As a young boy born in sikh family in late 80’s , I heard so many stories from grand parents about muslims and specially some muslim rulers and what injustice they did , why sikh gurus went through all the trouble at that time, babar at 1st gurus time upto aauranzeb at 10th gurus time I heard so many stories in detail. How they used power and cruelty to convert non muslims, it surprised me as a child if they were like that why their footprints are all over our country, how nobody is talking about it , Because hindus suffered lot more then anyone else at those times but still nobody say anything . Now I understand people can’t do anything until their is a political will , i m not in favour of punishing today’s muslims for what mugals did , but it hurt when today’s muslims start defending them .
@basantakumarsahoo90892 жыл бұрын
Conspiracy aap samajhte hain, Jaan kar acha laga
@ashokbishnoi28702 жыл бұрын
0
@ashokbishnoi28702 жыл бұрын
9k
@ashokbishnoi28702 жыл бұрын
@@basantakumarsahoo9089 0
@sarangmishra7982 жыл бұрын
As a hindu, I will be always grateful for the support and lives given by sikh gurus and soldiers to save hindus when when no one was standing for hindus. We will always be sorry for what happened in '84.
@user-bp5dm4tp6c2 жыл бұрын
Ruchika Ma'am ! Destroying temple is different and taking away idol from one temple to another is different.
@DharmveerSingh-vg4hu2 жыл бұрын
Ye log apna jhutha narrative isi tarah build karte hain. They know there is difference between breaking and stealing but how conveniently she chose the world breaking than stealing.
@somashekarbhat56302 жыл бұрын
She is not learning history
@TrisomyTwoOne2 жыл бұрын
She does not deserve to be called Ma"am but I respect your choice of words!
@sagaryadav33902 жыл бұрын
Leftist history padh ke historian bache ruchika ji jaise hi honge
@binoyjani2 жыл бұрын
If one says that in history demolitions was there before mugal, then then present time also one day will become history,, so then let it be continue,, NOW PRESENT TIME IS FROM MASJID TO TEMPLE,,, , " LET THE HISTORY TO BE CONTINUE" THIS PRESENT PROCESS ALSO ONE DAY WILL BE CALLED HISTORY. SO SUPPORT HISTORY AND ENJOY.
@aijazulhaquefareedi9346 ай бұрын
लाखों हिन्दू जो भारत में मुसलमान हुए हैं क्या वह किसी मन्दिर के मालिक नहीं थे? अगर थे तो मुसलमान होकर उन्होंने अपने मन्दिरों को मन्दिर नहीं बनाया होगा? ईश्वर हमें सद्बुद्धि दें। सत्यमेव जयते।
@Shiven_Singh10 ай бұрын
Ultimately Prof. Kapil's point is proved throughout the debate. This is what I feel. I may be wrong. What he wanted to say was that First accept the history and then move on. There is no need to demonise today's Muslim on account of what Muslim rulers did in name of religion. Don't defend it or try to tone it down. However that's what Prof. Nadeem and Mrs. Ruchika are doing throughout the debate.
@basantakumarnayak95902 жыл бұрын
Since I am from odisha, as odisha history have been taught to us the idol which have been stolen from odisha by vijay nagar king has been recovered by Gajpati Kapildev by attacking vijay nagar kingdom. Th idol never destroyed.
@sauvagyakumarpanda68052 жыл бұрын
But i think prataprudra dev was the king when krushnadev attacked odisha and prataprudra was the last gajapati ruler
@dhirendradhiraj91882 жыл бұрын
The perspective of then hindu rulers were different, they theft the idols for worship as they installed it in temple with a faith that it would increase the prosperity of their kingdom.
@asoul35292 жыл бұрын
And they missed the point that though they stole the idol but respected and didn't break with hatred...is there any comparison with what mughals did?
@rehnumai6592 жыл бұрын
How will u define Stolen and damaged?
@shehnazqazi1172 жыл бұрын
Ye sab political hi he jab se bjp ai ye Mandir masjid ki rajnity kar rahi he.supreme court ne keh diya tha k babar ne n masjid banai n koi mandir pehle tha jo toda gaya.ye ap historian suprime court ka judgement padh le.aur ye bhi supreme court ne ye bhi k ha k jis tarah se masjid todi gai woh bhi galat thi.aur un ko saza mil ni chaiye.mager akhir me astha k naam par un hi masjid todne walo ko masjid sonpi gai.un ko saza ke patra Mane gae mager un ko saza nahi di gai.
@sachdanand20572 жыл бұрын
Any Acknowledgement of Atrocities by Muslim Community is next to impossible.
@faisalmuneerone2 жыл бұрын
I am Muslim.. and i acknowledged they did.. but is it fair to punish someone who was not born then. 🤷 What kind of insane argument is that.
@sachdanand20572 жыл бұрын
@@faisalmuneerone If it is insane argument then what is the purpose in Acknowledgement.Moreover there is no question of punishment.
@shubhamtripathi57092 жыл бұрын
@@faisalmuneerone insane argument is when u term punishment as wanting our prestigious temple of holiest place of hindus Kashi. If it's a attrocity in your thinking then kudos to your ideology
@boredparticle04442 жыл бұрын
@@faisalmuneerone is rebuilding temple punishment? No . killing of someone bcz of their religion is.which should nt happen
@AmanKumar-fl5ud2 жыл бұрын
@@faisalmuneerone german except that hitler did wrong to jews dosent means everyone is punishing germans but its about ressetelling history so that people can live peacefully but if you say aurenzeb was good and prais himthen its automatic hindus will get angry
@akchoudhury71852 жыл бұрын
I am really thankful to lallantop for this wonderful episode, We have to learn from history in a positive way. But I wonder why some people angry on today’s Muslims, most of them are converted, they are not the one who did this. We have to work together for better future…..Hopefully our people will understand it ASAP😊😊😊
@binoyjani2 жыл бұрын
If one says that in history demolitions was there before mugal, then then present time also one day will become history,, so then let it be continue,, NOW PRESENT TIME IS FROM MASJID TO TEMPLE,,, , " LET THE HISTORY TO BE CONTINUE" THIS PRESENT PROCESS ALSO ONE DAY WILL BE CALLED HISTORY. SO SUPPORT HISTORY AND ENJOY.
