"The S tank is also capable of traversing smoothly, despite minor obstacles in it's path." *pushes a whole tree out of it's way*
@Jumbatato Жыл бұрын
Yes yes, *minor obstacles*
@WeekendWarrior925 жыл бұрын
"... is capable of traversing smoothly despite minor obstacles in it's path" **Hurls a boulder** **Breaks a tree** "minor obstacles"
@alanwatts82395 жыл бұрын
XD that was scary to see, such a powerful engine
@mtf_nine_tailed_fox3854 жыл бұрын
XD You my sir made my day
@nurs38264 жыл бұрын
For a tank yeah
@catsndogs984 жыл бұрын
It’s a tank of course it’s a minor obstacle
@ZETH_273 жыл бұрын
Those tracks refuse to come of-
@DESIBOY-fe7nm4 жыл бұрын
13 years later. Im finally here.
@werhnerd27734 жыл бұрын
Me too. just 1 day later than you.
@julesonghena68064 жыл бұрын
@@werhnerd2773 Me too. Just 1 day later than you
@lakshmanank32064 жыл бұрын
@@julesonghena6806 me too. I'm just 3hrs later than you
@ciaranfoster474 жыл бұрын
@@bedathesimp1994 me too just 6 hours later than you
@taufiqa.farizi91034 жыл бұрын
War Thunder, anybody?
@prince-solomon4 жыл бұрын
4:07 That roar it makes sounds really menacing and cool. I love these old documentaries without stupid action music, special effects and frantic editing
@t_k_o_l2 жыл бұрын
Gas turbine + diesel, sounds super dope
@alangordon32838 ай бұрын
That’s isn’t it’s engine noise it just some overlay gash.
@rafomic42108 ай бұрын
@@t_k_o_lits a Mix ?
@t_k_o_l8 ай бұрын
@@rafomic4210 yeah it uses both
@generalrommel56664 жыл бұрын
1:16 T-34-85 1:25 now it’s a Maus!
@notion75364 жыл бұрын
I saw that too
@edgedcanshufl4 жыл бұрын
The documentary seems bias
@4lderion4 жыл бұрын
Lol xD
@remcomoerland17804 жыл бұрын
Didnt even notice that, wow
@RedVRCC4 жыл бұрын
maus with big cupola
@militariaclips18 жыл бұрын
That is the clip in it's entirety. The voice heard at the end is talking about a different tank.
@akurvaanyadat4 жыл бұрын
Are you doing good?
@aulianizar25994 жыл бұрын
Hi there!
@bayuakbar16643 жыл бұрын
What tank the narrator is talking later on this video?
@ryanlin2 жыл бұрын
You should pin this message, so viewers would see it and know :) Thanks for uploading this documentary! Enjoyed it very much!
@gabrielle81237 жыл бұрын
this tank pooping after shooting 5:05
@user-ed6ul4sm6e4 жыл бұрын
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@user-ed6ul4sm6e4 жыл бұрын
Seriously, its pooping tank
@renzovergara34364 жыл бұрын
and it happens in war thunder unlike in WoT
@spelare14 жыл бұрын
I wish i didnt see that now it seems less intimidating
@paulmurgatroyd63723 жыл бұрын
I think I nearly did the same thing the first time I fired a gun.
@SkullKing1184112 жыл бұрын
In 1968, two 103s were tested at the British armour school in Bovington,which reported that "the turretless concept of the "S"-tank holds considerable advantage over turreted tanks". In BAOR 1973, the 103 was tested against the Chieftain tank. Availability never fell under 90% and the final report stated, "It has not been possible to prove any disadvantage in the "S" inability to fire on the move." It has also been tested that it can fire more accurately than the Leo 1 and M60,but 0.5 sec slower
@korana63086 ай бұрын
It summarizes everything in the end. It is not an offensive tank, it's a defensive tank. Essentially a movable cannon. A terrible tank, but a great movable cannon.
@tomaskling24296 ай бұрын
@@korana6308 A turret on tracks. Yes, it was designed to hide and do fast ambush attacks then run and hide and repeat
@SgtAponeSWE17 жыл бұрын
2. It can't fire in any other direction than forward, but it CAN turn the whole tank to get a bearing on target much faster than any other tank of that day could turn its turret! And when it does have the gun bearing towards the enemy - it also has it FRONT armour towards the enemy, which makes it even harder to defeat. Remember that the 105mm gun was 1,5 meters longer than any other tanks, it could hit a lot harder and more accurate!
