Asklepios27 Is there some other form if law you wretched woman

And a dictator

AN SHIET

GODS I WAS DIPLOMATIC THEN

A Consul of Rome.....

And one of the most influential personalities in our history.

if Alexander was 10/10, then Caesar would be and 8, he was a lot better politician then he was a general.

Yeah, Caesar also kneeled at a statue of Alexander and said that he can't do half the things that Alexander did , sad that they made him a Templar, or at elast he should have been done like Haytham Kenway

Legatus Sedricillius Eh, Alexander's tactics, we're basic but effective for the enemy he was fighting and most of his early success was due to his father well Julius Caesar was more adaptive to most situations and was constantly thinking how can I make the enemy up early how can I make them skip breakfast etc etc, and he greatly understood how to control the people and have complete Obedience of his Legions.

Legatus Sedricillius And Alexander had a huge arrogance issue he thought he was going to be one of the Gods, or Greek Legends and and wouldn't let anyone else rule his Empire and he didn't understand morale very well his army even revolting against him a few times.

Sellot91 Almost as if killing people doesn't always solve problems.

Sellot91 Well Aya wants Cleopatra killed so bad which it succeeded due to Augustus defeating her and Antony years later, it clouded her judgment

Sellot91 the goal wasn’t to make Rome weak, as Rome wasn’t the problem, the men with power were the problem, as they sought to oppress the people

DJ Yoda, The Hidden Ones thought that by killing Caesar they would save the republic and "freedom" What truly happened? The people, the Hidden Ones fight for, were pissed off and a long civil war has started and republic was gone. Assassins are actually good in making bad things even worse.

Флоріан Фанта Well so did the Borgias, Charles Lee and Sophia Rikkin.

nerfvideos96 Despite popular belief no it wasn't actually a rug, it was a laundry bag. The rug was an embellishment made by hollywood for entertainment purposes, so in the context of this game it can also be forgiven.

One of the things they got right about them two

SHAME ON THE HOUSE OF PTOLEMY

I felt the same i was let down by his poor reaction hbo did it best the whole room shit them selfs

Spot on

As you said, Caesar cares his public image, an image-conscious opportunist. It's not Ptolemy's fault wanted to ally with Caesar, but Caesar‘s who didnt ally with Ptolemy first and discuss how to capture Pompey. so imagine hes like "yeah it's kinda everyone's fault tell my biographer say I'm furious and let's move on to business..." totally makes sense

Dude. Doo you really think ceaser would execute a roman general in front of roman citizencs? And that guy being pompey magnus? Really? People would hate him for it and as you know he was a populist bro. Try to think a bit more like ceaser. He would never have done that

I doubt Caesar would publicly execute Pompey, a famous Roman General in front of Roman citizens, Caesar was known for his mercy and forgiveness during the Civil War since he pardoned many.

He also worked for his position instead of just getting it

Yep one of the misconceptions of history only a group of the them killed him others ran away some even tried to help him but were held back

I always wondered why augustus wouldn't take the title, was he afraid of caesars fate or did he enjoy watching the citizens beg him to become dictator.

@@RCsFinest Both

@@GaetanoBonaparte you think so? You really think he was that vain to have citizens beg him like that...I think he didn't want to have the same fate as Caesar.

Lol he probably didn’t even know how to use a bow the romans hired auxiliaries and mercenaries to do that shit

LoL not more barbaric than thousands of innocent lives he killed when he took their territories during the Gallic war The real shame is that history is always written by the victors

NearestGalaxy He was referencing a scene from a TV series

NearestGalaxy HE WAS A CONSUL OF ROME!!!

Classified 07 a consul of rome....

@@NearestGalaxy they killed thousands of innocent roman lives as well

Now we must join the ships... We will be heroes of sword and mind! 🤝

I totally thought Caesar was about to be a bro. I was wrong.

Maybe this Caesar was different to the real life Caesar. But also I think the Assasins are most often in the wrong so to me it's not suprising she wanted to do that.

Aya was a Hoe with power

Uh, for the record, there were basically like 3 civil wars in Rome's 500 year history as a Republic. In the next 500 years there would be like a civil war every 15 years or so. So if your concern is about the people; then murdering every Caesar is definitely the best course and fixing the Republic. Let's not worship tyrants. Julius Caesar was badass, but he could have fixed the institutions rather than destroy them.

ShadowsFate To be honest, the only difference between a king and an emperor is the size of their territory

Romans would still never say lord, that was derived from kings and medieval times.

DOMINUS

Dominus was only used for slaves or those who worked under the supervision of their master, Roman soldiers would have said Imperator or General.

