@SuperCorrector1 huh?

It really is

@David Webb You are brianwashed. Repeat after me "I am a duped fool".

@levner brown > why are you so obsessed about racism? I think that makes you a racist. The left is, does that make them racist? >Nearly everyone in the world is interracial at some point. Wrong/beside the point. > Colorising people is stupid Correct, and he didn't. > basing people behaviour and characteristics based on race is extremely dangerous and dumb. Correct, and he didn't.

@levner brown it's always "them!"

We're there now.

Mr. Snyder knows what he is talking about.

@Paulo Chan what are you on about? hard left... 100 million corpses?

@Paulo Chan oooh temper temper.

@Paulo Chan Where did this person say that the rise of hard left isn't a problem or disagreeing with you? They just weren't discussing the hard left, they were in this case, discussing fascism, nothing else. Pointing out a body count of 100 million corpses isn't getting anyone's point across and has absolutely nothing to do with the discussion at hand. They also haven't mentioned any body count for fascism, which is not to be trifled with. They only discussed symptoms of proopaganda and some characteristics of fascism. And they're not wrong. What the UK really needs after Brexit is a mirror to take a good long look at itself, rather than telling others how horrible they are.

@James Registe Have I said that there are? In any case it's not entirely true. There was the Khmer and several other organizations, but yes, most of the left wing extremism has died out with the failure of communism in several parts. But one could hardly argue that for example North Korea is right wing, not a dictatorship and doesn't have people killed -- the facts point in the other direction. Whlie not the same as right wing extremism / supremacy, there are extremes on both sides of the spectrum. National socialism, or nazism, by its very definition is socialist, except its an extremely populist and extremist version of it which invariably includes the superiority complex - something which is clearly observable in present day politics both in America and in the UK (but not ONLY). In other countriesm, such as Poland, Hungary, Italy and even Germany there are also such groups. Not like the IRA or the RAF leftist groups mind you, but at least political ones. So while I largely agree with you, I think we shouldn't completely discount the other side either.

@Paulo Chan None of these leftists are in power, you muppet. You do exactly what Snyder refers to when he talks about how the responsibility is never theirs. Trump, Johnson, Bolsonaro, Orban, Putin, Erdogan are people who hold actual power, and all you can do is whine about those that stand outside of the doors of government. You won. Whine less and take some responsibility.

​@@guywithdacap4713 and you sound like a condescending git, sweetie.

​@@elingrome5853 When these words come from you, this is a really sweet compliment for me. Thank you.

@Joe Bloggs. Don't deflect, my friend. You can criticise Timothy Snyder all day long. He is not a perfect historian. He got his flaws. But when you criticise him don't just state: "empirical facts are just opinions". That's nothing else than simply stupid and says more about you than him.

@Joe Bloggs. Dr. Snyder is a historian who specializes in the history of Central and Eastern Europe, specifically the 20th century. Central and Eastern Europe in the 20th century, in case you are unaware, included democracies that fell into fascism and authoritarianism. That is not an opinion and it is not up for debate. If you are unfamiliar with 20th century European History, that's fine, but perhaps in the meantime it would be best to not comment on it as though you were. if you are unfamiliar with Dr. Snyder himself, I just mentioned 3 of his books to help you get up to speed. There are also numerous KZfaq videos of him giving lectures and interviews, and he has his own KZfaq channel where he posts his own content. Now that you are informed as to how you may educate yourself on this specific topic should you wish to be included in intelligent discussion, feel free to proceed. (this is good advice for generally every topic). If you respond with a reply that is similar to your previous one, I'm going to let you know in advance that it will be ignored because I have a policy of disengaging from situations that I see going nowhere. If you would like to engage in a way that makes meaningful discussion possible and are able to back up any assertions with factual sources and logical reasoning, then I look forward to it. Enjoy your day. :)

He's not beyond criticism. The NY Review of Books made serious criticisms on his "Bloodlands" and the suspicion that he's kinda "angry" about Trump's election was actually debated in specialized midia. Hitler's biographer, Volker Ullrich, was clear when he said that whenever someone is compared with Hitler, the comparison has political motives. I personally think that he should be ashamed of this kind of talk, specially being a historian. "Us and them" is not exactly specific fascist trait, it is the core of class struggle, which is the blood of almost all leftist politics ( not judging, just stating the fact). The same goes to simple slogans. When Julien Benda wrote his book, he didnt accuse a specific ideological spectrum as the sole responsible. Snyder is a good historian but I suspect that he will regret this phase of his career.

