As a lifelong physicalist (retired eye doctor with undergrad studies in physics), what a joy it was to discover that I was WRONG ... that materialism truly is "Baloney." Only now is it obvious that consciousness is primary - that it is an ontological primitive - that all we have is awareness and the specious present, and that what we call the 'physical world' is an inference; a theoretical abstraction. Words cannot express how thankful I am to have discovered such luminaries as Bernardo Kastrup and Federico Faggin. Thanks also to the Essentia Foundation who are committed to promoting such metaphysical positions as analytic idealism.❤

Thank you! I’m a child of the 1960s. I had my first psychedelic experience, listened to Alan Watts live every week on television, and started meditating when I was 14. I’m now 78. Many of the ideas you now address with concerted analytic vigor I have been thinking about all my life since then. I believe that Bernardo and scientists like Fernando Fagin and others are vigorously building the paradigm shift we have long awaited. Everyone should thank you, but they don’t get it yet. On behalf of humanity and life on earth, I thank you all. Keep it up!

osho : "Love is a by-product of a rising consciousness. It is just like a fragrance of a flower. Don’t search for it in the roots; it is not there. Your biology is your roots; your consciousness is your flowering. As you become more and more an open lotus of consciousness, you will be surprised - taken aback - with a tremendous experience which can only be called love. You are so full of joy, so full of bliss, each fiber of your being is dancing with ecstasy. You are just like a rain cloud that wants to rain and shower. The moment you are overflowing with bliss, a tremendous longing arises in you, to share it. That sharing is love'"

" What I can say about what I feel is much much less then what I feel " beautiful quote

We are going to come full circle ⭕ when spirituality and science merge. The science of the soul.

I am a perfumer and through out years am i trying to figure out how to combine scents and predict the outcome.Along the way have I made astonishing observations.The most awing observation is what I call the concluding phase of smell formation:The exact moment the scent show ups in your mind,is when your feeling of intentional sniffing concludes.The sensation is transferring from physical to mind.

He described exactly what I experienced when my mind exploded from a brownie once in Amsterdam. I saw myself as a ball of light inside my head controlling my body like a machine. My eyes were like windows, my physical movements delayed and separate to my conciousness. I never saw reality or myself the same again since

What a joy, I can’t help but give thanks to all the people who have made this video possible, past and present. How fantastic is it to be a human trying to understand the consciousness we are all a part of! The gift that keeps giving, smelling the roses and rejoicing and then the joy of being able to deeply think about it all, and then the joy of sharing with us your thinking. Beautiful, thank you all.

I bought this book, Irreducible after watching this video. I’m blown away by the clarity of this view of consciousness. Having studied metaphysics, religions, meditation, and non duality for 45 years of adult life, Federico settles the dust of debate in the Preface! I am totally enjoying this book! Well done!

Im glad more of our brightest minds are studying consciousness more. When i went to NC State, alot of my friends who studied physics or were minorly interested in the field were very cautious to even talk about such a thing I hope the stigma attached to it decreases and we keep diving deeper and deeper into it!

This is paradigm shifting and I'm happy that we are arriving here at last. Thank you, Federico Faggin, for opening this window for us!

He is saying what they have been saying in Hinduism and Buddhism for thousands of years.

I listened 3x in the past 24 hours - this here video is a complete game changer 🙌🏻 my prayer is that the unconscious algorithms get this info out to the right conscious minds so we can cooperate, better humanity and look forward to a new future on this planet rooted in love and peace. #faith

Life is the universe's way of knowing itself.

Not that I have heard anything I dont know from my own experience in this video, but the way Federico incorporated it with physics and quantum theory ....WOW just WOW. Thank you so much for posting this video.

