I whole-heartedly agree. Great videos, too.

it is quite cozy

Bot

That was the best game.

Lovedddddd that game

Amazing game

It truly was the best HP game and it added Lore that I didn't know existed when I was younger until I read the 4th book

@@housetraitor4806 lol fr my little ass didnt even know that usa was part of the harry potter world until that game

Locomotormortis!

@@AL-nv4gk AHHAHAHAHAAHHAHAA before opening the comments section I was already hearing in my mind "LOCOMOTOR MORTIS!"

Percy: Get back to the common room, Harry. Also Percy: Come here!

What about Filch chasing after you after spotting you, then catching you.

The games where generally scary when I was like 5. I went into the forbidden forest a scared child and left as a grown man

I gotta be fair here. I went for the pc version cuz I never played the ps2 version since I only know about differences since these vids. I did play all harry potters on pc though until part 1 midway trough I'm planning on going trough them soon enough.

I've played both and still prefer the PC version. The PS2 version is great but felt short and easy in the last half of the game whereas the PC version still had challenges

@@RetroSmoo They're both about on par with each other, but the PC version does have superior game design, so it wins in gameplay. :)

It's good, but not perfect IMHO. HP1 PS1 ranked above HP2 PS1 is a joke, and HP1 on PC being on A is an overstatement, since this game was an experiment and pretty rushed, virtually no open world, rushed story etc.... Order of Phoenix should be higher than just B grade, it should be at least on A! The rest of the rankings is okay!

Honestly, Chamber of Secrets and Philosopher's Stone for PS2 are probably one of my least favorite HP games, mainly because of awkward controls, too much stealth, repetetiveness and overally, the PC and even the PS1 versions (which I adore) felt more dynamic and responsive to play. Sure, the PS2 games look great, but that's the only thing I can give the games credit for to be honest

So true. Style is extremely important, Harry Potter is supposed to be a magical Wonderland, with magical colors and unique character designs. After said game it got more bland and too realistic colors/lighting plus they became "movie copies" i personally feel. The games should give their own witty interpretation of the books if you ask me. The new game that's coming looks fantastic though, it manages to be realistic but also magical and vibrant from what I've seen.

Goblet was a flop for sure. I remember as a kid thinking "Is it just me, or does this game actually kinda suck compared to the first 3?" Then this year I looked up these games on the internet and felt vindicated learning that everyone else hated Goblet as well.

@@cubedmelons876 definitely wasn't just you, I felt pretty much the same. As much as yet another 3D adventure game reusing the same formula as the first three games would seem quite boring, the Goblet of Fire seemed like something too much different and I have not even played anything past 'the trilogy'.

Would be cool to see a poll run with the voting system that allows you to vote your 1 2 3 top choices

@@toastedt140 I played all these games and I will never choose PC versions (for the first 3) over the Console counter parts

@@Anonymous-Wolf why not?

@@Anonymous-Wolf Maybe the console version of Philosopher's Stone is better than the PC version but I'll choose the PC version of Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets over the console versions because it has the best game design imo.

Not enough people played this game :(. Had they, it would have been #1!

Half blood prince on psp was pretty bad I went to the shop to get my money back lol I think it's similar to the ds version tho

I agree with you, they're great RPGs. I would dare to say Chamber of Secrets (GBC) is better than its sequel Prisoner of Azkaban (GBA). Prisoner of Azkaban may have better graphics but the artistic design feels worse: too blurry, without the charm of pixelart. Hogwarts has a worse design and the puzzles felt cheap for me, almost a waste of time (far from Golden Sun or Mario & Luigi). I couldn't finish it.

Based, Chamber of Secrets - GBC is the best

prisoners of azakaban on GBA is made by the same developers

Can you link the theme

It is one of my favorite games ever, nostalgia definitely playing a part. I replayed it not that long ago, and found many secrets I had never found before. Also checked out some stuff in the game that is not actually accessible without using cheats. There are some cool stuff not used, a full extra course (like the classes) in the Gryffindor Common Room for example.

@@natef1212 kzfaq.info/get/bejne/j86omtyY2t2al4E.html

i more remembered the ps2 game since that was my first ps2 game. got soo many memoerys of all the games in the series appart from gof cus that game was bad even when it was new

@@natef1212 kzfaq.info/get/bejne/mKuXf9mSsqq4ZHk.html

It was the first game I ever played in my life, I was so amazed at leveling up my spells, exploring hogwarts, attending classes. Even today I play it on my phone, it's so incredible fun

Ah yes! That's a very underrated game. I've recently replayed it and had a blast

It was my childhood game too, i loved getting lost around the castle and just find secret rooms. I just actually found out that HP 1 and 2 for PC might even be better, i so wanna try them even though i'm an adult now xD

Forgot this even existed! Had a great time with this game despite not playing it as much as the HP2 PC-version.

