😍😍😍

You’re a legend for the title

Did you just edit the title of the video? Are you trying to attract likes by playing on current ideological controversies...?

Just found your channel today and the title alone made me subscribe.

Unsubscribing, this witch-hunt is ridiculous.

Isn't it mentioned that Harry couldn't see Rita on the Marauder's map? 'Cause if I remember it correctly, Rita Skeeter, as an animagus, should appear on the map, since Peter Pettigrew did (in the Prisoner of Azkaban, in the scene where Harry is walking in the hallways in the night and meets Snape and then Lupin who takes the map away from him) even though he was in rat form. It's weird that nobody points out this plothole.

@@_HappyRadio_ Yes, I'm pretty sure she did appear on the map.

@JD James maybe they did and figured ron wasnt ready to come out lol

HappyRadio but are we sure he used the map when she was beside as a beetle? Crouch jr. as Moody took it from him after he went searching for Crouch at night!! JK was always ahead while writing these...

@JD James I explain it to myself as such: a marauder cannot be seen on a map by anyone other than marauders or their relatives, or alternatively, he cannot be seen when he doesn't want to be seen. They "programmed" this map after all)

Yeah, it could have just been a white orb as well, maybe make it really bright and maybe have it dim and before it focuses, Lupin changes it. Also, as far as Ginny, they could have done the same thing as in the book and have her try to talk to Harry and Co. and as soon as she starts talking, Percy shoos her away and says that it's nothing and that he knows what she's on about and it's got nothing to do with anything. Either way, you can still look guilty and not be involved with the main event too. She's also supposed to be really embarrassed of being around Harry at this point and that's also why Harry sees her looking so shifty.

They showed crystal ball reading in Divination class later in the film, so they could've tried to use that as a red herring, but they didn't.

I find it hard to believe they were doing that and still left out Peeves, but that's usually not why movies are made. People who read tend to like the books better anyways. I would more assume they didn't do too much because they didn't know how or they decided to make it more obvious for younger audiences who haven't read the books? No idea.

It might have to do with the swedish translation of the book, but for long I thought that he saw a silver orb of some sort. Being a werewolf, this also makes sense for him to be afraid of and I think I figured it out before his transformation.

well the guy that directed the 3rd movie originaly didn't even bother with reading the books, not even the one he is adapting and i think it shows, prisoner of askaban is one of the best harry potter movies as a movie alone, but one of the worst adaptations (not as bad as goblet of fire but still pretty bad)

lilyme3 Rowling is a genius

What mystery?

What's the much larger mystery

Yurim02 Horcruxes

horcruxes indeed, and Harry being one of them is one of the main recurring motives throughout the series that are hinted but not explained until the very end of book 7. So when you read the books a second time after reading book 7, you can see so many clues that you missed the first time haha

Oh yeah!!!!!

Oh yes, that was a great one.

Yes, that was really clever.

Or how she introduced a new teacher in the 2nd book so readers of the 1st book might think this new teacher is the culprit

Of course, the costume designers couldn't be bothered to care that it was a BLUE dress. That was their only limitation, but they couldn't abide that. They had to put her in pink as though Emma Watson didn't look good in blue.

Best observation so far!

FYI, this technique is called a "red herring" :)

Yes, but the Wronski feint is a red herring move and since it's from the Harry Potter books works perfectly here ;)

@@KyleHarmieson A red herring is where you're presented something that seems to be important, but actually isn't. What swanpride is talking about is where you're presented something important, but are fooled into thinking it isn't. You could make the argument that the latter involves a red herring as the distracting element, but I think the distinction is fair. After all the sorts of examples swan outlined are quite a different technique from the 'snape is the bad guy' type red herrings we get.

@@a1ethioS No, it's nothing that specific. It's just a misleading/distracting clue.

My ten year-old brain could not handle all the plot twists 😂

Those are part of the mystery element. She does it in such clever ways!

yeah I loved those twists where you're like "oh snap, Harry's got bamboozled". And they are part of the "fair mystery" technique - most of the twists you COULD have seen coming but you didn't and you feel kinda guilty that you didnt haha

And then there's Half-Blood Prince, where Harry suspects Draco and Snape - people he already suspected in previous books, they already proved innocent in previous books, and they're quite clearly red herrings now, as other characters point out to him... and then at the end it turns out he was right, and the previous books actually manage to make that into a twist.