@rahulanand73152 жыл бұрын
One good thing that started is, we have started learning our past more clearly. It's very important for us to learn our roots. Otherwise a lot of narrative has been fed to us to destroy our cultural value. And Narendra Modi advent in political space has caused this. He's the greatest leader we need.
@nannaredmi73412 жыл бұрын
God help the students of Ruchika, her understanding I believe is only limited to the books she has partially read... Meguthi temple in karnataka even today is recognized as a Jain Basadi and is a unfinished temple... No hindu will install a idol in unfinished temples... Even if they had a motive to morph the basadi to shivalaya. Also untrue are the words she uses when she says that Lord Krishna idol was broken 'thodke' and installed as Vittala in another temple by Vijayanagara ruler Krishnadeva raya. Appears she has no knowledge of hindu rituals and of hindu temples... No way a broken idol will be installed/worshipped in any Hindu temple. She is a half baked eggg...
@MM-ue4ol2 жыл бұрын
I think you shd read the history of vitthal ie vithoba ( as called in maharashtra), it is documented and claimed by the priests in Pandharpur that on few occasions they removed n hide the original murti of vithoba in fear to get destroyed by Muslims in war times and reinstalled it afterwards. Anyways let it be Muslim or Hindus or anyone shd accept the past, religion is found to be a main cause of human casualties in history, and most war fought by the name of religion n gods, now lets look at the present n future by throwing the radicalism/ fundamentalism away.
@asnfhtmlzxsje2742 жыл бұрын
She is Half Rotten egg
@johnab12352 жыл бұрын
ruchika is nivedita menon new brand . inventing history out of thin air in disguised support for islamic jehaadis . classical communist/leftist hindu hater . appeal to the channel not to invite such hollow ,boasting shamelessly anti Hindu propagandists .
@niamscookery34422 жыл бұрын
I agree with you on consecration of broken idols.
@jyotivsood44762 жыл бұрын
I agree with you especially when you mention ruchika is a half baked egg.
@kamalnaria942 жыл бұрын
मैडम, मूर्ति तोड़ना और मूर्ति को हटाकर दूसरी जगह स्थापित करना दोनों में आपको फर्क नज़र नहीं आता ? शब्द के चयन में इतनी छोटी सी सावधानी तो रखी जानी चाहिए। सौरभ, आपने उन्हें टोका क्यों नहीं, ये भी मेरी शंका है।
@Arun-fg2bu2 жыл бұрын
I have same exact view
@jagdishnarola52932 жыл бұрын
Sahi bat bole bro
@DharmveerSingh-vg4hu2 жыл бұрын
Ye log apna jhutha narrative isi tarah banate hain.
@manjunathpatil3062 жыл бұрын
Madam videshi sharab pi ke ayi hain....mandir todna uske liye ordinary event hain....
@pradeepsahrawat31282 жыл бұрын
Tokta kesay akhir saurab hay to noker he jo iska malik bolayga vesa he to program banayga
@vkyadava7262 жыл бұрын
Prof Kapil has very valid reasoning backed with historical evidences. Prof Nadeem and Ruchita too have presented their views with a mindset which is quite obvious and needs to be kept in mind before arriving any conclusion.
@ramsundarsingh9496 ай бұрын
इस महिला ने कही कि मस्जिद को भी तोड़कर मंदिर भी बनवाया गया तो किसी एक मंदिर का नाम और स्थान बताएं कि कौन से मस्जिद को तोड़कर मंदिर बनाया गया था? जय श्री राम जी
@RK-jh9ee2 жыл бұрын
"The Sun, The Moon And The Truth Can't Be Hidden For a Long Time". ~ Gautam Buddha
@World_Spiritual2 жыл бұрын
पिछले 12 वर्षों से मेरे परिवार को उत्तर प्रदेश पुलिस प्रशासन द्वारा मानसिक प्रताड़ना दिया जा रहा है । kzfaq.info/get/bejne/prqcgMt6uZfYaKM.html मुख्यमंत्री कार्यालय उत्तर प्रदेश व पुलिस प्रशासन का कहना है कि यह सबकुछ मुख्यमंत्री श्री योगी आदित्यनाथ जी के आदेश पर हो रहा है । Please help my family to meet the Chief Minister of Uttar Pradesh Shree Yogi Adityanath Ji. My family wants to live please help us. 🙏🙏🙏
@indudiwan32902 жыл бұрын
@@World_Spiritual "
@sunilghadge28332 жыл бұрын
@@World_Spiritual keep some social organization contacts
@sachinkhare17082 жыл бұрын
And the Buddha himself is hidden(no where now) in India. Context: how Buddha and buddhism and jainism and their temples have been destroyed is rarely debated in our times. And you who must have done that ;) (definitely not mughals)
@miloblackmetalhate2 жыл бұрын
@@sachinkhare1708 Definitely yes Mughals. Wtf are you on about? Except Pushyamitra Shunga no other Hindu ruler actively destroyed such structures. While Bakhtiyar Khilji destroyed the largest Buddhist and Hindu University & Library in the World. This one being one of thousands of such examples.
@giridharshetty27782 жыл бұрын
Before Indepence there was a Jewish Molalla in mumbai. There were 3 Hindu temples there. But after Jewish migration after Israel became independent that area became a Muslim area. Those 3 temples have disappeared.
@shantithakur70182 жыл бұрын
⁰0
@OK-vh2xp2 жыл бұрын
Where in Mumbai ?
@binoyjani2 жыл бұрын
If one says that in history demolitions was there before mugal, then then present time also one day will become history,, so then let it be continue,, NOW PRESENT TIME IS FROM MASJID TO TEMPLE,,, , " LET THE HISTORY TO BE CONTINUE" THIS PRESENT PROCESS ALSO ONE DAY WILL BE CALLED HISTORY. SO SUPPORT HISTORY AND ENJOY.
