جزاك الله خير 🎖

جَزَاكَ ٱللَّٰهُ خَيْرًا

You are a Legend, jazakallah khair

Jazakallah khair

Thank you brother

Same

Yeah

Same..

Yeah

Same

🤣🤣

@@matthewpaulson6497 lmao you think the Gospel that was written by an unknown person is the Injeel (aka verbatim word of god). Making me laugh lol 😂

@@JJmetaphysics The Gospel wasn't written by any unknown person, you dunce. You really think God is incapable of picking good people to pass on his message? You literally just regurgitate what you've been indoctrinated. Making me cry with your ignorance.

@@matthewpaulson6497 Good that you've reached halfway and believe in Allah's revelation of Injeel. Now you've just got to find out that the Gospels of Mark, Mathew, Luke and John are fake for many obvious reasons.

@TheDude: keep reading the Quran. Ask God for guidance to the truth. We all want the truth and nothing but, after that what's there to fear?

@@daventry2 Sounds like you value truth. Do you agree with this verse in the quran saying questions are the key to knowledge? >>We all want the truth and nothing but, after that what's there to fear?"" While truth might stop some fears from things that dont exist, knowing the truth about dangerous things that do exist could drive up ones fear. I know after learning about all the dangerous animals in australia I now have some fear of going there LOL. Have you seen some of those spider? They are big like kitchen plates LOL.

That's funny, I don't have the problem

I avoid google as much as possible. The company is scary walaahi. If you only knew how much of your information they have and listen in to private conversations.

@@orwellianyoutube8978 I never have any voice assistance on from any device regardless of the company running it. Front camera is blocked off as well. Try to limit as much as I can in what I willingly can share. They're all terrible companies.

I wish Muhammad Ali made it to the stream

@@commandar88 yup brother. He always calm and articulate

Amīn

Did jake really go after him though? I mean he laughed when hamza started going after him, but I dont feel like jake went at him hard. I could be wrong about this though. I will watch that part again and see.

Islam is direct and honest. They want Islam as they wish and like them hypocrite. Say we hate racism and do it say we hate violence and murder millions. This is the problem.

Jesus is God ✝️

As far as I remember he was telling someone after he had accepted Islam about the event that happened while he was a non Muslim. The events have to be known before people start quoting Hadeeth and Quran also

what type of food u having ?

What a fool that guy was. 😂😂😂

@@ericdumont610 No group has a monopoly on dumb. We’ve all got our fair share of those. Sorry to break your heart but atheists too. But this guy was something special.

@@slsa915 But atheists and agnostic dont have belief systems that when certain questions get asked, they avoid them from subconscious bias.... unless you want to prove me wrong and answer the questions. There are 4 judges and 10 guilty criminals. Judge #1 orders punishment for all 10 criminals and does not forgive without punishment a single one. Judge #2 forgives without punishment all 10 criminals. Judge #3 forgives without punishment 9 of them and punishes 1 of them. Judge #4 punishes 9 of them and forgives without punishment 1 of them. 1 Which judge is the most/maximally just? 2 Which judge is the most/maximally forgiving? 3 Is judge #3 either most/maximally forgiving or most just? 4 Is judge #4 most/maximally forgiving or most just? 5 is it possible for any judge to be both most/maximally forgiving and most/maximally just?

@@macmac1022 Your premise is innately flawed and therefore the questions too. You are positing forgiveness and justice as mutually exclusive polar opposites. That’s not the case in life. Sometime that is the case but sometimes it is Justice to be forgiving.

Yes i totaly agree there has to be an expert in hadith in the panel...there are said to be so many false hadith circulating...its very harmful to us muslims...in my country malaysia hadith experts are often wrongfuly catorised as wahabis bkos they correct the false traditions and beliefs practised by the socciety

Yup, I knew it was him!! Lol. He’s got a very distinct and funny way of talking like 100mph..

