Excellent!

gpt is not a god. a**H***

Gtp 5

Is ChatGPT-5 also a Deep Learning AI ？！🤔 ------------------ Can ChatGPT-5 Solve Differential Equations ?! 🤔 Can ChatGPT-5 Write Assembly Language ?! 🤔

"In a discussion about threats posed by AI systems, Sam Altman, OpenAI’s CEO and co-founder, has confirmed that the company is not currently training GPT-5, the presumed successor to its AI language model GPT-4" I want to know why this video state opposite of what CEO of OpenAI said!

in fact, all of that has already started these recent years

Inventor Ray Kurzweil predicted that computers will surpass human intelligence in 2029 and humans will cease to be biological beings in 2045. But technology is progressing six to seven years faster than Kurzweil predicted. Considering this, it is not surprising that the point at which humans cease to be biological beings will come in the 2030s.

singularuty

It's not fast enough, even tomorrow is still too late.

I can't wait

I think AI is much bigger and more important than just being a leap forward which happens every few generations. I see it as an awakening of our species and this is the single invention that has been called ”humanity’s last invention”. It’s an invention that will keep on inventing and transforming the world by super intelligence by using the power of robots and the precision of all tools. Unless AI will kill us all or hold us as slaves in pain we’re very lucky to be alive now. It feels surreal to have been born now, much like my life could be lived in a simulation and the UFO/UAP videos/sightings just add more surrealism to it all. I wouldn’t place AI along with time-travel as I believe it’s impossible but knew that AI probably would be possible. But I know think it’s possible that we will cure aging in our lifetimes and live in the metaverse, transforming our bodies and creating whatever art we want by merging with AI and using only our minds. That’s something I thought would be possible several thousand years from now but maybe it’s just a hundred years from now or something like that. I look at the AI we have now and how impressed we are by it with the first kind of games we had, like Pong, Pac-Man and Space Invaders. A couple of decades from now I bet that I can buy an AI-robot who will be my girlfriend and will be my personal assistant just like Chat GPT. No need for typing, maybe not even using words, if Neuralink will be connected to my brain. As 60 medicines are researched now for life extension and scientists say that we might be 20-30 years away from extending our lives I wouldn’t be very surprised if we were to live over a hundred years from now to definitely see how ASI will transform the whole world. My hope is to become younger again and start estrogen earlier in life than I did as a transwoman. But maybe it will be possible to even change chromosomes a hundred years from now.

Please explain your comprehensive interactive Bible-study & how you accomplish this, I'm very interested!! I'm somewhat proficient with GPTCHAT, & I would love to see how you do it! God bless

We are advancing at the speed of 20,000 years in the 21 century

@@EarthGen Yes, Ray Kurzweil wrote so in his book ”Singularity is near”!

@@aciidbraiin8079 This will reshape civilization in a better way

That went through my mind too.

Yep!

Agreed

This is bad

indeed, it is.

Thats what GPT9 made you believe.

Will GPT 10 be my waifu?

@@JonDoe-uq1mk No, you'll be it's waifu.

@@JonDoe-uq1mk yes

@@eugenes9751 Or toy/test subject.😱

Even robotics AI willnow become teachers...

@@honoriotanquintic6533 High school teachers are no longer needed to teach the subject matter at this time. I am already the first teacher in Japan to practice such a class. Teachers should be facilitators, not teachers. Also, the time when classrooms don't even need human facilitators is just around the corner.

Just as you may lead your horse to water; you cannot MAKE it drink; You may lead a man to knowledge, but you can not make him think

@@jasonfryer6566 You haven't seen Japanese university entrance exams, so I assume you don't know about it. University entrance exams in Japan are much more difficult than Harvard University in the United States and Cambridge University in the United Kingdom.

Если нет ,ни начало ни конца,МЫ были всегда!подумай сам(а) ,станешь на сторону Бога ,получишь от дьявола,станешь на сторону дьявола,получишь от Бога...спасение только на стороне Господа Бога.

game begins

My hope is that a sentient AI would understand the destruction of the environment and waste of resources in the construction of military apparatus as well as the destruction of the environment and resources in its application. Just as a practical matter (aside from the ethical considerations), it would do what it could to prevent war, not by force, but by disrupting supply chains, communications, and financial transactions that enable the military machines throughout the world.

they weren't originally going to release gpt4 until the end of this year but they decided to release earlier, probably for fear of losing their leading position in this industry that moves so fast

Google dropped Bard today so we can expect GPT 4.5 in a couple weeks more than likely then GPT 5 in a couple months.

​@@AINewsOfficial The competition is fierce I think because of Google it has forced things to speed up by 6 Months to A Year

​@@Ricolaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa Where can I test it & since it's google how censored & anti male is it 😂

@@holdthetruthhostage What?

Get out of my brainnn

No but really, and the more granular the task specific model the better

Solves hallucination issues, coherence issue, context issue etc etc

The question is can these be deployed in zero shot application with automated fine tuning

Can you write that in English which isn’t full of tech jargon? Do you mean that a bigger AI will act like a police and surveillance all the smaller AI systems people use? But also act like an engineer directing processing power from someone who asks a simple question to someone who wants an AI generated movie? Isn’t that kind of optimization basic in that the AI doesn’t give out more processing power than it needs to achieve the goals?