You also have a problem with them speaking English?

Bayek fucking loves his wife, and I'm all here for it.

Sonikku El Hedgehog Yes you are blinded by ancient Roman propaganda.

Nah, Assassinating Caesar was one of the dumbest mistakes of history.

I have a feeling if Ceasar did aided the creed one way or the other the Assassins would over look the fact he was bad to the people, I mean they canceled Assassin Creed Civil War cus Abraham was supposedly Templar allied.

Caeser was great to his people what are you talking about?!

Sonikku El Hedgehog Caesar introduced massive land reform and was loved by the peoole, it's was the aristocrats that hated him

They are being historically accurate as that shield came into use AFTER Julius Caesar's death.

sry, but that´s complete bull... There were some occasional use of Clipei by Triarii, Equites and Tribunes in the later period of the Republic. But usually, Legionaries used Scuta, most probably of the Al-Fayyuum type (www.roman-reenactor.com/wpimages/wpf3ab5917_05_06.jpg) as is written by Polybius. He even noted how Roman soldiers were more courageous than others due to the size of their shields.

Geordie Nicholson whenever Soldiers brought their own equipment, they were entitled to bring whatever the hell they wanted, and if anyone still used the clipeus, it was rich men, like the Tribunes, equites etc. there is archeological evidence of that

@Geordie Nicholson Student of history here, so I´m afraid I do know what I am talking about I do love historical debate though ;P If you read Raffaele D´Amatos Arms and Armour of the Imperial Roman Soldier, you´ll see a archeological plate of an Imperial Tribune using a clipeus on a stele. Generally it seems equipment was less standardised than the Trajan Pillar makes it seem. Old equipment tended to be used until it was no longer operable (it cost a lot to produce after all) But you are right, most of Caesars Legions were equipped in Cisalpine Gaul before the Gaulish war, though he used a lot of Pompeian Legionaries after Pharsalos, who had been equipped and recruited rather decentralisedly in the east, so their equipment would have been more rag-tag. I´m pretty sure some of them would have used a Greek Thyreos derivative.

I very much agree with this, nontheless, a Tribune is a Roman soldier of sorts^^ I just wanted to prove a point there^^ Legionaries would have long foregone the Clipeus, though like with all things ancient, we can never be too sure. The shields most Legionaries seem to be using in ACO are very much like the type associated with Auxiliary soldiers

twas amazing!

I get what you are saying i think they did that to stop you from climbing away all the time but they could just do pilums. In reality only auxiliaries would use them like you said

That's why we love it.

Why even taking this game seriously? Even after seeing black egyptians mate?, WE WUZ ASSASINZ N SHIET

what greater insult than to portray Caesar as the Roman Tony Montana

Because black Egyptians are/were real. Nubians are/were black. Southern Egyptians were black, Greeks and Romans in Egypt were light, and many other Egyptians were brown and possibly mixed. Ancient Egypt was very multicultural. If you ever go to Egypt you can see it for yourself with all the different styles from different countries and the various skin colours shown. Pro-white or Pro-black arguments on Ancient Egypt are both stupid since the place was multi-racial and a major part of the ancient world where cultures came together.

A lot of Egyptians are black. wtf are you talking about

Caesar was quite literally a "Dictator for Life". Not saying the Optimates were any better but ye.

Caesar stood for the people with his land reforms it was the aristocracy that hated him and his death plunged rome into a civil war, if that’s your definition of a tyrant then I don’t know what is.

Puking Panda i study ancient latin,”dictator” ()in the Romans’ mankind had a different mean,was more like “emperor” or “pontifex maximum” not “tyran”,the senatus elected “dictator” and then killed him

Dictator had a different meaning than what it means today

I only give it a pass because the romans were like side characters in this game they seemed to focuse more on the greek side but i will expect more if they make one in Ancient Rome

Romans were big Some were gigantic in size

you do know that he was leader of the order right? have you played any of the missions in all egypt where the order obviously did bad things? speeches do not overpower actions

elessal Julius Caesar was not the leader of the egyption order. He came way after they were made their branch. He was the leader of the roman branch. By killing Caesar Aya has just started a civil war and all Caesar wanted to do was to help his people no matter the cost

The Emerald Snorlax I think long term, better it was snuffed out faster than let the Templar like organization grow more

addy addu why kill the templars they fight for order and peace while assassin's fight for "freedom" which really is just chaos

They fight for a 1984 type order and peace. Read the book, and you'll understand why the Assassins are better.

Palpatine killed cesaer because he’s the senate heheheheh.... heh.......

President Panda oversimplified, you know the game isnt just about him?

Apollo the sun god My complaints are universal for the whole game.

