Bro that's how you will become professional animator in the future. Good work bro.

Thank you bro

Nice video, I have a doubt regarding one claim you made. Can we talk?

u need to improove your english speaking skills!

@@thanhnguyenuc8545 you need to fuck off. his English is just fine

Thank you so much bro

Thank you ☺️

Yes,agree.Butvit is just a little bit faster for me to listen the voice and watching the animation.However it is very informative.Like.

Thank you

Thank You... i used "Blender 3D" Software www.blender.org

@Data Fix dense 🤣🤣🤣🤣👍

.. either we're not being taught some important chemistry, or he doesn't clarify the specific oil it produces. It's probably more of a liquid state of plastic that can be reformed rather than it is actualy 'black oil.

@@michaelbedford2993 i think your right 👍

Plastic is a waste product from oil. So... this is squeezing lemon peels to make limonade. Basically, this burns as much fuel as you get out or costs even more.

Energy is used to make plastic and it's recovered by using plastic as fuel

Glad it was helpful!

With a little spark of technicality.

I like your idea! But I wonder if the fuel required to restore plastics into fuel would end up polluting the atmosphere?

@@user-wp9nd4le8e I know there used to be a type of filter they would put on smoke stacks. In street slang, it was called a scrubber. I haven't seen any reference to it in years. It removed pollutant particles from the vented air. Like a hepa filter, but tougher, more durable, heat resistant, washable. Once installed, it would last for years. Actually, if they would go back to that system, redesign it for anything that vents air, it could solve most of the air pollution problems in today's world.

@@user-wp9nd4le8e it won't, just don't stand right next to it and breathe in the smoke, the "atmosphere " can not get polluted, unless you do it intentionally by propelling things into the gas, which would in any case inevitably come down once you stop propelling it. This of course goes against what your Government and Media propaganda would tell you, however that is the truth of the matter. Things that have more density will drop out of the gasses in the "atmosphere" hydrogen, helium, neon, nitrogen and oxygen all have less density than the so called Carbon dioxide and as such it would be ejected from the gasses the same way air would be in water, unless kept there by some form of pressure or continuous propulsion.

@@user-wp9nd4le8e nuclear power can solve that issue

@@user-wp9nd4le8e The fuel and gas produced by the pyrolysis process replaces fossil fuels, thus, while it does release carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, it reduces the same use of more fossil fuels and at the same time eliminates plastic waste in the environment.

Did you find the answer to this question ?

@@nicobriceno732 No, no answer to that question, unfortunately

dirty gases are burnet a feedback

You can loop the pyrolyzed gas back into the system to generate more heat. The burnt fumes have to be cleaned by a chemical exchanger, I guess, to make'em less degrading to the environment.

@@ayonbiswas4186 this was my thought use the emissions for something good

Have you done your experiment microwave pyrolysis of plastic using zeolite catalyst?

It would yes , but companies don't want to burn money . Obviously the energy needed to make fuel out of plastic is more than the energy produced by the plastic fuel , decent bit of recycling if you are using renewable energy like solar panels to do it I suppose but no company will want to do it

Thanks for watching!

Glad it was helpful! Thank You

Thank you 🙏

Is the oil produced from the pyrolysis process the same as diesel?

Thank You

Thank you

totaly agree

Thanks a lot!

Sulphur is only a concern if the plastic molecule you are making the oil from would have the element sulphur in it. Otherwise, there's no way it could be in the oil. If it does contain sulphur, the sulphur gas should be separable from the oil at certain temperatures, if you staged the distillation or condensing. Carbon black is a popular pigment. You can add it to anything that uses pigments, and even concrete, if you want black concrete, or pottery, for black pottery. It is a very flame resistant powder, so it can improve the thermal properties of some things, as well as you can cement it together to make a bad form of pencil lead.