Joseph Davis I KNEW that Snape was good because the end of the sixth book was way too soon to reveal his loyalty.

indeed! I read them all in Spanish and Snape and Trelawney were as clear as day! I recognized Draco more by his blonde platinum hair than by his skin color, so that might be why I didn't get him

Same

No kidding. I haven't read the books and got 2 of them right.

Well the greasy hear is mentioned fairly enough throughout the series, that was one of the reasons he was bullied as a student. Trelawney’s glasses are depicted quite well in the movies so it was easy to remember her too. I couldn’t get Malfoy right though.

Me too.

Pointillax Fucking awesome

Same for me - I got RAB almost immediately.

I didn't get R.A.B. I read it the books in Russian. And in Russian, "rab" is a word that means "slave", so that became a red hering.

I reread Harry Potter Love how in book 5 it sets up what seems like just some other details but turn out to be absolutely key later on like: Aberforth, reading that from his perspective gives a bit more depth and has you understanding his thoughts. Same with Lupin in poa Regulus, mentioned in quick passing by family tree Locket, mentioned when they’re cleaning out the house

I solved in during Christmas. It was weeks after finishing the sixth book and I suddenly realized, who RAB was. I was lying in bed and literally sat up, when solving it :)

You are right, but the Harry Potter books are actually written for children and I don't think many children know what "Lupus" means or who Romolus and Remus were.

​@@lenastorm6280 I do!! I know who Romulus an remus were!!

@@lenastorm6280 On top of that, even if you know who Romulus and Remus were, with all the strange names in Harry Potter series, you can still shrug it off as nothing important.

At least you're reading in another language. I didn't realize about the name Remulus till now because in my language the names are slightly different so it isn't as straightfoward as is in English. (But after reading it, it seems obvious XD).

@@cavc94 Totally! In spanish we called them Romulo and Remo so even thought I knew the legend I never imagined Remo was actually Remus in english.

Not to mention his wife LITERALLY ignores him throughout the rest of the film like he's not there at all. Now if that if that first scene had been taken out all together and we followed his journey and his confusion until he met Cole, the ONLY character in the film who CAN see and acknowledge him, that would have been great. Then mystery becomes, who is/was this guy and how did he die?

Pretty sure most people who watched Sixth Sense just assumed he survived the shooting like I did. It was a great twist for me at the end.

Oh, I did too but then, as I got older and watched it again, I started thinking, why isn't his wife talking to him? I get she is traumatized by the shooting, but MOST of the movie? And if he's helping Cole with his problems, then CAN the mom see him this whole time? Oh he's a ghost? But then the mom was dropping Cole off to see..a ghost? Oh my head LOL too much for 10 year old me to think about back then (:

Timberwolf410 I assumed they were simply having marital issues after the shooting and that Willis was spending too much time on his work, determined to not fail another of his patients.

I recall that when it came out, the Sixth Sense's plot twist was pretty novel. We kind of assumed that he survived the shooting, but some other familial issues emerge and he's separated from his wife, so they're not on good terms. The fact that no one acknowledges him seems to reflect his life falling apart and no one being there for him. At least that's how I saw it. Funny how knowing the twist makes everything seem so obvious.

Just keep scrolling plenty of people are

I was confused about how recently this happened.

Sort by new and taste the terf salt

I had this video saved in the watch later folder, just recently noticed the name change. I was like 'C'moon! Can't we just have nice things? No? Okay...'

I'm sure JKR is devastated.

Wasn't it the hand? I clearly remember it. Maybe it's both. Anyway, you're right, it's one of the awesome things about those books. When you reread them you can see all the tiny detail and how they pay of later.

I never noticed all of these details in the first reading and i certainly wouldnt have guessed the endings of each book (if i wasnt spoilered) but the special thing about harry potter is even if you already know how it ends its still interesting to read and reread it. And then when those clues come up its extremely satisfying

Honestly, after the success of the first book, I think she planned everything out. The second book is filled with clues to the 6th book, especially in the Borgin & Burkes. The cabinet, the hand, and the necklace were all mentioned. Harry hid in the vanishing cabinet!

I love how she the only unsolved the mystery of the first book (What did Dumbledore see in the mirror of Erised) in the last book, when we find out about Ariana

Yeeesss! The endless discussions about what might happen in the next book during the 2 year waiting period. You could talk to almost anyone you ran into about it. The only problem I had is that sometimes the theories ended up being better than what was actually written. A good friend had me absolutely CONVINCED that Snape had said Avada Kedavra out loud, but in his mind had actually said expelliarmus (that's the book where unspoken spells are introduced I think), and since Dumbledore wasn't holding a wand it couldn't fly away and there was just a green flash, which is what it describes expelliarmus as being like. It all fit together so well, and I thought for sure Dumbledore would show up alive at the end of book 7.

