virtues of protecting our environment should be pretty obvious. Truth is also a virtue. The students did not seem level headed.

​@@patricklincoln5942 Are there any solutions that cost less money than we have?

Terry Pankhurst You a George Carlin fan?

+judomagyar the arrogance struck me as well. it's as if they felt that this 8 min presentation was all that bjorn had considered. it's very shallow thinking

the kids are smarter

Where else would you like them to get their info?

Climate change? There are $ trillions at stake for governments and global companies on both sides if the climate alarmists convince pollies and NGOs that Climate change is a major election issue. Fact is 99.99% of scientists are not climate scientists and like many are being conned by these activists that make fossil fuels the scapegoat when it represents only 3% of all CO2 emissions. This FACT comes from Australian Emeritus Prof Ian Plimer who addressed the UK government on climate change . In fact man's worldwide obsession with deforestation (15 billion trees annually) and burning the waste, generates 8 times atmospheric CO2 as fossil fuel. He also says if CO2 in the atmosphere was halved, plant and marine life would be severely threatened. *Research shows plants thrive in contrived atmospheres where CO2 is up 300ppm* Let me assure readers, if you see it, smell it, if it makes you ill and causes cancer, it is not CO2. The latter is a colourless odourless and invisible gas. *Without it, the world would be desolate, lifeless wasteland.* Governments won't continue to fund researchers to investigate rising sea levels and temperatures if they don't come up with the results they want.

@@patricklincoln5942 mine the arsehole!

Climate change used to be called the 4 seasons. It's not manmade, it's not an emergency. It's not real and I don't want to pay bogus carbon taxes to "solve" what is not a problem.

@@saintejeannedarc9460 can you please provide evidence for this claim?

He was full of shit in 2013 and hes full of shit in 2019. The models have never predicted the observed warming or lack of, and yet somehow hes able to project out to the end of the century? that is dishonest.

@@mysteryyoutuber2683 Can you provide evidence to challenge their ideas?

you didn't miss it. . .the arrogance is staggering.

Jeez that's a low bar, don't go to a comedy show you may die of laughter.

yes in his head he is probably helping the planet by drinking carbon dioxide

Thats not the point. Since he takes on their premise, he shows how idiotic all proposed policies are to tackle those problems. They cant debate him on the models since he takes theirs, so they have to debate him on the field he has the advantage and they dont have any logical justification to go with their proposals.

@Stephanie Mujan horse shizen

Agreed. To think that he just indifferently brushed off the poverty and malnutrition ordeals of millions of underprivileged people in the midst of something as arbitrary as the effects of climate change just shocked me. It's saddening. On a slightly different note, an old boyfriend of mine brushed off the severity of street harassment by saying verbatim 'cuz um, there are bigger problems like climate change'. I'm Sri Lankan, and street harassment is a really big issue over here. He was American, and a radical leftist. I'm still recovering from the end of that relationship, but I guess I should also feel a little relieved that I'm not together with him anymore, now that I've written this down and got better clarity.

@@SakinahMissSakinah That is of course the problem: "If it doesn't directly effect me then it's not important".

Joseph King and they are eyes sores

I thought they were perpetual motion machines 200% efficient. My Marxist gender studies professor said so. Also, soy has more protein than meat. And lifting the European ban on transgenic modified soy has nothing to do with German Bayer acquiring Monsanto.

@@squarerootof2 Not at all, but even if they were brilliant and did more than expected, at the cost of thousands of birds millions of insects and the annihilation of certain species of bats, there wiping out species quicker than any climate catastrophe.

@@josephking1947 The film "Kingsman" had the proper solution. Wiping out the entire human race in the most violent, cruel way possible, except for a few select elites. I wonder if that's the real plan behind it all. Umm... no, they need us to work for them. On the other hand, maybe a million slaves or so would be enough to meet their needs.

@@squarerootof2 I'm not aware of the film, but I've given that idea thought before, like space exploration what complete bollocks that is, they can't solve what's in front of their eyes on this planet let alone fucking up another one, and who would benefit from all this stuff? The Ridiculously rich elite of course not the cannon fodder masses...let's hope that a plague wipes out 48% of humans indiscriminately that should sort things out for a while..keep well..

Low resolution thinking. Ahhh... You too came here from Jordan Peterson's video!

@@Just-Ross Absolutely

Doubt it (maybe if Yellowstone were to blow). Anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions are around 60x the emissions from natural sources (on average per year).

Sorry matespider. Its just not true. You were lied to.

Paul Almond very interesting comment. Are you able to provide me with a link to this research so that I may learn more about it?

Yes, matespider....that is correct. Warming and cooling cycles are Normal and Natural. That being said, the earth is NOT in a warming cycle right now, and the global warming scam is a lie.

@@powermetal26 Yes warming and cooling cycles are natural. However it is the RATE of warming that has occurred over the past century that isn't natural. The warming that has occurred over the last century, is equivalent to what would normally occur over tens of thousands of years naturally. 97% of scientists that express an opinion on recent climate change, believe the planet is being warmed as a result of humans (source below). iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/8/2/024024

It's all about politics I'm afraid.

Humans always do - it just takes time.

It’s the cows.

Like Jordan Peterson, Bjorn's fingernail clippings are more intelligent than so many of today's students because of the tripe they are preaching in universities worldwide.

skepticalscience.com/co2-temperature-correlation.htm

Oh, what a tangled web we weave. When first we practise to deceive

Correlation is no proof of causation. Statistics show that shark attacks peak when consumption of ice cream is at its highest. Fact is shark attacks occur mostly in summer when beaches are crowded.