I have also thought this. I read somewhere, maybe many places, that 500-600C was required for pyrolysis. I was also reading that larger concentrated solar mirror arrays are capable of producing such temperatures. The sources may have been unreliable and/or I may be remembering incorrectly

anything from 475Celsius will be fine for the pyrolysis process.

engineering a reactor like this would be interesting; it would need to be a column elevated above the ground so that an array of concentrating mirrors can focus on it. Just like the solar thermal molten salt to steam method of generating electricity. On that note perhaps you can have a co-gen facility where the molten salt is used to heat the pyrolysis chamber; and residual heat left over when there is no more plastic to pyrolyze goes towards generating electricity. IE when no plastic waste it generates electricity when steam; when waste needs to be pyrolyzed molten salt is sent to heat the pyrolysis chamber.

@@MM-bm6en dang i mean, i could use my solar cooker for it, i'd just have to start it in the morning, in arizona or something.

Use solar panels to heat the stove and there you go. Or create a stove that will operate on the gas you are producing. Whatever is left is the profit.

I was thinking that a similar process, using solar panels, would be a great way to desalinate ocean water for drinking. IDK why they aren't doing this already. Even without solar panels for heat, there are ways to use the containers to and sun on them to cause evaporation in the distillation process. Like solar ovens work.

the last thing the world needs right now is another way to burn oil and gas.

@@cageybee7221 how do you figure? Recycling that plastic is better than digging more oil out of the ground. Of course it would be nice to convert co2 in the air back into oil using renewables, then we could stop digging entirely while working on biodiesel or alternatives to plastics.

@@Archpimp not if the power we use to "recycle" that plastic also comes from oil, which 80% of the world's power does. the last thing the world needs is more ways to use fossil fuels. this is like being in a car that has driven into a river and is slowly flooding, and smashing the window with a hammer because you are thirsty.

It depends on the scale. My guess is a small operation could be set up for $10 000 and a very large one for millions. It all depends on how much you would want to process and how quickly

Thank you bro Abhishek 😍

I was exactly same way

Came

@@karthi_explains I love your work and I know how it takes to make a animeted videos because I am also try to make videos

Even after considering this factor, the energy required for pyrolysis will be greater than the energy output you can generate from the fuel processed by this method

There’s energy expended in the collection, sorting, cleaning, & shredding.

1.Polystyrene 2.I think both

@@musoniyves5447 Thanks Buddy

Thank you, Very cool!

Are you doing this as a business or just on a laboratory scale?

@@harshkumarsingh08 well at first I just wanted to learn it. Now I'm in the process of installing one to power my home, I have run my truck on the same system. I would build them to sell.

@@accelwell7018 great job, where are you from?

@@harshkumarsingh08 I'm in the US Southern Arizona Tucson

Yes, my company produce this kind of plant using heat to transform the plastic and tire and garbage into Crude oil, Gas and Carbon.

You need to calculate the efficiency of using solar power in to heating phase of the process. And at the end you will consume solar power for producing crude oil 🤔, the gas and ash will be hard to handle in an nonprofessional environment.

@@pipelcamadalin9280 no actually the ash is valuable as it can then break down to other useful chemicals. The gas is what we condense to at worst a low grade fuel.

Exactly. The waste plastic is all fuel. Using some of the material to generate the heat to produce the other products is perfectly acceptable. What matters is whether the process produces a profit. If the waste material is free, and the refined products produce more income than it costs to maintain the refinery, then it's a win-win-win.

Brilliant idea 💡👏 from an active volcano lava they'll have all the heat they need to convert the plastic into fuel. Would love to see that happen. Unfortunately this is too simple for governments they prefer to waste money on wind farms that cost more energy to build than it produces. Then blames us all for polution but dont invest in projects like this that helps the earth as its being recycled They can also make fuel out of water 💧

@@ryde2012 how about use geothermal heat?

Stupid location for any plant!! Who is going to work there?????

@@donberry6079 Don't people already live and work in California? They've got plenty of rubbish.. If a plant was set up near to the Great Pacific Garbage Patch then the country that ran and exported the fuel would be minted 🤑 Unfortunately the nearest viable location for the UK would probably be Iceland 😔 Although I did hear they might have some land for sale, so 🤞

Thank you😍... edho first time try chesa😅

😍😇

I used “Blender 3D” animation Software for 3D Designing And I used “GIMP” software for 2D drawing Both Software’s are free to use and open source😊

Thank you so much for the information. Hope to see more videos from you. It is very educational.

his use of the word sustainable is misleading i am pretty sure what he means is it wont make money there are many many ways to generate the heat required, 450 isn't that high coppicing (funny how spell check pretends that is not a word) comes to mind but really this technology will only ever benefit individuals

Solarpanels and batterys are made of metals (silver, copper,nickel...) that need to be mined using a lot of diesel... They are not good for environment as the mining puts huge holes in the ground. That green electric revolution is a lie to prop up the economy, nothing more!

