I preferred World at War over this

5:54 was a pure “9mm rounds can blow the lungs out of your body” moment.

By time I got to the end of the game I was half expecting to fight Hitler and his faithful mp7, one on one as a Aztec priest

The Merville battery being under German control until August just floored me. Had no idea that the British paras had such tough luck on D-Day.

A Japanese man asking a white American man in the 1940s if he speaks Japanese is ridiculous😂

The biggest issue with Henry is that he’s a fake character who replaces a REAL person and is used as a way to try saying “the black man is better than everyone”, he’s somehow just the best soldier who doesn’t need help from anyone during D-Day and he completely ignores rank structure. Tells his superiors what to do, rallies the scared Brits (who are absolutely mortified and shell shocked) by saying “we’ve got a job to do”. Edit: The 93rd didn’t fight as a rescue unit on the island when they were there.

Lyudmila Pavlichenko is clearly the prototype for the girl of Stalingrad. However, she was born not far away for Kyiv as an ethnical ukrainian. She was defending Sevastopol during the Crimean campaign in 1942. She was also there during Siege of Odessa. *She was never is Stalingrad, however.* The nickname given was 'Lady Death' and was used by western allies only due to its inappropriateness in USSR. The overarching plot of this sad game is bonkers ofc, but what's bothering me even more is that they came up with some imagined heroes when there are real ones

Did that MP40 have explosive bullets? That enemy just got split in two.

Just a lil point when Arthur falls in the water he drops his ......M1 Garand.....

My favorite pet peeve is when they censor the flag for Germany. Look at World at War on multiplayer, it was a RESOUNDING success when it was uncensored and bare for all to see. I hate it when they censor the flags, I hate it when they censor anything really. I hate it when they change something for the comforts of society. I say, I don't care about the comforts of society. They should be uncomfortable, they should be uneasy, they should be ANGRY at the horrors mankind has wrought. So it will never be repreated again. History, whether it be in a game, movie, or book, should never be censored for any reason. Period. I know it sounds petty of me to be focused on the flag, but to me, it reflects what kind of game company we're dealing with. Those who are more likely to cave to the pressures of mainstream media and society.

Didn't it also take the Germans many days to take over Stalingrad? The game shows that they took control in a matter of hours.

Worth A Buy made an excellent observation about the Operation Tonga mission. According to the developers Richard Webb is based on Lt. Col. Terence Otway, who was actually the CO of the 9th Parachute Battalion and was actually the one who led the assault on the Merville battery. Having a black main character in a WWII game is perfectly fine, but what isn't fine is elevating the representation of black soldiers by deliberately devaluing the achievements and sacrifices of actual men who were there; basically calling Otway a coward and awarding his role in the Normandy invasion to someone else. It's really shameful, and that can be said to be a woke part of the game.

Also in the Stalingrad mission they call Molotov cocktails, well, Molotovs. That doesn't seem realistic, if we think about where the nickname comes from, but I'm not that educated on the topic. (Point being I doubt Soviets would call a weapon by a nickname that came from the enemy that is mocking a high ranking member in the party)

The reason why they made Vanguard into what it was is because they wanted to have the feel of the Modern Warfare series in a WWII setting, This was also done for World At War and COD WWII but it was done way better. There was also a mention of an RPG but that term didn't exist until the 50s during the Cold War years

A sledgehammer Dev was at the ww2 museum for research for this game, and an employee from that place wrote that they said that they were only looking for thencoold stuff, not the historical accurate stuff...

I understand they need a black character to fit the modern narrative, but also ignoring the hundreds of thousands of Indians and Nepalese Gurkhas that fought during the war for the British empire is just pathetic…

20:07 that old cod 2 shout its perfect.

The Japanese soldiers didn't give a hoot about the POWs! Not that they killed them en masse like the Germans did to the Jews. They saw surrender as dishonorable and forfeit of life. At best, the POWs would go through hard labor and/or torture. At worst, certain death. Really makes the first American mission in ''COD: World At War'' pretty darn accurate by comparison!

Adding animals in Stalingrad is propably a wasted opportunity to show that pretty much every animal was eaten by the Russian and German to survive.

On the Japanese why not show the japanese psychopathic warfare on atrocities and also why not show the Tuskegee if you want a black man.