@@raymaaf7516 yup he got banned earlier

There’s Christian King then theres this ‘Muslim’ who reads Salah in English, sometimes, he’s Muslim, sometimes he’s a Christian, sometimes He’s Quran only Muslim. In reality he’s a lonely loser who need people to talk to him who’ll eventually hang himself

Worldly Law is Just One Sided Law, which very rearly Compensate and Do justice equally. But Allah is Ultimate Judge He Repays us with More than Compensation that we Endure and More Merciful to forgive the Sins.

No he took a sudden turn and panel has enough experience to know. What's the point of forcing Shahda when he is not ready to leave Bible. You find people turning away from Islam after few days when their heart is not fully in it.

>>The reason he cannot reconcile Justice and Mercy is that per Christian Doctrine Jesus (pbuh) has to pay for Adam's Sin. God cannot be Merciful and forgive Adam, and to confound this all, an innocent person (who is God Himself) must atone for this infringement. So in Christianity there is neither Justice nor Mercy, only confusion, as the caller demonstrated."" ???? Do you think I am a christian? I am agnostic. I told hamza I was agnostic in his warm up, I typed it in chat when they asked before I got in the stream. I use this same argument against christians all the time too. The justice and forgiveness is the same for both religions, punishment is hell forgiveness is heaven, you do not fair any better. They do have the major problem I point out when they start to say jesus took the punishment for everyone so there was maximal justice. The problem with this is punishing the only innocent person to ever live (according to them, and you I believe) for the crimes of others is completely unjust. We consider it a great injustice when innocent people get punished for others crimes. #1 Do you consider yourself to be honest? #2 Do you value truth? #3 Do you understand the verse about questions? "“Knowledge is a treasury and the keys to it are questions. May God have mercy on you, always ask.""

>>Mac Mac saying by showing mercy i can't be just, but i can be just be being mercy full, just say someone killed my child and i beat the guy up, the judge badly, the judge can be mercy full and give me a lesser sentence because of the situation"" That is justice. That is why you go to court and the police dont just throw you in jail with maximum sentence with no trail if you are caught red handed. The judge giving you a lesser sentence or even just letting you go completely is justice as that is what is deserving. This is why courts try and get the real story, the real situations so they can apply the proper amount of justice. You are welcome to come to my thread above and we can debate this.

@@macmac1022 stop embarrassing yourself clearly you dont have the intellectual capacity to understand what is being said, just stop mate for your own sake

He is hard headed. The reason he is adamant is because he wants to prove that Allah is not most just and most merciful. He miserably failed so not he is trolling comments.

Absolutely he is a gem I love that brothers content he is a great speaker I hope to see him on the streams one day

you mean the guy who preach women to be leaders in society and embrace feminism

Are you honest? If I asked questions would you answer them honestly?

​@@macmac1022​​​​Why not just ask the question instead of making it dramatic ?

@@arifabd >>Why not just ask the question instead of making it dramatic ?"" Because of over a year of asking these questions, less then 3% of the time they get answered. The people that do answer them, we have good discussions as they are honest people. There are 4 judges and 10 guilty criminals. Judge #1 orders punishment for all 10 criminals and does not forgive without punishment a single one. Judge #2 forgives without punishment all 10 criminals. Judge #3 forgives without punishment 9 of them and punishes 1 of them. Judge #4 punishes 9 of them and forgives without punishment 1 of them. 1 Which judge is the most/maximally just? 2 Which judge is the most/maximally forgiving? 3 Is judge #3 either most/maximally forgiving or most just? 4 Is judge #4 most/maximally forgiving or most just? 5 is it possible for any judge to be both most/maximally forgiving and most/maximally just?

