What did the guy yell at 17:08?

I like Cheese

I think you should debate Sam Seder. I'm losing more and more respect for you.

definitely censorship

My Crowder fix! 🖒😂🕇🇺🇸

Amelia EverythingBabyNames that’s what sucks about people that want to come into a conversation and don’t want their mind to be changed. Even if they do agree with you it won’t happen because they already have made up their mind.

true. He even hinted at her multiple times, but her ego i guess speaks louder

Love your vid

Well explained!

@Zee she is the school marm stereotype. "Something must be done! I don't know what or how, but I know someone needs to do something immediately!"

This is great, they wouldn't be able to handle it

Try rainbow six, oh boy even I couldn't stand the free trial.

Truuu tru

Honestly bro lmfao AGREE

Modern warfare or black ops I've been called nigger how many times I'm brown skin so I had grown ass white dudes saying I have shit on my skin and I was only like 13 those motherfuckas was ruthless they definitely can't handle that lol 😂 😂😂 😂

Yep.

The institutions that are in place have done an 3xcellent job at priming generations of people to accept the prwellian world of 1984, and ots coming. Lol

"Ignorance is strength"

Founding fathers would be proud

The masses are asses.

But in the end they agree. I think this shows how people are scared to express their opinion publicly

@@BOLBify its just difficult to change your opinion and be humbled in general

First guy was not real 😂

How can I be expected to be respectful to someone who wishes to shutter my speech, take away my human rights, take away any chance of regaining ANY form of political representation, and even punish me and discriminate against me by law, purely for my thoughts, opinions, etc. There is a time to be respectful. And there is a time to fight for what's right. Like the lives of children, basic human rights, your culture being destroyed. I don't need to be respectful. That's the whole fn point. RESPECT IS EARNED NOT GIVEN.

mattanasio73 I agree. They've been conditioned to react based on their emotions. ( and they call conservatives reactionaries, lol ) I'm willing to bet that the majority of their professors discourage critical thinking, rationality and logic in general. This is why we hear students say things like, "I don't debate fascists." The traditional method of using a cogent argument to refute an opposing idea has been replaced with a clichéd, ubiquitous knee-jerk reaction that can only be based on emotion. They've essentially "unlearned" logic at these "institutes of higher learning." It Is by design that they're entering the world entirely dependent on authority and lacking even a vague concept of what it means to have agency.

That’s absolutely insane that their IQ is that low for that to happen....also brainwashed

"Passion rules reason." --Wizard's 3rd Rule. "Mind what people do, not only what they say, for deeds will betray a lie." --Wizard's 5th Rule. "The most important rule, is the Wizard's Sixth Rule: the only sovereign you can allow to rule you is reason. The first law of reason is this: what exists, exists, what is, is and from this irreducible bedrock principle, all knowledge is built. It is the foundation from which life is embraced." "You can destroy those who speak the truth, but you cannot destroy the truth itself" --Wizard's 12th Rule. “There have always been those who hate, and there always will be.” --Wizard's 14th Rule. “In this world, everyone must die. None of us has any choice in that. Our choice is how we wish to live.” --Wizard's 15th Rule.

300th like😊

That's called Democrats, sjws, or liberals

This comment deserves more attention

Lmao surprised such a common sense question isn't raised in this.

I'm going to borrow that if you don't mind fucking good point would be like a silver bullet to these libtards

Best comment of all

You, sir, just nailed it.

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

@IvnValmont I always assume I could do much better than Crowder, but then when I have to communicate with someone, My Mouth Stops Obeying My Brain

​@@zacharymcleod460 read, read, think, talk to yourself and repeat, j improved the way j argue by doing this (and calmly)

@@SomeOtherRegularGuy Yeah I used to talk to myself, but then I felt like it was weird. so I stopped. But I guess I did myself dirty

Oh shit! Love the channel, man.

First kid took the opportunity to actually articulate his argument, discovered the flaws in his reasoning & acknowledged those flaws. That's beautiful.

urmaker honestly it wasn’t that obvious either, he didn’t stutter or embarrass himself either, the only/major reason I knew he was nervous because he said he was.

Love your channel, never thought I'd see you here though lol!

Honestly all of them were pretty respectful, even the last guy, he just had a very different world view

God bless you sir, that is the most relevant quote ive seen.

