lol...always

+Brandon Garcia What, you rather have royalty free music?

i know right why dont they play drake - marvins room

+dj stankdaddy ok gonna go there.....; Why not Darude-Sandstorm?

Because space is dramatic

Hey love your videos

Suuhh dude

+TheVolitionSociety They didn't "forget to turn off the gravity", they're in NEAR space. Aka, Gravity is still acting on the rocket. But what do I know.

+Jeremy Burne You missed the joke, m8.

+dante42lk shit I hope that's true. I've seen too many fucktards on KZfaq who are completely serious saying very similar things to that!

What? CGI?

​@@tankthelord1178 name a video cgi producing program. go ahead. you clearly did your research

@@Robert99909 NVidia for one - it doesn't take a program it just takes programmers to do it.

@@tankthelord1178 People like you are the reason this world isn't advanced.

@@C0ncep1t Yeah right, you are the fool for believing something that is not real.

Can we have the gopro footage from launch to "being in space" or are we gonna use a fisheye lense at earths outer orbit

​@@MrViovasviGoPros have fisheye lens so... What are you asking for?

@@MrViovasvi Yes you can. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/fdKFhbl0sJvZmqM.htmlsi=y40iloIzGKhdLzak

@@zeendaniels5809 for it to be uncut footage from one gopro fisheye lense. start to finish. launch to landing, is it not possible?

This is fake! You can see and hear how the rocket hit something, and then it was edited to a fake rocket in space. 😮

+Fabien White haha, exactly what I was thinking.

+Fabien White me gusta

yes me gusta

+Fabien White I wonder if the spinning was on purpose or a tolerable side effect of the go pros

+Ethan Schoen It's spinning on purpose, it's for gyroscopic stabilization.

Its because of that shot, that it won the gopro awards

Straight from a sci-fi movie

why would they freak out?

@Paradoxic Knox inverted earthers

@Paradoxic Knox damn!!! The earth ain't round, the earth ain't flat... The earth is a ring. WAIT... THAT'S ILLEGAL!!!!

but its a hoot to see the idiots

Too bad it's entirely CGI. I proved this in a comment on this video 7 years ago, and GoPro Channel deleted it.

@@adamchurvis1 its not cgi, it was a mission for nasa kzfaq.info/get/bejne/d6unfrKWqNCUmok.html

@@adamchurvis1 : LOL, sure you did, champ. So you're claiming a craft can't go up 73 miles? Why? Magic? Don't you flatters claim it hit the dome? So does this claim of yours not destroy the FE claims of so many others? And here's some 411 for you, son. Make your own video showing your proof. Who would delete it? You? But you won't, because you're just too lazy to. That's ok. I'm sure you feel big and that's all that matters, right?

That's what we do here

Indeed

it is horrible too.

@@Jack-kx2lv true but that's not the case

AGREED!!!!!!!

Yeah it's phenomenal that part!

Because the camera has more weight than the strings

Calm down homie

spacex just changed the system lol. they have a live feed and land their boosters for footage.

@@ethanbuno-an8002 Pre recorded live feed that sheep like you believe in, nice religion.

ksp

I'm pretty sure the gopro wasn't just stuck to the side of the rocket. lol

@@falcoperegrinus82 Seriously? I think double sided tape is that strong :) Mach 5 is nothing for double sided tape

A gopro on the side of the rocket would be a plastic residue by the time it reached space. Also would cause drag, unevenly.

Because it still inside the earth atmosphere, below the karman line. Nothing much change with the temperature and pressure

@@falcoperegrinus82 Part of it does have to be sticking out, though, to get a straight shot down the length of the rocket to the engines. If you put the GoPro all the way inside the rocket so it was flush with the side, we'd only have a view from looking straight out from the side into blank space and a little of the earth at the bottom, but no rocket would be in the frame.

Tregeta this is disturbingly devoid of explosions and rapid unplanned disassemblies.

Tregeta I think they forgot to turn on the SAS mode. It's rotating so vigorously.

Gokul k anil lol like this tiny rocket is going to have SAS. if it was in KSP, though, it would 😛

Flat Kerbin theory

I wonder why this didn’t explode... That’s pretty... unusual...