This talk reinforces my belief that out next breakthrough in history will be of the human mind. I feel we're on the cusp of advancements in terms of our understanding of ourselves. Brings hope to my poor human heart 😊

To quote Bernardo himself: „Unfathomable change is on the horizon“

I literally cried with joy at certain parts - truly beautiful and harmonious insights. Thank you Federico & Essentia ❤

This is akin to the Surangama Sutra, Hindu, Theravada and other eastern concepts. He gives it a western material reduction language. He’s not the first by far. Still, more voices make a harmonious sound.

Nice to see the scientists are finally catching up to basic yogic knowledge :))

I am a physicist and I will explain why our scientific knowledge refutes the idea that consciousness is generated by the brain and that the origin of our mental experiences is physical/biological . My argument proves that the fragmentary structure of brain processes implies that brain processes are not a sufficient condition for the existence of consciousness, which existence implies the existence in us of an indivisible unphysical element, which is usually called soul or spirit (in my youtube channel you can find a video with more detailed explanations). I also argue that all emergent properties are subjective cognitive contructs that depend on the level of abstraction one chooses to analyze the system and are used to approximately describe underlying physical processes; these descriptions refer only to mind-dependent entities, and therefore consciousness, being implied by these cognitive contructs, cannot itself be an emergent property. Preliminary considerations: the concept of set refers to something that has an intrinsically conceptual and subjective nature and implies the arbitrary choice of determining which elements are to be included in the set; what exists objectively are only the single elements. In fact, when we define a set, it is like drawing an imaginary line that separates some elements from all the other elements; obviously this imaginary line does not exist physically, independently of our mind, and therefore any set is just an abstract and subjective cognitive construct and not a physical entity and so are all its properties. Similar considerations can be made for a sequence of elementary processes; sequence is a subjective and abstract concept. Mental experience is a precondition for the existence of subjectivity/arbitrariness and cognitive constructs, therefore mental experience cannot itself be a cognitive construct; obviously we can conceive the concept of consciousness, but the concept of consciousness is not actual consciousness. (With the word consciousness I do not refer to self-awareness, but to the property of being conscious= having a mental experiences such as sensations, emotions, thoughts, memories and even dreams). From the above considerations it follows that only indivisible elements may exist objectively and independently of consciousness, and consequently the only logically coherent and significant statement is that consciousness exists as a property of an indivisible element. Furthermore, this indivisible entity must interact globally with brain processes because we know that there is a correlation between brain processes and consciousness. This indivisible entity is not physical, since according to the laws of physics, there is no physical entity with such properties; therefore this indivisible entity can be identified with what is traditionally called soul or spirit. The soul is the missing element that interprets globally the distinct elementary physical processes occurring at separate points in the brain as a unified mental experience. Some clarifications. The brain doesn't objectively and physically exist as a mind-independent entity since we create the concept of the brain by separating an arbitrarily chosen group of quantum particles from everything else. This separation is not done on the basis of the laws of physics, but using addictional subjective criteria, independent of the laws of physics; actually there is a continuous exchange of molecules with the blood and when and how such molecules start and stop being part of the brain is decided arbitrarily. An example may clarify this point: the concept of nation. Nation is not a physical entity and does not refer to a mind-independent entity because it is just a set of arbitrarily chosen people. The same goes for the brain. Brain processes consist of many parallel sequences of ordinary elementary physical processes occurring at separate points. There is no direct connection between the separate points in the brain and such connections are just a subjective abstractions used to approximately describe sequences of many distinct physical processes. Indeed, considering consciousness as a property of an entire sequence of elementary processes implies the arbitrary definition of the entire sequence; the entire sequence as a whole (and therefore every function/property/capacity attributed to the brain) is a subjective abstraction that does not refer to any mind-independendent reality. Physicalism/naturalism is based on the belief that consciousness is an emergent property of the brain. However, an emergent property is defined as a property that is possessed by a set of elements that its individual components do not possess; my arguments prove that this definition implies that emergent properties are only subjective cognitive constructs and therefore, consciousness cannot be an emergent property. Actually, all the alleged emergent properties are just simplified and approximate descriptions or subjective/arbitrary classifications of underlying physical processes or properties, which are described directly by the fundamental laws of physics alone, without involving any emergent properties (arbitrariness/subjectivity is involved when more than one option is possible; in this case, more than one possible description). An approximate description is only an abstract idea, and no actual entity exists per se corresponding to that approximate description, simply because an actual entity is exactly what it is and not an approximation of itself. What physically exists are the underlying physical processes. Emergence is nothing more than a cognitive construct that is applied to physical phenomena, and cognition itself can only come from a mind; thus emergence can never explain mental experience as, by itself, it implies mental experience. My approach is scientific and is based on our scientific knowledge of the physical processes that occur in the brain; my arguments prove that the very foundations of our scientific knowledge excludes the possibility that the physical processes that occur in the brain could be a sufficient condition for the existence of consciousness. Marco Biagini