@azammasurkar80462 жыл бұрын
Where was they there is still juvish temple existed
@sudhakarkamatam71016 ай бұрын
@@binoyjaniye Chapti ZAMEEN kaha hy 😅😅
@renur58912 жыл бұрын
Tremendous amout of respect for Professor Kapil. I've bee watching his shows and am a huge fan of his.
@AyushGupta_31032 жыл бұрын
When Ruchika was asked about the sense of injustice in Hindus for the demolition of their Religious monuments She simply didn't answer that but rant about Bharat Mata Mandir (despite that has not been constructed after any demolition) So people please understand this hypocrisy
@vishvanathjoshi93582 жыл бұрын
Ruchika narrating Daulatabad episode is also whataboutary. Mosque was built by plundering hindu temples and same materials was used which is evident even now. So your choice of history expert is under question Lallantop team. This was happened in 1948 during police action on Nizam of Hyderabad. There had been a great deal of local pressure to reinstate temple. To avoid communal bais Govt installed bharatmata idol. Ruchika twisted whole story and tried to prove first Indian govt (of nehruji) communal or equal to auranjeb. Lalantop need to study and make correction on false claims made in best ever discussion program.
@rajanikulkarni79202 жыл бұрын
Lallan top always play mischief shamelessly..
@gurpalanand25082 жыл бұрын
The lady is quite ignorant..does not have indepth knowledge.I pity her students.
@gurpalanand25082 жыл бұрын
The problem with muslim scholars is that they dont have d guts to admit d wrong done by mughals...
@binoyjani2 жыл бұрын
If one says that in history demolitions was there before mugal, then then present time also one day will become history,, so then let it be continue,, NOW PRESENT TIME IS FROM MASJID TO TEMPLE,,, , " LET THE HISTORY TO BE CONTINUE" THIS PRESENT PROCESS ALSO ONE DAY WILL BE CALLED HISTORY. SO SUPPORT HISTORY AND ENJOY.
@gauravaim12132 жыл бұрын
This is for Ruchika Maam....destroying an idol and defacing it is different and taking an idol from one place to another is different(In respect of Krishnadevaraya)....so please do not mix the two things
@aadityaranjan73102 жыл бұрын
Isne to mughal k bare me ek v word nhi bola,isko koi mulla leta hoga😠😠isko mai historian kv nhi manta or ye communist ideology hai😠😠
@gauravaim12132 жыл бұрын
@@aadityaranjan7310 Sorry but I don't subscribe to these kind of comments.... I am just stating what I understand about history in a parliamentary language
@sanjaymishra3982 жыл бұрын
Lalantop namakharam wampanti channel hai hindhu virodhe
@kaiwalyaghotkar8322 жыл бұрын
@@gauravaim1213 she never said its same, she just gave context what things used occur even before Mughals came in , she also gave examples about Jain Temples and how shaivaits converted those . How Hindus destroyed Buddhist Monuments.
@sadikhalishaik20262 жыл бұрын
Yes because they both are Hindus 👏😆🤭
@craftboom36876 ай бұрын
HINDU ❌😎❌ MUSALMAN 😎 AYODHYA.....❌ MAKKA ❌ ARAB ❌ ME MATHURA...❌ MADINA KASHI......... ❌ KABA ❌ DEKHO 😎
@shariqishrat75492 жыл бұрын
Dear Saurabh thanks for organizing such a beautiful debate , there are three people representing Ancient , Medieval and Present periods. Most of the people doesn't like quarrelling among themselves. They want peace in their present competitive world , where one need hard to earn bread and butter. HISTORY IS TO TAKE LESSON FROM THE PAST , NOT TO REPEAT.
@prahladresumes49457 ай бұрын
Isn't Islamic Invaders your heroes ?
@Vikaskumar-wo3gi2 жыл бұрын
Nice debate. Before Ruchika madam opened her mouth I was sure she is left winged. Jab Hindu raja ne Murti Tor di to phir apni mandir me kaise lagayi.First I thought it is slip of tongue but she repeated it many times.I learned a new terminology of reuse also. Prof. Nadeem agrees that temple was broken but doesn’t fail to glorify Aurangzeb
@aadityaranjan73102 жыл бұрын
Nhi bhai,itna hi nhiis lrki ne hindu ko lrwa diya,isne kv mughal k bare me kuch nhi bola...ab samajh jao
@umairahmad29112 жыл бұрын
What is your definition of leftist??
@aadityaranjan73102 жыл бұрын
@@umairahmad2911 what is the defination of chuslam?what is ola hu uber??
@AmitSingh-ou6kj2 жыл бұрын
Wampanthin.... Maine dekhi nhi thi isase pahle.... Inki acting dekhne ka mja hi kuch aur hai jb ye kisi anyay ko chipane ke liye nukkad ki debate krne aati hn.... Iss nawtnkibaz aurat ke example to dekho.... 😀😀😀😀😀
@qaz010wsx2 жыл бұрын
Professor Nadeem at the last did exactly what Professor Kapil was accusing him of. Prof. Nadeem at the end started saying that there is no written proof that a temple was demolished to build gyanvapi mosque.
@sagaryadav33902 жыл бұрын
Wahi toh inke paas 800 AD me koi jain yaa buddist mandir todkar hindu banaya uske saboot he lekin Kashi aur Gyanvapi kankuch nahi he
Yes yes ek dum sahi Taliban never destroyed badiyam Buddhists idol ...we are fake secular ...prof was right 😅😂🤣
@raindropsfromsky99122 жыл бұрын
I am not sure what he expected: A DPR (Detailed Project Report)? A tender for the demolition of the temple? A notice served to the temple administration?
@satyendrapandeyful6 ай бұрын
@@sagaryadav3390"Masar E alamgiri " book written by historian in Aurangjeb administration time in his state....it explains when and how thish kashiwishanath temple was breaked down by order of King Aurangjeb....
@transparentviewer2 жыл бұрын
पॉलिटिकल नजरिए से देखे तो भी आक्रांताओ का कोई भी निशान आजाद मुल्क में होना नहीं चाहिए। सबका अपने धर्म संस्कृति के अनुसार पुनः निर्मित करना चाहिए।
@pradumnsoni4472 жыл бұрын
Factual,Calm& Proper way of Discussion that we rarely watch, specially in Media nowadays.