@@saxglend9439 My, my, my.....you're a busy TROLL, on every thread almost😄😄😄😄 Do YOU get paid nicely for such???

@@saxglend9439 What you say is true Even the mathmatical and physics laws are interpretations of complex things to convey main idea with a language such as symbols and numbers. So some interpretations are better than others for specific people in specific times and situations while some are applicable and valid for greater time span indeed.

@@saxglend9439 No! What i mean by the laws is that they are an interpretation of what can beobserved and can be scaled. So those laws consist of what rules the world along with our interventions or collaborations

How do you go about quantifying the facts of something like Brexit?

Am I allowed to criticize those “facts”?

share this video widely!!!

It is total and utter shite and all the American guy is doing is revealing Remainers, lefties and globalist tactics. These people do not care about democracy or a democratic vote. They want a dictatorship like the EU.

Yeah if you believe him premise that people dont actually have agency and they are being cynically manipulated. You should have more respect for others.

@@rolo5424 Everything has become a dog whistle for you on Brexit. Try thinking for once about something else.

@@aceplatini859 I simply look out and observe, from my observation I come to a conclusion. You should try it.

Poppycock.

@David Webb Amazing how you racist fuckwits can bend pretty much anything to your mindset. Well, less amazing and more like predictable, I suppose

Why do are politicians not have this mans intellect, and articulisum?

A very astute observation. Thank you.

Funnily enough there are incredibly strict rules/laws applying to advertising here in the UK. If you're selling cat food or washing powder you absolutely can't lie about it. You can even go to prison for it. Unfortunately these laws don't apply to political advertising. You can literally tell any lie you want.

@@170adamb1 It's not so much the raw facts as the subtle subliminals. Our cat food will make your life better, look at the kind of life this buyer has, all shiney and full of happiness ... the Derren Brown stuff ... which the regulators don't see, don't see as lies, are paid off perhaps, or just ignore for fear of being called daft.

@@jamessherburn Well It's hard to regulate against shiny, happy people but at least we're protected from claims which are just false. If someone buy's a cat food or washing powder because there's a handsome guy or beautiful woman in the advert, that's on them. We have zero protections from our leaders lying to us, and so we end up with a democracy built on lies. Which can't be a good thing.

@@170adamb1 Many things are hard. 'That's on them' ... no it's not. Derren Brown could make you commit murder, would that be on you?

is it never someone elses fault?

@@public.public We can only really hold ourselves accountable, dude.

@@public.public Wow, you used at least three fallacious arguments and implied several others in just one sentence. Nice job there.

‘Politics of envy’ is usually only the cry of either the politician of greed or the voter of ignorance. Envy doesn’t really come into it when you’re holding to account a government who has allowed building regulations to kill people, nationals to be treated like foreign invaders, pensioners losing their promised pensions, causing some to be made destitute, police number reduced so much that protection network failed to prevent at least one massive terrorist attack, disabled people being made to attend tribunals at their lowest, when their illnesses are degenerative. A government who has cut services so much yet now finds bottomless pots of cash to fund a project that is undoubtedly going to mean less focus and spending on the countries needs.

@James Registe "It's the other tribe. They're evil and not like my tribe" Kind of a fascistic impulse, fella.

@@saxglend9439. Facists and communists are: "6 of one and half a dozen of the other"

@@saxglend9439. Oh I see facists had enough soul to start a second world war in which countless of millions of souls died? Is that what you mean? Both, the facists and commies are as soulless as the other.

@@saxglend9439. 😃😃😃😃😃 👍 😃for the last statement😂👍

@@saxglend9439. Thanks for your concern. I feeel perfectly fine. I feel that if I headbutt a bull, I'll come out on top. But I really do appreciate your concern.