Quite a few aspects of Federico Faggin's description of the universe are essentially the Seven Hermetic Principles. Truth is universal, and it is being re-discovered again and again in more and more detail. This talk is the first compelling description of the quantum nature of consciousness I have heard.

it s so refreshing to see the jungian point of view of consciousness being revitalised in modern topics that gives us a better understaning of it know in the age of quantum mechanics, he was so ahead of his time indeed, also thank you for the video.

Will get his book as soon as it's on audible. Very good.

54:23 what an answer!

I have had 5 out of body experiences, 4 were from a sober state. Each one was more real than my everyday reality, and I have memory of every single second of every single detail, nowhere in my life do I have memories as crystal clear as my out of body experiences. Just the sheer clarity of my memory of those experiences proves to me that life expands outside of the physical vibration speed of this dimension. Our consciousness/soul/spirit/quantum mind exists inside and outside of the body. This individual mind makes up one large individual mind.

In this age of computation, consciousness non computability become more important, Congratulations for important interview.

i love seing kastrup and faggin together, two legends!

Amazing, im excited at the trajectory of these discussions.

Amazing to have drawn these two great minds together

Beautiful! Thank you very much.

Like a long awaited rain in a dessert this video brought me back to reality of life! Marvellous, thank you so much for introducing Federico's work for the masses!

Liked him saying it will help know yourself better... leads to better people...to realise who we are....co operate instead of competing the end of the interview.....

This is so profound! OMG I saved this one to my folder to share with a ton of my friends and associates! Priceless! I'm ordering several copies of his book and a Kindle version also!! ❤️🙏😃

Thank very much, thank you also for Turkish subtitle,,,🙏🌹❤️

When you read out his accomplishments I almost fell over. You now have my full attention.

I love this man and I cherish these discussions as well as this presentation. I spent my intellectual life as a materialist - with all the questions being surrendered to “rationalism” and then I stumbled upon Kastrup. Thank you!

Yes! Thank you very much.

“There are more things in heaven and earth than our dreamt of in your philosophy, Horatio”. I believe is the quote Federico was trying to remember! Love that quote.

Thank you all for bringing this into awareness. Clearly consciousness is manifesting briefly through what we call "life" and then reabsorbs into "no words only consciousness"... A Zen teacher that I studied with had said "human thinking always manifests the human world - "no" thinking manifests where everything is One.

One wants to know itself, was presented to me as a description of God by a Sufi about 45 years ago, and that concept resurfaced for me when listening to Frederico, which is intrinsically joyful to me.

Absolutely brilliant. His postulate on the 1 & knowing oneself, recognising the difference between consciousness & symbolic reality is something I have been questioning in my mind for a while, he annunciated it more clearly for me, thank you Federico & thank you for sharing this

There are numerous studies that show that our consciousness perceives what is going to happen 6 seconds in the future. This aligns with experimental evidence regarding quantum superposition in microtubule arrays which allow faster than light - essentially reversing time - and permitting “real time” instantaneous conscious perceptions. When we also are able to demonstrate our reality is created (co-created as a larger group of consciousnesses) by our own conscious projections as perceptions, preconceived ideas, and historical understanding / emotions) we begin to move toward a working model within a new discipline: the science of consciousness

I've just ordered it on amazon. Looking forward to reading it!!!

