so true

These comments are really boring now

You joined in 2016

Exactly I'm used to getting video recommendations from 2007, I'm very disappointed😡

@@zeyadashraf6396 Me too

Me🔥🔥

Me

Oh no no

andy tiniacos oh no no

People with fortnite prof pics are the.b8ggest virgims ever

... and even THAT is replaceable xD

Really

Meris Ahmic m

javixm there is

javixm yes

Yea

How to activate it? It never workrs with me.

It activates by itself.

+Bruh. hit cross bar like next to line (post)

Why is it broken? I never noticed any issues

bjehulk So what? The correct decision is what matters!

Mexico vs Argentina WC 2010 Messi was CLEARLY offsides. Then the ref was in shock because he actually he admitted he messed up. Idk why they couldn't have taken off the goal

+ricomajestic Excactly....it won't even take that long. It'll take less than 25 seconds. What are you talking about...it'll take too long? As long as they get it right-that's what matters!

bjehulk...they can just do what is done in the NFL where a coach gets a limited number calls to be reviewed during a game. In soccer there could be a maximum of 2 review calls per team during an entire game. This would prevent repetitive stopping of the game. There is already technology that would review offside plays in real time and would not require the game to be stopped! Imagine how this could clean up the game. If a player is legitimately fouled or if he dives in the penalty area, the play could be reviewed by the 4th official and the correct call could be made. This might eliminate diving by players for fear of getting caught and receiving a red card!

+ricomajestic yeah.... THE CORRECT decision is what matters. If offside technology will avoid bad calls then why not have it?

lol

lol what

T21boygamer no, the AI just picks the wrong picture frame

EDG FIFA jsjdjyefhhdejfhyrhf 😎🤗😚🤗😊🙂🤗😋🤗😚

3yers later bro come to fifa 19 no more words

Yes I am.

Yes I am

Made the matches fair for both

YESS...

but in the Indonesian league there is no Video Assistant referee and Goal line technology

best and easiest os known to man

bjy true that

The ref isn't allowed to see the replay of the goal, the technology allows them to know when the ball is behind the line

Firegamers789 why isn't he allowed to rewatch it?

Jerombolo The argument amongst the critics is if we introduce video replays like other sports it would slow down the game too much, so rather than stopping the game so the ref can watch a replay they use the current system so that the cameras and the tech do all the work and it just alerts the referee if it's a goal. FIFA stated the system must be able to do this in under 1 second to be considered. The 2 systems that passed are the ones that are now used.

Jerombolo Because Football is not an American sport.

Nicke. Well tennis is neither but they have this system there. Forgot it's name. You probably know which one, to see if the ball touches the line or not

Offside is a waste of time cause without the offside that is what u call football

That would be stupid cause of your toe is off then it is offside

+Carlos Franco the offside rule is a rule of interpretation.. it's not only about being in an offside position. the refs have to decide if he is active in the play...

That would be like the hardest thing ever . They would need to put tech all around the pitch

Absolutely-if you think about it-it's actually really easy to make offside technology. Just think about VR, computer games etc

Your 10 years late bro, and so am i

@@hibye4469 so true man 😉

😂

***** It would not have mattered anyway 4-1 I mean hello?????

Phillip Jang The score was 2-1 at the time. Going into the second half at 2-2 rather than 2-1 would have completely changed the momentum of the game. Two goals in Two Minutes would have been a real confidence booster and Germany would have been on the back foot.

Expert Plasma You know, when you play sports sometimes stupid decisions are made and you have to deal with it. And the fact that the score was 4-1 instead of staying at maybe 2-1 or 3-1 showed that England's collapse was inevitable. Anyway, have fun at the next world cup

But you can't blame losing a game because of it things happen and you have to deal with it.

Phillip Jang Actually, it would. The match wouldve been 2-2 with momentum on the English side. btw im not english

I wonder if similar systems are installed on highways to predict car crashes?

*think

Caleb Silverman you're right. Thanks.

***** You have problem with us potatoes now? huh? You choked on one of us when you're a child or something?

***** Potatoes can read minds~~~ Not really. I'm the one you chocked on and you shat me and I live again. I like the feeling of being inside you.