TheNumberScott The books describe Expelliarmus as a red flash, actually, and in the movies it is shown as red too. Cool idea though.

this is not better than what was written.

TheNumberScott Dumbledore was dying anyway, so his plan to be killed by Snape made perfect sense. That's much better than your friend's theory.

I was the opposite, I don't think I remembered the locket, but when Harry in HBP was fussing around with an old tarnished tiara I did the squinty suspect eyes and thought, "ok that has to be something...a horcrux..?" I just felt there was too much attention being put on that vs the locket. I also got back into writing (because of the books) by that time so ..that might be why.

Harry's Moving Castle LOVE YOUR CHANNEL

Harry's Moving Castle Shame your Harry Potter "Did it suck?" series is over, mate. It's been fun watching it.

I give the video 9 + 3/4 just because he pronounced Rowling wrong

Ludo Bagman in Goblet of Fire as well, which IMO has the best mysteries, between the triwizard tournament, Barty Crouch, and Rita Skeeter

He already talked about that in his plot twist video.

Snape is a red herring even for himself. I add to your list: Sirus and Peter case in book 3

And in Half-Blood Prince, Harry suspects that Malfoy is an agent of Voldemort. By now, the reader is suspicious that this might be another red herring - but it turns out to be true. Sneaky.

Yes I was thinking that. She amazing at making you think its one person and then being like lol jk its this guy. And if you read the book again you can see that she doesn't mislead you the info was all there.

What do you mean?#in what way?

Same, I'm staring my shelf right now wondering if I pick them or not. lol

Yes, how dare a woman say that men aren't women. Unsubbed.

@@Yaarrr trans women ARE women but i'm not going to fight with some uneducated person on the internet, have a nice day :)

@@Yaarrr just in case this is just out of not knowing much about menstruation instead of outright bigotry against trans people, I'll just say this: the term "people who menstruate" was specifically used because it's not just cisgender women who menstruate - older women stop menstruating after menopause, are they not still women? girls start menstruating with puberty, usually between the ages of 12-14, but they're not old enough to be considered women, the adult version of a female descriptor - are they not still 'people who menstruate' just because they are underage? And then, getting into trans issues, trans men and trans boys can still go through menstruation despite transitioning - do they not count as needing assistance when it comes to reproductive healthcare and do not benefit from menstruation being de-stigmatized as a whole? But of course, you're obviously referring to trans-women in this statement as if they're "men" - which they're not since they live their lives as women, reintegrated themselves into society as women at great personal risk, and often get bottom gender confirmation surgery because people won't view them as women until they have the anatomy associated with females - even though they very plainly are not men, no matter what you may say about how they "still look/act like men" even when that's clearly not the case. On the grounds of talking about the health issue of menstruation - though let's be frank, it's pretty dehumanizing and disgusting to solely conflate womanhood with the ability to menstruate or carry a pregnancy, as if women are just incubators and there's no legitimate place or identity for women to occupy outside of menstruating and carrying a pregnancy - I'll say you're right, trans women do not menstruate. *BUT,* don't you see that's the *whole point* in using the term "people who menstruate" *instead* of just saying women? The term "women" includes trans women + older cisgender women - who do not menstruate - while the term "people who menstruate" includes teenage cisgender girls + trans men/boys - people who *do* have the capability of menstruating ALONG WITH cisgender women between the ages of 18 to ~50 years old. [The TERF] we're talking about here, who insists on implying that only cisgender women menstruate can count in this discussion, is ignoring a significant population of people who menstruate while also delegitimizing an already marginalized and vulnerable community. There's a reason why people are rightfully mad that [the TERF] has once again shown how she doesn't perceive trans people as being important or relevant to discussions about reproductive healthcare and issues stereotypically categorized as "women's issues" when these issues are *bigger* than just those who identify *as* women. I'd like to think that your comment was just born out of not knowing all of these things but, based on my past experiences on the internet, I'm more inclined to believe this is a result of transphobia. However, I don't personally know you or your story. Now that I've laid out the context, I would hope you'd read it and conduct your own research so that you can get a better understanding of *why* there's a push towards finally using inclusive language when talking about menstruation, abortion, and biologically female reproductive healthcare. Gender identity =/= biological sex and neither are binary - if you'd like to argue, I would *very* highly suggest you consider the existence of intersex individuals, "two-spirit" identities in indigenous cultures, and the many myths and stories of LGBT people from ancient civilizations as evidence that there *never* has been a binary when it comes to human sexuality, biology, and identity. *TLDR* if you're going to post something like this, I would hope that you're willing to put your money where your mouth is and consider *why* people are mad and would react this way to [the TERF]'s recent behavior. If not, I'd ask you to stay in your lane and consider that not everything that other people do is a personal attack against you - something that's not the case for trans people when others that make the kinds of statements that [the TERF] made, of which is very much a personal attack against trans people since it tells trans people they either do not count as women or count as people who menstruate; both of these statements specifically hurt trans people and it's irresponsible for someone as well known, powerful, and influential as [the TERF] to perpetuate these ideas to as large of an audience as she has.

