It was cool finally meeting Chris down there.

Thanks

Would have been cool to see.

Thanks for watching

Thanks

Interesting

Yep

Thanks

Thanks for watching

I heard the 121 was making the trip.

I’m not sold on the looks of them. They might grow on me.

@@Oliver66FarmBoy Ohh i agree they look kinda fugly but im cheap too! And just went on a WD Allis for pulling.

It’s a cherry.

You don’t get much of anything done in a hurry with a cub. Lol

Thanks for watching

Nice shiny tractor but they were really struggling to make that plow work. Lol

@@Oliver66FarmBoy Them series of plows are heavy, and they got clearance, but they seem to like to do exactly what that one was doing. I have a 4-18s of the same series and it can be a bitch to get it set right, once it is set I don't touch it at all except for when I'm pulling out of the furrow and raise the 3pt.

It’s all clay spoils from excavating the runways. That ground is something else.

People were smarter back then to not put they're fingers where they would put their peckers.

Yes sir I agree, common sense isn’t all that common anymore

Back before osha made it impossible to do your job.

Yep

Corn was going 170-190. Didn’t hear on beans but I would guess 35-40.

They are kind of a neat tractor.

A lot of money in that row of tractors.

@@Oliver66FarmBoy true, but thats in all of them.

The prairie tractors are their own ball game. That Altman Taylor 30-60 alone is probably in the 175-200 thousand dollar range. Especially in that kind of original condition. Pre 1930 stuff is stupid money.

@@Oliver66FarmBoy did you catch that jd 8020 plowing with that roll over plow?

😂

I’d say you’d be at the limit at best

Was good meeting you guys.

Crazy when you can see tractors you saw on tv.

@@Oliver66FarmBoy did get a chance to meet Max Armstrong?

It’s worth the trip.

He’s got a bunch of it on video

@@Oliver66FarmBoy well yeah, but I like other perspectives

I think that is the one.

500 or so.

Why would the show provide fuel?

Id wanna find a yellow one. The red never really yanked my crank for some reason.

He had a kid

It may be but in my mind it’s still not all that special. 1855 gassers aren’t to hard to come by. (Why on earth anybody would want a 100 horse gas tractor in the first place is behind me cause you could never afford to run it especially today). And if you really wanted a narrow front it’s not hard to swap them. Id pay more for a run of the mill diesel wide front before I bought that hog. Now if it was something really different like a gas front wheel assist. That may be a little different story.

@@Oliver66FarmBoy I agree with the gas part, but I think the narrow front is neat. We have a narrow front off of a 1755 that we swapped for a wide front to bale hay. And, what size tires on on the front of your 1955? I want to build a 1/16 scale model of it.

I watch Bandit's channel as well, must have missed that one. As to big gassers, I have a 806 gas that cost IHC around 3 million in law suits. Fellow got burned trying to fill the tank while running and spilled over on the broken manifold, visited with Max Armstrong some years back about it at the Pennfield show, seems he is friends with the lawyer that worked for harvester at the time. All those lawsuits were filed here in St Clair county. I got it "salvage" after the litigation and restored it. We used it for many years since, never had any issues, but it isn't all that bad on fuel. Pulled the same load as the diesel version here for years till we went to 200 hp tractors, needs restoration again and a proper place in the IHC story.

There was a lot more than one.

Thanks

Pretty much

Nice to see you. Lol

It’s neat.