@alexisXcore93 Жыл бұрын
I cant believe im answering to a 16 year old comment but i believe is a similar concept as a bullpup rifle. You can have a longer barrel in the same amount of space
@Faded._6 ай бұрын
@@alexisXcore93 💀💀
@cn04126 жыл бұрын
Look at that sloped frontal armor when facing enemies. Ricochet at its highest probability.
@1nEGOR4 жыл бұрын
Uranium depleted shells don't care tho- aka every single shell fired since 1970 by USSR and USA
@thurbine24114 жыл бұрын
Egor Rorvik wrong. They Will perforate the UFP of the Strv 103 at combat ranges if it just has that angle but as the strv 103 can angle it's armor upwards so that the du apfsds ricochets
@1nEGOR4 жыл бұрын
@@thurbine2411 i think that any armor today- M1a4 or T72b3, cannot withstand a shell. That is the reason every one is upgraiding with active protection, because pure thickness and composition of a material is not enough to stop a uranium shell that can melt over 4000mm of composit armor layers
@1nEGOR4 жыл бұрын
Shells are made with stabilisatores - kinda lika an octopus that deploys its tenticals upon impact to normalize the impact to any slope, i think that manpowered vehicles are a thing of the past tbh
@thurbine24114 жыл бұрын
Egor Rorvik well if you have an impact angle of over 85* I think even du rounds of today and absolutely those of the 70s and 80s would bounce/ricochet
@hitpst8952 Жыл бұрын
I'm expecting Daebom fans to appear because of of this scene at 5:03. Here it comes.
@Eyeless_Camper8 жыл бұрын
It CAN fire on the move, the problem is that it needs to be pretty flat ground and at ranges less then 500 meters for it to be accurate doing so.
@gonun698 жыл бұрын
and it has to drive directly towards or away from the target...
@hanfei68714 жыл бұрын
So basically it can’t fire on the move
@homermadriaga64684 жыл бұрын
but if u play world of tanks? this guy is a devil
@sorapantsu85984 жыл бұрын
Why u need fire on the move when u can stop move for fire and get more accurate?
@sorapantsu85984 жыл бұрын
@@ashmr.b3386 yes. I'm not know lot about tank. But, even with gyro, aim when move seems not worth it. If that 90 or Abrams should do that, keep working. Cuz S tank have small siluet. That will make this tank harder to aim. Especially when it is moving.
@nero919 жыл бұрын
Jagdpanther on steroids. I love it.
@detectivepatchouli82665 жыл бұрын
more like JgTiger on steroid and horse steroid added
@denijorgji86445 жыл бұрын
@@detectivepatchouli8266 more like E25 on steroids.
@generalrommel56664 жыл бұрын
At least JagdPanther and JagdTiger can move their guns😐
@Hiznogood4 жыл бұрын
Mohammad Jaafar But this one has engines that don’t break down all the time, plus it can be operated by one man if needed.
@onlythewise14 жыл бұрын
@@Hiznogood a bit bull your dumb arent you
@dreamshot94084 жыл бұрын
2020 Nobody: 2020 KZfaq: Hey, what about this random video from 2006?
@nextgen89944 жыл бұрын
True. Правда
@artilleryfire65764 жыл бұрын
probably because war thunder released it
@Eldar_Aytpaev4 жыл бұрын
@@artilleryfire6576 and World of tanks
@artilleryfire65764 жыл бұрын
@@Eldar_Aytpaev they released it a couple of years ago, what do you mean?
@Eldar_Aytpaev4 жыл бұрын
@@artilleryfire6576 But WOT has a larger audience.
@habedoudefiant37544 жыл бұрын
Probably lots of world of tanks players here?
@ivorthumm11044 жыл бұрын
I have this tank
@TheBulletoffire4 жыл бұрын
@@ivorthumm1104 i jave the S1. And i like it.
@imperialstardestroyer7124 жыл бұрын
@@TheBulletoffire mee too
@hirohito22714 жыл бұрын
Habedou Defiant yes
@Seanthefox4 жыл бұрын
Nah, a bunch of us War Thunder players are here too
@TheCherrybuster7 жыл бұрын
it's funny how it poops brass))
@Mordiiax7 жыл бұрын
It is like when you are really bad in you stomach and you sneeze and fart at the same time :P
@pchwang6 жыл бұрын
rofl
@ccalidor5 жыл бұрын
It is not fun, but it has a function!