President Panda The only thing cool was the actual assassination. With all the conspirators.

Pompeius, Ptolemy, Cleopatra and Pothinus were also terribly done (besides the fact that figures like Arsinoe, and the whole alexandrian crisis never really appeared...) Love the game for its world, hate it for the bad inclusion of history in the main story...

Agreed, it is an eyesore

When bad character kills a literal God

Exactly what I’m saying

he was a vile power-hungry narcissist

There’s no evidence of him being a good man lmaoo. Do you know how much unnecessary blood is on this man’s hands just for entertainment purposes and the weird obsession of world domination. Like bruh, get your little corner and govern your people and make sure they are clean, happy, and well fed. That’s it. Men die because they think they should own the dirt, trees, and sky. Filthy scum, and he’s 5’7, not the towering giant they made him in ac.

Grow up

if that is the main reason you want to play a game then just don't play any and read a book about cesar instead.

I suggest Commentarii de Bello Gallico by Caesar himself. Great book.

Christopher Marlowe Some people like seeing history come to life dude. I like history a lot, and seeing it come to life was something I loved about the Assassins Creed games, and when Origins came out I knew quite a bit about Caesar so it was a shame this is how they chose to depict him.

I was really looking forward to it i was hyped when they finally name dropped him but was let down about how they went about it

No way. All he cared about was himself. He wanted power, and he was willing to do anything to secure it.

@@rosskerr1439 says who? Try a history book.

@@rosskerr1439 How to say "I know literally nothing about Julius Ceasar's politics" without actually saying you know nothing about Julius Ceasar's politics.

Idk, but it definitely make more sense for him to be 5”7.. why is he a damn giant in this game.

@@Akiraspin Bruh, everything we know about Caesar was that while he made good reforms, he made every effort to consolidate power to himself and was a megalomaniac. He was not a good person; he was just an effective one. He deserved his death. So does any tyrant.

All the guys here that stabbed Ceasar, including Brutus were assassins. And just because the armor belonged to Brutus doesn't mean he wore it all the time. Besides, Brutus only got the armor late into his time as an assassin, when he became a master assassin. Ceasar was Brutus's first assassination, so why would he already have his master assassin armor?

I'm gonna trust you on this one, in that case I'm happy that they thought of that!

But there was actually an error in the scene, but only a small one, nothing to major. Funny enough it relates to the armor of Brutus, but more specifically the dagger that comes along with it. Because it was established that it was that dagger that Brutus stabbed Ceasar with. But in the scene in Origins it was a normal looking dagger, as opposed to the rather unique look of the one in Brotherhood (that was actually the reason I watched the video, to check if it was the same dagger). But I think that can be easily overlooked, since the dagger in Origins was only shown for a few seconds.

Jonah Steinfeld It was probably upgraded when Brutus fought Octavian.

@@Sc0rpJoe yeah I’m gonna call bullshit on half the senate being assassins. 23 men stabbed Caesar

To be fair, they were using the longer Hispaniensis model during this time, but yeah, the weapons and armor were a big disappointment. It's a shame you don't see it depicted often.

Historical inspiration yes but not accuracy.

I believe his name pronounce as " Kaiser " or " Kaisar " ?

they will. Aya is now Amunet and is the leader of the Assassins in Rome, so Octavian, Mark Antony and Cleopatra are her next targets

Andree Tungcab Assassins supported Augustus (Octavian) against Mark Anthony and Cleopatra. Its already known that Aya killed Cleopatra, but idk about Anthony.

Mo Hadri Well in my POV, Octavian might be betray the Assassins later due to the fact he may know or may have known they murdered Caesar, may resulting to Aya alias Amunet's persecution and maybe even execution.

Andree Tungcab Sorry I was thinking of another emperor hahaha, Octavian and Antonius formed their alliance to kill the Assassin backed army led by Brutus and co. When Augustus and Antonius/Cleopatra went to war, Im guessing the Assassins did something to influence the side of (the new Emperor) Augustus....seeing as they (Aya) killed Cleopatra and maybe even Antonius. No way they would back the side of the woman they eventually killed in her own palace

Mo Hadri I guess both Aya and Augustus planned on betraying each other maybe for the fact Aya now has Cleopatra killed and Augustus has Mark Antony eliminated.

That is exactly what I was about to type lol Ptolemy's a bitch

Except not as good.

Well I think accorting to history, he was a little shit...

Tommen, not Joffrey! Tommen was a stupid puppet like the pharao.