Also it’s Stalingrad, a KZfaqr pointed out that it’s should be hands on deck and that everyone and I mean everyone should raise up defences and civilians are to be trained or at war since Stalin wants no retreat. But if you look a lot of people are just living in chill mode. Again, that’s what I’ve heard from a KZfaqr and from what I can gather and learned.

I really feel like you should've mentioned the Einhorn Revolving Shotgun in the actual video. I know you said you weren't gonna nitpick the guns, but oh man, the Einhorn Revolving Shotgun.

This game just makes me miss the days of CoD Finest Hour, where you played as a female Russian sniper and a black tank commander, and it wasn’t some awful forced commentary, you just played them and learned something neat about that time in history. Where did all the subtlety and nuance go?

Another big reason why historical accuracy is important is that kids learn a lot from games and movies, and if you are pushing garbage kids won't know what's real and what's made up crap

I cannot with the red dot sights.

Felix Steiner didn't die in stalingrad, he was never there... he lived past the war

I got over the historical inaccuracies by calling the game alt-history, I kinda want to see you break down WW2

The black soldiers were so tokenistic, at times it almost felt like they were intentionally playing up their blackness as a joke on their white rescuee. And that's probably the most charitable interpretation of them. Mhm hmmm, I sure do loves me some grits, Messeh Wade.

5:02 one thing i'm confused about is how the fuck he's still wearing po8 webbing like he just brought that from ww1.

We need world at war remake asap

They put in so much effort to make levels look smoky and dirty and muddy and yet all the characters look so clean and immaculate.

"Yes, I paid money for this experience" As a fellow history buff and aspiring historian from across the pond, I know that pain well, friend. I usually go into and experience a Call of Duty game by playing the campaign first. I was one of those unfortunates who bought the game, believing that the campaign was going to be like the stories told in prior Medal of Honor games and Blazing Angels 2: a WW2 story that is fictional in nature, but rooted in the deep historical authenticity that has been cultivated by not only past WW2 CoD titles, but also past WW2 games and other WW2 media. A WW2 story that was going to tell the story of the first special forces, such as the SAS, the British Commandos, the Devil's Brigade, the SOE, and the OSS just to name a few. I even bought a book about the secret operations in WW2 thanks to this damn game. Instead, what we got is a stinking pile of historically inaccurate, historically inauthentic nonsense I have ever had the misfortune of ever playing in my 28 years of existence, as well as the most cursed gun attachment combinations I have ever seen. Call of Duty: World at War on Veteran difficulty (yes, including the incessant grenade spam) was more entertaining than this mess. I feel bad for Jonathan Ferguson for having to endure those cursed guns, but at least he has his emotional support STG-44 to rely on. www.reddit.com/r/CODVanguard/comments/qt5nvb/vanguard_a_review_from_a_historians_perspective/ This review of Vanguard I found on Reddit goes into more detail about the game's flaws in historical accuracy and authenticity than I could ever on a single KZfaq comment. One thing was how the 93rd Infantry, the segregated unit featured in the 1943 Bougainville mission, was not deployed there until March of 1944 and did not see much action throughout the war, mostly due to how segregated units were treated by US military command at that time. The Reddit user said it best: "What is really frustrating about this decision by Sledgehammer to use the 93rd is the opposite of what they probably intended. They wanted to show some of the underbelly of the Greatest Generation, that there still existed this perverse system of segregation and that while colored soldiers could fight and die no different than their fair skinned counterparts, they were often denied that right. While a great idea and something I'd love to see in a video game, they chose to pick some random unit that didn't even fight in this campaign at the time portrayed. They could have honored an actual colored unit and the actual sacrifices they made for a country that marginalized them. Good examples would have been the 17th Special Seabee or the 16th Marine Field Depot which were two segregated Marine units that fought so bravely during a counterattack on Peleliu Island that the 7th Marines may not have repulsed the enemy without them. They received a Presidential Unit Citation for their actions." (Yes, I understand the 93rd Infantry did see some action against the Japanese, as shown by the Silver Stars awarded to Pvt. Isaac Sermon and SSgt. Rothschild Webb respectively, but I would like to further reiterate the Reddit user's posts by saying this was after the 93rd deployed in March 1944, not 1943 as Vanguard so haphazardly proliferates) On another matter, one of the lead writers for Vanguard told in a panel the following: "We came into this process saying, 'how do we make the iconic CoD characters?', because you don't really have that in Call of Duty right now." After reading that, I can hear characters like WWII-era characters (Cpt. Price, Maj. Ingram, Sgt. Sullivan, Cpl. Roebuck, Pvt. Polonsky, Sgt. Reznov, Pvt. Dimitri Petrenko, and Pvt. Chernov) and the other characters from the MW and BO series saying, "Are we a joke to you?!" On a happier note, I have watched Guy Ritchie's "Ministry of Ungentlemanly Warfare" and, while still heavily fictionalizing the events of Operation Postmaster, there is also a deep abiding respect to the historical events the movie is based upon, which Vanguard clearly lacks. It instilled in me a desire to learn more about Operation Postmaster, Gus March-Phillips, and other operations conducted by the Special Operations Executive and the Office of Strategic Services.

