Very Kind Thanks Ian

Very very kind. Thank you so much for you comments.

@@ianatkinson6367 totally agree with the above comment

Thanks for your kind comments. Ian

Thank you so much Yune! Lovely to have you as our first comment. All the best for the holidays!

💯 % agree - thank you for sharing your insightful review and wonderfully edited video with us! A true pleasure to watch!👏

@@ianatkinson6367 great video. Really nice work. Keep up the good work.

You are very welcome, and thanks for the kind comments. Best Ian

Thanks, not enough discussion on how cameras and lenses render on print, all seems to get lost in edge sharpness these days. Glad you liked it. Cheers Ian

Very kind thanks, glad you enjoyed it. Best Ian

Thanks Ian

Thank You so much for the kind comments. Here at Linhof Studio we were so pleased Ian was available to happy to do this .

Very Kind thank you. Ian

could not agree more

Thanks Lee, I am glad it was of help. best Ian

Very kind thanks Ian

Thank you so much for your kind comments. Best Ian

Very kind thanks Justin.

Thanks Harold.

Cheers Kevin, Let me know how you get on with it. Best Ian

Welcome, thanks for the kind comments, best Ian

Glad it was helpful!

Many thanks for your kind comments. We would all love the time to produce more like this but sadly it may well be one of the only advantages of the last years events that gave us the time to do it !

Very kind thanks Ian. I'd like to do more but it was a lot of work, both in shooting and editing. It would also need to be the right kit. Thanks again, Ian

@@ianatkinson6367 Thank you for the reply. I bought a CFV 16 many years ago - my most expensive single photography purchase. I was somewhat disappointed with the performance first of all, suspecting that it was not focussing on the sensor properly but assumed it was me. I took advantage of a Hasselblad 'offer' to get my camera equipment checked out resulting in extra cost due to a scratch on the sensor (no idea how that happened) and lenses needing to be serviced. It was touch-and-go whether I would sell off the equipment and cut my losses but I decided to go for the service and restore my equipment. In another check-up I found that my sensor had mound growing underneath the filter - once again no idea how that happened. When I retired I hoped to be able to buy a CFV 50 back but my lump sum did not come through while they were on offer, and then they were discontinued! Hoping to cash in on a further injection of cash following my wife's retirement I was hoping to get the 'new' back but that took so long to come out that I have spent the money elsewhere. I looked at the X-Series when it came out and was tempted but I have so much invested in Canon and Panasonic digital systems that it did not make sense. The reviews I have seen of the 907X 50C (including yours) have once again piqued my interest. Maybe one day! Best Wishes for a Happy Christmas (whatever you are able to do) and a Safe New Year.

@@iangillett1817 It sounds like you have been on quite a journey. There was a bit in the film which I cut short where I talk about cutting out the last 10 years of digital purchases. I have no doubt if I was not in the same position as yourself that I would definitely buy in to this system and would love to still own my original Linhof Technikardan and Hasselblad system. Good luck with whatever you decide and hope you too have a good Christmas. best Ian

@@ianatkinson6367 Thank you so much for taking the time out to reply to my ramblings. My Very Best Wishes Ian

Very Kind Thanks, Best Ian

Thanks Kenneth, glad you enjoyed it. It is quite amazing the size and quality we can make prints. Best Ian

Glad to hear it was useful. We hope to do some more when other related kit is released. best Ian

Cheers Rich, enjoying your landscapes. keep em coming. Best Ian

Thanks Linden, you never know. I'd like to do more but it was a lot of work. Best Ian

I only did a small test of the XCD lenses and I don't have the camera to test now. All lenses have issues with diffraction towards the smaller apertures. I find most digital lenses work best at around f8/f11. Wide open will often have a slight softening towards the edges depending on the quality of the glass, but I don't always see this as a major disadvantage, unless shooting landscapes and who shoots landscapes wide open?

I think it's the size that is the winner and the method of use is a completely different experience to DSLR. Joy to use. Thanks for your comments, best Ian

@@ianatkinson6367 I have GFX100 and I love it but I need a camera for my daily use. 907X can be a good one for that.

That's great hope you enjoy it. Best Ian

Cheers. Ian

Very kind, thanks Cade. With it's price point it gives photographers like you an ideal way in to digital large and medium format. I'm also sure some of the older Schnieder/Rodenstock lenses will perform very well with this size of sensor. Good luck Ian