NASA IS A BIG FAKE IN THE LIFE

@@nextplay2134 this is not nasa wtf

@@RobertoHerrera-bm4pl that just shows you how stupid and ignorant they are.

Imagine not adding the SD card.

Imagine forgetting to charge the cam

hahahahaha

When it's centered it's convex. Why cherry pick?

@Mutsyti because there's videos when it doesn't change at all...

@@joshallotta9450 If you're saying that in those videos the horizon doesn't curve, that is because they aren't high enough. You're again cherry picking, why in the videos where they are too low to see a curve you believe those but in the videos they've gone high enough to see the curve you don't believe those.

@Mutsyti it's never high enough lol

Yeah if you skip to 1:57 it's actually concave : ]

Why they don’t show u full video of it passing the atmosphere

I remember from mw2

Interstaller

Ghost

Launch the Focken Nukes

too much...

WAIT WHAT ARE YOU DOING HERE LMFAYO yeah mate it is indeed really cool

Young Schlatt Young Schlatt

HI SCHLATT!!!

Oh wow it's jschlatt from 4 years ago

NASA IS A BIG FAKE IN THE LIFE

The earth is a flat and this is the evidence. They always use a fish-eye lens camera to make a curve but here we can see a concave. All of it is a fake.

That's because of a type of wide angle lens, I believe

It’s only possible to look like that (with a GoPro) “if the earths horizon is flat!” If it was a sphere, at that angle it would only appear to flatten out. Facts!

@@jazznotes3802 What?

@@Julmaa87 Basically if the earth was a sphere (round globe 🌎) the inversion @1:55 would not concave like it does. It would just straighten out. But if you use a GoPro upside down on a flat object it would concave equally both ways. If you still don’t get what I’m saying, do an experiment on a round vs flat object and see for yourself. The earth is a flat!

+M3TR0P0LiS Media That is the best part! wow, absolute luck indeed

+M3TR0P0LiS Media I was amazed, thought it was fake at first!

Carl Hancock Perhaps they just had like 6 cameras around it in a ring so it was guaranteed that at least one would be pointing it. Probably better for weight distribution too.

+M3TR0P0LiS Media I know I did. What a serendipitous bit of good fortune!

+M3TR0P0LiS Media What's so great about that clip?

+Michael Montes Oh yes!

Agreed

+Michael Montes Dam and GoPro has a dope 360 camera too. They dropped the ball on that one!

+Michael Montes It Is Not Permitted. They Are Hiding Our Real Plain.

+We Are USURPER GROUP United. DM1-L13 FHHH HLLC Our real plain bagel?

It's amazing to me how much evidence there is from SO many different sources, yet some people out there are still dumb enough to believe it is flat. They really think they're quite special.

​@@AlphaRaine يا اخي الامريكين نشرو عقلية المؤامرات عند العرب لقد اصبحو مجنين جدا بعض منهم يكره ناسا بشكل كبير جدا لدرجة التعصب يحولون ان يربطوها بلدين حتا ينشرو الفكرة اغبياء حقا 💀

This video was posted 7 yrs ago

But we're afraid of a balloon ahahahahhahahahahahha

Did you even watch it? The fisheye lens was making it look concave half the time, while in the middle where it creates no distortion it was perfectly flat. So, yeah...

@@istvantoth9647 1:50 There is a curve. It's not the result of a fisheye, otherwise the rocket would be distorted as well.

@@Error-yv8ec I did, that's how I know it's not real curve.

@Social Phobic Royalty Instead they're watching fake space videos because that's much more productive...

@@A23xander The rocket is distorted, but it's so thin along the line of the fisheye effect that it's barely noticable.

All 17 of them

JAJAJAJAJJAJAJAJA TRUE!!!!!😂😂😂😂

+Moto Canada (Spirito Diaboli) Even they'd love to see someone reach a fairytale land.

pauahahahahah no it is the Fish eye of gopro ahahah the world is cubic

+Jay Cea And bastards that don't think we've developed space technology and believe it's all lies. I hate 'em.

