Yes i agree. It gave me chills

You have 11d cinema aliens?

I saw it in 3D at the theater, and it was indeed awesome!

I envy u

This! 3D in this one and the sound was insane!

Меня тоже, потому что ты понимаешь как Всевышний всё прекрасно создал, всего лишь хрупкая планета 🌏 а над ней семь небес, что защищают нас от космоса.

You would be a sucker for the real thing then.

@@12Sayat Oh come on, be serious.

You people have no morals.

@1415w I have 10 kerbals stuck on the Mun

@@AethernaLuxen I had two. Jeb on my first manned Mun mission, and Val on a Jeb rescue mission. I eventually recovered both of them, and Jeb (despite having never touched Minmus, Val did all of that) has been to Duna, Ike, an orbit of Jool, a flyby of Tylo, and Gilly.

@Anthony Umana-Paniagua rescue them

@@ommadammo science and progress requires sacrifices!

Im Proud of you Miss

what game

@Just a baka but capsules dont have yt built in

@@sergejgajic he used a phone or computer

@@PantherAusfD1944 but where did he get the power

👏👏👏

Its just a burning space station

You understood the movie

@@josemanosalvas4041 Surprising how many either don't seem to, or appear to and yet reject that understanding instead to be a tech pedant. Sad, that. Especially considering what a potent message it is and how nowadays we are all 'having the conversation' - this is the best film about mental health and depression I've seen in a long time. Not dreary, not miserable, just empowering.

Interstellars docking scene is better!

Nah

@@mindboard8203 ohh yeah

@@mindboard8203 that one party pooper

No shame in tears here, lad.

same

And always remember, the other astronaut that was with her sacrificed himself to give her enough push to reach the Chinese space station.

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/qMpyoctozbfYo6M.html

😂👍🏻

@@whocares1302 "Thank you for that great introduction Dr. Watney. I would like to keep this very short, and based on experience. DON'T FREAKIN' DO-IT! YOU MUST BE NUTS TO DO THAT STUFF! Thank-you Dr. Watney".

It doesn’t scare me I think earth looks so cool from space and I love space but I would never want to go to space that’s the scary bit

No shit looks scary here's the planet we've found Life only on

@@wretchedmusic8782 Getting to space, that's the easy part. Coming back, that's the most dangerous mission. A tiny little capsule hurtling towards the earth faster than the speed of sound, fire is trying to engulf you, air resistance is trying to shred you, and you have to get said capsule to slow down enough so that it doesn't kill you. As Chris Hadfield described it, it's like flying a meteorite home.

@@platygetzkillz2144 yeah

and at the same time it’s what protects us from most asteroids hitting the planet and preserves life on this little rock…

Evokes the terror (and beauty, paradoxically) of what the Challenger and Columbia astronauts experienced in their final moments.

I had the same thought when viewing that final scene. As if to compress 390 million years of evolution into less than 1 minute of screen time, to show that the human species may have had humble beginnings, but (and here's where the "looking up" camera angle that makes her look like a 30 foot tall giant comes in) we've made it this far -- and by proving that we can put ourselves into outer space and survive reentry, we show that there are even greater achievements just over the horizon of time if we can stand tall and walk tall and not destroy ourselves first.

They set up the moment, too. There's a near miss while the camera is in a long shot, then they show debris hitting each other so you get to see what would happen if a large chunk hits her capsule. Then a small chunk *does* hit the capsule, as you say, but only after the audience expectation is set. James Cameron does a good job of this. The mass drowning behind a watertight door near the beginning of The Abyss sets up Ed Harris' narrow escape from the exact same situation a moment later, etc.

'Terrified'? Her script consists almost entirely of screaming. The graphics in this film were impressive, but almost none of the physics was anything other than abysmal.

Glad to see that so many others noticed the accurate physics at play!!

It was the Chinese Space station. It looks identical to Mir because I think China used Russia's design.

@@jukio02 China uses everyone else's design. I wouldn't be surprised if it is.

@@sebastiandomingos335 Countries use other countries designs for almost about anything. Cars, planes, tools, military weapons, just about anything. China using Russia's design is no different than the US using a German scientist Wernher von Braun, to help build their space program. Just like the US has done with the help of Germany, China is getting help from Russia, it's really no different. The US used Russian rocket design to get their astronauts into space. If other countries would like to go to space besides China, US, and Russia, they too will use other countries rockets to do it.

@@jukio02 makes sense, but China seems to do it a lot more.

@@sebastiandomingos335 it was made in hollywood mate. not from china

It’s all in your imagination and it’s fake anyhow, so who cares

@@brianwood1041 -Get a life

@@brianwood1041wow you’re a barrel of laughs

What do you think would make it more accurate?