Yesssss!!!!!!

How can it be a hate crime when I loved doing it :3

Lol

should it be illegal to be openly racist? NO IT SHOULDNT

The government is smart in what they're doing. Making the loudest majority of people actively want their rights taken away. It's honestly brilliant.

That's because they only know what to think, not how to think. They've been inundated with circular logic and groupthink. This is 1984 for real.

What thought process?

“… among the many negative characteristics of the Left, the most prominent is stupidity.” (translated from Polish philospher B.Wolniewicz)

To her credit she was not emotional and was polite all the way

What amazes me is how he never pointed out that her whole argument is that we should tip toe around crazy people who can't handle what other people say instead of teaching them from the beginning that words should never have that kind of power over you in the first place! This shouldn't even be an argument our species could be so much ahead of our time but instead were stuck In a never ending argument with each other about feelings.

As a Russian we don't claim her 🤮

​@@maxthc3648 Her argument is basically this: person A told person B that if he jumped from a 5 story building, he wouldn't fall down due to gravity and die. Instead he'd fly. So, since crazy person A said so, person B decided to act on it. In her logic, person A should be responsible for the outcome. That's ridiculous. In the end, the only person responsible, is person B. He was the one who decided to do it. Her logic is illogical.

​@@ohklahoma7376 Yeah but still she was wrong but she was polite and tried to explain logicly even if that logic is bad

@@ohklahoma7376 exactly. What's funny is in society people like this say that theirs a deep rooted systemic racism in our country, yet would allow our government who they say are hurting minorities to have power on what you can say.....

Haha 😂 Nice

Oof!!!! Love this comment.

She did extremely well, wasn't off the cuff and clearly researched and prepared before hand but she held her own better than anyone I've seen him interview thus far.

@@BKMongo7 She mostly used buzz words that impressed you while actually saying very little.

@@BKMongo7 did we listen to the same discussion? She couldn't give any specifics, just vague, intangible, generalities. That's a good sign she did no research on the topic. She used a lot of words to say very little and really relied on her use of "intelligent" words - - primarily status quo and rhetoric, which she used A LOT - - but words, that are not often used outside the debate stage. If you're alert to it, you can see most people do this to try and sound intellectually superior to whoever they're debating (or everyone), and lots of people side with them literally because they sound smart. And she asked a lot of questions... Nothing wrong with asking questions, but you must have answers to the questions you're asked, not just turn it back to the other person.

But they white. They think All white people are bad.

LMAO

@@KrisD007 what’s it like being the minority group that is being a internet troll? I wouldn’t know

@@Savitar-dk6gw he say THEY think that. Read the full comment before you pounce, bro, you are making conservatives look bad.

“YOURE A WHITE MALE!!!

Literally 😂😂

Melissa Bates she’s a baddie too. I’m sure she knows that though

@@keeganlicko8572 Yeah most Russians are. Beautiful people

@@keeganlicko8572 How gay are you?

@@charon_lix bruh she is finneee

we don't want her.

1slena blew my mind a rational democrat

She was in iowa my home state it’s a decent state of decent people makes me proud to be from there

Felicia...come join us! 👌

Id hang out with Felicia. She seems funny and smart. Good on her for standing for her morals

Depending on the topic though maybe she should, if something is backed by facts and someone doesn't believe those facts or atleast takes those into account then maybe she should. However, there are some political views that are based emotion and those should not be attacked unless some kind of fact comes in to play.

​​@@tracygrant7931ah think before you start talking. When he said correlation is not causation no where did they say correlation never means causation. Come on this is high school level thinking. Ice cream sales tend to rise as drowning rates rise. Does this mean ice cream causes drowning!!!! No, they are correlated as in you can say an increase of ice cream sales is a sign that drownings may be on the rise as well. However, both of these are caused by increasing temperatures. Ice cream sales and deaths by drowning have correlation but one is not the cause.

To be honest Crowder does prepare weeks in advanced with sources, stories, and statistics while everyone who debates him doesnt get time to prepare at all. If the others where given the topic and the same time allotted they would have counter points and counter statistics to be able to back up their words instead of the "I feels or I thinks" that usually happens then crowder just spouts off some numbers and cites and the other person cant debate that because they have no information.