@@macmac1022 Perhaps you feel the question you ask is being answered less than 3 percentage of the time because you feel like you get an answer only if it conforms to a preconceived mould of an answer you already have in mind! Your question obviously (and obviously, not obvious to you though!) has incomplete information to begin with. To start - there are several assumptions to be made in your question to even begin to answer it. Here are some: 1. Are all the judges maximally honest and unbiased ? 2. Are all the judges equally privy to ALL of the relevant information about ALL the criminals in question? 3. Are all the judges EQUALLY clear about the CORRECT interpretation of all of the applicable laws in the case ? 4. Are all the "criminals" in question correctly accused of the exact same crime, with practically the same implications and background to consider them as almost being the same case? If the answer to all these questions are a YES, then it is logically impossible for judge # 3 and judge #4 to give the judgements they apparently gave in your story. On the other hand, if the answer to any of these questions is a NO, then we have a divergent scenario , and therefore the ultimate answer you seek out of asking this generalized question over the collective of the criminals, would be a corrupted one, and will have no further truth value that is of general consequence. In light of this, if you decide to say the answer to all the questions are a "YES", and if you restrict the question to just about the judges #1 and #2, then we may have something to talk about.

@@arifabd >>Perhaps you feel the question you ask is being answered less than 3 percentage of the time because you feel like you get an answer only if it conforms to a preconceived mould of an answer you already have in mind!"" No, even if the answer is wrong I accept it as an answer. ANY answer, even I dont know is an answer. >>Your question obviously (and obviously, not obvious to you though!) has incomplete information to begin with. To start - there are several assumptions to be made in your question to even begin to answer it. Here are some:"" Oh here we go again. Its a hypothetical, you take it as the best interpretation as possible. That is what you are suppose to do in proper conversation and with hypotheticals. >>1. Are all the judges maximally honest and unbiased ?"" Yes. >>2. Are all the judges equally privy to ALL of the relevant information about ALL the criminals in question?"" Yes. >>3. Are all the judges EQUALLY clear about the CORRECT interpretation of all of the applicable laws in the case ?"" Yes. >>4. Are all the "criminals" in question correctly accused of the exact same crime, with practically the same implications and background to consider them as almost being the same case?"" While this is not relevant as they can be different crimes as long as they are either forgiven or not is all that matters, It does not hurt it either so yes. >>If the answer to all these questions are a YES, then it is logically impossible for judge # 3 and judge #4 to give the judgements they apparently gave in your story. "" No its not impossible, its a hypothetical and its not an impossible thing to happen, its just not good if judges do not judge properly. But for the case of the hypothetical, just assume it did happen ok? Can you do that? And why not judge #2 as well as he forgave them all? That is complete injustice. Either way, its hypothetical. >>In light of this, if you decide to say the answer to all the questions are a "YES", and if you restrict the question to just about the judges #1 and #2, then we may have something to talk about."" Yes all the answer are yes. It does not have to be restricted, questions 3 and 4 have a point if certain counter arguments come up. Now can you just answer the questions?

He quoted the surah but didn’t give the chapter of the surah which is annoying to deal with bc the information has to be presented and it simply wasn’t it

Ya I was also surprised to know. They are openly dishonest. Anything can be expected from them.

Probably a mix of shaitan and 🍄 , horrible mix . May Allah guide him if he is sincere

@@homtanks7259 he needs one more session. And he will be praying Jama’a.

This is the problem. You see that with Christians often.

My thread is up above if you want to really debate it. I think your daft and all who dont understand are daft. But your welcome to come to the thread and prove me wrong, if you can.

@@macmac1022 can't debate illogical people. So I'd definitely give the skip

@@AyubKhan-md4km >>can't debate illogical people. So I'd definitely give the skip"" Put your money where you mouth is, dont be a coward.

@@macmac1022 it's illogical for you to believe mercy is opposite to justice while they are complimentary. You cant have justice without mercy and vice versa. You have a colloquial understanding, not a deep philosophy understanding of it. Or perhaps you have the illogical biblical understanding of it which is why you might be struggling

Haven't heard the word daft in years 🤣🤣🤣

🤣🤣🤣😭

>>Mac Mac, lol, this was your big moment to bring down Islam? When Jake highlighted Mac Mac's binary relation between mercy/justice it broke his brain and then he got emotional."" Jake was fine, It was hamza with the constant interruptions that got me mad as it does most people who are trying to talk and someone just keeps trying to talk over them. Are you an honest person? Do you value truth? If i ask you questions will you be honest and try and answer them?

