screw too much security it's boring.

1. Start your projects with security concerns included in the project plan. This is called "security by design" 2. Include a security architect that can advise and analyze the security profile of projects. This goes beyond paper security and includes actual security reviews and security tests. 3. Pay for the cost of security by design. 4. Include penetration testing of all system components which include the people and processes operating a system.

No, stuff like this is fun

security through obscurity

more time DLP and encryption

Same...

You need to go watch his defcon talk for that kzfaq.info/get/bejne/odtghMKIyt-Ye2Q.html

Yea I was just searching for something…..

was looking for the same...

You won't, because he hasn't. 2048 bit encryption is nearly impossible.

Def the nerdiest though and it's a complement.

@Joe- Biden duh, that's a complement, coming from a fellow nerd. Be yourself pussy, nothing less in being a nerd.

Yeah, be afraid or he will let all hell break loose and won't even flinch

bhai ye ladka hai ldki?

@@PRASHANTKUMAR-sn2gs Ladka hi hoga na bhai

We will relay this message, hopefully there's still time! 😉

Great eye!

haha so if a guy who cant code python can break a satellite we are screwed :D

Imagine using anything other than VS Code... Pitiful

Oh yeh I see that too ;)

nope its all true. i took his course and now i have unlimited indonesian pornography.

aim for the impossible!!

whoami-You are a man of Culture i see

Wait, who am I wasn't german only :o

Because it's a German movie and I never thought about the fact that it got translated ^^

nevermind, it never got translated, the only available is the movie with english subtitle

Point is: users should protect their traffic (themselves as providers don't do it for them). They don't realise that their data is publically visible over entire continents.

what if they moved it to hit another satellite/object in orbit ?

Agree, most of this old satellite are for TV and radio broadcast, not for spying...... New satellite that are being placed in the orbit are much mo secure than those 20 years ago but still serving tv broadcast..

@@silverismoney they do not know words by means the satelites are controled from tower

So glad you like it! Thanks for the feedback, we are considering it going forward!

'How'🤣🤣

@@ram_bharosey what?

To put it short, it's just turning radio wave into computer bytes. So learn about radio waves and eletricmegnatic field and how they work, then learn how to turn into computer bytes and read it

The biggest issue with games now-a-days is people don't seem to care... Developers in particular because it is a business. They purposefully leave vulnerabilities ( example, allowing the client to dictate terms to the server when you should never trust client data... this is how people can be shot from across a solar system with a weapon which could never reach that far, instantly, and continuously because the server doesn't check the data and simply trusts. It is why speed hacks exist. It is why people can teleport, and more ). So here is how it is a business.... Game is released, charge is $15 to $120 for the game. Game is intentionally left vulnerable. Scripters use basic logic, packet spoofing, or whatever to replicate actions and if the server accepts it, cheaters have a tool. People in the community get annoyed that day 1 there are people cheating. Developers vow to ban cheaters. Cheaters are found, easily, and typically given a month to cheat before the account is banned. So the cheater gets to play the game on a subscription model while legitimate players who want to enjoy the game and not ruin it for others pay a one time fee for a license. Because the devs are being paid on 2 separate models based on cheater vs non-cheater, they do everything they can to keep that going. For instance, kicking cheaters for common cheats and telling the server about it ( Rust is an example where they kick people for 'fly hack' which can actually be triggered by standing on the very edge of a scrap helicopter as you can't board the helicopter even if you are on the same team, unless they allowed this, unless you are the owner. But you can stand on the very edge in the back and be airlifted out - this causes a false-positive ) making the community 'feel like' something is being done. The actual bans don't typically happen within days or weeks unless the cheater is blatantly doing it non-stop to the point where influential players are complaining. Then they get banned pretty quickly. Otherwise, infractions are added up and eventually the account is banned. But, these cheaters typically by 10s of accounts when the game is on sale, or get it for pennies on the dollar from hacked accounts, credit card fraud, and more. So they don't care - they just create a new free account on the service, then cheat and play to ruin other peoples fun on a subscription model. I am a developer myself, and I can't stand the state of the industry in this regard. I would never put this type of system into anything I work on. I would ban the cheater, log their hardware and every new account would be linked to it, along with other methods of tracking so they could create a thousand accounts and they wouldn't be able to be used and every account they try to login with ( with special conditions in place so they can't just hack someones account and get them banned permanently, etc... but they would then be temporarily blocked or some other mechanism to ensure innocent accounts can't be used in this regard ) would be blocked. Speedhacking is easily detectable. Aimbots are incredibly simple to detect, especially if they are blatant. Aim assists are also easy to detect, but more difficult that straight up snap-to'ing. Packet spoofing is stupid easy to detect too. If you design a game and the logic, then you know what to expect and if something falls outside the bounds of what can be done, for instance a player attempting to teleport or claim they are on something solid when they aren't ( ie fly hacking ), etc.. can easily be prevented... The goal is to have the server control and verify - but allow the client as much control as is reasonable. ie: Don't send the clients the full loot list, etc... when they are in range they can get data networked regarding things so they are far enough away it doesn't pop in ( ie just outside a door they are about to enter or could enter, etc.. ) but close enough that there is no major benefit... If the clients want to modify their money value - let them. It can act as a strike when the server sees the disconnect. All of that data can be tracked and used as evidence of cheating - obviously memory can fail so you wouldn't ban for something like that, when the client tries to use the money is when you can let them know about the money they have and fix the desync instead of 60 times per second for an unchanging value. Let them modify the memory data - although you could protect against that and if detected you could swap the data with a backup but that adds overheat... you could cause the game to crash - fun, then they'll just complain... so just let them, it won't matter especially if the server handles the data how it should. It just makes them see a big number and go - oh wow.... Let them edit their health and armor values too... it will only show the data on the hud and change the data they are seeing but it will not change when they perish, how much damage they take, etc.. because that's handled by the server when done properly... So many devs send so much data every frame when it isn't necessary. They don't track time properly, etc.. They trust client data... they don't know when to let a client modify something and when not to - or they just allow it and let the client tell the server that there was a valid change. I'm also not saying that Rust does this on purpose or to make money, but I'm stating it looks that way because of how long it takes to get people banned and it typically only happens within hours if an influencer reports the person non-stop or if the entire server is constantly reporting them, etc... most will gather info and do a bulk ban every month or so.... convenient...