@@mamodokod4613 he has a day job. He does a daily podcast and is a very busy man. Also, there is one of him challenging an entire crowd. If you aren't confident in your ability to argue a point, don't step up to the plate. You know he knows his facts. Don't rush in if you don't have a solid argument.

@@mamodokod4613 honestly a lot of these change my mind segments are more rooted in fundamental presuppositions and not data and statistics. He’s challenging axioms and in doing so, sometimes challenges their statistics. Being able to support your presuppositions is necessary to have a belief in the first place so he is pointing out the fallacies ingrained in people’s ideologies

@@mamodokod4613 Doesn't get time? he sits there for hours andn they have smart phone... it's not hard to research something in an hour or 2... crowder has the information, don't blame him because the others don't...

She did get him on the "parametricize" word! HAHA LMAO Only thing she beat Steven in. Other than that, her circular arguments were exhausting. She kept bashing her head into her own wall. College kids. They just listen to BS propogated by "smart people" and will defend it like this without really even believing it. Wow.

No joke. In undergrad I knew people who thought they were experts in physics, biology, chemistry etc. they all know everything and that’s why they are going to school.

Dylan they didn’t go to school to learn they went to confirm that they’re geniuses

I know I sure thought so

As a college student i can say that it's really only bad at the big name universities.

They’re brainwashed

Hear, hear!

They’re about to find out if things keep progressing with China And Russia.

*"Freedom costs a buck oh fiiiiiiive"* -Team America

It was a heated joke 🤦🏽‍♂️

B More if you’re in college and still making “this person is a virgin” jokes chances are you’re still a virgin

Crowders hot, tall, and smart as f_ck, and tall lol

Will have children...they’re still cooking in utero 😊

@@pineapplegirl8078 did he happen to announce the gender(s) of the twins yet?

I think the dark-haired girl was respectful too, she never said anything rude or passive-aggressive

His parent hit him right.

@@moloviorlsv5484 lol

There's better people out there

He was an apologist, a conformist, a sheep... the first dude. There was no actual conversation, bc all be says is "racist is rude" repeatedly

He's a dipshit too.

He verbally abused his pregnant (former) wife for not doing her “wifely duties” at 8 months pregnant with twins lol, he’s pathetic

Liberal logic. And she is probably touted as "an intellectual debater"

Check out the big brain on Braaadddd

@@calebhebert650 "I don't remember asking you a gotdamn thing!"

One of the FIRST things you learn in school is when you'e trying to define a word, you neveruse that word in the defnition itself. How can you mess up that badly?

@@artlover5060Sigh. It's called a circular definition and despite your protestations of it being an implied peccadillo in speech, it is fact a logically coherent and pragmatic way of speaking. It assumes a previous understanding of the word/s that is being asked to be explained. An example might be the multi-word term 'mobile phone, explicated as a 'phone that is mobile'. This is an appropriate and logical response, provided the correct circumstance is in motion. If you want to talk about poor debating skills, just consider the affirmative - Hate Speech isn't Real. Hate speech is CERTAINLY real. In fact, many people in this very comment section have uttered it. The question is how hate speech should be governed, IF at all. Crowder is a buffoon. As much as I despise radical leftist and their attempts to balkanize public discourse, Crowder and his acolytes are just irresponsible in their tactics. I wish I was on this campus. I would have destroyed him here AND his 'Donald Trump is not a racist' segment. Pssh. What an amateur.

Alejandro hooray youtube censorship!

I had to try this for myself. I performed the same search as you and did not find this video. I then added "stevencrowder" to the search and it still wasn't the first result. It was the 17th result despite this video having over 4.5 million views, the first result was "Leftist EXPLODES on Crowder Over Idea of People Having 'Free Speech' I Louder with Crowder" some video by BlazeTV that only has 357 thousand views. This is ridiculous!

The SEEM to have corrected it, but it's pretty alarming. Especially when you consider that the channel is ONLY deranked in the US with an election coming up.

American KZfaq demonetization for ya

For me it did, that’s weird

The problem is she's defined hate speech as something different to the interviewer.

She believes the Lefty BS that bad speech definitely is to blame for specific acts of violence. She said about 5 times, "Yeah, protect free speech, but there has to be some sort of line drawn." That's the intellectual equivalent of "The media says this society problem exists for this reason, so Duh!!! We have to do SOMETHING about it to make it better....!!!"