@harshitbajpai81212 жыл бұрын
Prof. Kapil is right about historical facts given by him from Nizami and Habib, Barni, Abul Fazl etc.
@World_Spiritual2 жыл бұрын
पिछले 12 वर्षों से मेरे परिवार को उत्तर प्रदेश पुलिस प्रशासन द्वारा मानसिक प्रताड़ना दिया जा रहा है । kzfaq.info/get/bejne/prqcgMt6uZfYaKM.html मुख्यमंत्री कार्यालय उत्तर प्रदेश व पुलिस प्रशासन का कहना है कि यह सबकुछ मुख्यमंत्री श्री योगी आदित्यनाथ जी के आदेश पर हो रहा है । Please help my family to meet the Chief Minister of Uttar Pradesh Shree Yogi Adityanath Ji. My family wants to live please help us. 🙏🙏🙏
@oummati79972 жыл бұрын
😂😂😂😂😂 Aise hi kapil ghatiya prof. Hinduu ko musalmano k issue bna k gobar bna rahe hai...
@sushilkumarr89342 жыл бұрын
@@oummati7997 tu punture Bana, yaha kya karra....tere level ki baatein nahi h ye sab ...
@miloblackmetalhate2 жыл бұрын
@@oummati7997 Hawala toh Muslim Historians ka hi de raha hai moorkh? Isse behtar suboot toh Allah Miyan hi de paayenge.
@binoyjani2 жыл бұрын
If one says that in history demolitions was there before mugal, then then present time also one day will become history,, so then let it be continue,, NOW PRESENT TIME IS FROM MASJID TO TEMPLE,,, , " LET THE HISTORY TO BE CONTINUE" THIS PRESENT PROCESS ALSO ONE DAY WILL BE CALLED HISTORY. SO SUPPORT HISTORY AND ENJOY.
@ashisharjariya37402 жыл бұрын
Kapil is a example of how someone can have that clarity without any support of ecosystem, we can understand how many secrifices you must have given for this ideology. Mr. Nadeem put his points well. Ruchira is an example how a mediocre person can get good platform when associated to left ideology and ecosystem.
@sumitshekhar26642 жыл бұрын
Bhai Saurabh aapka mai bhot bara fan tha aapka par aapka jo stand rhta h na aap neeutral baane ke chakkar me sachai se door jaake apno ko hi mar lete h bare bhai
@gauravpolekar21582 жыл бұрын
Very well written Ashish ji. And everyone will be 100% agree on last point
@AmitSingh-ou6kj2 жыл бұрын
Wampanth ka asar patrakarita pe na ho to western prize nhi milta bhai...
@profkapilkumar-historian2 жыл бұрын
Thanks
@binoyjani2 жыл бұрын
If one says that in history demolitions was there before mugal, then then present time also one day will become history,, so then let it be continue,, NOW PRESENT TIME IS FROM MASJID TO TEMPLE,,, , " LET THE HISTORY TO BE CONTINUE" THIS PRESENT PROCESS ALSO ONE DAY WILL BE CALLED HISTORY. SO SUPPORT HISTORY AND ENJOY.
@xxxxccc33332 жыл бұрын
Thanks Lallan top to bring such intellectual opinions to us and help us to vanish out the misconceptions to build our India great.
@NurulIslam-kc2jl6 ай бұрын
Madam is definitely going to be a frontline historian of India in future.👍👍👍
@pawansinghgbu2 жыл бұрын
हिंदू धर्म में खंडित मूर्ति की पूजा नही की जाती है। लेकिन मैडम जी इतने बड़े राजा को ये करते हुए कहती है की वो मूर्ति तोड़ कर अपने यहां ले गए और अपने यहां की मंदिर में लगा दिए ये बात मेरे दिमाग ने एक्सेप्ट नही की अभी तक 🔥
@manmohangandhi16512 жыл бұрын
She leftist
@azizqadry45512 жыл бұрын
History aisi hi hoti he.mind me aaye ya na aaye.
@Jitadasa2 жыл бұрын
Ae medam Jehadiyo ki tulna 🕉 hindu Raja che karti he
@zebrunstate28152 жыл бұрын
Didi chutiya bana rahi hai😂
@maniklalbhoumick72396 ай бұрын
Murti agar akshat absstha me uthaya ja sata hai toh uss murti ka pujan ki koi badha nehi hai.
@vijaychadha65212 жыл бұрын
Ruchika is a new generation hindu and said to be a historian.She does not know which word to use when you shift an idol from one place to another is not called idol breaking. Mr saurabh your choice is wrong as far as the young historian is concerned. Whatever she has said is about idol shifting by Hindus, what we are discussing is making of mosque on Hindu temple.
@dpsharma28522 жыл бұрын
She needs to read more authentic history
@geetasingh24702 жыл бұрын
रुचिका मूर्ख है
@devarshi13012 жыл бұрын
Swara bhaskar ki kaum ki hindu hai ye. Honorary musalmaan
@vgkher12 жыл бұрын
Absolutely wrong choice of a "young historian"
@SudhirKumar-gb8gv2 жыл бұрын
Dear Saurabh , good that you invited Ms Ruchika for the debate. Two things - interpretation and analysis of history & facts should be scientific and with same base unit of mearements. Here she compared the Karnataka temple with incident with Mughals. This is the flaw of the Arts faculties run in the universities by non rational intellectuals.
@sarojhota60222 жыл бұрын
I want to say in the context of Ms Ruchika Sharma that although the vaishnbites or shaibaites in earlier eras had demolished jainite temples,but they had not desecreted those idols ,but they converted the idols to lord Shiva or lord Vishnu and worshipped them.But in Gnanabspi temple,the muslims are deliberately desecreting lord shiva' idol.
@bakuljavadekar67672 жыл бұрын
The anchor probably knew from the beginning that the muslim case is weak. Therefore he invited 2 speakers on their side to counter 1 Kapilsir.