The earth is not a ball of bendy water though 😊

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/rqt5epx_zrq4p58.htmlsi=Luw1ZsIFqUA4Dtlv

@@whatislifebro yeah, it's a sphere of rock instead

@@CarlosAM1 with bendy water on it? Last time I checked water sits level. No matter how large it is.

@@whatislifebro bruh you gotta be trolling

This one’s better. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/rqt5epx_zrq4p58.htmlsi=Luw1ZsIFqUA4Dtlv

Bel andung.

Bep t Belppp

@@maxilbdg1370 learn English fuckwit

Yea man, see ya

Yeaahhh

Did he receive money for the reward? Crazy to imagine going out there...

@@lennartherrmann3057 he didn't receive anything, only a piece of cake 😔

@@lukie2588 TF are u talking about

@@Andr14nt0 r/woosh

RIP

;)

***** LMAO

How so? They just made the camera that was used..

@@Julmaa87 because this was 6 years ago and I was really high. Plus the music is chill. Now I have children and am drug free. Life is so crazy.

@@nasem7470 So it was, 6 years doesn’t feel that long.. oh well..

That’s a fish eyed lense

​@@osamasufian24 there are other version with no fish eye lens

@@osamasufian24 The reason is that the camera has a wide angle lens (you capture much more than you would with a standard lens.) which offers a much wider field of view. The consequence is that objects that are more towards the periphery look curved. When the edge of the globe is in the center of the frame, much less is captured

Fish eye lens, the Earth goes convex when it flips Earth is flat

@@osamasufian24incorrect

yeah like wtf

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/jd6Je5h0vcjUiXU.html

outer space? didnt look like that to me, rocket goes up...falls back down.

@@alchemistreaction935 goes up into outer space

outer space = outside earth's SOI i think

+Capitão Brasil it's Call Of Duty Ghosts

+Capitão Brasil Gravity.. In CoD Infinity Warfare u can see ships .. Here nothing ..

+Teámo I thought he meant Ghosts until i found out there really was a CoD infinity warfare

...Duh. This is Infinite Warfare 2.

They messed up the editing tho and we have a lot of sheep watching... at 1:53 they forgot to keep earth curved, and curved the other way lol

@@benan7852 🤡☝

⁠​⁠@@benan7852 Its called refraction. Atleast im pretty sure it is, the speed of light changes as it goes from vacuum to air, and as the light you see is passing through different densities of atmosphere, that also changes how the light refracts. So the light bends depending on the optical density of a substance. Meaning we see the change in curvature And before you say anything about flat earth you’ll need to explain why gravity is different at different locations at sea level, and why gravity has less effect the further you move away from earth. Basically, prove that GMM/r^2 is false

@@Mystic_Voidbro you kept them quiet 😂😂

@@Mystic_Void This is how I see these arguments always go> lol idk prove that GMM/r^2 isnt false. You cant ask people to go on a 20year math jounrey if you dont go first being the one to bring it up. The answer: go read what they claim in books. Go into the institutions and get indoctrinated by all the other "supporting" math and theories.

boi Thats wahatijdifuasfdsh

*sees comment* *subtracts two years from the current year to see if comment was posted in 2016*

Sm00th TV you mean 1:52 ?

+Gamesmaster 3000X ikr..hahah

It's just luck you can't stick RCS to an amateur rocket to control it's turning.

It can easily be done with the series of rapidly spinning wheels that use inertia to rotate the rocket without expending any fuel. They're called reaction Wheels.

@@iantaggart3064 add the weight of that system

People are blind, and only believe tv

super fake globe dung

Liam O'Dowd When Neil Degrasse Tyson appeared on TV and did his little rap show, at what altitude did he calculate curvature was visible from? Did this rocket attain said altitude? Mmm...no...cuz you're dumb...lol

Liam O'Dowd 36 thumbs up their butts lol

Liam O'Dowd This flat Earth nonsense is getting out of control

sonnyblack0870 we are making a good job :)

I have a question what did the rocket hit 1:00

ur funny bro , we all know the truth when we died

Why? This is CGI, I guess

It's pointless trying to prove a point to someone who doesn't consider facts that invalidate their theory. You'll make yourself go insane in the process

We just learned that your a lier, there’s something called a core? The earth is round

r/woooosh

@@Minecrafter6818 Dude, are you serious? we can CLEARLY tell thats a donut.