17:26 Paulus did not surrender his men, he ordered them to do what they think is best (he had also at that point lost contact with about half of the remaining German soldiers still fighting in Stalingrad) the Soviet generals where angry and demanded he order his men's total surrender and he simply told them that he couldn't. Tldr Paulus only surrendered himself and his immediate staff who where found surrounded by food, warmth and plenty of cigars while the lower ranks where out in Stalingrad fighting in the snow and ruins, some where even reported trying to walk back to the German frontlines, some Soviet soldiers where left Stalingrad to mop up the few Germans who remained while the rest left to fight against the main German army in the east. 19:22 there are also German records of digging out frozen horses around Christmas to eat them as back when they died the men still had an incoming supply of food, but as they where cut of from food supplies from back home they made due with even the dead carcass of their animals. 21:10 some Japanese soldiers could speak English, as they did study pre ww2 in UK and US higher education schools, however these by the time of ww2 where higher ranking officers usually at the rank of captain in the navy or higher, some more successful army officers in the Pacific knew of the American tactics due to studying in America and orderd their men to wait untill the Americans had landed in full force before opening fire rather than try and physically remove them from the beach as soon as they landed as some officers fresh out of thr Imperial Japanese military academy did, only resulted in mass casualties and their own deaths as they led from the front with their katana.

This game is racist as hell

They could have done so much more with Bougainville. 2nd and 3rd Raiders have Latino and Native Americans in its ranks so they have their diversity. The Battles through Cape Torakina to the Piva Forks and Hellzapoppin Ridge are filled with action (in my opinion at least) and Bougainville itself was the stuff of nightmare fuel. They could have done so much with it but they chose to shoehorn the 93rd division in a fictional encounter that what their real battles were like on the Numa Numa trail.

Little fun fact: In WaW according to a cutscene the Miller, Roebuck and Sullivan have also fought in Bougainville in 1943. Kinda shame that they weren't seen or mentioned since Vanguard shares the same timeline with waw and black ops

Call of duty lost their touch since Black ops 1. Yes 2 was good but this is where it all went down Hill.

Operation Neptune was the overall airborne operation on D day. It occurred several hours before overlord

As an American I can appreciate how a foreigner can stand up for our stupid injustices so thank you

good video yet again, would defo be interested in a weapons inaccuracy follow up video

Something to mention as well is the T-34-85 in Stalingrad. A tank that if I'm recalling correctly was only invented/deployed in 1944. (Or was it 1943? I can't recall currently rn but i suspect I'm right with 1944)

"Fourth Reich"? This isn't bloody Wolfenstein, it's World War 2. If you want to make an alternate history of World War 2 like Wolfenstein then sure but if it's purportedly World War 2 then make it ABOUT World War 2. I didn't know about Sidney Cornell myself so I actually learned something new so that's neat. Sort of like how in that one World War 1 game they showed the Harlem Hell Fighters whose history I find really interesting. Other than that, people really need to do their research when it comes to actual battlefield protocol. And they just assume every single white person back then was racist and acted like it even during moments where they could very well be killed.

I am a huge firearm enthusiast and as far as the guns are concerned two of the most stupid ones are removing the stocks from both the MG-42 and STG-44, they would flat out not work as the recoil spring that the bolt pushes against to eject the spent round and pickup the next extends into said stock. No stock = no spring, no spring = a single shot weapon at best and at worst without the spring to slow the mass of the bolt down you would fire it once and get a heavy chunk of steel punching a big hole in your shoulder or face. they literally put 0 thought into how real firearms work when they made the weapon customizations and purely went with the rule of cool or what shooters set in modern times do. Not to mention that removing the stock from an MG-42 even if it COULD function would be totally uncontrollable due to the recoil of 1200 rounds per minute of 7.92x57mm when fired from anything but a mounted position, with a stock it is possible to fire it while standing in very short bursts but anything more than that would knock you on your ass due to the muzzle rise.