The use of electricity would more or less negate this as a way of generating fuel. It is almost necessitated it be done in a low tech fashion, and apparently there are ways to set up the system to run more efficiently than as presented here. if you are worried about the amount of pollution generated by wood fires, well..i just don't know what to tell you.

I think that it all comes down to the meaning of words (semantics). I believe that original statement is correct on its face, but a better and more useful way of describing the reality would be to say "Pyrolysis of plastic can be sustained for as long as we have plastic waste.". I think that would have been a better choice of words in that context.

Looking at this positively, I'm a proponent of molten salt reactor systems (MSR's), they would be an excellent source of high temperature heat to drive the pyrolysis process and do so with emitting carbon. In addition there would be further opportunity to integrate the heat coming out of the condensation processes back into the main power cycle further improving overall thermal efficiency.

Yes @@lindsaydempsey5683 Thank you for your input. the language used is important. I like that you've used the words "reality" and "context" because the original statement is only really true out of context and from an ideal starting position. We will have plastic waste as long as there is a petrochemical industry, as it is a byproduct of oil refinery. It's just about how efficient (or inefficient) the refining process is. So long as we do have an abundance of plastic waste, and heat sources we could use, then pyrolysis can be sustained so long as it is done efficiently and at an appropriate scale. While oil remains cheap and available, it won't make much financial sense to do this industrially unless it was subsidised, as even if you have a heat source going begging, it would be more profitable to refine crude oil with it, but where this would require long transportation chains, such as in Iceland, it might one day make more sense to use the waste plastic already shipped there as the hydrocarbon source rather than shipping it away again. In reality, the small scale operations on remote islands or in isolated communities holds more promise, neatly solving the particular issues they face locally. I could see that being scaled up for larger remote communities such as Iceland, where they have cheap geothermal energy, or perhaps for somewhere sunny or windy where they could harness renewables. The fact that they could cut out long tanker journeys from the equation would be the real saving, making it a potentially more sustainable solution, especially when the energy that would have been used in the transport of waste plastics is factored in. It's a solution, and sustainable isn't really a relevant concept in this context, as we'd ideally want the source of plastic waste to eventually dry up. Then, for true sustainability, the pyrolysis process could switch to using biomass as both the fuel source AND the hydrocarbon source, as shown in this other video: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/abFhrbpyvqrafXU.html

@@JoesWebPresence I agree with your comments, this is an opportunity where you want to be so successful that you do yourself out of a job. On the concept of sustainability in context, your comment here nails that nicely. "... the original statement is only really true out of context and from an ideal starting position.", that's the crux of it. The problem of plastic waste is multifaceted, I don't think that there is one 'best solution', but we do have a range of technologies a policy options that can really move the dial on this issue. IMO we need to use less where we can, use reusable containers where practical, where we can't use a deposit system that gets bottles and cans back for recycling as hi-spec material. Then at the bottom of the pile, pay a bounty per kg for general plastics that may not be recyclable and send those for pyrolysis and adding that product back into the oil and gas supply chain. How can we raise the cash to cover the net costs of such an endeavour? Simply levy $/kg charge on all plastics that cannot be easily recycled that has to be tied directly to the net cost of running the plastics recovery program. The trick here is to create incentives for everyone to be more efficient and effective, not simply punish those industries that some people don't like. The levy mentioned in the previous paragraph could fund/partially fund automated plastics recovery schemes from harbours and rivers like Mr Trash Wheel. It could also partially fund improvements in city stormwater infrastructure that would allow plastics to be recovered instead of simply discharging them to rivers and harbours along with the stormwater. I can't tell you which of these would be most economic or most effective. Personally I would favour as open a program as you can and see what works best, reducing costs and becoming more effective over time.

I don't think we're going to run out of plastic waste anytime soon.

Glad it was helpful!