@onlythewise14 жыл бұрын
@@Mordiiax what does than mean dork ?
@MykolaSternenkoDroneBoyHoleMan4 жыл бұрын
@@onlythewise1 fecal repulse
@c0nstantin864 жыл бұрын
"Can't fire on the move" You mean you can't auto-aim while holding down "W"?
@Connor-dq4my4 жыл бұрын
ever moment
@DonMeaker14 жыл бұрын
@MajSolo Instead of a turretless tank, think of the S tank as a tankless turret...
@handblitz44084 жыл бұрын
DonMeaker the entire thing is an oscillating tank
@K5KTM16 жыл бұрын
I had a good friend who was a crewman on a swedish S-tank, he liked it a lot and said that it was very accuarate. He did say that it was limited on occasion due to the lack of turret though.
@mange29711 жыл бұрын
I love how it "shits" out the spent cartridge. :)
@operation_bravo97414 жыл бұрын
This is 13 years old in my recommendation box, But still awesome
@kmzmmz12 жыл бұрын
Well the worlds first Tank did not have any revolving turret. So by defenition a tank do not need a turret. Swedish S-Tank Capt.(Ret.)
@lawsontse15454 жыл бұрын
It is not a tank without turret, but a turret without a chassis
@iwanttobetankman42604 жыл бұрын
It's a Tank destroyer.
@renzovergara34364 жыл бұрын
@@iwanttobetankman4260 we know that
@SonnyKnutson3 жыл бұрын
@@iwanttobetankman4260 No, it's not. It's a MBT
@jyralnadreth44423 жыл бұрын
The whole vehicle is a turret....the suspension elevates and depresses the gun.
@casedreamer4 жыл бұрын
KZfaq recommendations never disappointing me.
@Supportik4 жыл бұрын
This tank was a real futuristic beast to it's date.
@danielgyllenbreider Жыл бұрын
This is the best situational and patriotic tank in the world! Made only for the conditions that its country required at a specific time and for a specific strategy. Spoiler: in the 1990´s when the Swedish army could purchase a few of the Soviet tanks the S-tank was supposed to counter, there was a rude awakening that any of those Soviet tanks could penetrate the tank from the front out the back, no matter the theoretical perfect angle the S-tank was designed with. But i stick to my love for this incredible tank anyway, especially for the great thinking, professionalism and intended functionality that was put into its design and construction.
@artilleryarmorbeer Жыл бұрын
The United States, the United Kingdom, and Norway have all evaluated Strv103 and their own main tanks. They all have good evaluations of this tank, and some performances are even better. If any soviet tank like you said could easily penetrate the Strv103, this tank would not have been built
@jimmydylan14724 ай бұрын
@@artilleryarmorbeerThis tank predates APFSDS technologies and the powerful 120 and 125mm smoothbore cannons, so it is not at all surprising that it only serves as a target for duck shooting in conflicts against tanks more modern than it and with larger smoothbore cannons.
@Zenox_18094 жыл бұрын
Спустя 13 лет, и ютуб решил кинуть мне в рекомендации это.
@ivankovalenko31054 жыл бұрын
Domik Cromwell у меня для тебя новость, спустя 14 лет
@muhazreen2 жыл бұрын
5:05 My 9y/o mind : Hahaha, Poopy tank
@Morris196217 жыл бұрын
Very cool, I love to see novel solutions to problems. Thanks for posting this Grimlock.
@irrelevent26975 жыл бұрын
1:53 says minor obstacles *shows a whole ass bolder*
@Nukelover16 жыл бұрын
I fell in love with this tank when I was just a kid. It's still my favorite, just because it's so freakin' cool. But I'd never fight in it against a well-funded state of the art military. Almost any top-attacking AT weapon would obliterate the s-tank in one go. Reactive armor wouldn't even save you. If I can't attack first on the move, I'll die trying to ambush an invader, because if you can be seen before you attack, you are dead these days. But how cool is this machine?!
@MykolaSternenkoDroneBoyHoleMan4 жыл бұрын
No
@delphicdescant4 жыл бұрын
@@MykolaSternenkoDroneBoyHoleMan 12 years to come up with that burn.
