Why dont people protest to put her out... She is just parroting 2+ years

Tess Tickle - It was the UK who occupied the Irish Island and hold on to it even after the Irish fought for their independence. So the EU tried to find a work how the Good Friday Agreement an international treaty could be uphold. This is a mess that exist only because of the decision of the UK.

@@TorianTammas is it not northern Ireland that want to stay as part of the UK and not IRELAND? I'm asking as I don't get why the British government don't just give the Irish they're land back seeing as the British government have only got what they have because they've always took what they want??

@@commonsenselogic9901 This is a very good question. Northern Ireland costs the British tax payer around 14 billion (amusingly more as EU membership) and as such are quite a costly luxury. As the majority in NI voted to stay in the EU. They could at least do a referendum to see if a majority in NI wants to leave the UK or not. So they could reunite with Ireland. So no backstop and all would be so much easier.

This is wrong in pretty much every conceivable way. The Treaty of Paris (formally the Treaty establishing the European Coal and Steel Community) was signed on 18 April 1951 between France, West Germany, Italy and the three Benelux countries (Belgium, Luxembourg, and the Netherlands), establishing the European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC), which subsequently became the foundation of the European Union. In 1957, Belgium, France, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, and West Germany signed the Treaty of Rome, which created the European Economic Community (EEC) and established a customs union. They also signed another pact creating the European Atomic Energy Community (Euratom) for co-operation in developing nuclear energy. The UK did not sign the Rome treaty until 1973 with Denmark and Ireland. 'Modern' Europe is considered from the date of the Maastricht Treaty from 1992-2007, which saw the introduction of the Euro, which was positively smashed down in the house of commons. From the beginning of the 2010s, the cohesion of the European Union, following the introduction of several new countries, faced serious debt crisis' and questions about open borders and new emergent threats following wars in the middle east. The UK have taken a fundamentally different stance based on the fact that we joined late, have different reasons for being in the EU, contribute more than many other nations and do not have the capacity to trade effectively with rapidly growing economies such as America and China. The EU are protectionist, which is what sets them apart from the UK and leads to the idea that their ideologies clash with the ones we have based the formation of our business culture on.

Why answer anything when that would require a new lie that she hasn't rehearsed.

She is called Maybot for that reason.

jocelyne, I agree👍, after all it’s not much to ask for, just one straight answer.................please.

I understand that,but her answers are always evasive,speaking a lot but not saying much at all.

Questions are being so defined that is is not beyond a yes/no answer.

just remember how this woman answers when getting questioned. It might come in handy if you ever get questioned by the police.

Amen. ..That

Mike Freeman She isn't interested in the will of the people, she just uses the rhetoric to achieve 'her' goal rather than running the UK effectively. Brexit should have been scrapped two and a half years ago.

Lying? literally everything she is saying is backed up by a wealth of evidence. Documentation of her policies is everywhere and freely available online

@@alexanderhowarth6460 and non of it back her up, at this point I would double check if she said the sun will rise tomorrow

ivy kkb Whats your IQ ... 125? Or less Can you imagine standing up for hours, answering blind “pre-prepared loaded” questions, that are all specifically designed to torpedo you? Furthermore add the complexity ... that she rightly has to be evasive on some sensitive areas ... e.g. when asked “what if “ questions ... that she may have to later take a stance on with the EU. Get real she cant answer some forthrightly as that could undermine her negotiating position with the EU .... er dummy that would hurt us. I guess you must be one of these dumb blind Corbynistas, clueless as to how one negotiates and happy to score a five second win at the expense of the Nation. Look at Corbyns 6 tests ... what a joke. Respect the will of the people but stay in the single market and the customs union ... ooops thats impossible! Unless of course Corbyn caves in and pays the EU trillions of Euros for the privelidge! Which he would do .... but hell it don’t matter, because he would “borrow it” until we were bankrupt and the next Cons gov came in and cleared up the financial mess. Barnier would massacre Corbyn .... the only way you win over the EU is by constantly reminding them of the logic of Your argument. How would Corbyn convince the EU to comply with his 6th Test. I.e. to have a better deal than we currently have. Ludicrous to think he could as a leaving, non-fee paying member, get a better deal than existing Members, who pay their fees! That man is a total Moron!

@@peterrolex2349 what negotiating position both she and the European have said it can't be renegotiated, best option is no deal and actictively lobby other member states to exit while offering them mutually beneficial trade deals and bring the whole EU crashing down.

@@peterrolex2349 IQ is irrelevant when it comes to somebody's argument. I know he doesn't have one but if you're simply boasting that you have an IQ of 125, counter-intuitively it makes you look like an idiot. being able to recognise patterns and having mental agility is a great parlour trick but nobody of any real intelligence has to boast about their IQ or even mention it

@John what's wrong with the British like? I know the generalisation of 'brits' but not all of us were born with a silver spoon, a massive ego, a view that we deserve ad should be allowed to go where we want and when, privileged, obnoxious or ignorant.... don't tar ALL brits because the majority are as fucked up as the majority of Americans,

she is is the punchingbag :) in this horrible shitshow

If only it was as easy to compel someone.

yeah,someone needs to find the switch and turn her off

She's a remainer and this is as close to remain and as much Sabotage that forces is back into the EU at future date as is possible to sell as a brexit deal. Or she's completely incompetent. Probably incompetent.

@John I agree, the British should definitely get what they voted for, which universally almost everyone agrees isn't what May has delivered.

rebecca mafia Initially it would be attractive to be the Prime Minister that achieved brexit, now she can't lose face and be seen to back down. Then there's all the other dubious and improper issues with brexit and the referendum that are sidelined.

She has a job to do that no one wants her TO DO

leapsplashafrog Wto is best option for U.K. to maintain the U.K.

leapsplashafrog Yes wto is best option get out and safe from Eu first then negotiate from safety

Oh I totally disagree. She answered the questions very effectively. The problem is that she’s being asked binary questions that don’t have binary answers.

TYPING IN CAPLOCKS MAKES EVERYONE DISLIKE LIKE YOU, BE CIVIL AND WRITE IN LOWER CASE.

We need a people's Canada plus deal.

@@melthalin3559 no deal best deal

If she doesnt get her deal there may be no deal wow how remoeners would wail then!

REEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!

She has to provide evidence to back up her answers. That's how this works. Also, she is the leader of the conservative party, so she can't say she won't deliver Brexit if her deal is rejected. That's political suicide.

If I could turn back time - Cher

@@Dannycarry Please release me - Engelbert Humperdinck

Also, the UK must trade on an level playing field to the EU, which means no competitiveness compared to a no deal WTO Brexit.

we never voted her in

@@madpoolie she still represent you, doesn't she? my point is disregard who voted she still have a lot of people that support her..which is totally suicidal..she's like the Pied Piper and the rats..sorry