You should check out Call of Duty 2. I don’t know exactly how accurate it is but it’s got to be miles better than Vanguard. It’s my personal favorite WW2 CoD (and CoD in general), and maybe my favorite single player WW2 campaign in general out of any game. It’s so underrated and forgotten compared to World at War, which is a shame because from an accuracy and authenticity standpoint I actually think it does a better job in every department besides blood and gore, something I don’t think is quite as important as people make it out to be

17:50 the optics is also bonkers, she wouldn't have anything better than ПУ'42. However, binocs are prob cause field of view

One of my biggest issues with this game is the pushing of agendas. Old CoDs like Finest Hour had Black and Female characters, but they made sense, like Tanya Pavelona who was a female Russian Sniper or Sam Rivers a Black Tanker in Patton's 3rd army. This stuff actually happened, yet they instead want to change history, when History is already diverse.

17:50 because soviet binoculars had better magnification and light transmission than sniper scope, and i think, she uses standard PE/PEM scope which had magnification ×3,87

I ready want a WWII game where we play as the hero’s of WWII Hell that first mission could’ve been Jake “McNasty” McNeice’s drop

How is it i wrote a long ass historically accurate scipt for highschool and yet a AAA game company cannot.

See, a lot of people do jump the gun on calling everything"woke" but this game is also one of the first textbook examples of why it's such a bad idea to force diversity. Most of the things depicted in this game are somewhat based on truth, but the writers and designers ham fisted true history into whatever garbage story they were telling.

I don’t even mind historical inaccuracies as long as it doesn’t completely pull me out of the atmosphere. Battlefield 1 is a perfect example of this in action. But in the case of Vanguard’s campaign, I had to stop and question why the developers made half the choices that ended up in the game. Why did a Japanese soldier ask an American in perfect English if he spoke Japanese? Why did the Soviet Union agree to put one of their supposed best soldiers on a team with an American, instead of on their own frontlines? Why does said team have a fighter pilot on it when they’re a ground-based unit? Aren’t they kinda wasting his skill set by not having him in a plane? Why are they called the vanguard anyway when they seem to run infiltration missions, which is pretty much the opposite of what a vanguard does? How did this team even get assembled? Wouldn’t their countries want them to be fighting on their own lines, that way their efforts would be more spread out? It’s like they wanted to make the game zany like Wolfenstein, but still retain the ability to brag about how it portrays perspectives of all fronts of the war.

Thank you for having the patience of making this video and playing the game properly. I could Never....

Diversity over quality. They’re not trying to make good games anymore. It’s all about the message.

Great video. I like this series alot. Can you do Battlefield 1 next? We haven't seen a WW1 game yet and I bet it'll be great seeing one as that game is one of my all time favorites.

Stalingrad had huge strategic importance. Not only because it was an industrial center, but also because it was a major point in logistics between Baku (source of most of the oil in USSR at a time) and Central USSR/Russia

in my personal opinion and my father being Southern, the grits in heaven line wouldn't be too of point especially for a southerner in the 1940's but thats just my opinion so take it with a grain of salt

I really appreciate that despite talking about the various inaccuracieis you were really respectful to the colored and female soldiers that fought in the war acknowledging that they did play a big part. Most youtubers who talk about this game just brush them off as "woke propaganda".

also, when chort gets shot, it was a headshot but IRL snipers avoided headshots, as they were a lot more likely to miss

Vanguard was never meant to showcase or respect historical accuracy, which the same can be said about almost any other CoD title, especially the "historical" ones, like all the WWII titles and the Black Ops subseries (minus the futuristic ones). Funnily enough, just like some other WWII games that came out in recent years, the devs claimed and marketed these games as "historical accuracy" and "realistic", whereas both claims were found to be completely false and almost far from reality. Vanguard can be perceived as an "alternate history" version of WWII, while trying hard to take inspiration from actual events and people during the war, without really caring about what people may think about the final product: "Oh, your favorite weapon of that era is using a magazine that was never invented for? Boo-hoo. One of the main characters, who is based on a real person, has a different nationality? Not our problem." That's the current take of modern game devs. They didn't even try to hide their lack of understanding of history or realism, and they surely didn't care about public opinion. You get what you paid for. Now, any professional historian or just the typical history buff can easily identify the many inaccuracies such games contain, without blinking once. This content may be interesting for us, but definitely doesn't serve anyone in the high castles, which are, obviously, the AAA/AAAA companies. Anyone with enough brain cells can run a quick Google search on whatever inaccurate content there's in the game and find many sources that show otherwise. Finally, and no offense, but I cannot ignore the "X Reacts to..." titles. They turn out to be tiring, repetitive and, at times, cringe. Not trying to assume anything about you or your knowledge, but I needed to express that. I do appreciate this video , though. It's always good to learn new things.