@crashcoursezed79474 жыл бұрын
😂
@Jan_3724 жыл бұрын
Then again, this is a defensive tank, to protect Sweden.
@Danger-Tater4 жыл бұрын
Very nice points, I know I'm a little late but this man's got a point
@TheGrenadier97Ай бұрын
I absolutely like these niche systems created for specific requirements and contexts.
@stevemc012 жыл бұрын
*Strv 103* Other tank: “haha shorty” *Deploys flotation screen* “What did you say to me you little shi-“
@codeporsche46514 жыл бұрын
Not a tank because of no turret First tank ever : am I a joke to you
@wearefarmersbumbabumbumbum16204 жыл бұрын
I love how it turns into a boat 😂😂
@renzovergara34364 жыл бұрын
theres alot of tanks that are like that... and theres even tanks that are actual boats(amphibious armored vehicles) so yeah... swimming tanks are common
@xyloghas_tiktok87286 жыл бұрын
я здесь единственный русский? \
@user-eb8xh2eb3h4 жыл бұрын
Нет братан! Еще я есть! Пиздец шведы мозг сломают!
@xolok15214 жыл бұрын
Согласен
@user-dk3oi1no2e4 жыл бұрын
Нет
@user-dw6wh4du3j4 жыл бұрын
Не, ты не один.
@subarualania4 жыл бұрын
А 13 лет назад Ютуб был?)
@chrisivan_yt Жыл бұрын
what a nifty machine being able to tackle most obstacles like that. it’s very cool to watch this high 😄
@rattinox14 жыл бұрын
Being a Swedish-American, I'm almost required to love this tank! I never met a Minnesota Swede who didn't puff up with pride at this genius Swedish military science acheivement. (we still think of Sverige as the Home Country, US Patriots though we certainly are) The S Tank concept is still 100% valid; if I were the leader of some fictitional country, purchasing AFV's for the defensive role, I would pay Sweden to put the 103C back into FULL production!!!!
@generalrommel56664 жыл бұрын
It’s an MBT not an AFV or even TD
@peterlewerin42134 жыл бұрын
At the end of its lifetime, the Swedish army performed some tests with T-72s bought from GDR. Firing into the front, slat armor and all, the APDS went clean through the S-tank and hit the concrete behind it. Since the T-72 itself is obsolete today, I would _not_ recommend reviving the S-tank.
@VicariousReality7 Жыл бұрын
Tror du vi tycker att ni är svenskar om ni bor på andra sidan världen och inte kan svenska?
@Trashcansam12312 жыл бұрын
I've designed a fictional tank which houses everything (crew and controls) in the turret and lacks a true "hull" minus the treads suspended below it. The engine is suspended in an armored compartment below it. To keep the driver from becoming confused if the turret is turned, his position is in the center located within the shaft where the turret revolves around so he always faces forward. I have a few blueprints of it if you people are interested.
@ArtietheArchon8 жыл бұрын
people get so hung up on how sick it was on defense that they seem to overlook this: a vehicle this agile and with this level of protection and firepower and accuracy and observation would have been very nasty on offense as well
@SonnyKnutson3 жыл бұрын
4:10 sounds like a roaring sportscar :O
@jyralnadreth44423 жыл бұрын
Imagine the S tank coming back today...Composite armour too. The Swedish designed a gem with this vehicle, think of all the weight saved by not having a turret and all the armour with it. It had 40mm of armour at best but at the angle is was set it was like a battleship belt lol
@King.Leonidas3 жыл бұрын
i would put a remote turret on it
@beaclaster Жыл бұрын
@@King.Leonidas mg?
@iphnar4 жыл бұрын
2006 World of Tanks haven't been created yet.
@Potatotenkopf4 жыл бұрын
Ahhh yes the almighty swedish wedge
@cherokeefit42487 ай бұрын
Never seen or heard of this before but I’m happy to now know
@CmJH18 жыл бұрын
S-tank must be the coolest tank ever. I've been waiting for a clip like this. Thanks for posting!