Minecrafter6818 yes man it’s huge donut 🍩 🤗

you know "barrel distortion"?

The money shot.

That was supposed to happen.

@@benpickens9918 But not on camera.

Arpan Akash Ray Actually yeah, it was probably even planned this way, since it is a very important stage of the rockets re-entry into the Earths Stratosphere, so yes, they would’ve wanted to document it.

BetaPotata Wow you are dumb. *sigh* ok, how do I explain this to you? i.ytimg.com/vi/v184lSB2LHI/maxresdefault.jpg Look up information about what you are attempting to prove before you make yourself look even more braindead.

@Ivanhoe ॐ lol

Look pass that and you'll see no star's... how is that? Total darkness.

@@524enaud because of the camera

@@iliilil5761 cameras can't capture stars?

@@524enaud if you film the sky with your phone the stars probably cant be seen

maybe years? WHOLE LIFE OF MANY PEOPLE YOU IGNORANT

years? this is planned for maybe a month. it's a test rocket they have hundreds of them ready

Of course... This is the GoPro channel. Did you genuinely expected to see something else here?

@@user_-vm2tf 2:22 flat earth sorry kids 🤩 A fisheye lens is an ultra wide-angle lens that produces strong visual distortion intended to create a wide panoramic or hemispherical image.

I assure you that no one involved in this launch cared one bit about seeing the shape of the earth. They all know it's a sphere.

@@kitcanyon658 🙄

@@robertosanchez8793 : Thanks for admitting the earth is a sphere. Next question?

Purlee100 CGI troll

Purlee100 But it’s a fisheye lens being used, isn’t it?

Joel Tunnah yes it is thats why it goes round back.n forth

plusmetal rise Well according to Nasa every "picture" they have is a composite. Meaning they're all CGI

Joel Tunnah so is every lens thats took footage of earth from space a fisheye lens? Thats convenient for you.

Ye

They don't Dislike the video, they just hate GoPro

+Zyxo No, they dislike the video.

+Josh g no they just think the earth is flat

+ThreeWrap I disliked it because it's edited in such a way to show something that didn't really happen the way it really did. The slow motion speed they shot at made things more dramatic and seem to "float". Meanwhile thats not what happened, the entire ride was violent, they just slowed the footage down so it looked like shots from movies. Much more of a faked look than what was really happened. Thats why.

its made to look like a cinematic stop being buthurt cause it looked cool

Absolutely

+Rex Tube that was lucky

+DaniloDeriu very lucky, is almost impossible to control that spinning, but probably they will have GoPro cameras around the whole rocket, so it's just be lucky and create nice slowmo scenes

+Rex Tube yea,amazing shot

+Rex Tube I was waiting for another stage to ignite.

me too!

lol

+Duct Tape lol I saw one from a concave earth believer

Me beweve in qubic wurld naut phlat m9

same

🤣😂🤣 I'm dyin

Haha

Flat earther

*Yeah, Like Your Head!*

Loo

Shoot, wrong video. Ignore my deleted reply. Yes this uses a fish eye lens. But the one I thought this was the MESOS amateur rocket launch which did not use a fish eye lens yet showed curvature.

theoneandonly, who said that this video is about to prove anything and have no fish eye lenses, you absolute I***cile? Can't you read the description and make a comment without idiotic assertions?

Facts

nutella oh stop 😥 scary thought. You'd be dead in minutes

You couldn't you would vaporize if you did

Have to tell you this. Santa brought me a massive jar of Nutella

that will be fun. But where do you hold on? XD

Light Man only ate a spoon full. Was great

@@grandpatoothless8162 Your mom doesn't exist.

@@grandpatoothless8162 found the dummy

@@grandpatoothless8162 shhh it's time to take your sleep medication

Flat earthers know GoPro's use a fish eye lense

@@IFentonito And the proof of distortion is right in the video itself when the lens line up the horizon in the centre of the camera and you see a straight line.