@Martin Baldwin-Edwards. There you go. You got it. The facist logic is "If I kill 1million, I'm ok. I'm good because the communists have killed 1m and 1." Anybody who kills is evil. In fact if you look at history, both, facists snd communists have killed countless of millions of innocent souls. I'm not talk about individuals, but as parties. Both, fascists and communists are soulless evils, with literally 100s of millions of dead souls on their conscious.

id be ok with the tories disappearimg up their own arseholes , those shits have never done any good , every time they get elected they inflict harm on the economy , making millions suffer poverty just so they and their rich donors can keep stuffing their faces

@Martin Baldwin-Edwards you obviously did not listen. You are one of the people he talks about. The people that think with emotion and not facts.

@@shaununderwood6048 you also who the guy in this video was talking about. You are thinking with you feelings.

think with logic , affirmative spock , ffs ben you trying to wind me up ? if that's your critique then its bollox

@@shaununderwood6048 you claimed the tories have never done any good. Have Labour done better?

Keith Pieterse lol

luka zupie lol

@@baukebaljeu8636 : Two Fascist trolls within an hour. Not bad! The joke's on you. Now go to the toolshed. Your mother is waiting for you to do what you always do. She's wet! lol

Well said

Keith Pieterse your sense of humour is state of the art indeed

How about telling a lie? Unless you care to provide a citation for that quote.

@Bobs Vegana. As Orwell was talking about a, globalised, Totalitarian world, in the Future, not really sure his knowledge of history is very relevant. But 1984 was written just after WW2, at a time, when he was dismayed by the growing antisemitism in the Labour Party, of which he was a member. So I would say his knowledge on the subject was sufficient

@Bobs Vegana Well, he either does know it, or Trump and Bojo are using 1984 as a manual, or both.

Yeah, but referendum it self is anti-Democratic. Democracy can only exist with a well informed public. Imagine primary were thier two parties with different policy and they only write policies and beliefs. While majority voting public is illiterate. Would that be a democratic excerise?

@@angelperez3750 Well that maybe your own point of view, but why should a democratic country offer its citizens an undemocratic Referendum vote, that doesn't make sense.

@@wearsider In my opinion it had nothing do with policy and everything to do with politics. E.U. is popular scape goat for each memeber. If something goes wrong e.u. did it, but thier are clear economic benefit from staying in eourpean union. The prime minister at the time was pretty sure most of the country was pro-union, thier for justifying his pro-e.u. policies, While ukip the anarchest can wage a brave political campaign that could help them secure a couple seats in parliament, but wouldn't be big enough to actually cause any actual harm at least that's what would happen if remain had won, but they didn't. Now all these politician are stuck in this political paradox. They have lead everyone to believe that e.u. is the root cuase of all thier problem and solution is to harm themselfs. Also minority of doners actually wanted to leave since thier was series of tax loopholes that would be closed in three years time.

@@angelperez3750 There are several major flaws in your argument. The first being that we were not clever enough to vote on brexit If this is the case, then we should not vote for governments/parties either. For we vote in a government which deals with a VAST range of issues, of which Brexit is a subset. The other is that the entire history of our being in the EU has been a string of anti-democratic actions. Begining with powers of law making and governance being handed over to a foreign organisation without ANY electoral consent by way of manifesto or referendum. Calls for referendums were blocked and denied for decades, until BOTH main parties were elected on a promise of an EU manifesto. BOTH of them reneged on the promises when they found out what the result would be. ONLY when they thought it safe to do so, and remain would win by a comfortable margin did the ant-democrats allow us a say in who rules over us and who we pay taxes to. Then they lost the democratic vote, and an election followed in which well over 80% of MP's were elected on a promise to honour the outcome of the referendum. Shortly afterwards the perfidious liars declared themselves proud remainers. But I already knew from previous EU promises that they had NO intention of keeping, they would lie. They have no respect for democratic procedure, not respect for the electorate, (Just look at the childish name calling tantrums which many leading remain politicians wallowed in after the result was announced.) they do not even respect their own manifesto. (If you dont represent what you claim to represent at election time, then it is NOT representative democracy.)