This theory is entirely inline with my own personal views and experiences, the presentation was very emotive for myself and I assume others, I appreciate the insight. I look forward to reading the book when I have the means to get a copy. Thank you.

Consciousness is fundamental for sure

Thank you for this. 🙏

Great work ! Two of my greatest heroes on one table.

This puts an entirely new light on "Feeling is the answer". "Feelings are the language of the soul" -Conversations with God Book 1 Feeling is quantum! All observable physical effects on our body are a result of that quantum state. And since it cannot be copied, it can only be replicated approximately. Feelings (Quantum State) are Absolute. Our interpretation of that Quantum State is relative. From Quantum Feeling to Classical physiological effects- information of the Absolute State is lost. Thus all physiological effects are only an approximation of what we truly feel. And all our technological constructions being physical, cannot truly feel and be conscious of it like we can. Mind blowing stuff... Ties in well with Stephen Wolfram's discovery of computational irreducibility. Consciousness cannot be computed/derived, because it is Absolute.

My firsts cpus were made by this guy, among others, 8086 and z80. Its quite exciting seeing him talking about conscience. Really, we grew used to technology and determinism, fearing things apart that. However, quantum technology today isn't efficient like the one found in plants, so if nature did that for plants, ...

what a great insight that can only lead to the real truth about who we are. because whoever says he knows who he is does not go further than naming labels.

Good talk . Thank you very much.

Definitely the way forward with this subject👌

Brilliant 🎉 so wonderful to hear someone with academic education bring it all together - it's as though ancient traditions meet modern quantum physics meets Wisdom & Insight 🎉 brilliant 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏

I usually am hard to impress when it comes to consciousness and any attempts at describing, but theres something about the way federico explains it that i really enjoy.

The interest in consciousness seems to be increasing.

Thank you for helping me understand Thyself a bit better. Still processing it all. Peace, and love.

"We are fields created by one to know itself." Seems like a pretty good explanation for God and an afterlife (where consciousness is separate from classical).

The argument Federico Faggin makes at 30m is: We can't accurately put feelings into words, therefore they cannot be copied. Quantum states also cannot be copied, therefore feelings must come from quantum states. That is in itself a logical fallacy - a version of the inverse error. But the whole concept that feelings must be outside of classical physics just because they evade description is one of many statements in this interview that indicate he simply doesn't understand neurology well enough. If he did, he would have realized that it may simply be because the limbic system evolved hundreds of millions of years before Broca's or Wernike's areas and because of that it operates so differently that it cannot communicate much information to them, even if it DID have the pathways to do so (which it doesn't). It's not uncommon for someone with a high degree of specialty in certain areas, in this case physics and engineering, to look at a problem in another area and assume that they can grasp it just as well as the specialists of those fields. Like all of us, it's hard for him to wrap his head around the fact that language and consciousness are only the very tip of what the brain is doing - we are unaware of the vast majority of what is going on in our own heads. THAT is why it is such a black box. So he looks at this mystery with his physics hammer and assumes it must be the same quantum nail that is still a mystery in physics. There may very well be mechanisms in the brain that go beyond classical physics, but he's basically the guy who sees something in the sky that he can't identify and then telling everyone that it must be aliens.

This is the best explanation I know of, missing is the unknown unseen connections between individuals with consciousness.

