I can probably see that India by far has the highest population of Andriod users fun fact apple tried iPhones there and no dice that's why they all stick with Andriod

Agreed 😁

If the latency is equivalent with the devices, then yes, it should work.

Good point. I'll propose the idea with the Bluetooth SIG and see what they say. 😂

We don’t call it blueteeth in Arkansas 😂

Most hearing aids are automatic nowadays

Are you sure because my Oticon real ones do not change programs by themselves… I know Phonak does. What other brands do? G

@@gerardweber3733 off the top of my head I believe resound does it the jabra brand at Costco does also phonak of course does as you mentioned not sure about the rest though

Your Hearing Care Professional should be able to tell you this information. In reality, bluetooth performance will vary depending on firmware updates in your hearing aids and software updates of your wireless devices. It might be a non-issue & then become an issue based on these updates.

😂 Who knows what other skeletons I have in my closet?

Android Mafia unite

Agree 💯

Stop being an iPhone hater. There’s lots of room in the world for all technologies.

I am not an Iphone hater. Apple is always behind the curve with new technologies. To get LE Audio Bluetooth to become mainstream, Apple needs to adopt it. Rumor has it that it won't be in the IPhone 16.

I have the moto g stylus 5g (2022) and I’m using the Kirkland signature k9’s from costco (they are phonaks which use classic Bluetooth). I can stream phone calls to my aids and also connect them via Bluetooth to my pc. If I want new aids though, costco doesn’t sell phonak now and I will have to look elsewear because I don’t want to buy an iPhone.

Marvel?

@@DrCliffAuD Yes the Belong? was horrible! Marvel is the Belong fixed!

​@@zone1hearingso the belong 2.0 eh? 🤣

Cool. You just gave me another podcast idea. Thanks.

​@@DrCliffAuDthat's actually a really cool podcast idea

If you see me on a flight with you, would you get off the plane?

Using Airplane mode on a cellphone is a myth that was debunked years ago. Fact: The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) conducted a study in 2012 that found nearly zero conclusive instances of aircraft disturbances from cell phone usage. Most of the evidence on this seems to be anecdotal or severely outdated. But if you feel that it's important to use Airplane mode, then you do you, but it won't really matter.

Planes would fall like flies if this was still the case. These are old rules, on old tech that needs updating.

@@26jdowns OMG: this is a hearing aid channel and not a place for debating whether we should follow FAA regulations or not based on what we read on the internet. I apologize for opening this can of worms. My reason for saying anything at all is, as a commercial pilot, I feel responsible for the safety of my passengers. So, I believe in complying with “ALL” FAA regulations, even if I think they are outdated, or I read someone’s opinion debunking a particular FAA regulation. The truth is that we still need conclusive studies that can 100% ensure safety during critical phases of flight. For example, 5G technology (not around in 2012) is encroaching on the radio bandwidth of aircraft navigation systems; we’ll need more research to answer the 5G question regarding interference with aircraft navigation during landings in extremely low visibility weather. Of course, it’s not a problem if I can see the runway. But sometimes I cannot until right at touchdown. I have to trust, 100%, my navigation equipment. If there is even a small chance that someone with their smartphone, or laptop, or some other electronic device (not in airplane mode) can cause even the slightest interference with the radar altimeter/navigation equipment, even by a few feet or a degree or two, I would rather not take that risk. I don’t think that most passengers would like to take that risk either. But unfortunately, there are still lots of people who disregard the FAA regulation to turn their cell phone to airplane mode because they read somewhere that it is an outdated regulation or more often don’t fully understand the ramifications in severe critical flight conditions. When I read the study that can guarantee 100% safety, I’ll leave my electronic devices on. Apparently, you have read that certified study. Please provide me the link to that study so I can leave my electronic stuff on and not worry about a low visibility, high crosswind, icy runway, blowing snow 100% safe landing. I look forward to reading that report. Maybe we can change the FAA regulations. In the meantime, feel free to ignore any FAA regulations you think are not for you. I personally will follow them until rescinded. And for you that are reading this that are not part of this discussion, you will feel safer to know that Delta Airlines has recently decided to continue enforcing all FAA regulation until further studies are done that can 100% ensure the safety of their passengers during those rare critical landing times. Many of the European airlines don’t enforce it. FLY Delta.

Man why you gotta be so hard on ol' doctor cliff so he's a bit of a rebel when it comes to airplane mode so what? We all do it plus this ain't really the place to be discussing this to be perfectly honest