I think you're correct" professor Crowder".... That does have a ring to it 😉

I like that quote

Amen

@William Baker kudos to you knowing that, too!

Very wise and from this point forward I'm using this against liberals all the time!!👍👍👍 Thank you for the ammo 💛👍🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲 it is very prolific!!!!🤓☝️

i thought that was voltaire

For now..........

or racism, or sexism, or fascism, or pro-life

Yes! Gentle 🤣

Valar Morghulis 🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🙏🏽

Here after people with certain political opinions are banned from twitter

Exactly

Oh see here’s where you’re wrong. According to these people, all you need is a new, never before seen, perfectly infallible and completely just, magic government that never ever gets anything wrong to regulate people’s thoughts. Never mind that government is inherently corrupt and that fact can be easily demonstrated though history. This time it’s TOTTALLLLYYYYY gonna work.

@@joelsefur666 but it's only going to work if they themselves were in charge, because they alone know what's good for everyone. raising children to believe they are perfect, special and destined for greatness was a mistake, just like giving them participation trophies...

As an outsider who sees US news stories I am fully aware the government isnt forcing people to be good 😂

Governments only role is to protect people’s rights that is all and insure public order

Specifically, it's virtually impossible to clearly identify hate speech but it's relatively effortless to identify speech you hate.

I LOVE YOU I LOVE TOM MACDONALD!! you made my day

YES! Tom hit the nail on the head there. Thanks for pointing that out!

yes… i do hate racism

@@goondocksaints9597 no

Larno Larno that is called genius debating. It is nuance which is why you don’t get it 😂😂

Give me the source! I need a scholarly article! Brah, you're gonna argue that nazi germany wasn't a thing?

He clearly doesn't understand the concept of falsification. A scientific theory is never proved right, it's just never falsified. So Crowders claim is legitimate: He has a large set of observations that supports his claim, and none that doesn't. An opposing view should therefore present at least one examples that falsifies Crowders claim. This is basic Karl Popper scientific theory. The psychology guy is an accurate demonstration of what it means to be a marxist: You deny that the world has certain qualities that everyone can observe, and try to change the landscape so that it fits with you map. This is also the reason why every marxist society has failed: None are based on any scientific or logical construction that can be observed, and all of them are based on the most irrational and least developed parts of the human psyche.

@@jeremysmith9694 "Google it" - Chenk. 🤣🤣🤣🤣. Finally yungr was good for something.

Darth Plagueis false you just don’t get it. It is nuance

I wonder why, hhrrrmmmm?

Blue things goooooddd! Red things baaaaaddd!

Big mystery....

@@thebatman4279 You separated rug 'muching' and lesbo... is she actually eating floor coverings?

@@michaelhutchinson1789 It wouldn't surprise me tbh.

Not really. Today's "immigrants" didn't make America; settlers, pioneers, and immigrants from more than a century ago did. The immigrants coming over now are just leeching off an already successful nation.

Things to Know Dont Screw up dude

As an immigrant, this made me shed a tear

@@How2MakeAGirlSquirt just as Americans settlers took advantage of the natives not having developed technology to compete in warfare, resulting in genocide. But oh boy this generation is just leeches and monsters, unlike the 50s when racism was rife, or 20s when mafias were rampant, or 1800s when children died from black lung. Man why can't modern day be like that... (My point is every generation has done somethong shity and you shouldn't blame the current generations for not being born when that work was being done, it's stupid.)

DEPORT THEM. NO COATS. DON'T GIVE THEM THEIR COATS.

But someone can argue that the direct speech to kill someone is a sarcasm or is a joke. Just like incase of PewDiePie. So where is the line between direct speech to cause action and indirectly hating or a joke. Please explain

@@owaiswasim8911 again, in case of Pewds, that was a call for action (even as a joke), it's not speech. Please, google the definition of speech first.

Even worse, her ideas to control what others post on social media are the same as the Russian government.

People don’t cause someone to do hateful behavior because of their words. This Russian chick thinks she is still in Russia.

@@owaiswasim8911 that's why ANY solicitation of violence is a crime, even if said as a joke. Similarly, any threat of violence is, legally speaking, assault.

Exactly!

I don't see hate speech as a problem. If somebody hates something and wants to talk about it, ok. There are people spewing hate against white cis males which bothers me but I think they are idiots so let em.

ah, reality. You see it, yes?