He stated multiple times he doesnt know and only calculates based on the various models and takes them as a premise. He is a economist and not a enviroment scientist and he calculates spending and benefit, not temperatures. If the models were right, he would have the most beneficial solutions to tackle them, if the models are wrong so are his calculations.

skepticalscience.com/climate-models-intermediate.htm skepticalscience.com/empirical-evidence-for-co2-enhanced-greenhouse-effect.htm

Bjorn is working on the data at hand and analysing it without a political standpoint. He's not a forecaster as that's unreliable. In fact, anyone using modelling isn't any more accurate - that's only as good as the data going in and can be too easily manipulated to produce outcomes. One main tenet is that education is the way forward. If we can bring everyone up to a good level of education then people are doing better and less likely to be living hand to mouth burning resources around them just to exist. They'll better understand how to live sustainably. A better-educated planet sounds positive to me. And none of the current climate activists running around like headless chickens are pushing for that.

You're saying that there's been dramatic changes which tell us that the world is going to end in 10 years or something?

nyrtzi I said science, not alarmism.

@@bigike1313 Sorry, I've been getting so used to people not being able to tell the difference that it's already become the default for me to assume that.

'try and clean up our act' is a little bit of an understatement. Natural ecosystems all over the planet are being destroyed because of intensive farming and palm plantations... Something needs to change, it's not as simple as 'well the earth's going to die so it's okay'.

Sadly people don't want to hear the truth. The brainwashing has been going on way to long.

down to zero ?

can you say anything that is implicitly more genocidal and evil than that

Bill Gates and the Democrats have that covered ... kzfaq.info/get/bejne/jK6Fp6iVl828fqc.html

it does matter if X or Y doesn't work

And ideally push for a cheaper alternative. But, alternatives require R&D and R&D has a high energy costs… seems like we’re in a catch 22 situation.

But if people need to drive to earn meagre wages then they can't use less gas.... And the extra they pay doesn't go into research for clean alternatives either.

Actually the point of the carbon tax is to rob people of their money for a phoney cause.

while technology is being developed for this purpose there's isn't a viable easy solution to implement. Plus research and inventing takes a lot of funding. Best option would be trees since they use carbon to grow. But we cut down more trees than we plant and we would also need huge amounts.

Climate change? There are $ trillions at stake for governments and global companies on both sides if the climate alarmists convince pollies and NGOs that Climate change is a major election issue. Fact is 99.99% of scientists are not climate scientists and like many are being conned by these activists that make fossil fuels the scapegoat when it represents only 3% of all CO2 emissions. This FACT comes from Australian Emeritus Prof Ian Plimer who addressed the UK government on climate change . In fact man's worldwide obsession with deforestation (15 billion trees annually) and burning the waste, generates 8 times atmospheric CO2 as fossil fuel. He also says if CO2 in the atmosphere was halved, plant and marine life would be severely threatened. *Research shows plants thrive in contrived atmospheres where CO2 is up 300ppm* Let me assure readers, if you see it, smell it, if it makes you ill and causes cancer, it is not CO2. The latter is a colourless odourless and invisible gas. *Without it, the world would be desolate, lifeless wasteland.* Governments won't continue to fund researchers to investigate rising sea levels and temperatures if they don't come up with the results they want.

skepticalscience.com/co2-lags-temperature.htm skepticalscience.com/water-vapor-greenhouse-gas.htm skepticalscience.com/co2-plant-food.htm skepticalscience.com/co2-pollutant.htm

skepticalscience.com/global-warming-cold-weather.htm

How was your 2023 summer? Went on any walks in the forest? :)

SCIENCE IS A LIBBRUL CONSPIRACY THEORYY IM AN A MURICAN ONLY WORDS I NEED TO KNOW IS U S A

No you don’t.

Yeah there's no proof for that mate

Moin mein Guter Kompagnon.

@@jannesklein2539 es ward mir eine Ehre sie hier zu begegnen herr Nes.

@@liptonsugarwaster7987 Ah! Herr Arl! Ich entsinne mich ihrer, welch Freud sie hier anzutreffen aber werde nun aus Gründen, deren Nennung der Aussage, die ich beibringen möchte, nicht beiträglich sind, des Weges ziehen.

Ardy Hagen yeah like bailing out banks at the next crash

@MrBadabimBadabum Its indoctrination...not education...

Ceist 8 Do you have to be a priest to criticise the bible?

@@RevoltingPeasant123 You're not making any sense. We're talking about science and evidence, not religious beliefs

He is a economist, not a enviroment scientist. He takes the ipcc models as a premise and shows how the proposed policies are just bad and how it is more beneficial to spend money into free trade, tackling heartdiseases or investing into research.

+judomagyar nothing frightens more than people who think we can modify nature on a global scale with such precision

Phone Bad, good argument.

Patrick Lincoln But see... you said it yourself: assuming business as usual. I think it is a commonly overlooked possibility that technological advancements are going to decrease carbon dioxide emissions. I mean, if the projection is for 2100; do you honestly think that no groundbreaking inventions are going to be made in the next century? I don’t.

@MrBadabimBadabum I thought you beatniks liked whales.

That would be an eco disaster for sure.

You certainly are.

Maker Marx can you point out the lies specifically please?