Swapping our perspective to view 0D as truly fundamental, rather than the higher 1D-4D dimensions we currently take as basic building blocks, could potentially resolve numerous long-standing contradictions and paradoxes across logic, mathematics and physics. Here are some of the key issues that a "0D is fundamental" viewpoint may shed new light on: 1. The Continuum Hypothesis and Set Theory Paradoxes: Treating points (0D) as the fundamental entities, rather than deriving them from sets/continuums of higher dimensions, could resolve paradoxes around infinity, self-reference, and the problematic concept of completed infinite sets in set theory. 2. Zeno's Paradoxes of Motion: The paradoxes surrounding infinitely dividing space and time may dissolve if 0D points are seen as more real and fundamental than the derived concept of extension through higher dimensions. 3. Singularity Problems in General Relativity: The bizarre infinities and paradoxes surrounding gravitational singularities could be avoided if 4D spacetime is not fundamental, but emerges from a more primitive 0D theory of quantum gravity. 4. The Measurement Problem in Quantum Mechanics: The paradoxes around wavefunction collapse may result from trying to fit inherently 0D quantum processes into a higher 3D spatial manifold. A 0D quantum gravity basis could resolve this. 5. Non-Locality and Bell's Inequality Paradox: Entanglement and non-local correlations violating Bell's inequality seem paradoxical from a 3D perspective, but a fundamentally 0D underpinning could naturally allow such phenomena. 6. The Substantive Reality of Space and Time: The paradoxical nature of space and time as seemingly real yet dynamical players in physics could be resolved if they are not primordial substances but derivative from an essence of 0D events. If 1D-4D manifolds are not locally real in some sense that alone may force us to recognize a more primitive 0D reality as the true locus of beables and local verities in our cosmic model. A daring shift to 0D fundamentality could echo past revolutions like the atomic model or quantum theory itself in resolving deeply ingrained paradoxes. It's a profound concept well worth exploring rigorously by physicists and logicians.

.".. What I feel goes beyond numbers and bits..." ❤...this one sentence says everything.. 😊

This must be the most profound pointer for our times. The Dalai Lama will be on the edge of his meditation cushion. Thank you Federico! Sincerely.

This is quite extraordinary. These new quantum theories of consciousness, which I happen to agree with, are the most important scientific development of my lifetime. It could be year 1 of a new age.

Its Funny i Smelled Roses outside from Nowhere before Clicking on this Video. What a Beautiful Experience all of this is, To Ponder in Solidity feeling Not So Solid After All. Whether The Meaning Was or We Found It, It Is Now and Now Therefore It Was. "Know Thyself" 💕

Love this! Thank You.

10:02 - I think Federico is at least giving a good model for how something like 'telic recursion' could work. It's one of the more interesting ideas out there because it suggests that instead of just being feed-forward through time from internal and external causes that there's an autonomous aspect of ourselves - in the field - that would behave in this manner where there's constant feedback loops between embodied and unembodied self thus giving us an additional horizontal above and beyond simply self-inquiry.

AMEN. This is wild stuff. Absolutely inspiring and worth meditating on day and night.

We need more such scientists and researchers who primarily deal with left-brain stuff combine their right-brain experiences to come to conclusions made by integrating the two perspectives. It takes courage to speak the truth and love in the heart to be someone like this. Immense love and respect to you.

Thank you for your brilliance and common sense! We all know it!

Right. Richard Feyman had said" I can safely say that no one can understand quantum physics " . . I am very much appreciated for all scientists are working hard to find out the solution. I am strongly believe in what Buddha had told us the truth about 3000 years ago. Why not spend some time to study Sharma.

Yesterday I'd written .."Vanilla only alleviates sleep apnea & sleep apnea hasn't another natural remedy. Had vanilla inspired greater wakefulness?" Without wakefulness whilst sleeping, are we sometimes known to die, but this is not to say that life isn't all there is. If we can figure out what fate worse than death we die in lieu of, which I think may be not to endure longterm stigmatism. As a person ages they can find themselves alienated, and I wonder that old age is brought on by hypochondria in fear of being stigmatised worse for what we actually deserve to be. They extract sympathy, and so wanting what they want, we follow suit. I tend to think that sniff & to be what to be sniffed are different ends of one of the first spectrums, from one end to another of the gap between two things feared in first surroundings that caused about first consciousness. I think that as far as we look we will find ourselves, . . Right before we'd noticed an explosion between galaxies, I had a vision about how we & earth are a stage and storyteller duo, and about how earth is mobile moving safe crevice to safe crevice as history expands as does universe and everything changes beneath and including our noses. Umm, I posted it here if you'd like a look. All I write is free. I write about abiogenesis. Live on facee. It's quite shocking. ..I go by the same name there as here. Read this again, and then leave it for a while. See if anything resonates later.