@_w_z_36604 жыл бұрын
WHO FROM WOT ? :)
@kanmuri3714 жыл бұрын
Yessss
@TheBulletoffire4 жыл бұрын
Yup, here i am :)
@Viktor58054 жыл бұрын
Well wot blitz
@tightbootyhole7074 жыл бұрын
Its me
@hirohito22714 жыл бұрын
Yeeeaahhh
@calimero52164 жыл бұрын
The more I see it, the more I like this vehicle, It’s really a innovative concept...🐥
@oscarsterner26234 жыл бұрын
My grandfather was a Crewman of this tank, stationed in the rear end during his time in the military.
@neklimonet3 ай бұрын
did he loved it?
@jimmyn89SWE12 жыл бұрын
@jimmyn89SWE And speaking of the M60 and Leo 1, those were actually considered as the alternatives to the S tank.
@webmotors91494 жыл бұрын
Машина высокого технологического уровня. The machine is a high technological level.
@usbgaming33672 жыл бұрын
6:57 clean drift
@jimmydylan14724 ай бұрын
Beautiful
@johnsharky13454 жыл бұрын
Interesting construction
@Skalmans75013 жыл бұрын
@Bullzeye95 Back in the days it must have been pretty hard to take out :) It´s still a impressive machine allthough it´s a 35 year old tech. With some upgrades it could, as you say, be a major force multiplier.
@anderslindell33727 жыл бұрын
In It's last "war" the S-Tank fought, 6 of them stod against 6 Leopard Mk 1 and the 103 took out ALL of them and only lost one of there own. And yet Sweden decided to buy the "Leopard" from Germany. This "war" took place at "Kvarn" practice field in Sweden in 1997. Of the 302 "S-Tanks" ever made, 39 of them are preserved around the world.
@cmdrantezscar33687 жыл бұрын
yes we bought the Leopard 2, not Leopard 1, and that was only after testing one of our own designs first (search for project Stridsvagn 2000) but our government at the time said it was cheaper to buy Leo2's instead of building your own. i think that was the wrong move that we did that. but what can you do...
@Qmodi7 жыл бұрын
dont forget that the leopard 2s that was bought were also mounted with a shorter barrel for the purpose of mobility/turret traversing in forested areas. And by 1997 the S-tank was obsolete, leo 2s being purchased was also a show of good will since sweden is allied to NATO not a part of NATO.
@jyotirmayamohanty57235 жыл бұрын
These tanks are still valuable given Russian usage of T-64 reserves. Baltic countries can utilize this tank. This tank can be retrofitted with an anti-tank missile.
@johnpierce14704 ай бұрын
The “no turret, not a tank” argument is so silly. There are so many infamous examples of tanks that are turret-less; from the Jadgpanther to the Hetzer. Although these may typically be considered SPGs or Tank Destroyers, they still fulfill all of the requirements and duties that a frontline tank would.
@greystripesleeps Жыл бұрын
15 years later man KZfaq has really grown
@greystripesleeps Жыл бұрын
16 now
@Zazkon084 жыл бұрын
Pewdiepie : *Hard as a Diamond Rock*
@L1ghtn1ngB0lt Жыл бұрын
5:04 me when the when the me when
@otto123411 жыл бұрын
If you've ever played a tank simulator you would know all the benefits this tank would provide. Still the weakness was that it was hard to be offensive with it. But in any case that would rarely happen if an invasion would occur during the cold war.
@princey_064 жыл бұрын
Strv 103 is the perfect example of a turretless tank
@user-op5pn5qy9i4 жыл бұрын
Стерва, мать её!
@user-rq7uw9qb5u4 жыл бұрын
Бульбашей на момент выхода видео еще не существовало)
@user-zx5hk1lv1e4 жыл бұрын
Поставьте лайк. Пусть думают, что я что-то путёвое написал)
@noturclassm87334 жыл бұрын
Although I don’t understand Russian but it sounds nice
@jamisonmaguire43982 жыл бұрын
It should also be noted that the first armored vehicles to be called tanks did not have turrets.
@jimmyn89SWE12 жыл бұрын
@CaptHawkeye We had conventional tanks in service alongside the S tanks that could have been used in more offensive roles if needed. We had some 350 Centurion tanks and 225 Strv m/74, which was a Strv m/42 upgraded with a new turret and a longer gun. So in total 865 tanks including the S tank.
@xShido0 Жыл бұрын
5:04 hmm
@GCho73311 жыл бұрын
StuG life!