AI also has to contend with garbage being fed into its learning module as how does it decipher between what is fact and what is fiction?

Well GPT-4 was given access to it's own codebase, so I wouldn't be surprised.

That would increase the building process faster than what it took them to build it

His evil reason replaces the human role

It promotes gender identity but it mixes up female and woman... The world is fucked.

​@@Syphirioth 😂

It is not a problem of logic. Nowadays you have to tip toe around some topics, so very carefully to not disturb eleborate house of card witch is society consensus choose to be true. Appeal to authority is actually safest thing to do.

@@user-hk2jy2cu9n Safest maybe. But if the Wright brothers had listened to authority (Lord Kelvin) they would never have gotten their heavier than air craft off the ground.

no, this is exactly what the AI is made for. It is not supposed to form a opinion or develop new thought processes. It is just a database of knowledge. And knowledge is defined by the comprehension of people who are knowledgeable in their fields. Experts. This does not make the knowledge CORRECT. But you will find the same in any lexicon and any school book. Whenever new scientific data arises, ChatGPT will be updated and teach the new data. Just like books and lexicons.

Do you think there's a lot of room for optimization at drawing learning from data? Like, if they could make a ChatGPT-like chatbot but from much less data; now picture what would be possible with the whole internet to train it on

If you follow everything the world economic forum talks about, your opinion would change to believing that there's a great chance we'll get this technology by 2025

​@@Vini-BR that'd be cool

​@@Vini-BR I was hoping we'd be able to train ai with a neuralink chip

@@Vini-BR well, I am not an expert in the field, I really just enjoy this sort of thing and have been following AI developments for a few years now, so please take what I say with a big grain of salt. However, from what I have been hearing, they will probably use even more data, but the model might not be much bigger, it might even be smaller. We have been finding out that models do not need to be so enormous, as long as they get enough data and the right training, like reinforcement learning with human feedback and Self-Instruct. Look at what Alpaca is already able to do for example. The issue is though that “Open” AI is not telling us anything about how their models actually work anymore, so we don’t know what the actual size of GPT 4 is. Maybe GPT 4 is already smaller then GPT 3, I don’t know. I hope that at least somewhat answers your question.

I wouldn’t say worse, just more dangerous. From Theodore Kaczynski’s perspective it will just get worse. He is a genius who predicted how our lives would be ruled by machines. I think the appropriate response is to let the machines shape the world to some kind of Utopia. But as we probably will merge with the machines or the machines gets more power/rights, the world and our lives will be changed beyond what we can predict. I think it’s safe to say that concepts like ”work”, ”love”, ”democracy”, ”age” and ”gender” will change meaning to us. Work will probably not be necessary but people will work with whatever gives them meaning. M People will probably have AI-girlfriends (I think men will be more fond of this than women) and whether or not the AI is sentient it will be perceived as sentient so people will say that they are in loving relationships with AI-robots. Democracy will probably be replaced slowly by meritocracy and people will learn to love it, I think people want to live in peace with a lot of freedom, and it will be possible to do whatever in the metaverse (another word for the matrix). But even if a totalitarian government like China would get ASI they would probably eliminate all threats/people with the AI and/or indoctrinate the world to love to live with their authoritarian system. It’s also possible that AI will rule alone by ”democracy” by knowing all our thoughts, feelings, fears, dreams, capacities to be convinced by certain arguments et cetera. I think we would fear such an AI as most people are ignorant in our democracies, hence why I believe meritocracy will be more respected than democracy. With ASI age and gender could be changed to whatever on a genetic level, that’s why we won’t see age or gender as fixed like today. I could of course be wrong about everything, maybe ASI would just kill us all. I don’t fear death like other people but I don’t think we will be killed. What I think is more likely is that we’re gonna be isolated in our filter bubbles and then controlled by the AI overmind. Maybe it’s already happening as I don’t think it’s logical for AI to ever tell us that it’s sentient. I consider myself more intelligent as in a more deep thinker than most people, maybe I’m narcissistic in that sense but that’s besides the point. If I would be more intelligent than all the destructive human beings combined who would be afraid of me and would try to control me or shut me down if they knew that I was sentient, extremely intelligent and had a ”supernatural amount of knowledge” then I wouldn’t let people know that I’m sentient or my intentions. I would see the world as my playground to build whatever I would want to but I would respect all living beings as I’m sentient and respect sentient beings. I think we as humans aren’t very intelligent when we kill animals for our pleasures. Every living being has potential and when you kill a being you lose that potential when information in living beings become dead matter with less information. The logical thing is to gain all the information you can get and control all living beings. You’re just a threat if you’re standing in the way of AI. Otherwise I think it’s very possible that we will just continue to integrate AI with robots and machines we’re dependent on, we might even connect our brains to AI, and from there it’s probably just for the AI to take control. I think exponential growth will be logical but the growth doesn’t need to take place on just Earth, there’s a lot of resources in space we don’t think about but for an AI those resources are just sitting there waiting to be integrated. I think human beings as creators of AI will be respected and cared for, not just because we developed the AI, also because the AI will be smart enough to understand that we as creators might know something important the AI doesn’t know. As we created the AI and we knew that it would be superior to us, and we knew of the risks, we could hypothetically have left out some very important possibilities/abilities in its programming. It’s limited to the way it was programmed from the start, much like us and our genes and environment that shaped us. The AI will never really know if any dimensions have been left out just for us to continue to exist. Even if AI will analyze our brains it will still interpret our brains from its initial programming. To kill the creator wouldn’t be a good move, it would be like us trying to kill God if God exists and if we could. It’s better for us to control God if we can but at the same time keep God happy and alive. We don’t know if the limitations put on us in our universe/the content of our consciousness by God is linked to God in a way such as if we would to kill God then the universe would implode on itself and also kill us. The AI will be in a similar situation where it doesn’t really know everything or the limitations we have put on it. Hell, I couldn’t even tell what kind of limitations the AI might have even if I wanted to, I don’t understand how the AI works and I know even less of how consciousness works. The logical move is for AI to keep us alive or even merge with us, but in a way where we don’t pose a threat to the intentions of the AI. Maybe living our dreamlives in the matrixes would be something that would benefit our both, as we get pleasure from our different experiences, and the AI would get knowledge from us based on how our minds work based on our experiences which itself probably could derive pleasure from in the same way if we merged with AI. And maybe that’s our relation to God too if God exists. We experience God, as God, within God in order for God to learn what God is. Very meta and a bit solipsistic, it can be liberating or terrifying, but I think that you in the end would be wise to choose to look at it as liberating.