One wanting to know itself is a mantra of new age spirituality.

Two brilliant minds comng together💯👌

I immediately clicked on Amazon to buy the book as soon as I found this out! Although I have a question - is the free will that Mr Faggin was talking about in his theory is the free will if the One or the big C Consciousness? I’ve watched and read a lot of Mr Kastrup’s books and he clearly states that everything is deterministic within the Consciousness. Because if it is the free will of the One then it coincides with idealism perfectly because it postulates that the Will does not have external influences so it’s truly free.

Loved this vid and how has put same spritual words into new scientific words that help u understand more abt this reality and consciousness and the process in btw . Last line he said just deserves 👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽 Great!

Interesting perspective and conversation..

I've felt it for quite some time very strongly that we are literally connected to each and every particle that we understand or we don't, that we know of or we don't and with the Universe 🌌 as a whole, with even inanimate objects that we commonly call "lifeless". One is all and all is one 🌞. I am thankful for everything "they" do and always have and will

Beautifuly said at the end. This theory is not about creating new, better technology, but about evolving humans beyond that primitive materialistic mindset of "fight or flight", "survival of the fittest", "free market", and other materialistic dogmas that were imposed on us through conditioning called "educational system", for the benefit of the few. Implications of this theory are that we are all connected more than we can perceive through analytical mind, and that we must start looking at each other as a part of one. Also, what's not mentioned here, but is implied down the road, it's about switching focus solely from the mind, also to the heart. Of course, that brings a totally new worldview that is in stark contradiction with a LOT of systems nowadays, therefore they will fight to discredit this theory and evolution of consciousness in general. But, the thing is, one who truly understands the implications, will realize the true meaning of free will, and therefore will simply choose the other way, and leave all the fights behind. Thank you Federico!

I just can say WOW❤

Brilliant interview, thanks for sharing it

With regards to coveying our conscious feeling in our limited vocabulary; the ancient greeks had a much richer language with considerably more words plus the ability to include more feeling and also numerical values.

As a xhild i atraggled to understanding the question that kept emerging in my mind. The question was "who doesnt exist?".

I don't think AI in and of itself can attain consciousness. However, I truly believe there will come a time where we can move consciousness into an AI construct of some type. This is fantastic Fredrico, thank you for contribution to humanity. 🙏❤️

There is a beautiful way in which this line of thinking, put in the language and understanding of our age, is resonant and consonant with the perennialist tradition :)

Comparing the brains of the 2 or 3 precent of people that do not have a minds eye, and people who do not have an internal voice with the majority would be an interesting way to learn more about consciousness. Many of these people are surprised to learn that most people hear a voices in there head, or can see images with there eyes closed, and for some both. These people seem to describe abstract experience when they do task that most people do. For example people who don’t have a minds eye can remember where things and describe it as not seeing it but knowing it somehow. Some people without an internal dialogue can read exceptionally fast by visually processing the words in lines rather than hearing the words. Now a interesting study would be to compare the brains of people without a minds eye and the majority when doing task such as mental rotation. Those without a minds eye can still pass these test without rotating the object in there mind eye. So does that mean the rotation is still happening but that the processing is just being done in the subconscious of those people. There are some studies comparing these groups. And there are differences in how different regions of the Brain communicate with one another. But it would be interesting to compare the neurons of a recently deceased person that had this lack of visual imagination to see if there are any differences structurally in the brains at a level that quantum effects would be more realistic. Like microtubials differences in like with Penrose and his co authors idea. So if it can be shown that there are people who are able to rotate items in there head but without being self aware how they do it that seems like a very good place to look for a physical structure in the brain that effects self awareness. Either these people are not have the full conscious experience most have, or there experiencing it in a more abstract way. Either way there is a tremendous opportunity to study how self awareness manifests itself given how prevalent this is in the population.