The solution to hate speech is to put on your big boy undies and quit letting “mean words” get to you like a functional adult.

that might be the single best comment ever written in the history of the internet

Yep. I think they try to intellectually defeat him, fail...and are left with their 'feelz' but dont know how to debate it further. Hopefully they will examine their feelings vs what they intellectually know to be true, and improve their logical skills. Too much emotions in intelligent debates tbh ....and im not harshin on the kids, they are on a campus, so it is nice to see them running out of emotional arguments to realize they have no factual data to bring to the topic. Good food for thought

Bruh I saw a subreddit on how he's a prick and that all his facts are wrong lmao and then calling him a virgin and how he waited till his marriage bruh all of them seem like a high school bully who now work in McDonald's lmao typical redditors ig

@@oldarthurmorgan6319 it’s reddit. A bunch of fat nerds who sit on computers all day.

Because they’re all misinformed liberals

@@oldarthurmorgan6319 ohhh you saw on Reddit huh? An Internet forum full of unemployed liberals that make memes all day? They must know the truth.

Tbf i kinda just want to talk to Steven

You’re name isn’t working out very well

Matthew Gallego true but I mean he still has more than you

Alive 2 Long I’m trying to get him more subs, reverse psychology

Matthew Gallego big brain time

I'm surprised it wasn't a "Subscribe to Pewdiepie" sign

Where is he?

@@xy-hh2cs 40:56

@SAV AGE was ist nicht schlecht?

@@jlav2170 thx

Comment checks out. Proof: He spelled "barely" as "barley". Bet you are from a farmer state? (love the comment btw, I feel the same way)

🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣

It could also be horrible predictive text/autocorrect. The times I read the messages I’ve sent and realize how stupid I sound🤦🏻‍♂️

@@AlejandroRodriguez-cn9wq anytime you oppose the view of a democrat and they cant debate, then they start grading your comments based on spelling and punctuation. lol yeah i cant weigh in on the conversation because im not a good speller.....

I think we should make fun of people who get emotional while debating in public

Hateful rhetoric 🤬

I'm a debater, too. Sometimes, words like "like", "uhh", "well" help us to keep on track when we're talking and help us to not lose our train of thought. Using "filler words" is extremely common in debate, and unless you're REALLY overdoing it (which she wasn't) you're fine. As long as the other sides understands what you're trying to say, there is no point in bringing attention to it. Honestly, this particular comment section is full of ad hominem towards her, and for what? Imo she did a great job, kept an open mind, was eloquent and well-spoken. As if you could do any better.

@@anahrsak4793 You don't know how I would have done, so calm your tits. Debating isn't some supernatural skill that few people possess. Most people debate without the need for excessively using filler words. Most people use the filler "like" when they can't really articulate their points well and aren't very confident in what they are saying. People in college are taught not to do this and to always be self-aware. I remember a professor actually giving an entire lesson on the subject and why people do it. Better debaters pause and gather their thoughts before speaking, instead of running through talking points with filler words between the sentences.

@@anthony452 i agree that filler words aren't exactly a sign of a great debater, but my point was they aren't a sign of a bad debater either. She didn't stop or get lost while speaking and her points came across loud and clear, so in comparison her saying "like" a lot is irrelavant. (And I never said debating is some magical power, idk how you managed to take that away from my comment.) And excuse my tits for not being calm, I was writing the comment bc I was sick and tired of everyone bashing and insulting her in the comment section (and dare I say, being sexist).

@@anahrsak4793 She contradicted herself in points and argued for something she couldn't explain. She wanted legislation but couldn't provide anything more in depth than "I'm not a legislator, so I wouldn't know what the barriers should be." You ended the first statement by acting like I wouldn't be able to handle such a conversation as well as her. It would seem that you think debating is a great skill that most people aren't capable of if your first thought is that most people aren't up to this sub-par level of it. She didn't do well in the conversation and people called her on it in the comment section. The top comment about her says that she's a republican that doesn't know it yet. Most of the others are about how badly she handled the debate. You taking sexism away from comments that criticize her is laughable. Please, put that victim card back in the deck and present a better argument. Using the term "like" constantly in a debate is TOTALLY relevant when you start the conversation out by letting everyone know you're on the debate team. Filler words like "like" are actively discouraged from debate team coaches to English professors.

