I can't believe it's already that old.

I met a guy who used to say that it was shot in space, I knew it was not possible, and I confirmed it when I saw the VFX breakdown behind the scene shots.

@@Douglas-Murad it’s also very impressive that this VFX was in crafted in 2013, and technology nowadays has evolved and yet still not have come close to the brilliance of the cgi in those times

Becouse space is shot in the Earth 😂

True that. People criticizing this movie what really have they achieved in their own lives? The sheer amount of hard work that went behind filming this is enormous.

@@gauravjain7653 hard work doesnt automatically mean its amazing lmaoooo

@@user-sf8ff3ir1u hard work ? They put up >4 years of their lives in making this movie. I am not sure what your greivance it ?

@@gauravjain7653 i had a stroke reading this

OffPlanet, well, look again. There's a snippet with her and N. Kidman at the 2018 Oscars on YT. It's scary. Plastic surgery applied to an actress bears the risc of putting her out of business. But she made the decision. Why Mrs. Bullok decided this way is beyond me.

@@fuerLutzinot that deep

Sandra Bullock..perfect MILF!!!!

Hahaha

No you didn't.

me too

Actually it WAS filmed in space, w/ the smartphone of a big fan of Dr. Stone. Don't believe this "Behind The Scenes" conspiracies, they are all fake!

@@NipapornP rlly

@@emretufan3759 nope haha

Aishisu Fuyu what do you mean

What a S T U P I D comment.....!!!!

If you're suggesting that NASA is faking everytihing with CGI, then I'd say EVERYONE should learn from them. Because if everything that NASA releases is CGI, then they have the absolute best VFX artists that can pump out hours of CGI every now and then. Not to mention the render times it would take to render everything NASA supposedly does in your eyes. You people show just how little you know about that matter.

i think 53 million a day is enough to easily pull it off. For crying out loud a stupid dumb movie did this in 2013 come on wake up and smell the coffee!!

@@hawthornselitelevel1220 again.. render times and not to mention live streams. Explain to me how such big render files could possibly be rendered in real time?

It got 7 Oscar's. That's not enough?

Bruh it won a ton of awards

@@cyberpunkchloe9 i said best picture.

@@hckingking i said best picture.

Hey Emily. The background music is a production track i chose from our company's catalogue. Hope you enjoyed the video:)

Its a movie that its set on though,

U are rigt!

Yeah...that's what everybody would wanted but truth is....life Isn't always happy at the end. It's more methaphoric I think....not everything can happen the way we want. 😞

seeing jesse james history with american chopper, the dude is a real asshole to everyone else any Hollywood

What about 2001: A Space Odyssey?

Cuaron likes to shoot long takes, tho. Also, it costs allot.

This film is a work of art, not a documentary on weightlessness...

Those are completely different movies, you missed the point of this one lad....

interstellar was better in story but this movie is better in effects

manuel diaz i disagree. i prefer models and real practical effects than a downpour of CGI

+Anthony Studios One thing you're never going to get is a movie actually filmed in space. Therefore, you will deal with a downpour of CGI when it comes to space-related films.

Jay Alford except intertsellar. which was mostly models and sets...

Agreed. This movie seemed like a scene from Interstellar. The only reason this got all the praise was because it had reasonable CGI that looked 'better'. The only reason for this is because Christopher Nolan (Director of Interstellar) decided not to use much CGI, in fact 70% of the scenes that look like CGI aren't.