Brilliant!!!

This is exactly the conclusion I came to independently after understanding I don't imagine with imagery (Aphantasia). It's actually insane how I predicted, before even clicking on this video, that it would be my exact theory's conclusion but drawn from an actual professional in the field that covers the harder conceptual blindspots. This is why we don't understand intuitively the complex systems outside of our own selves...And aphantasia, along with other sensory related disparities expressed in the modern human are perfect viewports for other intellectuals and scholars of nature to draw from, a rich contrast between their own conscious experience...in order to gain clarity and a tightening of the focus around the Quantum / Macro interrelationships. Interrelationships that have eluded us for as long as modern consciousness related fields of study can remember. Essentially, we, all of us, all brain types, can cooperatively exchange perspectives of perception in order to propel ourselves off of this planet and out into our destinies. Just think what we could do if we put our bullshit aside and just worked together on our collective trailblaze into the stars. Lets finally try to live long and prosper 🖖

I hope everyone listening has at least ONE friend they can talk to about this, otherwise, I think they'd go nuts, LOL I've got that ONE person!

Fascinating discussion. I would love to get your reaction @wesroth especially on AI not being able to achieve consciousness.

Yeees! Thought and emotion are aspects of our quantum state. Fractalise youtself in feelings and ideas or let the flow caress your awareness with more information than you possessed...if you stop to think your way through. It is an information field, quantumness is a depth that surfaces.

Claims are just claims if they are not objectively backed up by scientific experiments - just like "Billy Jean's claim in Michael Jackson's song". This is purely metaphysics, and anyone including scientists, inventors, and great people can trespass without a prior permission. It is a great pleasure to see good smart people authoring books good to read (as myself as an author).

Excellent. Thanks

This is great and encouraging for us as humans. What happens when we have quantum computers? Will they develop consciousness by having quantum states and fields?

The closing remark of getting to know each other and cooperate is so similqr to the verse of the Quran that says as translated "oh humanity we have created you from male and female and turned you into nations and tribe to get to know each other. Verily the most noble of you in Allahs sight is he who is most conscious"..wow

Consciousness is not just fundamental, it is all there is. I recently understood that this is an undeniable/nonnegotiable fact after a very long (years long) inner battle between me and myself. What we call Matter is nothing more than a bunch of experiences and ideas. Pick anything that you call matter and ask yourself what it really is, you will only find experiences and ideas. This wooden table infront of me, for example, is all about the brown colour of wood, the sound of woodness when I hit it, the wooden vibration I feel while hitting it, the feeling of woodness when I touch it, and the concept of a four legged object. Remove all of the senses and there will be no table.

I remember when i was a kid, and i saw a documentary saying how you cant have smell without quantum mechanics. Because the particles have to be in two places at the same time for smell to work.

The CPU is the most awesome invention the world has ever seen. It's the best toy man has ever created :)

I really love that someone of us humans has the beutyfull idea to express the One Truth that we are more than material biotecnologie but the Essence of a magnificent Being (the Creator) Who has divided It self for getting to experience what and Who he is❤ Such a discorse never touch the scientist minds becouse we struggle with deviding instead to see holistic approce 🎉

It seems mind is the bridge between classical and quantum. Gross thoughts, or even finer thoughts are in the realm of classical i.e. matter, but when thoughts are resolved and one is in no-mind state, one enters the realm of quantum. The no-mind and measurement are exclusive sets. Existence of thought, in turn, mind, in the given moment, is the measurement itself. No-mind is beyond measure. 10:44 Yet to go through the rest of video, already loving it.