Nahh check out the space walker. It more realistic and dynamic

Breakup wasn't very realistic

Columbus

For me, the best re-entry was in the (suprisingly) russian film The Spacewalker.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't this just a score video? I believe this is the actual score that plays in the scene, we just don't get the rest of the audio used in the scene

@Christopher VanGogh Ah, arigato.

wait....isn't "money shot" supposed to be something else?

@@chipgoesnyoom5074 yeah... but the video was perfectly synched to the audio i think that's what he meant.

Ll

Gravity is just an illusion experienced by objects moving in curved spacetime.

@@naveenk2524 o ok

@@bobubob5025 Gravity is not a force. gravity is an effect of curvature in spacetime. being curved, an object traveling through time gets to a denser point in the grid, which gives an illusion of attracting force. Big objects curve space fabric like our earth.

@@bobubob5025 Did you read a single paper about special relativity? Gravity is no force. Naveen K described gravity perfectly. The only force, that can be related to gravity is the force of the ground pushing against you while you "stand" on it.

@@Mantorix gravity is a curving or warping of space

Что забавно, по визуалу спускаемый аппарат в фильме садится в Северном Казахстане (незадолго до посадки виден характерный остров-завитушка на Каспии), а по сценарию - на Среднем Западе США.

OMG it was amazing in IMAX!

Share that regret too. Seeing it on a 43in from 4ft away is similar proportion to seeing the big screen...but still isn't the same...

I'd quit smoking 3 years before this came out. Saw it in IMAX. Immediately went and bought a pack of smokes, smoked 2, then threw the pack out.

Except for the special effects, Gravity was an abysmal film. Everything from the "Tag" story to the rest of the contrived script was completely forgettable. I want my $10 back.

I saw it in theaters 3 times! My only regret (and this is minimal) was seeing it for the first time on a regular theater screen instead of IMAX. The other two times I saw it in IMAX, and it was amazing! Sorry you didn't get the chance to see it in theaters, but if you noticed, they recently re-released The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King in DOLBY for 2 days not that long ago. They've done that with a lot of movies. I have a feeling at some point they'll re-release Gravity, too!

Yea those billion dollars made u able to watch KZfaq today.

And then you remember how you were a waste of 9 months for your mother. Since nothing that you've done in your entire life is even a fraction as good as this "bad" movie.

@@TatankaTaylor oh no someone who doesn't know me said something harmful. Who hurt you and why do you feel the need to inflict that pain on others? You know what? Nevermind I'll just report you.

Not at all. There's no Space Shuttle and Tiangong still has different inclination to ISS.

@@deniskhaidarov9166 Tiangong was never planned to be in the same inclination as the ISS. The shuttle at the beginning of the film is Explorer, which doesn't exist, flying STS-157, which also never existed. The ISS did then and does now exist. Net realism change is 0. Tiangong did not and _now does_ exist. Therefore that is a net increase in realism

Funny thing, the CSS is planned to have a co-orbiting space telescope roughly the size of Hubble called Xuntian, to be launched in 2024. Of course it wouldn't be serviced by a crewed vehicle, instead if it needed to be serviced it will rendezvous with the CSS and the station's robotic arm will grab it and hold into it while the crew EVA over and do whatever need to be done.

@@lewismassie at the movie's release, Tiangong-1 was in orbit. It was a single-launch station, there weren't plans to upgrade it, but it did exist. But in any case, the movie shows Tiangong(-1) and the ISS as being, for all intents and purposes, rendezvoused, which isn't really excusable.

Also the windom, because the windom burned on re-entry

This movie is super unrealistic but I don't think you are correct. 1. Airlocks open inwards, its basically impossible to open them outward without ripping the structure of the station apart and at the point where that mattered the atmosphere wasn't thick enough. 2. When the reentry vehicle was tumbling with the service module and chunk of the station attached she was pretty much right at the center of mass. So despite spinning pretty quick she wouldn't be subjected to that much force. 3. Astronauts train to be able to remain coherent and control their craft while tumbling randomly. 4. The software didn't really do anything to regain stability, a capsule shape is naturally stable in the correct position which is why everyone uses that shape, it falls into a stable position on its own.

@@odstwingman But her headphones floating peacefully in the decelerating and rotating spacecraft were inrealistic. That reminded me of the scene in "Contact" with the floating medallion near the shaking face of Jodie Foster character.

@@odstwingman It's not that the software couldn't do anything. It's that the thrusters the software controls are designed to be powerful enough to rotate the capsule itself but not the extra weight from the service and docking module attached to it but yeah the capsule itself is designed to aerodynamically orient it's shield down during re-entry.

@@MrAlexOrex Yes it is a bit unrealistic. Also she shouldn't be surrounded by burning debris while re-entering. The debris would break into tiny pieces that are easily slowed down by air resistance while the soyuz capsule she's in is one large heavy object that is harder for air resistance to slow down meaning she would zoom far ahead of all of the debris.

It’s unrealistic Hollywood garbage🤣🤣

@JRP Romeo156GTA sorry to hear that bru!