That's a big lie. And even it it was true, so what? It only says it's close but no one will tell you that following Quran alone is bad. Any says that, stay away from them.

yasin fahim what are you "astaghfirallah"ing about?! nothing but truth in this video.

***** 1) 3:32"Say, ‘Obey Allah and the Messenger;’ but if they turn away, then remember that Allah loves not the disbelievers." no, i dont say it, its Allah who says that the one who turns away from the messenger (alehj salatu wa sallam) is a disbeliever. and guess what happends with the disbelievers... 2) the sunni scholars, the salafi ones. and with salafi i dont mean those extremists what u might be thinking( al qaida, IS etc.) they ain´t salafi, they are khawarij. i can advise u some scholars and some real salafi websites, and you can see it by your self. www.troid.ca , www.salafitalk.net/ also check out the channels which i subscribed. yeah there are diffrent hadiths with diffrent chains, but there are hadith scholars who got methods to see which one are authentic and which not. its pretty clear. 3) yes, sunnah of rasulullah alejh salatu wa sallam. because we need to follow his way, because the quran was send down upon him to explain it to the people. 16:64 "We have revealed to you the Book (The Qur'an) so that you may clearly explain to them the reality of those things in which they differ - it is a guidance and blessing for those people who believe." so i ask u, who is doin the explanation? its the messenger. so if quran is explaining it slef completly, this vers would not make sense. another point is, if the quran only is enough, then why is there a messenger? why did the quran not just fall down from the sky, if its completly clariry itself? think about it. 4) i already said it and i will say it again. you guys are giving those verses your own interpretation. no where in the quran u will find something against the sunnah. and all the verses you bring are sham-argument and can be easily refuted. (refutation of your interpretation, not the vers itself, i dont doubt anyonw) and with your question about hadith, its because of the linguistic meaning. if there is written hadith, it doesnt mean necessarily the sunnah. thats what quranits dont want to understand for some reason. 5) no i dont. but at this time it was normal in any sociaty that people get married in young age. in ANY society. but they only blame our prophet. lol. the problem is that you look on islam , the quran and the sunnah from a western-world view. thats why u dont like it. u try to change islam to a western world comfirmed relgion. but actually you should change your life according to islam. and pls dont start bringin hadith to proof something. the problem is that to many people ,who dont know the explanation and how to handle, are talking about hadith and attacking it. likewise you cant pick a single verse from quran out from context without explanation, yout cant just pick up a hadith. Allah gave with islam the woman honor. we dont let our woman half naked outside showing the whole world their beauty. we dont sell our woman to the society by dressing them inappropriate like western society do. we protect our women from all that evil. so if you dont like islam, fine. look for another religion. but dont start changing it because you dont like something, because: 2:216 "But perhaps you hate a thing and it is good for you; and perhaps you love a thing and it is bad for you. And Allah Knows, while you know not." once again, i didnt say she is goin to hell. i said, if she keeps this belvieving rejecting the sunnah etc. till she die, then she will go to hellfire. because Allah says so 3:32. may Allah guide u. and the perfect knowledge is by Allah. may His peace and blessings be upon our prophet, his family and his companions.

***** 1) just because the prophet slehj salatu wa salam is not alive anymore doesnt mean we dont ahve to follow his commands, because Allah commands us to follow Him AND the prophet. and this concerns all people till the judgment day. so your point is invalid. yep the prophet banned hadith, but do you even know the historical context to this hadith? do u know the explanation and what was the case? obviously not, becuz if you would know, you wouldnt talk nonsense like this. however this was such a big own goal, becuz there is now 2 option: 1. u accept this hadith, but then u brake your rule of deniying all the hadith and u accused bukhari and many other people as liers. 2. u deny this hadith aswell, but then your point is invalid anyways and you cant use it as a proof. what ever you gonna do know, you set yourself a trap. you choose, you lose. once again, hadith doesnt mean necessarily the sunnah. btw its you who is picking verses and giving them your own interpretation, not me, so follow your own advise. 2) nobody told you that youhave to follow blindly. but the scholars are the ones who are strong in the knolegde of our religion, and they are who teaching us how understand it correctly. not some orientalist like john, frank, richard wannabe islam-experts. yes, scholars are just humans and do mistakes like everybody, yet it does not change the fact that they are the ones who we should stick to like Allah says: 7:21" ask the people of knowledge if you do not know." and the scholars are the one who fear Allah most 35:28 " only the people of knowledge fear Him; indeed Allah is the Most Honourable, Oft Forgiving." the proof that the hadith are authentic because there is to much narrators with diffrent chains, that its technically proofen that its authentic. you are the one who need to proof that their are fabricated. of their are fabricated hadith, but how dare to deny all of them and calling them lies? u must be crazy not accepting even a single one. you proof me that the quran is transmitted by the prophet. how can u proof this? the exactly same ppl who narrated the quran to us, are the ones who narrated the hadith too. u must be a gigantic fool if u accept the quran but deny the hadith at the same time. and NO, you are WRONG. the hadith wasnt banned and written down at the time of bukhari etc.. they were already written down by other ppl and hadith scholars before. and they were all the time around before bukhari. what do u think were bukhari get them from? he travelled from scholar to scholar to gather them. and many other ppl did it too. but the entire umma and all the scholars have agreed on that this is the most authentic collection of hadith. so pls stop spreading this stupid lie like "oh, the hadith came out 300 years later, they must be a lie" bla bla. most idiotic argument ever. "C man, said that B man, said that A man, said that the prophet said so and so. .... hmmmm THAT is your prooof?! Mashalla " indeed, this a proof if there is plenty narrations from diffrent ppl and diffrents chains of narration, yes its a proof. and this is one of the main points why hadith are getting attacked in our time. western orientalists denying the islamic method of hadith-sience and accept only their own method. and all u foolish quranists follow this lunatics. and then u laugh at me following the scholars. you have the stupid idea of denying the sunnah. so u follow those idiots who started with that nonsense. so if you was a muslim back in the days and now a quranist, then im sorry for u. you got misguided by foolish ppl. and why? because instead of going to the scholars of islam u listen to lunatics like this woman in the video or studying by yourself without a teacher. so thats why i said may Allah guide you. yeah may Allah guide me and all others too, but you are the one who is obviously misguided and i honestly hope that Allah guides you back that u may belong to the ppl of success, before its to late. and i know those hadiths u mentioning, but unlike u i know that there is a explanation of them and not just like black and white like u see it. and from Allah is the success

***** i cannot believe this bosni person is arguing with you to believe lies about the rasool and yet claim to obey him. prophet muhammad was NOTHING like these idiotic hadith claim him to be. he is as the quran describes a merciful character, how these disgraceful stories made into the "sahih" hadith i will never know. honestly is it UNBELIEVABLE how brainwashed people have become due to so called "scholars"!

astaghfirallah i cant believe what i have just read :( they are truly atrocious. not only do they insult the messenger of Allah (pbuh) but they insult ones own intelligence. i cant believe how muslim try to justify these lies. how brainwashed is the ummah. its truly sickening

***** thankyou. ill have a read. salam :)