@AmitSingh-ou6kj2 жыл бұрын
Exactly .. Mai v yhi soch rha.... Puri kosis thi iss wampathin ke madhyam se ek narrative banane ki.... But sayd ab wo waqt nhi jb... Hm inke bewkufana debate sun ke apni ray bnaye...... Abey jb mandir tuta hai to hm kya napunsak hain jo shivlinga pe waju hote dekhe..... Court se lege ... Ladne k jarurt nhi... Krte raho debate
@pradeepsahrawat31282 жыл бұрын
Yes bilkul sahi bola aap ne actually lallantop NDTV ka he dusra roop hay
@ashishmishra23462 жыл бұрын
Ye total Biased debate tha. Pura agenda aurangzeb ko defend karne ka lag raha tha.
@gshrms80832 жыл бұрын
Yeah
@shubhamjha49982 жыл бұрын
Right because he is from JNU and we already know their mentality
@RA-wn3qh2 жыл бұрын
If any Hindu Buddhist or Jain ruler hurt any temples or stupa . It was due to ruler and not ideology . Same is not correct with Mughals and invaders . From first to last all destroyed temples . In Buddhist , Jains and Hindus , all rulers did not destroy temples . Maybe one two , in thag also murti was preserved . To compare both is completely false like Ruchika is doing . Very very wrong comparison .
@parveshyadav8812 жыл бұрын
U r right
@subodhpandey22662 жыл бұрын
रुचिका शर्मा का ज्ञान थोड़ा कम है इसने शायद मांडू देखा नहीं है देखा होता तो ऐसी बात ना करती।
@NurulIslam-kc2jl6 ай бұрын
Madam Ruchika Sharma is definitely UNBIASED HISTORIAN.👌😊
@blue52312 жыл бұрын
It's clearly 2 vs 1 😂 but he rocks 🔥
@gauravrai40752 жыл бұрын
Ruchika knowledge is really shallow, she is comparing different entities she is marxist pseudo liberal but love ❤kapil sir
@latestcorm8762 жыл бұрын
One Like only for Kapil Sir
@ravindraharsoor34602 жыл бұрын
I have renewed respect for Lallantop's erudite discussions in a respectable manner. I was initially biased against this Channel as I watched Rajdeep Sardesai often. However, I started watching this with open mind, when I saw Vivek Agnihotri of Urban Naxal fame here and his treatment with due regards by Saurabh Ji.
@rishirajparmar16492 жыл бұрын
Dear so called academic, the temple in Varanasi was not a normal Shiva temple. It may help you in realising the mob psychology that is simmering on the streets.
@faisalmuneerone2 жыл бұрын
Desh Bjp ka Pradesh bjp ka.. kisne roka hai bhai Tod lo na... Lekin ni todenge bjp wale 2024 tk.. kyu ki election jeetna h
@deepakishere-e1d2 жыл бұрын
mob mat bol lawde!! Hindu bol
@satyavratmishra48172 жыл бұрын
आज तक एक भी ऐसा मुस्लिम इतिहासकार नही सुना जिसने बर्बरता को समर्थन न किया हो । सबका एक ही एजेंडा होता है ।
@hindustanhamara-8 ай бұрын
Breaking Idols of any religion has never been part of Hindu preaching. But in Islam, breaking Idols of other religions have been integral part of Islam.
@deepeshyadav39352 жыл бұрын
प्रोफ़ेसर साहिबा उस मूर्ति को तोड़ा नहीं था उसे उठाकर अपने मंदिर में स्थापित कर लिया था क्योंकि वह बहुत ही पुरानी और दिव्य मूर्ति थी और मोती का तोड़ना और स्थापित करना अलग अलग बात है
@manavkumar57432 жыл бұрын
Ruchika mam should have given numbers that how many temples were converted into mosques and visa vera. She didn't answer the last question in regards to the faith of the people.
@dpsharma28522 жыл бұрын
True.
@subhashbaranwal8332 жыл бұрын
Kapil ji is very good, talking with facts and logical viewpoint..
@SrikantPathak-qf5tp6 ай бұрын
Koi Muslim Saltanat ho ya Moghal Dynesty , sabne Hindu Community pe Atrocities he kee kisi na kam kisi ne Jaroorat se jada , Leepapoti aur generalised karne ki koshish use less hai . 100 % agreed with opinion of Prof. Kapil Kumar .
@smalik9856 ай бұрын
Kapil ji ne kaha ki kyu Mandir k samne musjid bnayi gyi 😮 Mere point of view se musjid isliye bnyi gyi hogi ki dono dermoid k log ek saath ek jagh apne bhagwan ki pooja archna krenge or aapsi bhaichara bhdega ek saath ek jgh honge to 😊❤
@i_ankitsharma2 жыл бұрын
Murti todkar dusre mandir mei sthapit karna is not comparable to demolishing and breaking an idol and changing the character of the worship place..
@ashishpatil305952 жыл бұрын
57:00 loved the way saurav kept them on point. 1:15 Ruchika's comparison is just comparing apple with oranges there. On one hand there is Birthplace Temples on other hand there is Mosque which is just another structure of prayer which can be transfer. If Bharat Mata temple would have been imposed on Mecca or Medina then it would have been a balanced argument.
@kaushalkumarsirohi30122 жыл бұрын
Ruchika is below average in her thoughts... Not worthwhile to be a part of this debate...
@fundamentalchemistry1302 жыл бұрын
Ruchika nam ki ak hindi book aati thi school mai bari bekar book thi
@yadvendrasharma86852 жыл бұрын
Absolutely agree with you
@sagaryadav33902 жыл бұрын
Leftist history padh ke historian bache ruchika ji jaise hi honge
@tankadhartandi29702 жыл бұрын
Sir bible me likha hai Abraham k samaya me sare biswa me murti puja tha ,esse o nahi chahatethe av unke Anuyai v nahi chahatethe hain
@pinakichatterjee57932 жыл бұрын
feeling much interested in knowing the factual history after listening to the historians
@ashishkumar60842 жыл бұрын
Ruchika is a perfect example of students are being manipulated in JNU and DU. You will find tons of Hindus who can easily questions Hindus past. But u will find most of the muslims scholars defending their past. Thats the difference.
