Emptiness is only empty of inherent existence. It does not say that there is no self, only no inherently existing self. That somehow does not seem contradictory, even on an intellectual level.

Katagiri’s (2011) “Each Moment Is the Universe” provides a paired description of self & no-self (existing in the phenomenal world & existing in the formless realm of timelessness). In his description we shift from moment-to-moment between the two. The subtitle of the book is: “Zen and the Way of Being Time” and it is Katagiri’s interpretation of Dogen’s Uji (Being-Time). Thus, we have (1) no-self, (2) self, and (3) the alternating combination of the two. This is the Threefold Truth of Tiantai: (1) All phenomena are empty. (2) Phenomena exist in a provisional manner. And (3) the middle truth: phenomena are both empty of existence & exist provisionally. But Katagiri actually explains how the combination takes place (in time & space)! This is always the case. But it isn’t always explicitly stated. So, when Dogen starts pointing out (spouting off about) all the implications of this, in a chapter focusing on another topic, it adds complexity on top of subtlety. Someone could write a book (trying) to explain why Dogen’s writings are so hard to follow. (Probably better to just try & explain his writings directly, as Brad does so well.)

I ran across the teaching about “milk” when I decided to sit down and actually READ an old sutra-which turned out to be the Nirvana Sutra, where Buddha talks about himself as an eternally existing, omnipresent force for the redemption of the whole cosmos and the True Self of all beings. It kind of blew my mind-especially because it was the pandemic and I had jacked up my sitting to a whole hour every day. The parable about “milk” has really stuck with me.

Murphy`s Law: "Nothing is always, and everything depends!"

Saved this one. I've bumped into this throughout my illustrious career of loving the sutras, the koans, the poetry, the point, Dogen immensely... One gets a sense of making leaps and bounds in just sitting, like a smidgen, when one takes note of its rapture, but, when one does not, it is like bounty of no bounty. And Yet, I've had to wrangle myself into a practice of Zazen once more. Seeking a Sangha this time ❤️🌎🙏🏻🧘‍♂️

I think the word you were searching for instead of "diversion" was "digression." Thanks much for the reading/description regarding self/no-self and permanence/impermanence. This may sound weird, but it was a big relief.

my Theravada teacher has had some deep experiences and now he still teaches no self but he’ll also say things like “no self but the All”

Awesome acoustic song, great video - complimentary to a great podcast! This all just makes sense to me, honestly. A thing cannot exist without its opposite! And I agree - on a purely intellectual level, Zen and Buddhism overall are daunting; practice is direct experience that makes it intuitively “true”.

My experience of Buddhism is about holding two contradictory truths at once. Both are true in a way that can't be said or written, and only Epworth through zazen. I consider myself a part of the universe in the shape of a nihilist. I come from everything, I am nothing, and to both I will return.

There is the permanent process of the arising and falling away of self - the point is that we need not be dependant on suffering/self.

Thank you Brad.👍👏🙏

Listening to Huang Po read by that Australian Buddhist nun (can’t remember her name) with the wonderful voice. Seemed a lot like Advaita Vedanta.

Cool channel. I’ve been finding my way back to Dharmic philosophy after a long hiatus. As an aside, how familiar are you with Carl Jung’s work?

This is a bit confusing, Brad, because that quote from the Nirvana Sutra doesn't say at all what Ziporyn claims it says. To occasionally refer to self as part of upaya, skillful means, is nothing like saying that everything is self and non-self at once. That's a universalizing statement, and the quote from the Sutra is basically saying there are no universalizing statements. Also, you say that practice helps you understand this identity of self and non-self. I don't think that's true in my case -- and fine, maybe I haven't practiced enough. But before I had a steady practice I was very enthusiastic about this philosophically, and I thought I got it, intellectually, at least. From sitting, well, it feels more like "self" and "non-self" are just words, and their identity or not is a non-issue. All there is is the moment of sitting, or walking my dog, or whatever -- the sound of the refrigerator cutting off then restarting, my aching knee, whatever. What does some metaphysical notion of self or non-self have to do with that? It's too capacious, too general to say anything about this moment or this place. It's just words.

Thx a lot for this video! Btw nice piece of music! What you are talking about reminds me of something I found in the book "Nonduality" by Loy. There he presents the thesis that negating Self or Non-Self leads necessarily to the other since both are interconnected. If we look at it historically we have a move from Self to Non-Self and then back. It is still puzzling for me but as you said, I think through practice this kind of paradox becomes lively emptiness. The problem with all polarities arise from too much thinking about them. Bye bye.

I knew tgat was a planet of the apes shirt! I like the new ones too but nothing compares to the originals

Ziggy is so enlithened , he does not cuestion anything .......

nice T shirt

please link to your podcast for Komyo

Is this idea kinda similar to when Shunryu Suzuki says in Zen Mind Beginners Mind "form is form, and emptiness is emptiness"? [just as much as form is emptiness].

It's simple. Its zero dimensional. It's the same self as in a dream. I don't think any understandings or concepts are worth anything except virtue/conscience and the danger of sensual intents/attachments. And that Samatha meditation is all you need until body+mind consciousness shut down. Then, you must probe to proceed further.

The middle way

The skillful view om the self according to buddha seems to be just as confising so... Yeah probably the toughest cookie of them all in buddhism

I think this follows apophatic logic. That is, embodident of God through negation. So you must see the lack of self in all phenomena, and what's left is the Self.

Does Ziggy have Buddha Nature? 😜

On a sidenote, maybe?

Wow! I don't get it! :)

What about doing the practice without studying the teachings? I sit every day but don't read any Dogen stuff. Am I going to go crazy or become a cult leader?

The stink of zen... :)