@@madcat9024 Lol @ thinking I consider it a personal attack. I'm not even a woman, why would it be a personal attack on me? My opinion is not borne out of ignorance, it's borne out of truth. The simple truth is that to be a woman you have to be female, and to be a man you have to be male. It's literally in the definitions of the words. Trans ideology is not based on truth. You can disagree with me but I'm neither a bigot nor a transphobe.

​@Fuckth eChineseGovt Please understand that I'm a cis-gendered heterosexual woman and I'm a survivor of childhood sexual abuse. What happened to JK Rowling is a painful story to read, because I know how deeply that hurt lasts. I am also easily startled. I hate loud noises. PTSD is real. Survivors have a hard life. Feminism is indeed important. I loved the Harry Potter books growing up and I admire the worldbuildling skill in JK Rowling's writing. But please also understand that the hate in your comments makes me very frustrated. The hate in the comments from people like you, people like JK Rowling, is extraordinarily frustrating. I support trans issues and the trans community. And someone assigned male at birth identifying as a woman, IS A WOMAN. And her being a woman doesn't take away rights from me. You're probably done reading now and don't care about anything I have to say, and I'm wasting my time, but I'll explain why. The word TERF does not erase anything. Trans-Excluding-Radical-Feminist is just the truth. She is a feminist and she is excluding trans people from what she supports. Trans women in her eyes, aren't women who deserve women's rights. This makes me angry. And we can't have dialogue with people like you because you clearly don't want to listen to us defending trans rights. You don't want to understand because you believe there's nothing left to understand. A trans woman is just a man to you. That's as far as your mental capacity stretches. You talk about wanting nuance and accuse trans activists of villainizing people, but for God's sake, you all make the same exact stupid arguments: "biological sex is real, stop bitching." NOBODY IS SAYING BIOLOGICAL SEX ISN'T REAL. Why is there no curiosity to learn more? Why is there no nuance on your side? It boggles my mind that people are so inflexible and stubborn in their beliefs that they will deny normal people basic human rights and ignore the other side of the debate. Why do you expect allies of trans people like me, and trans people themselves, to listen to you and take your arguments seriously when you don't even do the same? 22 to 44 % of trans people have attempted suicide in their life time: ( www.suicideinfo.ca/resource/transgender-people-suicide/ ) One in two transgender people suffer sexual assault at some point in their lives: (ovc.ojp.gov/sites/g/files/xyckuh226/files/pubs/forge/sexual_numbers.html) Police reports say that nondiscrimination laws do not increase sexual assault cases in regards to bathrooms (transequality.org/what-experts-say) We're saying that IN ADDITION to biological sex, there is also your Gender Identity. I don't understand how someone being born different from you takes away your rights as a cis gendered person. Nobody is forcing you to question your gender identity. Someone just wants to live the life that they want and they don't want to be discriminated for it. There's no secret motive. They're not trying to take away women's rights or corrupt people or get access to vulnerable people. That's what people like you WANT to believe, but what the fuck ever. I don't understand how someone assigned male at birth discovers that they strongly identify with being female (because that's what their gender identity is, fucking female,) and them expressing their femaleness... HOW DOES THIS TAKE AWAY YOUR RIGHTS? How does this negatively impact you? I genuinely don't get it. Anyways. God bless your heart and have a nice day.

Indeed. People forget that Holmes was based on a medical doctor, and thus his tells are too specific to be told vaguely.

So I got into Sherlock right around when I reread the original Sherlock Holmes novel in a critical light for a college course. The first episode is basically copy pasting the bullet points from the novel and reworking the details. You really aren’t supposed to be able to put it together.