@ganeshchoudhary33782 жыл бұрын
Saurabh ji ने Krishna Janmbhumi सवाल पूछा लेकिन रुचिका हिंदुओं द्वारा मस्जिद तोड़ने तक अपनी बात सीमित रखी ।
@vkss-eq7bp2 жыл бұрын
Good to see prof like Kapil...very good debate.
@SurenderSharma-ur7qe6 ай бұрын
God save the students of Prof. Ruchika. She is an eloquent example of how a historian of little knowledge can be oblivious of strong religious, social and historical facts and consequently put forth a distorted and biased analysis.
@shwetatrivedi30026 ай бұрын
I strongly agreed with respected kapil ji
@ganeshchoudhary33782 жыл бұрын
प्रो. कपिल के तर्क तथ्यों पर आधारित होते हैं । उनके तथ्यों को काट पाना मुश्किल होता है । उनका चयन विषय पर सही रोशनी डालेगी ।
@anshuraj42772 жыл бұрын
Did u watch it
@Ashish198612 жыл бұрын
बहुत सुंदर प्रोफेसर कपिल सर
@ShashiSingh-ct6ct Жыл бұрын
One more comment. I totally agree with Satyavrat Mishra that "आज तक एक भी ऐसा मुस्लिम इतिहासकार नही सुना जिसने बर्बरता को समर्थन न किया हो । सबका एक ही एजेंडा होता है ".
@abhiatharva88062 жыл бұрын
Pro. Ruchika gave new angle to see history
@SandeepJoshi072 жыл бұрын
कपिल सर की बातों में बेबागपन है। इतिहास जनता की भाषा मे लिखी पुस्तको से देखी जानी चाहिए। ना कि शासको के पिछलग्गू लेखको के लिखी बातों से। नदीम सर् का Closing remark भी काफी सराहनीय है।
@UMESHPILANIA2 жыл бұрын
Prof Kapil has got a new fan today!
@snowcrystal106 ай бұрын
जो तोड़ी गई मन्दिर में नमाज पढ़ने का शौक पालता वो औरंगबेज़ से अलग कैसे हैं इस्लाम की इसी खूबसूरती को समझने की जरुरत है
@alpanamittal82706 ай бұрын
प्रो नदीम ने सिद्ध कर दिया कि मुसलमान कितना भी पढ़ ले लेकिन वह विद्वान या सैकुलर कभी नहीं बन सकता....वह केवल और केवल मुसलमान ही रहता है.....
@shantivardhan17336 ай бұрын
Smells of Hindutva is there.
@durgeshparashar95962 жыл бұрын
जब आप इतने विद्वानों को बिना किसी बहस और हो हल्ला किये बिना सुनते हैं तो आप स्पष्ट रूप से अपनी राय बना सकते हैं धन्यवाद lalntop इतनी अच्छी debate के लिए👍👍
@shashikanttripathi1582 жыл бұрын
We have to reclaim glory without any if and but.
@kaiwalyaghotkar8322 жыл бұрын
What about Buddhist monuments and Jain Monuments which were destroyed by Hindu kings.
@bob.1102 жыл бұрын
@@kaiwalyaghotkar832 pls share any valid ASI report or study published by esteemed institutions on this matter, we will definitely be okay if Buddhists come forward 😊.
@boredparticle04442 жыл бұрын
We will do together for all dharmic religion
@na43692 жыл бұрын
@@kaiwalyaghotkar832 no problem let’s do subway and Hindus will help rebuild hain and Buddhist temples. We are open heartened
@muditsingh56282 жыл бұрын
@@kaiwalyaghotkar832 hindu, dalit, buddhist, jain, sikh, shaivaite, etc. Are not different. They all are sanatani
@deepeshyadav39352 жыл бұрын
What is the mentality behind breaking idols 1.there is no god but allah 2.don't marry polythiest women untill she convert into islam its better to marry your maid,cook or anyone else 3.those who humiliates allah and his messengers they will be punished here and hereafter.
@hindustanhamara-8 ай бұрын
Did any Brahmin massacred Buddhists. The answer is NO. In fact, no Hindu, Jain, Buddhists, and Sikh dharma kings or common people ever massacred innocent people.
@dipakpatnaik66622 жыл бұрын
Prof. Kapil and Prof. Nadim have logically deliberated the issue with different prospective. Madam Sharma' effort to oppose the popular fact based narrative about religious intent of Sultanate & Moghuls by highlighting a rare example , clearly indicates her inclination to left ideology. Vijaynagar empire case may be one of the rare case, but concealing of fact regarding intent of these attackers to demolish hindu culture and civilisation to prove superiority of Islam; is unjustifiable.
@asoul35292 жыл бұрын
Even in that case idol was respectfully kept.
@Myknowings2 жыл бұрын
Also he didn't break temple. He just shifted the idol to his kingdom. Different from breaking temple. Lot of temples were changed in ancient and mediaeval time. No doubt about it. But example given of Vijayanagar was not good enough.
@vijaydani66142 жыл бұрын
She is a Leftist and Agenda driven, is proved by her words "Broke" the idols she spoke more than once. She clearly says the winner king broke the idol and took it to his kingdom and established it in his temple because he too was a Krishna devotee. How can a hindu devotee break the idol? Khandit Murti is never worshipped but immersed. This proves that the winner king took the idol without breaking it to his temple. This lady intentionally telling lies by using the word 'broke' more than once to draw similarity with the destruction of thousands of temple by Muslim invaders and justifies them as normal act of that time.
@avneet122842 жыл бұрын
Rare example? She gave like 10 examples in 20 minutes. 🤦♂️
@manjujoshi12742 жыл бұрын
All difficult y is with the thought of grabbing the others property .uff tired off all this headache no doute outsiders has came and destroy our pease . nobody knows when this controversy will over .only all mighty can .