James L Henry VI was the inspiration for Joffrey and Aeris II

and remember the first guy tiberius gracchus tried it peacefully without military force and was beaten to death with table legs by the optimate senators then they killed 600 of his supporters then they granted themselves immunity from that clear murder they did

Henry Orlov Is that a Marc Antony quote from hbo's rome

Yea

That could have been a piece of propaganda by Caeser. Some historians say he definitely faked it while others say he was being genuine.

@@vascogiesteira1566 like, people forget that most of what we know about Caesar was written by caesar or under his instruction. he was a propaganda artist

SomeKidWithNoSkills He became when Cleopatra seduced him. Tbf, he was just nice to the Romans, not to the people he conquered.

SomeKidWithNoSkills, No, they do not. Temaplrs are not bad, there is no good or bad in Assassin's Creed.

Ubisoft is really bad at historical fact

SHIZZZAAAAAA!!!

Squiddy Pearl It’s treason then

Bobi d Drummer what are you talking about?

Apollo the sun god Alexander’s statue was placed in Spain, as a testament to how far Rome went in conquering the world.

SanFrancisco Bay, Assassins tend to make things worse. If you think of that, Assassins do that quite often.

Sometimes it’s vice versa. In brotherhood The Borgias were actual bastards and the assasins took care of em.

This is not accurate... at all.

@@Gameinger16 i'd argue the real one isn't either

mun choi that's what she did to caesar in the first place but was made into the father of understanding.

Assassins dickrider calm down it's called criticism

cant speak for everyone, but for me its the realisation. 1. women? in the senate? aegyptian women in the senate? cmon, patres conscripti (dont remember english translation, it was how the senators were often called) would've screamed and point a finger at her the moment she had tried to enter. she couldnt have been there, neither could've Bayek. 2. Caesars speech... just follows some rumours, never took place, never could've been taking place. thats just dumb, completely historically innacurate and OOC. and the source rumours (game goes too far from them, but still i can see where it was all taken from) i can bet were the parts of Augustian propaganda. it just fits too much. 3. legionaires? around the building where senate had a meeting? completely. 100%. historically. inacurate. yes, i can remember couple of times when peoples assembly was surrounded by armed forces, but it was never an army at that period of time. and they werent there when Caesar was killed (he had even dismissed his own personal guards not long before), otherwise, you know, he couldn't have been killed at all. so yeah, i have no problems with assassination of Caesar taking place in game, i have problems with lots of historical inacuracies, not only with the ides of march, but, you know, with the portrail of Caesar, which reminds of the actual historical person quite rarely, with Brutus and Cassius teleporting to Egypt with some magic and everything else that make me feel like wtf. ubisoft has just messed everything up from the moment the game reached romans arrival. thats it.

@@slipslip5720 you haven't played the game you moron

Her father’s uncle did.

Literally no-one thinks that its an 100% represantation of history.

Jonah Steinfeld Ikr, who tf is going to look at a single game and go "Yup, this is 100% fact."? They would be morons to assume that, and this game is just a GAME.

just a random dude 77 It even says in the beginning after you start the game: "This game is inspired by historical events", not "This game is a 100% accurate depiction of what went down back then"

Kurthimself like assassins existed back then. Assassin existed around the 11-12th century. Then they disappeared and presumbly die. Even If they continued Living after that, their shia sect has ended since long.

Well there are lot of retarded kids playing games these days so I won't be surprised if they really think this is what happens judging from ignorant comment here 😂

That´s why i hate history nerds Edit: I meant fanboy, being a nerd is ok, but not being a fanboy.

It's because, in the very beginning of the franchise, historical accuracy was of higher priority. It has however, became significantly less important as the series progressed. I recommend doing research into Patrice Desilets and Jade Raymonds' motivations behind Assassin's Creed 1, and reading about the book *Alamitos* by Vladimir Bartol, which was one of Assassin's Creed's source materials.

The Rising Theurge hey! I’m a history nerd and I don’t complain about the ending. I know it is fictional and inspired by true event. There are always little fucks that ruin it for everyone.

Julius Caesar Hey hey it's ok, I love history too and its one of my favourite fields, it was my hobby in my childhood to learn from history books and documentaries. I'm a History nerd too and I will expand my knowledge( I should have used fanboy instead of nerd, the former is a better insult), but people shouldn't take it too seriously, especially then, when they can't get the inaccuracies right.

Robert Samuels AC in it's earliest days was less historical accurate than later games, they turned both Assassins and Templars into Atheistic organizations try to bring forth a perfect world in thier own ways, in fact Robert de sable shouldn't even have died in the first AC game and Richard wasn't all that great of a political to be Honest on top of People surviving from a fall into a hailbail. Also dis you forgot the Gods, oh I mean Isu.