@@macmac1022 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣😭

@@gurutruthspeak598 WOW you can post emojis, That must take some awesome brain power to avoid saying anything of interest and post emojis. (sarcasm) If you got something to say, say it.

@@macmac1022 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣😆... F*** ***! 😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂

>>Mercy is a part of law."" How? >>You can enforcement punishment for every infraction, because human are literally incapable of being perfect."" It seems like maybe you wanted to say cant instead of can, but it works both ways. Basically if you break the law and are caught, your probably going to court. >> Humans will make mistakes, be it intentional or not. As such, Mercy is a part of justice, because being fair is Mercy and justice. "" Being fair is the definition of justice, but no where do I see that in the definition of forgiveness. Justice - fairness in the way people are dealt with: - the system of laws in a country that judges and punishes people: forgive- to stop blaming or being angry with someone for something that person has done, or not punish them for something: Antonym of forgive is punish, and there is the opposite and conflict. >>Justice is not about punishments."" I never said it was. Its about fairness as per the definition. And when you commit wrongdoing, this most times when justice is applied comes with punishment. >>It's about punishment and Mercy."" No its about justice and that is it. There are 4 judges and 10 guilty criminals. Judge #1 orders punishment for all 10 criminals and does not forgive without punishment a single one. Judge #2 forgives without punishment all 10 criminals. Judge #3 forgives without punishment 9 of them and punishes 1 of them. Judge #4 punishes 9 of them and forgives without punishment 1 of them. 1 Which judge is the most/maximally just? 2 Which judge is the most/maximally forgiving? 3 Is judge #3 either most/maximally forgiving or most just? 4 Is judge #4 most/maximally forgiving or most just? 5 is it possible for any judge to be both most/maximally forgiving and most/maximally just?

>>The first dude just argued for arguments sake Then he lost his temper cause he knew he was talking nonsense and said the F word and got switched off lol"" No, i lost my temper when hamza kept interrupting me. You people are blind to truth and run on subconscious bias I swear. Are you an honest person? Do you value truth? If i ask you questions will you be honest and try and answer them?

The first guy comes to argue with you now. 🤣🤣🤣

Hamza can speak his own mind but he should be aware that certain topics is better not to make fatwa than speaking of someone limited understanding

@@agn1087 He's stating his opinion, not making any fatwa. Also, I'm under the impression that he's talking about someone who don't know / ignorant about Islam is better than someone who know Islam or are a Muslim but choose disobedience. Anyway, that just his opinion, not a fatwa.

>>The guy who asked the question about Mercy and Forgiveness. In Islam we have a concept of the Rights of the Creator vs the Rights of the Creation. Allah will judge you for all the rights of the creation that you are held accountable for. Allah will be most forgiving to you when it will come to small sins specifically, sins that do not impact any other creation. All except for Shirk. There are specific examples of Allah's Mercy and Justice on the Day of Judgement. There are whole PhD level thesis done by Muslim Scholars on this matter and there are very clear examples from the Hadith of what will happen in specific scenarios on the day of judgement. An example: On that day you had some 'closet' sins that no one other than Allah is aware of. If you have been a forgiving person in this world, Allah will forgive your sins and allow you to enter Jannah without holding you accountable for it. There are other examples specific to justice. Example: If a Ram with horns hurt another Ram without horns, Allah will resurrect the two on that Day, give the one without horns to hurt the one with horn, which will be without horn until justice is served."" ok, are you an honest person? Do you value truth? If I ask a question will you try and answer it honestly?

@@macmac1022 even if I am honest, are you honest? An honest man would simply ask because they want to learn. A person with an agenda plays games like this.