@jwagner19934 жыл бұрын
It's a beast in defensive tactics and counter strike
@tsuaririndoku4 жыл бұрын
“Some people believe this should not be call a tank at all, because its lacks a turret” Tank Destroyers: Are we a joke to you? S tank: I am a fuckin MBT!
@user-qv1yd2tp3g4 жыл бұрын
Не танк, а могила. В реальном бою не сможет долго продержаться. Я как маршал танково-диванных войск вам это говорю.
@ragnarledbrog84004 жыл бұрын
А долго не надо ...напомни ка, сколько танкам отведено жизни.....вооооттт...4-5 минут....так что пЭтЭшить он сможет от обороны, как и задумывалось....считай это не танк, а ПТ
@4measurement4664 жыл бұрын
Маршал значит ты сраный , это НЕ ТАНК ЭТО *ПТ* и в боях она НЕ УЧАВСТВУЕТ 👊👊👊👊👊👊👊👊👊👊👊👊👊👊👊👊👊👊👊 А ЛУПИТ ИЗ ПОД ТЯЖКА .
@KrabbGaming11 жыл бұрын
The only place where traversing decreases accuracy is WarGaming's completely unrealistic arcade tank game called World of Tanks.
@bharn2535 жыл бұрын
No all tanks in the game are 1960s and before. No stab in any WW1 or WW2 tank. I joined the US Army in 1979 and they were still firing from the short halt technic.
@nuttynuts46014 жыл бұрын
War thunder is better for 49% that reason
@jonnygs5534 жыл бұрын
@@nuttynuts4601 but some of us are too poor for a pc so instead we play the blitz version
@havokvladimirovichstalinov4 жыл бұрын
And everything can pen your Strv 103 regardless of your armor slope. because nothing says realistic like a shell punching right through the thickness equivalent of 192-337mm.
@williamforbes69194 жыл бұрын
I love it. It would be nice to have more combat records on the vehicle.
@jari20183 жыл бұрын
The russian 125 mm smoothbore punches through the only 40 mm armour on the slope even as very sloped but with added ceramic tiles who knows
@Kodaiva7 ай бұрын
it might go through the slope, but what about the rest of the tank including the engines? the crew are in the back of the tank@@jari2018
@Lowkicksfordayz2 жыл бұрын
It’s so cool that one man can go on a rampage with this one alone !!
@Ju87StukaB218 жыл бұрын
The gun in the S tank is armed with a 105mm gun, probobly somewhat the same as the british L7. Since its rifled, the gun itself is probobly more accurate then the modern smoothbore 120mm guns, like the M1A2&Leopard2 series, but then they use more advanced aiming systems than the S. This vehicle is outdated as it is. But its a sweet concept. I surely hope to see more like this in the future. Assault guns have always worked out nice. Thanks a lot for the post btw.
@AgentSmith9114 жыл бұрын
6:56 how high does this engine rev?
@Rasbiff12 жыл бұрын
@TroubleEngineer85 Well the S tank presented a far lower profile while dug down or in hiding, plus, the T-72 had such a crammed interior that the maximum height of the crewmembers were set to 160 cm (5'2). A country with such a small population as Sweden could never afford excluding such a large portion of the annual conscripts to become tank crewmen.
@carhard_oldmachine53337 жыл бұрын
Отличная машинка смотрел документалку лет 12 назад вот уж не думал что в игре появится
@drunkenmaus222611 жыл бұрын
the S-tank is the modern Tank destroyer. im gonna call it the Swedish hetzer
@artilleryfire65765 жыл бұрын
Its not a tank destroyer
@generalrommel56664 жыл бұрын
It’s a freakin MBT
@LuiGiBon0004 жыл бұрын
And it's not modern
@LuiGiBon0004 жыл бұрын
It was in service to 1997. Cuurent Swedish MBT is STRV 122 and it's based on improved Leopard 2
@louistheimpotant14 жыл бұрын
that maybe true up until the 115mm of the t-62.
@enthusiastic_tank67523 ай бұрын
4:05 - 4:13. That sound that tank makes..... That sound induces fear into all nearby. I would be sacred shitless if i heard that thing near me at night.
@BigSwede740311 жыл бұрын
While it is true that it can not fire on the move, i have heard said from guys who actualy crewed it that it was quite possible for a good crew to go from full spead ahead to rounds on target in 10-15 seconds. Or even less, depending on crew skill and terrain.