Yeah that's a good point. I really loved BBC Sherlock but it was never much of a mystery series. I think that would have added to it, or at least if they made more effort to communicate it wasn't really in the mystery genre. With it being Sherlock Holmes everyone had that expectation; I guess I wasn't that disappointed by it not being one.

hated Sherlock for what it did! I had put so much expectations into that series just to realize it was simply stupid. I don't like to be told - hey look, this character is SMAART, trust us - when there are no actual proof to that in the series. All that money for special effects, actors and stuff simply wasted coz there is no credibility to those mysteries. No credibility that main charactar can actually think logically. A shame.

It's not like the Sherlock stories are perfect either, of course; I've been re-reading them and the Case of the Red-Headed league was great in terms of being a mystery you could solve (but probably won't), but the Resident Patient had too many new bits of information for me to feel like I could have guessed it from the start.

I remember, as a kid, there was one episode of The Scooby Doo Show about disappearing airplanes, where the culprits turned out to be people we haven't met in that episode, and I waz dissapointed, because I always tried to solve SD mysteries myself, but I couldn't do it of a villain is revealed oit of nowhere.

My friends used to harp on about it when we were all in high schol, but I never lifted my head up from my Harry Potter to bother.

If by dumbed down you mean completely eviscerated then yes, it certainly did. I could spend an hour listing all the ways that movie in particular betrays its core mystery from the weird tongue thing that _immediately_ gives the game away the _second_ you see "Moody" do it, all the way to the wholesale omission of Winky and how she plays into and is crucial to both Crouch's backstory and the events of the Quidditch Championship, but I'm too tired for that. I think that's the main reason why I always liked all of the movies much less than the books, because they all to some degree lose that core mystery which was a vital part of the books' lifeblood. It's also the reason why I liked the movies less and less the further into the series they got. As the books got longer, but the movies didn't have the runtime to compensate, more and more had to be left out and since they couldn't very well take out the big action moments for money reasons that means every time there was a little less mystery and a little more generic fantasy coming-of-age monomyth... Also Harry Potter was so monumentally successful that the people making the movies probably assumed that just about everyone watching already knew the answers so that's likely another reason why it feels like they just didn't even bother with the mysteries. Oh well, we'll always have the books and the movies are for the most part enjoyable enough in other ways so it's all good. Still, imagine how the movies could have been if they'd had the space to do the source material justice. That's why a part of me holds out hope that maybe one day we'll get a good tv adaptation with a season per book (potentially with varying episode counts if necessary) that will take its time to establish all the necessary elements, build its characters properly and is faithful to the mysteries at the heart of each book. Hey, I can dream, right?

ThegreatMizuti777 it wouldn't be the same without the original cast, in my heart at least 😂 I'm a sentimental mooshball lol

The fourth movie is also the worst in the series. Chamber of Secrets is just slightly not as bad. Third movie will always be king.

breakfastroute the fourth was unavoidable unless they would have split it I think

*Grace Haven* They could at least be more subtle with the clues. the way it was done in the movie was so blunt that it felt like an insult to viewer's intelligent!

Mate Safranka Just use Brandon Sanderson's laws of Magic. BOOM! All problems solved.

I'd say Fringe had just enough satisfying resolutions to its promised mysteries. Certainly leaps and bounds ahead of Lost.

Westworld appears to be following this formula too unfortunately.

Star Wars wasn't JJ's fault it was Disney's. Disney should have either kept JJ for the entire trilogy OR give Rian Johnson the predetermined answers and instructions for those mystery boxes.

I wouldn't say he's bad, he just sets up things with no plans. The people that have to resolve these mysteries tend to do an awful job. But maybe the mystery sucks if it doesn't pay off decently.

the problem is that he's wrong. You don't have a mystery unless you have an answer.

Rowling meant her to have African ancestry apparently. That's what she gets for dancing around the ethnicity.

Mikeztarp Really? Do you have a source for that?

she literally didn't thats another "dumbledore is gay" retcon thats completely ungrounded in her actual writing, and was only brought up so she could win more liberal points without needing to actually risk having a black main character.

Caius Cosades What? Do _you_ have any sources for this?

Mikeztarp She's still a brunette in the movies.

I was going to comment this myself if no one else did. It makes it hard to watch the whole video when I keep hearing her name mispronounced!