@@markhorton8578 yes, you do live in a representative democracy. You pick a politician represent you and your interest. I think referendum was clever way to throw away that responsibility of a representative goverment onto the public, and most people aren't politicain and don't have time or energy understanding socail-economic effects of brexit. If parlement can barely grasp how to implement what was voted for, can you realy trust the fact that the common man knew complexity of brexit ? The question was simple in or out, but how to go about it is completely different issue, and how it effects Britain is even more complex. The average person such as myself are morons and then other half is even dumber then that. janitors and school teachers should not be literally writing every letter of the law for politicians. The idea that direct democracy is some how more democrartic because people go to voting boths more often is not nessarly true.

Tories won't allow it. They will do all they can to avoid responsibility for their crimes, including Money Laundering.

If 45% is racist we should stop migration right now bcs what good can happen from it?? Also, china is the least religious country in the world i believe, so...?

Except when local media everywhere are bought up by a huge corporation that proceeds to use them to push a political agenda. Look at Sinclair Broadcast.

@Matthew Wyskiel: Where is proof or evidence that local media do not or cannot develop biased agenda ?!

i mean you contradicted yourself in what you just said

ITER ! That’s stupid! Trump is a criminal

if you're on a web page rather than the app, if your friend looks to the right of the save button there's three dots, if they click on that they'll see an option to open the transcript. I don't know where the option is in the app, sorry.

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/f5ell9uTsbzDfo0.html

and proud of it

@@alanbstard4 The duped welcome their galloping poverty, increasing world isolation, worsening security and bitter public discourse.

@Amanda Hughes Technically incorrect. All the fascist and populist parties supported Leave as well you know,. You are not fooling anyone and duped were on your side already.

True!

@Amanda Hughes No that's all nonsense. Nazis were nationalists and wouldn't stoop so low as to form the EU. The EU was championed and formed by the French, and Goldman Sachs is the banker behind it the EU is an international organisation wanting borders down, opposite to the Nazis

Metonymy1979 lol

Sweden had a referendum about abolishing to drive on the left side. A majority wanted to keep it Left. Then in 1967 it was changed to drive on right side. And people were happy with that. Times had changed and the change worked very well. A majority can make a decision to attack a minority. A democratic decision that is very wrong.

Stick to Llamas Bo.

Unlike you of course who are a of far more intelligent class and therefore deserve more attention to be paid to your view.That's not how it works in a democracy.

@@saxglend9439 VOTE OUT RIGHT WING PARTIES

@@saxglend9439 EVIDENCE has PROVEN. NOTHING CONSERVATIVE about CONSERVATIVES.

@@saxglend9439 Breitbart told you that?

Dongvale fascism is right wing but okay

@@ellewilliams5162 Doesn't have to be, Communism tend to be quite authoritarian and fascistic in nature and Communists tend to be left leaning, far left to be exact. I don't like either extremes really.

How's that wall that the Mexicans were going to pay for coming along?

Allard Freichmann you say poor vs rich don’t go together well and than propose we should take from one group even more and give to another??:) It is not like that anyway. Many poor people want lower taxes and many rich people want higher taxes. 36% of people who earn more than 200.000$ in USA are democrats. In europe the biggest division i see is with mass migrations, not rich vs poor.

Nspnspker it is nothing wrong with relatively small number of people controlling most of our resources. We are all richer bcs of it. Every other system failed miserably.

Nspnspker idk what trickle down means but capitalism is supported by almost every economist. Every single developed nation is capitalist. And all of them have poor people and extremely rich people. No country is rich as a country but without extremely rich people. Also, capitalism is freedom, everything else is not. You are anti freedom.

Nspnspker no need, tnx.

Nspnspker i just destroyed you with arguments what are you talking about? Hahahaha u are funny guy.

Maria Schick - Is that all you took away from the interview? ( Although credit where it's due, it was a pretty good one liner ).

Watneys Special well he was dead wrong.

Typical Gammon response.

Have you no better criticism to make which would show you have some comprehension of what I am talking about?