Yeah also the goal Messi scored at World Cup for argentina

There was no VAR at that time

A 7 yr old comment with no replies

Haha

+PugsNotDrugs4 That won't work, because this system only uses cameras. And if the puck is under the goalie and the goalie is in the goal with a part of his big protective material, even the cameras can't recognize it.

can use the electromagnetic method.

Taufik Akbar doesn't work, a puck is made out of hard rubber

@@Etherion195 Maybe they could repurpose the puck design from the old FoxTrax system.

@@SWalkerTTU i don't know exactly how that one works, but it seems like it works with lights, which in turn would cause the same problems as the other mentioned methods.

thats why they installed cameras for world cup

agreed

Wading song video

Poor joke

Harz.exe de

First string team

+Dan Kennedy Have you read the rulebook?

true

wt7h

Thats why they have VAR now

Karuna Shrestha and var still sucks hard

Be o piçin amk onun için bayrak açanında

Hemen hızlı hızlı gelip boş şeylere bayrakları asıyorsunuz

what is that?

+JamalPLAYS MC where there is a ref who watches the replays and makes a decision

Jazzicals Mr skeleton hands man yes in soccer it’s called var but it’s not used in la liga and other leagues for some reason

That ball was still in Play due to the ball being a sphere the outer edge was still in play so it still counts as a goal

Right 👍

It doesn’t actually work like that goal line tech is only used inside the goal and in the Fifa WC scenario the ball sends signals that tell the VAR room when to check to see if it’s in play or not.

+Erik Arustamyan or even better install a small go pro inside the goal post so it won't affect balls being blocked and face it towards the other post and also ask the fucking rules to change where if footage shows a goal credit it rather than following the blind af referee

242 now

+Kelvi Bulku (Pr3d4t0rElite18) Don't forget Chelsea ;)

254

+Kelvi Bulku (Pr3d4t0rElite18) You mean England (1966).....

Joao Antonio Nope.

Its impossible...

+Agustinøx Jrø it is possible

FOOOT Manuel How exactly?

Agustinøx Jrø the ball could have been hit so hard the camera falls off and then the GK is under the camera trying to get the ball and then BOOM gets knocked out 😎

FOOOT Manuel And personally , i don't think that a player would kick directly to the cameras/sensor just to throw it. It would be childish and stupid.

Well yes, it is more fun

it's a process

yeh in sports u need creativity not a bunch of machines

Hobbit Stomper Football is the best and most loved sports in the world. The amalgamation of talent and technology would reduce unfairness in games. FIFA knows more than you so they know how and when to bring new technology in action.

Aidid Rashed First off, there is not such thing as "best" in life. Anyone who uses the word "best" to compare anything in life, is clearly immature. Second, the reason FIFA doens't update their technology, is because FIFA is run by a bunch of 70-80 year old conservative men who are afraid of change. They grew up without technology, and they think that technology will ruin the sport. This way of conservative thinking is wrong. Our world is constantly changing, so we need to adapt to it as well. All the other sports that introduced technology just got more popular and a lot fairer.

***** Well it also improves the game. And stops cheating from happening.

***** It takes less time than you think also.

Yeah just like in hockey

they should definitely look at replays for diving, but only in the box/penalty situations. otherwise i'll be wasting my whole day watching spain

***** Slow motion exists.

+ae TÂY ĐÔNG CLAN you put the camera just behind the post facing the line, that's it.

+ae TÂY ĐÔNG CLAN well then you know it's a goal for sure if it hits the camera in the net

why not? it works well in rugby

But the ref can't see it

At the current time

What people are afraid of is that replays would slow down the game. But I think they should do it during important games or, more specifically, starting at the 80th minute of an important match while the teams are searching for the winning goal.

ybk360 To let the game slow down when the players are tired might be bad... or good.

Should they have timeouts too?

This system eliminates the need for the refs to take the time to review a replay.

Angel Bonilla There was no need for sarcasm. He's absolutely right. Most of American games are usually being reviewed by the referrers in slow motion in order to make a right call. What's point to waste your time to wait this technology to develop efficiently in the meanwhile most of matches get slaughtered by referees rather than just looking the cameras ?