@@ThulcandrianPilgrim The same. Read the comments only to see if someone had already said it.

Now it rhymes with NERF

To paraphrase from Stephen Fry, “I asked her if her surname was pronounced Ro*w*ling or R*o*wling, to which she replied, “Rolling.” I then asked her, “So if I hear anyone else pronounce it otherwise, do you give me permission to hit them with The Order of the Phoenix, or perhaps something smaller, like a fridge?””

I was wondering about that. I had a feeling it had changed. Seems some other man wanted to express how they don't respect the unique struggle of women born in a women's body.

I did a double take when I read it.

Its pretty dumb.

Cody Baker terf begone

@@codybaker1150Bigot.

I've been thinking about reading his work, only ever watched it. Definitely worth it?

Gerstenmann Butterblume Awesome! Thanks for the recommendation! Now I'll finallllly read him lol

Yet this channel never did so during the months and months of complaints made against Rowling earlier, and nobody complained either. This is childish hypocrisy. Check the other authors they have mentioned and let me know whether they will take the same high-handed false morality to their names, too.

@@Musicienne-DAB1995 how is it "so obviously" hipocrisy? How can you prove it's hipocrisy, other than wishing it were? There are a myriad reasons why a youtuber may ot decide to go back on a video and change the friggin' title to support a cause. Maybe they didn't think it was worthwhile or fair until someone encouraged them to. Maybe they were waiting for the author to come and explain herself, and when she didn't (or sank even deper) they decided it was time to take a stance. Maybe they didn't even fucking know, or didn't really know well enough to pronounce themselves, because not everyone is on this weird twitter bubble where everyone's only talking about how much each other progressive or self-proclaimed progressive ranks on the progressometer; I should know, I follow plenty of progressive youtubers and have plenty of progressive friends on social networks, and if it wasn't for the algorithm casually suggesting a video fron Sarah Z about a week ago, I would not know nor care about Rowling's quite disturbing take on transexuality and transgenderism.

@@Musicienne-DAB1995 not to mention thee are also plenty of reasons to take one cause and not another. Why? Do you expect everyone to take up every cause or else they're hypocrites? Would it be better if nobody took any cause at all so that there are no contradictions?

@@Elvalley I am not remotely interested in which "cause" they have taken up, nor am I interested in complaints about Rowling's personal views. It's the principle behind it which concerns me. This channel could very well go through other authors, including those living in earlier times, and make the same value judgment. They have chosen not to do so, which undermines the reasoning behind this cheap attempt to please the crowd, despite the video content having nothing to do with the complaints. If they are happy not to erase the names of other authors, including those living in times that precede our own, then the same should apply to Rowling.

@@Musicienne-DAB1995 how so? The very fact that you think complaining about dead people is the same as making a political statement about *living poitical actors* (remember the issue is with the author in this case, not her works) shows you live and die on the aesthetic of consistency, and use that surface-level judgement to decide what qualifies as hipocrisy. It's fine, to each their own, I just won't bother explaining myself thrice.

I love Terfs, I wanna marry one.

exactly

the cursed child is a time travel book (well, just a stage play actually) disguised as a harry potter book, thats why it sucked

And that's the very reason I don't like the last three books. They don't feel to me in tone with the first four mysteries. Sometimes it feels like she abandoned the mystery structure entirely, and others like she didn't really plan it ahead, sometimes it still works, but they're lost sparks. They're... strange books to me.

Captain Sveid when is everything wrong with everything wrong with the goblet of fire coming out?!

This week.

lilyme3 I've been through the whole series at least 10 times. But I love rereading books.

It's mentioned in the books several times.

Bluelaser I’m sure it was. Doesn’t mean it’s as distinctive a description as Snape’s or Trelawny’s. My first thought when I saw pale and sharp was actually of Voldemort.

Pale is right. I don't think anything about Voldemort's description was sharp though.

Hey, same here! I guessed Snape and Trelawney but for the second one, only a tentative: "Snape...? No, wait. Voldemort? No, that's not sharp. Uh. ... Snape?"

Astral Vagabond Right? Snape’s nose was my second thought, but I knew bone deep that that greasy black hair was going to be his, so I tried to think of others. Draco never occurred to me.

Yet other authors on their channel have not faced the same judgement or erasure. This is cheap crowd-pleasing hypocrisy, nothing more.

yes she is. It is mind-blowing when you re-read them as a young adult.

Coz one is not worth watching XD

its 50% ok 50% idiots

@@squibble311 which 50?