@@lawrencebrown3677 Well, your original statement was so verbose and rambling I was wrong to say it was a 'typical Gammon response.' It also made it somewhat difficult to decipher exactly the point(s) you were making. Regarding your points: I'm not sure his is 'obvious intention' was to 'appeal as an expert.' Channel 4 invited him in because he clearly does have some expertise and knowledge of history and Fascism. Doubtless he'd be the first to concede that his academic view is one amongst many. The referendum of 2016 was 'advisory.' Political parties could have used the result as a basis for informed and construct discussion within this country and within the EU. Sadly Cameron, like other British political leaders was too weak to consider that option. I would suggest that the Ancient Greek notion of democracy has now, in our society, changed or evolved so that UK democracy is dependent on the rule of law - indeed, that notion is now our custom (however Johnson and Cummings might want to challenge it). Snyder's insights on how propagandists in the Internet age are devising and using simple slogans repeated again and again as if that somehow gives them a truth was pertinent and replicates Fascist tactics. It was entirely relevant to the way in which the Leave campaign orchestrated their referendum campaign, and the way in which Johnson and Cummings are now pursuing their 'die in a ditch' Brexit strategy. As for equating the comments he made about Empire with the EU, well that's debatable - regardless of what you claim Verhofstadt said (and I don't know the context in which it was allegedly said). What I do know, is that the claims consistently made by Leavers about the EU - the Leaver/Gammon narrative - describe a political and organisational entity that I do not recognize. It's not perfect, but it's not as the Leaver/Gammon narrative would have us believe. Try as I might (and contrary to your assertion) I've not been able to get a Leaver to offer me any hard factual evidence for the claims consistently made by the Leave side. What I do know (in addition to the wealth of impartial research I've read) is that in some of the places I've lived in during my adult life, the failures of investment, of housing etc. have all been down to British Government policy. In contrast to that business and housing projects have been built and funded by EU money - specifically areas of Devon & West Cornwall, but elsewhere too. On the same theme (and again counter to your claim) I've also not been able to get Leavers to offer any hard factual evidence as to how lift outside the EU will be economically or culturally better than what I've experienced in this country for the last 40 years. What I get are the same tabloid slogans and untruths. Worse still, the mentality and world view of most of the Leavers I've encountered and tried to debate with is so tribal and bigoted that they simply refuse to engage with any view that does not equate to theirs. The usual response is to revert to slogans 'Leave means leave', 'will of the people', 'remoaners', 'lefty traitors' etc. Indeed, your final sentence is of the same ilk - hence my reply. If you regard C4's output as 'propaganda' then perhaps you shouldn't watch it.

@@saxglend9439 ORANGE TREASONOUS tRump is WORST then bad

@@saxglend9439 TROLLING a TROLL🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗 Never, you?

3:15

@@DerAua a majority of voters voted for brexit. Trying to bring up the people who couldn't and didn't vote means that nobody ever has a majority for anything in their minds. Also, claiming that the referendum was advisory when all referenda are in the UK. If you actually believe in democracy you have to accept that the other side can win sometimes.

@@catmonarchist8920 a majority of voters voted for brexit. - no doubt. The referendum wasn't binding. The majority was not an absolute majority bhut a tiny fraction. "Trying to bring up the people who couldn't and didn't vote means that nobody ever has a majority for anything in their minds." - I agree. I don't care for those who didn't vote. We live in a represantative democracy - this means our leaders are allowed to overrule an opinion which is voiced outside of general elections - but have to concede those. Weak, all encompassing democracy allowed for mob rule and ended classical greek and roman democracies. "Also, claiming that the referendum was advisory when all referenda are in the UK." - What does it have to do with a referendum being in the UK? I do not understand the question. "If you actually believe in democracy you have to accept that the other side can win sometimes." Sometimes winning means in general elections, but the Brits had weak leaders, so tough luck to them (representative democracy, democratic when possible, dictatorial when necessary). Also, I have no problem with Brexit. As a German I am glad the Brits are out. They can go reconquer India or something. But they have to respect our laws and our bargaining power. now We are a block power and Brexit demonstrated that. India and China are their own powers. We can withstand them, together, while the British are alone and have to hire African immigrants because no European is dumm or poor enough to work there.