@Ezzy_KB4 жыл бұрын
Who else came here from “world of tanks”?😄
@therngeffect11728 жыл бұрын
If world of tanks add this thing and the water thingy... ohh boy..
@TheHammerlukas8 жыл бұрын
they wont add amphibious vehicles or at least wont make it so you can go through water, there are already amphibious vehicles in the game and still they drown when u drive them into water
@TheHammerlukas8 жыл бұрын
they wont add amphibious vehicles or at least wont make it so you can go through water, there are already amphibious vehicles in the game and still they drown when u drive them into water
@TheHammerlukas8 жыл бұрын
they wont add amphibious vehicles or at least wont make it so you can go through water, there are already amphibious vehicles in the game and still they drown when u drive them into water
@Aldnon7 жыл бұрын
I'm f*cked, the first time I met this tank/TD I chase it with my T-10 thinking that TD is slow driving backward.
@xtrariceplease7 жыл бұрын
Then there's TOG
@Letsgopc23 күн бұрын
17 years later I am finally here 🎉
@Enrage1317 жыл бұрын
The Abrams had 120mm starting in the mid-80s. However, the older vehicles, probably in reserve formations, had 105mm. There are still some M1IPs in the National Guard that are only used for driver's training.
@tellstoryy4 жыл бұрын
Эта херня без кустов не светится, держу в курсе
@Vorobei_ibn_Horus4 жыл бұрын
плохо то, что без работающего двигателя этот танк ничего не может!
@PA3_DBA8874 жыл бұрын
А какой может?
@Wh1te_Horse4 жыл бұрын
@@PA3_DBA887 34-85
@bullets25344 жыл бұрын
Недавно прокачал, очень понравилась, особенно осадный режим
@fatturbo76804 жыл бұрын
Love the 103
@LateDude9610 жыл бұрын
Yeah and the turret and gun couldnt even move that much in the forrests up here in the north so the swedes decided they didnt need it anyway :)
@pnachtwey4 жыл бұрын
I still haven’t seen it hit anything.
@ww2planes_8104 жыл бұрын
It's funny that I thought "well with how much you have why doesn't it float" and then that section popped up. Dang, this MBT did all
@Mille92swe15 жыл бұрын
We should start using it again but 2.0 version when it can fire when moving ^^
@sharky092210 жыл бұрын
wonder what was overall cost of those? comparing to "normal" tank. 2:1? 3:1?
@viking93ify10 жыл бұрын
the reason why the swedish army accepted this project was among other reasons that it was pretty cheap because it's lack a turret and such. but also it's effectiveness.
@sharky092210 жыл бұрын
viking93ify yeah..and? i was asking what was the cost for tank.. i already stated that was cheap.
@dosvidanyagaming41234 жыл бұрын
@@sharky0922 roughly the same as a T-55
@combatantezoteric29654 жыл бұрын
The idiot sewedes used only 40mm of front Armour, so even with that extreme angle the Armour will still be penetrated by the 120mm Russian guns because of overmatching
@dosvidanyagaming41234 жыл бұрын
@@combatantezoteric2965 overmatch doesn't work that way IRL...
@jannesamurai16027 жыл бұрын
Defensive weapon? i find that Offensive to be Frank
@Hiznogood4 жыл бұрын
Janne Samurai Who is Frank?
@Zaph5014 жыл бұрын
Glad there wasn't a war, but it's also a shame that a unique tank like this never got a real test. Gotta settle for War Thunder I guess.
@el67004 жыл бұрын
Damn this tank is really cool
@MyDPbIU_Kot4 жыл бұрын
Привет тундроводы!!!
@CheshireCzech4 жыл бұрын
Еще и картошководы)
@chaostheory37186 жыл бұрын
Reminds me of the Stug
@leftcoaster675 жыл бұрын
Swedish Stug :)
@peterlewerin42134 жыл бұрын
Oh, we had the equivalent of StuGs as well: Sav (stormartillerivagn). One of them was in Saving Private Ryan, playing the Marder that takes down the clock tower.
@Techno-N-ThingzАй бұрын
Yeah me too a more modern stug.
@commanderkilleragent6 жыл бұрын
Interesting vehicle and very defensive in nature.
@melvinthedeathless12 жыл бұрын
It's more of a defensive vehicle than an offensive one, the lack of a turret means that it can't effectively engage targets while on the move.