@Ankit-tm2lh2 жыл бұрын
रुचिका अगर इस पैनल मे नहीं होती तो ज्यादा अच्छी debate हो पाती... फ़िज़ूल के logic and reference दिए जा रही है मैडम 🤦♂️
@NurulIslam-kc2jl6 ай бұрын
"Fijul" logic & reference😅😅😅
@user-jg6te9zr8h5 ай бұрын
रुचिका ही निष्पक्ष बोल रहीं हैं।
@nkshrivastava41656 ай бұрын
मेरी नजर में ईश्वर अल्ला एक है जिसकी आराधना करने के ढंग अलग है मंदिर मसजिद गिरजाघर अलग है ईश्वर एक है लोगो की सोच अलग है
@golcondaagrofarm2 жыл бұрын
Love ❤️ you Nadeem sahab
@whyadarsh7772 жыл бұрын
1. Ruchika madam, Agar Hinduo ne Hinduo ka temple toda to uss se Religious identity khatam nahi hoti hai. But different religion me yeh applicable hai. Sai deepak sir ko bulaiye Ruchika ki hypocrisy ki dhagiya uda denge.
@hemantjain30792 жыл бұрын
what about jain temples converted to hindu temples/ churches / mosques . Jains are not hindus
@neelamkulkarni2 жыл бұрын
Ruchika should use correct words...the veera Shivait Lingayats you were referring to as a "cult", is a sect of Hinduism. You said you have done an MPhil in Bijapur so you must know better than calling Lingayat samaj a "cult".
@aniaggarwal2 жыл бұрын
She is totally influenced by left ideology she even doesn't know how to respect idols . Very arrogant .😡
@VikkySaraswat2 жыл бұрын
Can we get the link of two articles that Kapil sir talked about.
@mdnayeem12062 жыл бұрын
Real good
@ansh_u_r2 жыл бұрын
हिंदुस्तान मे ऐसा इंसान कभी महान या सम्मानीय नही हो सकता जिसने धर्म के नाम पर ज़बरदस्ती एवंं अपने धर्म का वर्चस्व साबित करने के लिये दूसरों पर ज़बरदस्ती की हो।
@sureshshaw77512 жыл бұрын
साधुवाद भाई सौरभ आपको कि बीच 'बहस' में हल्ला-गुल्ला करने से वक्ताओं को रोककर एक अच्छा उदाहरण पेश करते हैं ।
@craftboom36876 ай бұрын
57......😎 MUSALMAN 😎 DESH 😎 Hai MUSALMAN.. KA 😎 SALA...SECULAR HINDU... KA HINDU ❤ DESH ❤ Hai ❤😃❤
@ramsundarsingh9496 ай бұрын
पंडित जवाहरलाल नेहरू इलाहाबाद के एक वेश्यालय में पैदा हुआ था!तो अब सवाल ऊठता है कि वेश्यालयों में तो हर एक घंटा में एक पुरुष बदलता है तो एक दिन में कम से कम चार-पांच पुरूष तो आते ही होंगे!अब पंडित जवाहरलाल नेहरू का जन्म एक वेश्यालय में हुआ तो चार-पांच पुरूषों में किस पुरुष को पंडित जवाहरलाल नेहरू का बाप मना जायेगा?कि कौन पंडित जवाहरलाल नेहरू का असली बाप कौन होगा?...जय श्री राम जी
@AmanKumar-fl5ud2 жыл бұрын
We are proud on Ahiliya bai holkar who rebuild India Temple Without any blood She used 90% of her revenue in restoration of temple distroyed by Mugals and invaders She herself used to sleep in Simple house but Rebuild whole india temple . They Are proud on Aurenjeb Who was UZBEK who killed thousand indian Converted The forefather of who defend them today Tey looted 1000 temples of india . WE ARE NOT SAME
@sauravbhattacharjee83942 жыл бұрын
With respect to Prof. Nadeem and this 'some ruchika from somewhere', have they ever read the full ayodhya judgement? how on earth can they/anybody contest this judgement!?????
@ayushmishra-bo2xl2 жыл бұрын
Correct Reading the "unanimous" judgment on the Ayodhya title suit in a packed courtroom on Saturday, CJI Ranjan Gogoi there is clear evidence that Hindus believe Lord Ram was born at the disputed site. "Babri Masjid was not constructed on vacant land. There was a structure underlying the disputed structure. The underlying structure was not an Islamic structure," the bench said.
@prasaddeoraj6 ай бұрын
पूरे विश्व हिन्दुस्तान में सबसे ज्यादा मस्जिद हैं।
@MrMt20122 жыл бұрын
माननीय महिला इतिहासकार ने इतिहास की बारीक लाइनों को मिला दिया। उनका ये कहना की दौलतपुर की मस्जिद में मेहराब को भारत माता का मंदिर बना दिया, इस लिहाज़ से गलत कि भारत माता किसी भी हिन्दू मुसलमान के धर्म से बड़ी हैं। दोनों उसी के बच्चें हैं। मैं इनके विश्लेषण और उदाहरणों से निराश हुआ।
@SuperRavi902 жыл бұрын
DU and JNU have historian like ruchika.ask her any question.... She will answer the question in a way she always wanted to answer according to her ideology. Ruchika..... Sucks
@somashekarbhat56302 жыл бұрын
Perfect 😂
@kaushalkumarsirohi30122 жыл бұрын
I have recently visited jogulamba temple complex in telangana... The scale of devastation of temples is beyond one's thoughts... Why sooo much hatred... Not understandable...
@na43692 жыл бұрын
Idol hatred is the reason. They hate idol worshippers as taught in their book
@bhavaniaarya25162 жыл бұрын
Watched a video on how new mosque has been installed in ancient shaktipeeth courtyard. Are the locals fighting back?