Bravo J,LIKE not a chance is LIKE a master debater,LIKE well she is attractive maybe that's why LIKE they push her out there,LIKE I'm not sure.LIKE your comment.

She is so used to using big words and speed in her speech that confuses most people in her age bracket but Crowder drills down her broad argument into a narrow corridor and she gets more flustered and realized she wasn't nearly as strong in an on the fly debate as she is at studying for a debate....

And “rhetoric” 🙄

She also says "misconstrue." She uses vocabulary to hide behind her lack of knowledge and ideas. Furthermore she uses it to hide her logic failure. Notice when she at last 'answers' the question to what legislative action should be taken she all the sudden backs down and says I'm not a politician or a legislator.

I like how she used big words as if that helped the debate lol

Well maybe in Canada or the UK

Actually, "punch a nazi" would fall under the call to action. Furthermore, "nazi" would need to be defined due to its overuse it today's environment. Either way, it is still a call to action.

Well Nazi by today's standard is anyone who isn't on the radical left

No it's a "call to action" where the outcome is aimed violence towards another, and that is a crime not hate speach. (Edit) nazis should get punched all the way to oblivion.

So it is somehow a hate CRIME. Because the religion of Hitler those Nazislms are a race. *irony off*

hey fbi, i hope you don't mind all that she-male stuff on my pc...

@@teddyrodgers5917 Your personal agent has informed us about it.. we are greatly disappointed

F.B.I yeah I have noticed that a lot of the people that end up agreeing with him are reluctant to agree to the conclusion that they agree. Confusing sentence but you get it.

Impersonating a federal officer of any kind is illegal, That includes the F.B.I

@@thebluelightforce5939 I'm not impersonating a federal officer as 'fbi' is an organization of a sort including more than 1 officer and also would you mind getting a sense of humor as it is obvious that I'm not the FBI it's just a joke

Welcome to the #walkaway.

Notafan Notatall welcome :)

thanks itachi fangirl

Look up the definition of liberal and look at the actions of these so called liberal politicians it’s the complete opposite handing more laws and restrictions is progressive really ? It’s being free really? The delusion it’s a miss used word today

It's been so long since they had a tyrant, that they've started to crave one.

@Dean spot on Dean! Point made

@Dean Fuuuck

YOU HAVE THE FREEDOM TO SAY AND THINK WHATEVER YOU WANT!!!!....... as long as its our opinion. If not??? THEN YOU'RE A RASCIST! SEXIST! MISOGYNIST! REEEEEEEEEEEEEE!

@Dean THANK YOU! I thought i was the only one who thought this way.

She completely agrees with him. Her saying that there should be some legislation but then not being able to name a single way to do so without going against free speech just shows that her on view point isn’t completely set in stone and kind of contradicts herself. She was good though, she had a good debate.

@@Richardson_mma "anyone but Trump" voter right there. Hope they like the literal burning dumpster fire they made.

​@@Aaroncarter95 “America is a nation that can be defined in a single word: Asufutimaehaehfutbw.” - Joe Biden.

But admit it, shes hot. Id bend her over my carhood outside a cólege bar ag 2am🤣🤣

@@tatotaytoman5934 🤣🤣 God that's so sad

Denise Hansen especially his use of sir, he was so respectful, a rare thing these days.

@@tobiasb.5843 I mean when u go out looking for people that express themself like a spastic ur gonna find spastics. Most people are normal

She was full of air and feelings.

Would the phrase “She got schooled” apply to this video or is that as out dated as got served? 😏

For someone who’s on the Debate team she’s certainly not very good at it.. well not when she’s debating someone who’s clearly more intelligent than she is..

She thinks she's so smart because she uses big words and dresses like she works in an office. She's in college. Most people wear sweatpants and shirts with puke stains from the night before.

@@nathanxbond Sounds oddly familiar.

It frustrates me how steven fails to use obvious and indisputable arguments like that.

basically

You weren’t listening

Is that like "I agree with democracy but if the masses choose something I disagree with then I'm not gonna accept it"?

Exactly. She had no point to make without comming out and saying i disagree because thats the 'thing' like um....