@@MohammadFaisalSaleem >> even if I am honest, are you honest?"" >>An honest man would simply ask because they want to learn."" Exactly, and I am learning. >> A person with an agenda plays games like this."" How am I suppose to learn about question avoidance if I dont use questions people will avoid to see it happening and learn about it? I will ask you some questions and lets see if you avoid these. More then 97% of theists I ask do and I can even say I give you a 97% chance that you will avoid these questions. I dont care if your answer is wrong or is I dont know as those are answers at least. But I am willing to bet your going to avoid them. There are 4 judges and 10 guilty criminals. Judge #1 orders punishment for all 10 criminals and does not forgive without punishment a single one. Judge #2 forgives without punishment all 10 criminals. Judge #3 forgives without punishment 9 of them and punishes 1 of them. Judge #4 punishes 9 of them and forgives without punishment 1 of them. 1 Which judge is the most/maximally just? 2 Which judge is the most/maximally forgiving? 3 Is judge #3 either most/maximally forgiving or most just? 4 Is judge #4 most/maximally forgiving or most just? 5 is it possible for any judge to be both most/maximally forgiving and most/maximally just?

@@macmac1022 is this in any way related to the topic at hand? God being Most Just and Most Forgiving? Can you explain? If you can explain as such, I would respond. Secondly, your attempt to box me into some paradigm where you have not given me any context is deceptive and shows you having a hidden agenda. Third, introduce yourself and your worldview. You already know mine. The way I see it, you are trying a gotcha question here.

@@MohammadFaisalSaleem >> is this in any way related to the topic at hand?"" it covers both. >>God being Most Just and Most Forgiving?"" The questions are not about god, just human judges. The follow up questions if these get answered will be about those attributes of god though. >>Can you explain?"" I will try. I will use the post I usually start with and hope this clears some things up. Would you be willing to help me in a test about questions and behavior in the avoidance of answering questions? I dont know is a perfectly acceptable answer, so are answers I that might be wrong, all that matters is if you answer the question directly and honesty if you can. I think it seems only fair that you can ask me anything as well but you need to try and find questions I will avoid answering, as that is the point. I think this might be something everyone does and does not know it, so far. I need more testing though and finding questions I wont answer and pointing that out to me would be awesome as well. You might need some background of me so you can find an idea of mine I will have bias to. I am agnostic atheist. I think money and ownership are bad things, I am canadian. I am using christianity and islam as this is where I noticed this behavior, but I dont think this is just a religious thing to be clear. The absolute worse are the corrupt politicians, the ones who create our laws then disobey them. >>Secondly, your attempt to box me into some paradigm where you have not given me any context is deceptive and shows you having a hidden agenda."" Not trying to be deceptive, and I am not trying to hide anything. I dont want to be a hypocrite and expect honesty from you if I am being dishonest myself. >>Third, introduce yourself and your worldview. You already know mine."" Yep. If you want to find questions I will avoid you will have to know things about me, that is why that comment I often post give some information about me to go on. If you can find a bias in me, that is what you will want to use as that is where the subconscious ego will take over and avoid the questions without me even realizing it. The mind is a powerful tool, but it can also be our own most deceptive enemy. >>The way I see it, you are trying a gotcha question here."" I wont deny it is. That is how this all started for me and how I realized this and wanted to study it. I dont know if you debate with any christians or other people, but you might do the same thing with asking them questions and probably have seen the avoidance they will do as well. Or maybe you have seen it watching christians getting questioned in hamzas den here. Politicians are the worst though, well here in canada and the US anyways. They avoid questions like that so much that watching the green house meetings, its ALL avoided questions after avoided question. So if you want even more of an in depth explanation just ask. It will probably be a long comment, might have a short 10 minute video or 2 linked in it to save typing. I really suck at typing and spelling, and grammar.

It was funny.🤣🤣🤣 And he wanted Islam with Alien twist. It's not a movie it's faith.🤦

"" _I think this man conflates terms because if you show mercy to someone than you don't have to be justice because it is forgiven._ "" That would be part of it, but there is more then that as well. Your not wrong, if someone was 100% forgiving, why would they need justice for wrongdoing when they are going to forgive wrongdoing every time? The antonym or opposite of forgive is punish. But there is also how forgiving wrongdoing is unjust as well. If someone kills people and the judge forgives them and lets them walk, how was this fair to the victim and their family and friends? How is this fair to all the other criminals that did get punished for the same crime?