Given all the weapon inaccuracies and horrid abominations that could be made with the attachments I felt as if I was about to have an aneurysm

You can see that T-34-85 in the background too in 1942. They weren't in service until much later in the war.

The rear irons on the 1911 were also too narow and wide

From what I can tell, this game would have been far more realistic if they showed how Stalin teamed up with the evil ice queen to freeze the sun, then push to Paris with the intent of using the Eiffel Tower as the frame for a massive laser. They met little resistance due to the panic by the Germans as to why the sun disappeared so they were quick to surrender. Then the Soviets encounter the Japanese Air Force, who didn’t want to loose the previously German occupied territory to the Soviets, just outside of Paris in the Battle of Britain, only for the Soviets to win because of a new plane they made the year prior: the MiG-21. We then end the campaign with American joining in the last days of the battle and then seeing cutscene where a British unit find hitler’s bunker and are very shocked by their secret weapon that was supposed to be deployed just the next week: the potato. I guarantee you that would be more realistic and historically accurate.

Obscure trivia but the Project Phoenix logo is literally just the repurposed Sturmabteilung, SA emblem. By the 40s the organization was a shadow of itself following Hitler's purge in the Night of the Long Knives nearly a decade ago. Freisinger's rank indicated on his collar tabs is lower than the glasses German which makes their dynamic pretty stupid, especially when you consider that the latter German has a SD diamond on his left sleeve, basically the SS' own police unit to police themselves, and one of the most nastiest of the Nazi's security agencies. But then again these are minor compared to the major historical rewrites this game has done.

The Japanese soldier at the beginning of bougainville made me chuckle abit, he kinda reminded me of the one from world at war except the one from that made spoke very little English and was more intimidating

The T-34 variant depicted in Stalingrad at 13:35 would not be made until well after the Battle of Stalingrad, almost a year after the battle had ended no less, with production of the T-34-85 only beginning in January 1944. Why they did this, I have no idea. It makes no sense to substitute actual T-34 variants that would have been in Stalingrad at the time, or the use of other Soviet Armor, with a model that wouldn't even exist as a prototype, let alone a production model, until well after the battle scene it is depicted in.

Question have you ever played enlisted? If so what are your opinions on the accuracy of it?

I think it’d be pretty cool if someone made a game where it’s a “what if” scenario. Like “what if the Allie’s failed to capture the beaches of Normandy”. First they’d give a history lesson on actual events like “on June 6 1944 the Allie’s invaded the beaches of Normandy and successfully did so, this is a what if scenario if they wasn’t the case and the German army successfully repelled them”

