it’s not as crazy as you think

I dont watch the show but I guess that depends how many times he shot somebody, what type of gun was used etc

@@Azaqa I did watch the show- the lawyer called in the expert witnesses boss and got her to confirm that it was an excessive amount of GSR and that it was due to his client being put into police vehicle that had previously been used to transport a guy who had shot over 90 rounds with different guns. So the back of the police vehicle was coated in GSR from the first guy, and it transferred to the second guy (his client) when he was put in the police vehicle.

I had assumed from just this short that the amount of gsr was probably more then normal. And im asking the same thing as you.

​@@russellstanley8884That...seems like a very important and semi-obvious possibility to consider. The vehicle used to transport a suspect isn't taken into consideration for such a case?

1. This is a shitty show, this isn’t how police investigations are actually conducted. 2. Are you trying to say that if you have dust on you then police will just say it’s smokeless powder?

Odly enough blood is what gets rid of g s r

@@kimberlymartin7498 Huh... So once I'm done killing someone, I should wash my clothes in their blood to get the GSR out? Thanks for the tip! Uh... Hypothetically, I mean. Of course!

​@@kimberlymartin7498 source?

@@somerandomgamingandstuff source these nuts nerd

I wonder if he brought cookies to this hearing 😂

The rest of Lewberger pops out and start singing

is that actually alex??

@@Max-yn2vf Yes

Yuh

I’m thinking if someone was planning to commit a crime or needed to camouflage what had been done, they would do this. Go to gun range and shoot. Reload some bullets at home.

Actually I can.

Of course it doesn’t outright prove anything, except when it’s corroborated with other evidence. Then it’s pretty damning

As a real lawyer.. You have 200% my backing on that little piece of evidence. Show writers are stupid. They think judges are handing out prison terms to people because they found some powder on their clothes under a microscope. That's not how the legalia works. Never how it works. The burden of proof lying on the suspect means as long as you can create reasonable doubt in the mind of the judge/jurors, you are good. You can't hang someone on circumstantial evidence. Can't even put them in jail for circumstantial evidence. If a judge does that.. they can kiss their chair and career goodbye that very moment.

@@IAmAFamelYa pretty much this. It would be pretty easy to prove you go target shooting but if you aren’t then ya.

Are you a lawyer or in the field? I have not watched the show but your arguments are telling

​@@marvinkweyu5206 the blood thing seems obvious, you would expect at least some if a point blank shot was made

i saw him and i was like IS THAT ALEX LEWIS???

Don't you dare! 😂

No, lawyers just say stupid shit all the time. The dude even hesitated before answering to make sure he wasn't answering wrong.

I guess that English isn’t your main language, but i’ll explain what that means - it means that someone showed positive, but due to external factors.

It depends on the time since the shooting. If the shooting was a few hours before testing then you can dismiss trace amounts but if it was a longer time ago where there’s only be trace amounts left then you’d get false positives

They never said that. They said the opposite. If it's more than just trace amounts, it can't be a false positive

Writers pretending they’re experts in anything good shit up

Where was the lie?

​@@VitoD226 Not exactly lie, but if by all records, the crime scene involved only two shots, and after tests, you find excessive amounts of residues, those two things don't fit together

He's an expert witness, leading questions are allowed

I just watched a trial where they called it GSR and even wrote down GSR on their documents. It was in Wisconsin though so I'm not sure they set the national standards.

This takes place 5 months after the murder and the defendant actually confessed he never used a gun.

Needs evidence of that tbf

Season 1. Don't remember which episode. I was on the jury.

If you are taking law advice from a tv show or a movie I think you deserve what’s coming to you

Finger Happy