@shabbirpatel29232 жыл бұрын
Good and ilmi guftugu. All participants are appreciated including anker
@mohndmoshatashim61202 жыл бұрын
I agree with the view of Historian Shilpa Sharma
@curious_nameless2 жыл бұрын
Lots of love to Prof. Kapil ❤
@myunus123452 жыл бұрын
मैं खुद भी भूगोल ,राजनीती विज्ञानं और इतिहास का सामान्य सा विद्यार्थी रहा हूँ ।मुझे आप द्वारा इस प्रकार के प्रोग्राम से भारत और विश्व के इतिहास का ज्ञान, मेरे स्वयं के ज्ञान में बढ़ोतरी करते हैं ।इससे मालूम भी होता है कि जिस ज्ञान का हमारे जीवन पर यदि अच्छा प्रभाव पड़ता है उसे और भी ज़्यादा विश्लेषित और परिष्कृत करना चाहिए । इतिहास को नही बदला जा सकता ,जो हो चूका वोह चूका ।क्यों हुआ ,कैसे हुआ और उसका परिणाम क्या हुआ ? इन इतिहासिक जानकारी से आज के मानवीय जीवन और उसके मुल्यो को ज़्यादा परिष्कृत करने की आवश्यकता है ना कि अस्वाभाविक और असंभावित इतिहास को बदलने की ।।
@myunus123452 жыл бұрын
@@Gauravpandey-yo7tm जैसी रब की इच्छा ,जो होगा अच्छा ही होगा । क्या मंदिर और क्या मस्जिद ,जिस किसी को खोज करने की प्रवृत्ति को अपने लिए फ़र्ज़ कर लेता है ,तो उसे हर तरह की खुशियों से नवाज़ दिया जाता है।
@suhailbaig7088 Жыл бұрын
टीपू सुल्तान के समय मराठों ने हमला किया था किंतु वे हार गए तब भागते हुए मंदिर तोड़ गए जिसका पुनर निर्माण टीपू सुल्तान ने कराया क्योंकि अपनी जनता का मान ,स्वाभिमान और विश्वास भी बनाए रखना था ।
@Prasad_S_Joshi2 жыл бұрын
Ruchika Sharma’s opinion is illogical. When Hindu temples were destroyed, it was attack on civilisations. Crores were killed, raped in the same temple premises. Statues were broken to break the moral of Hindu society. Temples were used as toilets. This plunder can’t be compared with earlier wars. The invaders attack was so brutal that thousands of women burned themselves alive in the fear of rape. Such history is not associated with Virashaiva or Buddhist armies. There were rules for battle but medieval invaders believed only in religious conflicts based on loot and brutality.
@DineshKumar-dx1es2 жыл бұрын
I feel the Ma'am reference was completely obsolete to the last question asked by Saurabh. Professor Kapil I mustsay I became your fan like last week Prof Maakhanlaal his knowledge and clarity of thought is of next level. Wish to see a debate of Prof Kapil and Prof Aditya Mukherjee. It would be a great debate to watchout for.
@harenderpaliwal14422 жыл бұрын
Example bhi hindu rajoo kaa he Mila is koo.ye nahi samja ke wo ladai bhagwan koo sirf ek sthan se dusre sthan par rakh diya.dusri jagah jakar apman nahi kiya.
@binoyjani2 жыл бұрын
If one says that in history demolitions was there before mugal, then then present time also one day will become history,, so then let it be continue,, NOW PRESENT TIME IS FROM MASJID TO TEMPLE,,, , " LET THE HISTORY TO BE CONTINUE" THIS PRESENT PROCESS ALSO ONE DAY WILL BE CALLED HISTORY. SO SUPPORT HISTORY AND ENJOY.
@mohitgupta52882 жыл бұрын
Both the other historians using sects of Hinduism to their advantage - Shivaite and Vaishnavite. There is no conflict between the two - both are complementary to each other. Please study Rameshwaram for better understanding!
@MM-ue4ol2 жыл бұрын
No, shaivate and vaishnavite even had wars, its documented. It was in later times that the movements to unite Hari-Har emgered.
@mohitgupta52882 жыл бұрын
@@MM-ue4ol yeah those were for the kingdom and extension of their rule, not for diminishing or destroying other faith! That's the basic difference.
@DhruvPatel-zg1zs2 жыл бұрын
@@MM-ue4ol war kingdom ke bich hoti thi aur kabhi bhi koi apne idols ko dusre pe thopne ke liye yuddh kiya ho aisa suna nai mene
@baljitsandhu94492 жыл бұрын
Ruchika is very Intelligent thanks
@daulatlilani96152 жыл бұрын
सौरभ जी को मेरा धन्यवाद, कपिल जी, नदीम जी और रूचिका जी जैसे इतिहास जानकारों को मंच पर लाकर हमें इतिहास की अनमोल जानकारी से अवगत कराना। मैंने इन तीनों को बहुत गौर से सुना और मंथन करने पर अपने विचार व्यक्त करने की अभिलाषा में कुछ अपने विचार व्यक्त करना चाहता हूं। मैं कोई इतिहासकार नहीं हूं, क्षमा चाहता हूं, यदि मेरे विचारानूसार किसी भी पैनलिस्ट को उनके विचारों से असहमति हो। मैं मानता हूं भारत में मुस्लिम आक्रांताओं और शासकों से पहले भी भारतीय राजाओं ने मंदिरों का परिवर्तन अपनी मान्यता अनुसार परिवर्तन किया था, परंतु वह सब सनातन धर्म में भी आस्था रखते थे। पंथ की विस्तार वाद नीति कभी मानवता के संहार का कारण नहीं बनी, संस्कृति भाषा और राम हनुमान आदि पूज्यनीय महापुरुषों का मंदिरों
@destroyer43692 жыл бұрын
*Karseva ki karo taiyari* *Bula rahe hain Tripurari 🔱🔱* *Jai Bholenath Jai Shiv* 🔱🔱 *Jai Kashi Vishwanath 🔱🔱🔱*
@Aegontargaryen-bx1ul2 жыл бұрын
बहुत ही बढ़िया जानकारी दी गई कपिल जी के द्वारा बहुत बहुत धन्यवाद
@munirameer94072 жыл бұрын
Ruchika ji aap ne bohat sahi aur saaf baat ki hai
@suffiabegum17682 жыл бұрын
I saw this video few hours back. God bless you for your earnest efforts to bring forth the historical facts. All the panelists have put forward their points of view with factual sources