!Save

That's different though. With basic public key cryptography you can make an unhackable satellite (assuming the private key isn't stolen from ground stations). With locally installed games, you can do whatever you want to decompile and mess with the game.

"diverse" lol

@@REALBanannaman Please explain your issue with "diverse."

you guys still working on that spaceship? when is it going to be finished 2079? im optimistic for 2090.

@@darkshadowsx5949 we're going to start prototype testing in 3090, so expect it to fly around 3150,and I'm being generous about this date .

Yh I just thought about that, wouldn't it be bad if they can easily be hacked

Looks like a new hackathon challenge for Elon

Starlink been out

to re-enter the atmosphere 18 months after launch due to its extremely low orbit.

@@otfizy5774 yeah its been in open beta for a month (which is about when they commentated). i pre-ordered 2/11 and no dishy yet.. my internet is about as fast as a mail man traveling by horse, also the horse has a broken leg and the mail man is dead and being drug behind the horse. (hughes net keeping 10+ year old internet communication technology going and claiming its "high speed" when it has 1000+ ms ping at less than 2Mb/s)

NOAA 18,19,20 Weather satellites?

Okay hackerman

@@jeremiahblessing3891 yup. All their frequencies are publicly available as well as the meteor M2 rus satellite.

I'm really excited for knowing someone like Hitecyberspace On Telegram. I was surprised when my Commander Wilson Brown recommended you to us. From Usa Army says Thanks.

@@Jigamanx2 how did you learn

He left the part out when you get caught..which they can..you will go to prison

YEh, the US military are wonderful. Nice how intelligence would not tell us who really took down 9-11 and we were in AFghanistan for twenty years and attacked iraq. But hey, gotta respect the military. you are damn stupid, bro. WE have not been in any danger since WW2, but have attacked about fifty nations since then.

🙏 🚫 ☄️ 🛰️

I'm really excited for knowing someone like Hitecyberspace On Telegram. I was surprised when my Commander Wilson Brown recommended you to us. From Usa Army says Thanks

They would burn up. No Biggie. They are only harmful to themselves. And trashing space.

@@janetjackson8117 The use of linguistic obfuscation in scientific review matches somewhat.

@Mist boohoo.

true story

True and factual

Max headroom exposed

I'm really excited for knowing someone like Hitecyberspace On Telegram. I was surprised when my Commander Wilson Brown recommended you to us. From Usa Army says Thanks.

My thought as well. He’s just receiving stuff. He probably need very different gear to uplink and control the satellite.

That is...exactly what we are saying. 😉

I mean, I’m sure you can find ways of doing it for free, but this is certainly one that’ll get you street nerd cred.

Why spent $300 ? When u have a pc ? Just say anything infront of ur camera

@FBI Federal Bureau of Investigation hey ! Just want to ask if facebook works for you

@FBI Federal Bureau of Investigationreally ?

I was thinking about that also, but it seems they are just thinking of decrypting those signals and not controlling the satellite, that is not hacking, its eavesdropping...

Seems like he is formal hacker chill bro

Good flag! Here's the presentation if anyone is interested: conference.hitb.org/hitbsecconf2011ams/materials/D2T2%20-%20Jim%20Geovedi%20and%20Raoul%20Chiesa%20-%20Hacking%20a%20Bird%20in%20the%20Sky.pdf

@@freethink Thx!

I'm really excited for knowing someone like Hitecyberspace On Telegram. I was surprised when my Commander Wilson Brown recommended you to us. From Usa Army says Thanks.

While it says to use a dish I have read the antenna is the only thing really necessary.... I'm most likely wrong i don't do this pro like J here does lol but yea hack-a-sat comp was selling the gear for it super cheap when defcon was cxld during covid if I recall 🤔

They just eavesdropped on a satellite signal and did not mention about encryption where most satellite broadcaster use. If they can control a satellite, that will be hacking but sad to say, an up and down transmission of those signals are just for broadcasters, signal that are use to control satellite in their stationary position in only in the uplink and it is secured.

Check out his Def Con talk for more info.

I recommend hackerlouis05 on Instagram to help you hack or recover any of you account back perfectly

Contact me

These guys are a joke, that's for sure.

Exactly. Most comm satellites are simply repeaters. If the data isn't encrypted going up to the satellite then the data coming back won't be either. That's shear laziness on the organization leasing the comm channel.

You can't really protect analog radio transponders. There also wouldn't be a point, since unlicensed transmissions carry hefty fines and therefore have a very unfavorable risk/reward ratio for the offender. To really disturb anyone, you'd have to overpower the legitimate stations transmitting on the same frequency in the same region.

Haha, sorry 'bout that!