Probably the best HP games for the content.

Terrible game truly tedious only correct assessment you made.

Eh, I prefer HP2 on GBC.

@@fictionalmediabully9830 PC IS BETTER

Yeah, as much as I love the Prisoner of Azkaban PC, that game is a downgrade to the Chamber of Secrets PC. My main problem is the length and a bigger castle that feels more hollow, because of some floors being straight up empty. Also, I really don't like, that spells are not being used apart from classrooms (in 90% of cases). In the Chamber of Secrets you had all those Spongify plates or Diffindo spider webs everywhere around Hogwarts and discovering new secrets with new learnt spells felt really satisfying. In the PoA, you can basically get all the secrets right away and it ruins all the charm. Although, the portrait passwords were a neat idea. Shame, it's like they did not have enough time for the production. It's weird, because they had an extra year, but then again, they were also working on a Brother Bear game, which came out in 2003, so that may be the reason

I recommend you give the movies a go. They are great! Its up to you but you might enjoy them!

Thank you, yes, been getting a lot of requests for Lego games. Will get to them soon

I only played part 2 but I remember I thought the game was very easy but fun 😁I think goblet of fire is way worse than deathly Hallows

Gof was the worst game by far i still think hallows part 1 and 2 only beat it by one spot cus they where still boring 3rd person shooters. but gof was by far the black sheep of the series.

Its what annoyed me soo much back in the day. when i was gorwing up i actuly played the games before watching the films but for goblit i actuly sore the film first and i remember thinking how cool the tornament is gonna be to play in the game. little did i know the game is basicly just a disscount lego game witch threw out everything good about the original 3

Same for me. That happened because EA chucked Know Wonder out of the development cycle, and they really made the first three games so well. It would have been amazing to see what would Know Wonder have done with goblet of fire if they still could develop the HP games

I never seen what the Goblet of Fire video game looked like until now and I feel disappointed. I loved the Triwizard Tournament in the Goblet of Fire novel and movie (my favorite Harry Potter novel) and I was wondering how well the video game adaptation would adapt the tournament.

And considering that game SEEMS, at least from previews, to revolve around beating down a house-elf / goblin rebellion... I don't think we'll be missing out on much either.

@@goranisacson2502 Wow. If that's true, then I don't wanna hear another soul try to argue _"Don't punish the game devs for something someone else said!"_ They're already paid for their labor, if they're not it's their employer's fault for being withholding, not mine, and if _that's_ what they made, then they _deserve_ to lose out

@@chompythebeast And just in case you hadn't been keeping up with stuff around that game (which I don't blame you if you haven't, I'm just remembering some people might not be as irrationally online as me to keep track of this stuff): the former lead designer for the game, Troy Leavitt, had or still has a youtube channel where he boosts Gamergate and rails against Anita Sarkeesian. Granted, he then resigned from the project in March 2021 when people investigated his youtube channel, and the articles I found back then do not mention if he was lead dev in a coding manner or a story-writing manner, but they do say management tried to prevent them from including trans-options when designing your character (yet it is apparently being included in the final game), so I can't swear on what influence he might have had... but it certainly adds up to deflate what enthusiasm one MIGHT have had for the game even more. Also, went and double-checked the info on the plot on the Harry Potter wiki. The two revealed villains so far is a Goblin who is trying to instigate a rebellion agaknst human wizards, and a human wizard who apparently backs his efforts from the shadows, so house elves are not involved in the rebellion from what I can tell. If they turn out to be involved later on, or if it turns out the Dark wizard is just instigating the rebellion and the Goblin is just his pawn and the whole rebellion isn't REAL and it's just faked by the human... well, that's for the people who'll actually play the game to find out.

Agreed it was Amazing on og Xbox i did play pc versio as well but it wasnt as good

Did you enjoy it?

Thank you for watching, hope things get better for you, mate

Reminded me of Golden Sun visually speaking. That ain’t a bad thing!

The order of the phnixe for psp was actuly a upgrade of the ps2 game. like it had more quests some extra parts that was missing from the ps2 one like a slight fight in the minestry of magic at the end. and it had a faction reputation system. like you had to do theses extra mini quests that gave you reputation in each of the 4 houses witch you had to get to a certen level to get past roadblocks of students that wouldnt let you into certen areas.

I should mention that I did eventually end up getting COS on PC, and couldn’t advance because I was scared of the slime 😂 still a great game that I was happy to see at the top.