Del 2013, y estamos en 2022

It's in epl

+yazan774 UEFA wil implement the technology in 2016-2017 UCL.

also did some research its really expensive, talkin like 500k to be installed in one stadium

+Melbourne Freekickerz thats not that much compared to the price of the clubs

Bpl

+PennyHerbst You would have to pause play while they look at the slow mo, what if another incident happens between the goal and the slo mo recognising the goal

Pav4n Because it's fucking expensive, goals can't really be moved again, it will be even more expensive, if something breaks, and it's not necessarily a useful effort. Plus, what happens, if referees start to count on this and then it doesn't work maybe one time? Nothing is flawless, but i'd rather have a very small human flaw than a very expensive technical flaw, which makes it lose all it's purpose.

It's not expensive relative for the money that is in football, at around £250K per install and it will last years and years, Premier League officials earn between £70,000/yr and £85,000/yr a year, the system pays for itself in the long run. Goals don't really get moved often, on the rare occasions where the groundsmen change the pitch they are more likely to repaint along the sides of the pitch. You seem to expect the system to have errors, Hawk-eye has been used in tennis for 10 years, and in other sports like cricket for nearly as long, this isnt exactly new technology. Even if Hawk-Eye was to slip up once, it would still be more accurate than a referee, look at all the close calls it has made already in the Premier League without incident. The reason this technology is needed isn't because the job cannot be done by a human, but because the decision needs to be instant, something a human cannot do. The reason it needs to be instant is so the ref can stop the game and declare the goal has been scored. You can't pause the game, or go back at a later time and declare that was a goal and play must be stopped, that's not football.

Pav4n uhm, your calculation is actuallypretty much non-existent. You don't pay more officials only because they need to watch the goals. The pitch is changed almost every year in some stadiums and therefore the goals have to be moved and everything maybe has to be installed again. But you areabsolutely right that the decision has to be instand, sometimes refs don't see that the situation has to be reviewed, i didn't think of that. Well but there still are problems. In football, the pitch is many, many times larger than a tennis court and the lines are sometimes not as visible as in other sports. And how does the camera decide, if it was the ball or just a head, which was going over the line?

+Etherion Refs aren't allowed to use replays as confirmation of goals .

Keezy .S for fights fauls and giving out cards

haha so true

I some times wonder that too, the ball goes out of the line, and instead of a throw-in, the game just continues on.

"it's well over the line" 5 yards away From the line XD

SpacePod9 no on FIFA games it is 100% correct but the replay stops at the wrong moment which makes it look like it wasn't a goal

+josh m ^^^^

He was reading it so he can speak better in english

+Alfie Williams No, you can see a shadow holding something like a gun that was pointed at him!

He is turkish

Be respect.He is speak other language.What do you want? He speak like an Englishman?

Because it took a very long time to develop, and it's probably a hassle to redesign it for anything else.

Andy Cox windows 7 was out in 2010 when they decided to make it...

TyloriusTechTips It doesn't make a different any OS will do the job.

because in real business world, not everything require "upgrade" just because there is a new version available for something. or go with orkham's razor, simplest explanation: they had a XP client at that day. these kind of software are usually developed platform-independent. xp or vista or 7 or 8 is not relevant. they are just operating systems, hence tools.

exactly people need to understand that the underline technology is what matters and user interface is just for the avg users

I know right, it's easier than waiting for two years to have it installed

It's harder to make an instant decision with cameras. You have to watch the replay and decide. Since football time is always going it takes unnecessary time.

+Joel Ayala doesn't matter. The game already is so long and time is wasted on every occassion (throw in's, corner kick, freekick etc). also those situations don't happen really often, so i would rather have a correct decision and play 94 instead of 92 minutes than having a wrong decision and just save two minutes. In the end those two minutes don't matter at all.

i think most football fans would prefer no replays

slows the game down too much

Exactly

the ref is allowed to change his decision.. it happened couple of times in soccer.. if there is a definitive reason to change it.. most recent to memory is kloses goal that was awarded then was cancelled when he told the ref he scored it with his hand.. then the ref cancelled the goal..

good on him

Abran Alvarez well it just happened in the fa cup final this year