*reason: they are greed. they want money for they are hungry.*

11:50 - a major railroad artery, an industrial powerhouse, a large tank and tractor plant, and a river port - and it's not a strategic target, don't bullshit me. It's true that at the same time Germans have sent troops to charge the Caucasus and take over oil fields in Chechnya, but saying that Stalingrad had no strategic value for german high command is nonsense. 12:09 never heard about Stalingrad being a model city for the country. There were many other cities and establishments named after Stalin - Stalinabad (modern day Dushanbe, Tajikistan), Stalinogorsk (Novomoskovsk, Russia) and so on. There were other cities that have been experimented with as the ways to try out the new ways of urban planning, most notably Moscow and Leningrad, as well as new cities that were a part of massive industrialization campaign, like Magnitogorsk. One of the main reasons for naming the city Stalingrad was the fact that it was called Tsarytsin (the Tsarina's city) before and because of Stalin's accomplishments as the man in charge of the city defense during Civil War. The battle of Tsarytsin has been one of the major points of Civil War. 12:45 Komsomol never conducted firearms training for civilians. Osoaviakhim (Society for defence, air force and chemical defence) did, though. The "Voroshilov's riflemen" were the civilians that went through the training and participated in various shooting competitions. The rifle, though, is an actual sign of status there. Before WWI and up until 1980s most of the civilian hunters used to own shotguns. During Civil War most of the rifles owned by civilians and undesireable groups (bandits, deserters) were to be confiscated, and only local Party members could keep a handgun and a rifle for protection. After Civil War many regulations were softened, in 1930s there were many rimfire rifles available for trainees and hunters, but getting a full power centerfire rifle was still difficult, unless you were a professional hunter who used to sell large game meat to the food factories, provided wildlife security or been a person of status. Though even so most of soviet VIP hunters preferred double shotguns. The first rifle scope made for civilian market was introduced some time before the gernan invasion, it was a version of a soviet PE military scope, so it fits the time just right 13:38 what bothers me is that in the game there seem to be little to no anti air defense whatsoever. The air raid was massive, there were heavy bombers with fighter escort, but there had to be some AA guns on the ground. 14:05 not to mention that they got so far right after the bombing 17:55 the scope offers less FOV and lower magnification. And it's not Zeiss, it's a variant of PE sight. Which was inspired by Zeiss and Busch Visar scopes. The scope mount is based on German side rail mounts manufactured by Geco back then and today similar mounts are offered by EAW Apel

Another banger

you forgot to mention the T-34-85's in the Stalingrad mission

Also the F2000 is in this game for some reason. Might as well add an M4

I really wish they would have had a whole arc with the 93rd va a majority of this game.

Who made the closed captions? These things are full of mistakes

I feel bad for anyone getting their history lessons from CoD. When there have been hundreds of history books published probably every year since 1945 on the subject of WW2.

great vid

I agree 100% that when you teach or make a show or make a video game about world war II and needs to be accurate no matter which side you're talking about or anything else it needs to be accurate

BF1 would be great to analyze next!

Sounds more like the real life story of the Operation Tonga was enough dramatic to actually dig into it and make it an interactive story of the real life, rather than inspiration and make fake drama with inaccuracies.

i would be very much inclined to say that the rewrite of Stalingrad was done for woke female empowerment as its the only justification i can see for that and later on as well for the relationship between white Americans and black Americans. this is exactly how i felt with the god aweful rewrite of history with battlefield 5 as well

Every ww2 game and movie gets criticism for underrepresented British support during D Day, but when an AAA game finally gives the tea drinkers some credit, we get these freshman Brirish video essays created from a chatgpt outline.

You'll have to agree that the historical inaccuracies pail in comparison to BFV lol

You forgot to add the panzerfaust which was smh RELOADABLE IN THE DESERT MISSION

The whole 93rd infantry and Stalingrad made me so mad why is this even allowed to be a ww2 game it is such an important war in human history and yet every time it is just romanticized it's so infuriating

One note about the Stalingrad mission is that you can hear civilians talk of leaving the city before the bombardment… Stalin would never have allowed that

It looks like the Germans always have Sd.Kfz.231 6 rad armored cars but they stopped using them after invading poland and france and they were replaced with Sd.Kfz.231 8 rads. So that's inaccurate too.

They should remake world at war with updated graphics. Just don’t let sledgehammer games do any of it

21:11 what if he only knew that phrase so that if you spoke japanese he could talk with you like that

This game was the first of many to receive much flak and all deserved. I had the same with BFV where some characters did exist IRL but got replaced or changed by current day 'politics'.

Its now daylight and Operation Overlord is in full swing but cant hear any battle sounds 06:28 the Germans would be on full alert😅😅😅. I can even hear birds whistling but no guns or any vehicles 😮😮😮

Where's the Midway Part of the Campaign? There are also innacuracies in that part

Stalingrad was an strategic bc of Volga. By taking Stalingrad OKH wanted to disrupt river transport

5:49 Also, Webbs real counterpart was actually extremely brave and daring. Not cautious and against protocol

23:35 the Nazis treating Owens better than his own country does is wild.

I don’t think people know some Japanese soldiers learned to speak English and graduated in the US

I know exactly why they failed to portray acurate eventd and chatacters. Its cheaper, faster and takes less effort

The fact the Japanese were using German guns was mind blowing

Can you do Medal of Honor European assault?

5:54 Was it gun or Anti Aircraft Cannon