@@simplyk8003 she basically said she wants people to get arrested for minor hurtful words, you shouldn’t be arrested for any speech at all unless it’s a call to action like “come on let’s set this guys house on fire” that actually results in the crime, shit can be abused and already is. especially when everything is considered hateful these days.we need less people in jail not more. The speech thing would effect minority’s just as much.

Man this is why I do stem, and I hate my peers, they’re full of themselves and most don’t have a full schedule and consider themselves victims. Like man you have no idea

Like how she says she's literally on the debate team, and everyone goes "ooohhh" thinking she's going to be some force to reckon with....when the entire world outside of university has 1000 fold the experience of any such student who is simply learning it for the first time. lol

@@genny1814 I concur. I did chem engineering, and at uni we used to just laugh at those mickey mouse degree fools. It does annoy me a bit when people tar all students with the same brush.

and they grow up and run for office

They do say dumb things but it’s because they lack of experience in the real world. They are full of piss and vinegar until reality gets a hold of them

Guess we saw different videos. That girl answered questions with Questions and couldn't give facts about anything. How does that show intelligents ?

Indeed

Exactly! I’m just flabbergasted at how eagerly these students want to restrict their own rights 🤨 i thought universities were placea where you came to broaden your mind

COVID-19 has entered the chat

It’s almost like humans have feelings and we 99% operate off them and the right to freedom is based off a feeling of being treated with respect and dignity. Feelings exist beyond, anger and sadness you know. Us soldiers go to war because we love our country. That’s a feeling. I stand up for those who get bullied based off my emotions of empathy and compassion. Just because someone personal feelings are involved doesn’t automatically cancel them out of any debate. Otherwise robots should run the country

@@dominiquebaby678 what? R u dumb? I’m talking about they value not feeling offended over the right to have freedom of speech etc .. Jesus wtf r u going on about? That Nonsense u r going on about? 🤣🤣 feelings cannot control how decisions are made. Give me liberty or give me death.. that means I’ll take my freedom over my own safety. Freedom is what is valued the most. Well. It should be. Your feelings take a back seat

@@dominiquebaby678, pathos is used to manipulate peoples emotion. While logos is used to argue with logic.

Yea That's a sign of stupidity.

Ehhh.. She's still a worthy D recipient.

Yip she was schooled. They want change but cant define what to change. Simply because if they get what they want then they wont be permitted to speak for any other changes they would like made! Why? Because they handed over control of speech to a government. Insanity

yep that's sad because shecis smart and she fears the student mon repercutions

Christos Belibasakis completely agree!

INJECT IT INTO MY VEINS

*CHANGE MY MIND YOU FILTHY ANIMAL*

An actual LoL at this comment! :)

Yehh

She's not a very good representative in this case then.

Kinda disappointed, it feels like she didn't even take her phone out for a couple seconds and find an actual source beforehand. As a former Nerdbater, I couldn't imagine going on camera without a couple sources

Strikerage I did speech and debate for 6 years in high school and watched plenty of college rounds, it’s not really that impressive

HeadWrinkle that’s just it, they think they are right and debates will be a walk in the park. They don’t test their beliefs often. She was doable though.. she might also grow from being embarrassed this way, maybe give up this shit life and pop out some kids.. good for her.

I'm on the debate team at my High school. Even for a spontaneous argument (spar), this is kinda ridiculous. If you make it to the college level, you tend to be a better speaker than this. Avoiding verbal pauses is a lesson 1 kind of thing.

Did you just say the B word?!?!

Hi npesta

@@yeshuat1399 and the G word. Maybe it identifies as something else. Can't assume now a days it's to hateful 😂

You dont know what color her hair identifies as prick

I'm jus over here looking at the blonde holding the sign

lol

Dude. From what I was hearing and how I translated what she was saying… it sounds like she thinks if I was like… wow, that dude is annoying af. And then someone else was like yeah he is annoying. And then the person hurt the person that I called annoying, I should be punished because my words caused violence. That’s crazy. 😂

I don't think she was reasonable. She still wants repercussions to certain people. She wants to be able to control people.

@@penelopeplimsoul3617 Reasonable means one can be reasoned with, which she was. Being unreasonable means ignoring the opposing side regardless of their merits.

@@gracecalis5421 true. I actually think she might she could change her mind. She seems like a good person

Lenni Siale ... I know but why not just wear it on a t shirt?

@@dmoney9285 i think he is sponsored by walther

its a wierd flex though lol