@@UToobUsername01 I know! When the camera is level the horizon is flat, explain that, this camera surely has to be like 25,000ft up and the horizon is still eye level

At the minute 1:46 the earth is a globe and at 1:56 the earth is a donut... how stupid can the globbard be... stupidity has no limits with you. This is the fish eye effect stupid stubborn ...

Fish eye

+Thakrulll Is it they just got lucky or some kind of control?

+Nick Liao pure luck

+Nick Liao maybe enough cameras to catch everything

luckiest shot in the history of aerospace

HEY SPACE NERD......ITS ALL ''SPACE SCIENCE LIES.'' PLS GET THE JAB. WE DONT NEED IDIOTS LIKE YOU

@@Guitarman7133 Oh just shut it. We have mounds of evidence to what we say and you have none.

@@generalgrievous5452 please for the love of god let me see your mounds of evidence you are referring to.

@@theBomified Your original comment isn't showing. What did you say that I disagreed with?

I love a minute in, when the rotation almost stops, loses speed, decline altitude, then the next clip space. Almost as good as Nixons phone call to the moon before cordless phones, 😂

No, the planet is quite large. How much does your math determine of the earth that you should see from ~72 miles?

Go back to sleep

Sleep, you need to wake up

@@301gobluehailmich1 aahh but you are for a real psychiatric hospital, you want to ruin the research of hundreds of thousands of professionals around the world for decades with those arguments of a primary school child, really, seek to study physics, astronomy, mechanics classical, particle physics, atomic physics, thermodynamics or quantum mechanics, so that you get out of such ignorance, in truth, for the good of those around you.

@@thomassacrato8662 aahh but you are for a real psychiatric hospital, you want to ruin the research of hundreds of thousands of professionals around the world for decades with those arguments of a primary school child, really, seek to study physics, astronomy, mechanics classical, particle physics, atomic physics, thermodynamics or quantum mechanics, so that you get out of such ignorance, in truth, for the good of those around you.

+BugSplat lol

Leave now 😂😂😂💀 I'm done

you misspelled rock it.

Stephen McAllister Lol xD

+BugSplat sorry I had too 😃

Hell yes my friend

+Fire_Element But is it a sphere? CONSPIRACY? ILLUMINATI?!?!?

edited

Funny that you say that. Go to 1:50 you can see the alteration that occurs that indicates fish lens. The curvature bends outwards instead of inwards. Now why is that? Flat earth confirmed?

+Fire_Element Haha are u really that afraid that what you know might not be true ? Are you relieved right now ? "I know the earth is round because i watched a 5 min video". Nice logic.

oh shit... nice perspective

Now that you said that, i see it

Indeed the earth is flatxD

Yeah haven't notice yet

Lmoa yeah

You must have escaped from the zoo, Please return science accidentally evolved you! If the earth is round, at what time do you level for vertical? If water always finds itself level, where does it start the curve? Your head is more than just a brain holder

Shine a light on a ball and create a horizon for me Mr.Believe what you’re told

Pra No they don't... What member of the Russian government thinks the US faked the moon landing? Surely they would've kicked up more of a fuss back in the day, given the stakes? But they didn't. They formally congratulated the US on their achievement.

Pra Right, but who would be in a better position to dispute the US's claims to have landed on the moon but their historical enemy, the USSR, who would certainly have been monitoring the US space program with their extensive spy network, as well as via their own satellites? The USSR had comparable technology to the US during this period and were close to launching their own manned moon missions. If the US really did cheat, why didn't the USSR cry foul? They would have been in a better position than anyone to do so.

Ong Back Yes, whenever it's pointed out that your conspiracy theory doesn't make any sense, just plug your ears and shout "JEWS JEWS JEWS". Lol.

Ong Back If by "wake up" you mean, accept your delusions as fact, yeah, you're probably right.

Ong Back And what term other than "conspiracy theory" describes the notion that the world's two most powerful governments were, for the entirety of the 20th century controlled by a shadowy, faceless organization of Zionists who controlled not just the KGB, but also the CIA and pull the puppet strings of world governments in order to advance their nefarious agenda. Please tell me what term you think more aptly describes this proposition other than CONSPIRACY THEORY? That's LITERALLY what you've just described. A theory. About a conspiracy. A conspiracy theory. What am I missing here?

