To be fair, Hingis formed a great doubles team with just about anyone. She won the calendar year Grand Slam in 1998 with two different partners. When she split up with Mirza, she used to beat her alongside Latisha Chan (whom she used to beat alongside Mirza before).

@@fundhund62 Very true.

Nobody cares about Hingis the coward's "third" career. She ran from the competition when it get tough and kept trying to sneak back in when she thought she could grab a good player and parasite off them to win matches.

@@egyptian_thoth Graf fan? 😂

​@@fundhund62she is a bitter graf fan lol

Aya!

Lots of power on it. I hope she can take as good as she gives... every match she plays, she smashes her forehand at the net player. Seems like they should be used to her doing that.

Hendra Hermawan Her attitude definitely improved when she returned in 2006 and again in 2013 for doubles. I guess it’s a benefit of getting older because as a teenager - and as with most teenagers - she was arrogant and became even more so when she dominated women’s tennis between 1997-2000.

@@marioescalante4401 Yep, I will never forget 'that' infamous Roland Garros final against Steffi Graf. I liked the winner speech Steffi gave, like she understood Hingis was a teenager with all the potential in the world, but still a teenager, so she praised her in her speech.

Makarina...

Yeah, she was much more aggressive in 97, later on she just got the ball back and hit it really short with her fh.

Agreed. I think that's one of the reasons she didn't win more singles slams. As the courts slowed down she went for more spin which really worked when mixing up spin and breaking down her opponents but reduced the power needed to hit winners as she used to do between 96 to 99. Saying all that, she did well against so many amazing power players and her doubles and mixed skills /wins is phenomenal.

@@jasonwillcox3208 brother she had injuries in both her ankles that's why she had to retire from tennis world in 2003 so that is why she couldn't win any slam,, then in 2006 she came back but gain retired in 2007 and then came back in 2013 but played only mixed and doubles, no more singlee And at the age of 19 she had 14 grand slams,,and when serena was at age of 19 she was having someabout 4 or 5 slams... So u can understand hingis level..... Though serena williams is my all time favourite but the fact is that, if hingis was there in between 2003-2017 then serena could not win more than 17 slams in singles...

She only dominated in 1997 because there was no competition. But when the competition got tough, she complained and ran and pretended there was "too much power" because she was an overrated coward.

@@egyptian_thoth She won slams between 97-99. It's not that there was no competition, that's like saying there was no competition for graf or martina, or serena.

she never got praised enough for her efforts

Their team was all about Hingis. When they split, Hingis went on to win major titles with other partners. What did Mirza do?

They’re a great partnership and balance.

@@fundhund62 btw what do you do? just copy n paste this everywhere? is that you do fulltime kiddo? Why do you talk about what she did after but before. hasn't she won the same tournament previous year with Cara Black? Lets speak of facts: 1. Hingis/Sania won french open in 2015 but they both lost to the same team in 2016 playing with different partners. Sania in QF and Hingis in SF both to the same pair 2. Hingis/Sania won Australian open in 2016 but they both lost playing different partners in the following year. Hingis in 2nd round and Sania in 3rd 3. Hingis/Sania US open winners in 2015 but then went on to choose different partners, both pairs lost in QF. However Hingis won 2017 but she had to face Sania in SFs. H2H in singles Sania had got Hingis twice. their score is 2:2. Im from India and you dont get too much motivation to become a tennis star in this country. Discrediting someone like this is very silly of you.

I'm not discrediting anyone. I was just answering to the OP's silly claim of Mirza being "the star" of their team. Btw, they never won the French Open. If you meant Wimbledon, they also didn't play with different partners, but lost in the quarters to Babos/ Shvedova.

Yup. I agree 💯

Mirza is nobody. Hingis could have chosen any random partners to dominate doubles in wta.

@@uletitlinger That's a little bit hard....yes Martina is the best double player ever and won with so much several partners titles but with Sania Mirza she was most succesful, because of her amazing forehand and her powerful game she was the ideal partner for Martinas brilliant volleys game

@ferzy09 hingis' partners became so lame once they left hingis. Like Mirza, like chan. They are indeed nobody without hingis. They never won another grand slam event after leaving hingis.

@@derhinko2359 after temporarily partnering with hingis, even Bacsinszky did well in doubles. We all know Bacsinszky is a really bad doubles player. On the other hand, Mirza failed to win another grand slam once leaving hingis. She has some brutal force in forehand, but she has the worst footwork and doesn't have a brain either. Even Coco is a better partner than Mirza.

@@uletitlinger We agree that Martina was brilliant

2015. The year of Sania Mirza

2015. The year of Sania Mirza

Yes she has the eyes of a Bird of Prey pure focus

I too don't like her

@@brahminangirasgotraraniselvisu so what do we do for that? you beautiful, hard working and an inspirational women

@@cskwillreturn2473 Are you talking about me which you have written?

= ?

Can't thank you enough

= ?