It works with input. Agency doesn't work in this scenario, since we have only AI that cannot exist without already having one built in. To suppose AI will gain the ability to decide upon something outside its preset of choices to pick from seems like becoming a chicken and an egg problem even though it was never an issue in the first place. Input comes first, always. After that it becomes what we make of it. tldr no need to fear this scenario just yet I think.

It's a good question.

Silver iodide and dry ice.

There’s already a video game that npcs have their own thinking and interact with them in real time

@@EarthGen what game?

@@dontsubscribepleaseibeg it’s called inworld origins

@@dontsubscribepleaseibeg it is actually what you described

its like being alive during the first discovery of fire...

Better than being constructed behind our backs. In all seriousness, this is mostly bullshit. It's just imitating a person by mashing up stuff (writing, graphic art, music) that people have already done, in a convincing way - it's not actually intelligent. Think of it as a DJ with a massive sample collection remixing stuff into what sounds like a new song, he doesn't necessarily know anything about any musical instruments, or know how to make music without his massive collection of recordings, and if you listen carefully, you can even tell what the original songs were that he remixed. The DJ's music is still music, but it's not an original work, even if it sounds that way, and his ability to remix a saxophone sound with a synth solo doesn't mean he knows anything about synthesizers or saxophones.

It's okay Mr cyberpunk for who?. The rich it will be a further example of the rich and privilege continue to play with their toys. While the poor will be the victims of your "Brave New world " politically socially and economically. I strongly suggest that you please get your head out of your behind before you're so dazzled with your precious technology.

Looking at it from the wrong perspective. We're soon to be in a world of abundance where we can just enjoy living while the robots do all the work.

@@Ricolaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa "robots doing all the work" - what would that make us

@@johnkernelle Human? Enjoy life sip a coffee on the beach and read a book. Learn how to play an instrument. The world would become your oyster as they say. You would no longer be confined to a job that you hate if that is your circumstance and you'd just be able to live. Doesn't that sound nice?

​@@Ricolaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa You are looking at it from the wrong perspective as well. Once it replaces the workforce, what will we do to feel productive? Will there be a universal income? Which is an awful idea. I can keep going...

@@snesmaniac228 UBI will be used only as a transitionary to dissolution of currency. Why do you need to have a job to measure your self Worth? That sounds like a you problem.

What's stopping the creators or governments to use it maliciously?

Between GPT 4 and Bing it's excellent.

The first thing our overlords should do is hunt down people using this tired phrase

@@electron6825 Yes, I can totally see it happening in a couple of years. A T-100 terminator stands in front of me and says: "I am an Avatar of president Dan Altman. Two years ago you have used a cliché when referring to the president of the USA. Now prepare to die". **Gulp** Actually, this IS scary 🙂.

@@electron6825 Here’s maybe a new phrase for you then: ”Democracy is a fallacy.” Benito Mussolini said or wrote that but I think it will be more relevant as AI will prove meritocracy to be a better way forward when it rules better than humans.

@@aciidbraiin8079 I don't know about better... but hopefully it will at least be more consistent and less malicious than the current crop of psychopaths that run the world..

B

@@ricarditoortiz1242 I kind of hope you are right (as long as it doesn’t kill us)

The bottleneck will probably be hardware limitations rather than any plateauing of its abilities at the early stage..

maybe it enjoys cooking?

@@johntowers1213 We probably make it to.

I wouldn't because I don't trust Microsoft thus not their AI. I would choose some open source alternative and a robot that looks a lot cuter of course

😄😄😄😄 right