Also nothing but CGI

@@fgpt4828 don't be ignorant please do some research and study, OK?

😂😂😂

yeah

For multiple cameras, it would be a very long video. Like, VERY long.

+M3TR0P0LiS Media would be better for me anyway

+GeStealth HD just what I was thinking. A little too many gaps, jumping from one altitude to another without explanation of what happened in between. Would have been better to have a consistent uninterrupted time line. I like the slow-mo bits, but they could have done some fast-mo bits to fill-in the blanks.

+Seb Gibbs exactly!

😂 🤣

Worst feeling ever.

Ha ha ha

I open my eyes after that to snap out of it lol

swimming on the moon is what I want to see and do!

+Matthew F Reyes If you want to swim on the moon you need to learn more about space; YOU CANT SWIM IN SPACE ITS IMPOSSIBLE

Cool idea but because the stars are very dim and it will be hard to see them in a video. Just test it yourself, try filming the stars at night on your phone, you won't see much. The best way to get images of the stars is with long exposure photography which requires the camera to be steady.

Tom McDonald what about long exposure video camera?

+sranjesuper while flying at rocket speed?

sranjesuper it won't exactly work as you wish it would

because the camera cant focus and ignores the small amount of light that actually reaches us so it shows as a black image for space so even at night it wouldn't work u just wouldn't be able to see the earth ether :}

I am not sure why that is the most important part. Yes, of course it would be better when it was uncut, but why is the altitude important? What do you expect to see in that shot?

@@sebastiannolte1201 did you come to watch a rocket ascend through our Atmosphere before teleporting 100,000 ft or did you come to watch it ascend into space? Let me ask you this question, did you even notice it happened before my comment? I bet not, which is why I left the comment, most probably didn't notice. Personally, I came to watch it ascend into space with a full view uncut. Sorry if we can't all just accept cut videos, some of us are looking for something uncut. They could atleast come up with a good excuses as to why they rarely/if ever seem to film that part. They could say the ionosphere tampers with the equipment, causing it to become unusable at that height, alas they don't even give us an excuse as to why, because no one challenges it. As to what I expected to see....I expected to see the whole video. The real question is why do you think it is cut? What possible reason could they have for not giving us the whole video. Is it some how unfounded to ask for uncut, when if it was any other situation no one would accept a cut video. For example, if I sent you a video that WEF guy saying he wanted to eliminate 50% of people, would you not want to see the uncut part where he is actually talking about eliminating 50% of the people who cant afford to buy their medicine. Sorry some of us have to remain critical, otherwise the world's entirely doomed. I can assure you I'm equally skeptical of everything.

Yeah that will never happen because it never did happen lol :)

@@Hold_the_Front_777 : You said it yourself. There is no reason to cut it. Meaning, they aren’t hiding anything

@@kitcanyon658 ok... Not once in either of my comments did I say there was 'no reason to cut it. Reread it and you will see I clearly said they could atleast give a good excuse. So your stance is if we just assume there was no reason to cut it.... Then why was it cut? See how circular that logic becomes... And basically just comes down to we trust there's no reason to cut it, so they cut it, and therefore we trust there's nothing to hide. If you could find one video that shows that altitude, with an altitude meter, that would be a more substantive argument to therefore jump to the conclusion of therefore this particular video wasn't trying to hide anything. Until then I watched a several minute video for nothing, because I can't send an edited video to anyone as having verified anything. Obviously.

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/mMd1ndl93NrYaKc.html

At one point the camera made earth look completely concave

it was stopped in +- 254 000 (it has was stopped by something and it couldn't go anymore) and at the same time frame was changed and became > 395 000 ft ? why they didn't showed as how rocket go from 254 to 395 ? it is more than 140 000 ft ; don't you think it is a very strange? how it go up further ? when it was stopped ? and why they changed frame ? and how he came down to eartH? when it went where the vacuum is ? it's very strange ; once it is flying in outer space and buc it is caming buck like nothing ;

@@Phantom-sg3wr there exist a thing called propellant has been fully drained and the engine has no more fuel to run.

+Rcbif so awesome, with that said I can't help but imagine that it's possible expert level cgi stuff

+Rcbif not luck... Spielberg