I don't think he was saying that tbh. He was challenging the premise of the question that there was - 'a popular will of the majority' - NOT a majority vote. Of course it is the majority VOTE, even if only ten people could be bothered. It is also a FACT that ALL referendums in the UK are ADVISORY because the UK Constitution states that Parliament, NOT Government or, as in Scotland, the People, is sovereign.

The whole concept of an EU was the idea of an Italian FASCIST at the end of WWII.

wait i can get rich and political points from fascism wow its even better than before

OR next level to stop it

Or....OUT VOTE FASCIST....tRump SHOULD be a huge wake up call to Non FASCIST. FASCIST are well funded, organized and vote. 33% of The USA is FASCIST minded.

@Martin Baldwin-Edwards tRump IS A FASCIST....Your both PARTIES are bad propaganda is LAZY!!!!!

@Martin Baldwin-Edwards I'm surprised you don't think Brexit happened due to an inflexible 2 party system. I would argue it did, precisely because the two ruling political parties ignored voters wishes for far too long, giving gravitas to the likes of Nigel Farage and now Boris Johnson. Nothing about these people is demonstrably fascist and labeling them as such diminishes the meaning of fascist. You may disagree with their policies, and dislike their ignoble characteristics, but the truth is there's nothing xenophobic with wanting sustainable immigration policies, and again, labeling these people as fascists or xenophobic just further alienates you from the people that have elected such politicians. If the remain side of the argument have any hope of winning, would be to make some compromise the electorate could make do with, evolve the EU policies which align with voter interests maybe? Sadly, Cameron tried this, but failed miserably.

@Martin Baldwin-Edwards Trump will NEVER be held accountable....ie GWB....SAD BUT TRUE

Cancer also has reasons for happening.

sashagooch That would very much depend on how it's done, not just if it is done. If you take the Bozo Boris approach, you will just make the wounds deeper.

What would be a possible solution then? Considering the customs union and ireland?

sashagooch A referendum on how we leave would be a good start. Not on whether we leave, but how and what the future arrangements should be. There are many versions of leave. Finding one that can unite the country might be a good thing. You don't unite a country by having one group dictate to another. Even if it's a majority.

@@bugsygoo trust me this country has healed many wounds before now and a clean break would do us no harm in the long run. If you are materialistic and live by your greedy wealth then a clean break is not for you because the thought of loosing something is far greater than what you can gain.

TheSpiritOfTheTimes please go back to playing the man, not the ball.

@@baukebaljeu8636 *ball not the man

Dave Blair *sarcasm

@@baukebaljeu8636 Ah. Didn't carry.

Exactly. He was inept and/or poorly prepared. The guest was compelling and laser-sharp.

@Dr Diablory All I can say, really, is the presenter didn't come across with any discernible depth. I would also suggest that Dr Snyder's replies indicated his reservations about the presenter. We all have our bad days; this may have been one of his.

@@coyotesong That was my point. I have seen Krishnan present at other times and he does a great job. Just that on this occasion the manner in which he responded to the answers and counter questioning could have been better when you consider the wealth of information and insight given.

@Dr Diablory Well, first, thanks for providing a transcript!! Starting with his first question, I find it sophomoric at best. In the UK, you've had UKIP to deal with for a while now. I consider as do most political scientists white nationalism a fascist or at least an incipient fascism. And in the States, we had the orange clown say overt fascists included good people the weekend that one of these 'good people' killed one peaceful demonstrator and injured several others in Charlottesville, Virginia. The phasing of his opening question just seems totally out of synch with the factual background. I frankly don't understand what his second question about borrowing tactics means---. And the third question again seems impossibly uninformed or misinformed: What's wrong with what they're doing? So the way this is worded, a possible answer could have been, aw, gee, nothing really. This kind of Zealousness of neutrality brings to mind Neville Chamberlain's ("peace in our time") appeasement of the epitome of evil, Adolf Hitler. I'm not trying to tell you that you're wrong; I'm just trying to describe my thought processes.

Please give an example of a question you would like to have asked.

@@cinderball1135 Why he consistently lies