Theres not much you can show for her passenger life other than her launch and maiden voyage, the sinking of titanic, collision with the HMS Hawke, the collision with the Nantucket light boat, and her being scrapped- I fully agree on the war part though

​@bloxburgimagineering9633 No not really. There's more to her story than that. She did save the HMS Audacious in 1918, her being quarantined in New York Harbour and famously sailing by Mauretania and Aquitania in 1928.

r.i.p u-103😢

​@@bloxburgimagineering9633you missed the part where u boat u53 fired two torpedoes at the olympic, one missing, but the other going straight for Olympic's center. Wouldn't you know, the torpedo never went off and was recently fitted with an inner skin on the hull so he could not flood. So I'm guessing engineers were suprissed to see a gaping hole in olympic's hull right after she docked.

She deserves a Sabaton song too

shouldn't have been scrapped

Olympic: Hmm, something is not right. I'm not alone here. Yes. Yes, I see you, dirty sea serpent. U-103: She sees me. If I want to blow her up, I'll need to move. Olympic: Tricky little bastard, aren't you? You're not ending my class, you're not killing my men. U-103: C'mon, damned torpedoes, c'mon!!! Work!!! Olympic: You set up traps to murder my sister, you slaughtered my innocent cousin, you destroyed so much morale in the troops of the British Empire, and this is how I repay you! You will NOT end my class!!! You will NOT kill my men!!! YOU WILL *NOT,* WIN. THIS. WAR!!!! *rams sub* U-103: AAAAHHHH!!!! Ugh, Germany... forgive... me... I... I failed... Olympic: *sigh* Sorry lads, I had to. We are winning this war, make no mistake about that. Right then, let's get you boys to France.

Something out of Kansai Collection or Azure Lane, eh?

@@kristoffermangila Maybe? Though I am not familiar with those or ever heard of them. To be honest, I thought of this on my own.

@@allidragon7041 you must be talking about Britannic mine trap and Lusitania torpedoed in the neck the ocean red with her blood a chapter in a Lusitania book don't remember the name

U-103: I'm gonna sink you! you're doomed! Olympic: **uno reverse card**

Technically the uboat did land a torpedo strike mid ship on the Olympic but due to the double side hull upgrades it didn’t sink the olympic

@@zackhaycraft8159 That and the fact that the torpedo was faulty and thus failed to detonate.

​@@oscarmanzanoserna3115 fucking lucky ass ship lmao

Britannic commenced building in the same yard after Olympic was launched. Common sense is allowed to be applied lol

@ToreDL87 I was commenting for those who were unfamiliar with the topic. No worries, and have a wonderful day.

Would be great to do a movie on all three but have Olympic as the main ship. The way she was suppost to be the main ship. Sucks she was so overshadowed.

Beast mode 🚢

I think so too, especially since she was torpedoed twice in the same time. One missed, but one hit and made a hole. Olympic didn’t sink because of her “inner skin”, implemented after Titanic. The crew didn’t discover the hole until after the war. Also because she rammed and sank lightship Nantucket as well.

​@@slepey_that is true

Sue was scrapped after me

She

Which sucked for him. Imagine being the dumkopf that can't even sink the Titanic!

It's 'hollywood' (movies)

I'd say the russian empires were speaking english and russian PoWs.

Sorry, my history knowledge on this story is not great. Does that mean they did manage to surface ? I know this is a Hollywood film, but it looks pretty unrecoverable from that angle. No sub would've survived a smacking like that interpretation surely?

@@DreadnoughtDan_1999 The crew blew the ballast tanks as soon as it became evident that the damage inflicted by the RMS Olympic had sliced a big gash in the U-boat's pressure hull. This sort of damage made a submarine useless since it made it impossible to dive and dangerous to navigate. They were able to surface and started scuttling the U-boat which is what caused it to sink.

Mais que merecido. Ele éra pra ter cido citado no filme "Titanic" de James Cameron.

@@rodrigoramos3741 Ah, isso é interessante!

well... it isnt olympic.... they somehow used a Titanic model.......

@@Zelurpio Yeah, I've noticed the A deck promenade being enclosed, but its supposed to depict Olympic, which hasn't been done before

​@@rodrigoramos3741 ..Absolutely... Rightly said bro ! 👏🏼

How do you know its Titanic?

@@joaoazambuja3390 A-deck is half enclosed, Olympic's is open across.

Also a slight mistake with her paintjob, the tops of her funnels weren't black in the war like they are shown in this clip

Yea. Wait a sec the old reliable was at a night to remember

There is only one problem in this video, the way in which the Olympic sank the U-103 is completely wrong, in addition to the Windows on Deck A being closed with those of its sister ship Titanic. The Olympic sank the U-103 by cutting it in half and the Windows on Deck A of the Olympic were Totally Panoramic, being the only one different between it and the Titanic.

@@viniciusantunes1415no it did not. I have seen the footage of U-103s wreck. It rests on the seabed decidedly intact, save for the 3-5 propeller gashes by the conning tower.

Awesome

and you forgot to have the German U-boat captain wear a white hat.

As it's supposed to be WW2, Olympic was scrapped in 1935...

And what was that cap badge the German skipper was wearing? I've only seen the trailer and read about it in imdb, but I won't be watching it...

​@stephencarey5074 If you're saying that this scene was supposed to be WW2, your mistaken. The date (1918) and location was given at the beginning of this clip. Additionally at time 1:15 you can clearly see the battle flag of the German Imperal Navy (Kaiserliche Marine) in the background, which places this scene in WW1.

that's definitely not Olympic that's must be Titanic I can see their deck were enclosed I noticed it

@@Ryuu1010YT yeah no, you can’t even get a good look at the promenade deck.

@@Fishycheese99 that's clearly not Olympic there was no showing Olympic any appearance of movie or series

@@Ryuu1010YT look kid, maybe go to school and learn some grammar and punctuation before being wrong. 😑

@@Fishycheese99 still it's not Olympic

There is one more moment. The Titanic Encyclopedia website has information that from 1913 to 1919 the central propeller of the Olympic was 3-bladed, and in the movie it is 4-bladed.

@MaritimeEventsMore76 Olympic only got 3 bladed center propeller in the 1913-1919 period.

@@ronratcliffe2219 yeah what a garbage movie wtf is that ?a fan made film or what? Also that super crappy cgi ,the Germans are now time travelers using 70s sub tech and even then they couldn't sink the Olympic hahaha

@@ronratcliffe2219 hahaha yeah I bet they used their grandma's house to make the uboat interior hahahah ,silent hunter 3 has better cgi than this garbage jajaja plus more realistic hahaha hey you played operation Monsun sh4 mod?

@@ronratcliffe2219 hahaha ohh sh3 those were wonderful times🤣(before women 🐀lol),specially when you get the type xxi and start to really kick ass, I played it with gwx mod but it was hard! Also played sh4 U-boat missions,and some American quick ones as well ,those Japs had a lot of destroyer types and fugly ships,it gets boring playing with usa after a while,op monsun turns sh4 into sh3 basically but without snorkel🤦that sucks, I also left gaming for being busy ,and now my desktop is decrepit 💩haha

@@ronratcliffe2219 cool pal you put servos and stuff In the model ,it goes to periscope depth ?or just surface? Where you go a lake or what? really good hobby pal ,how much time you spent building the model?

Just how many ww1 submarine interiors have you seen ?

Watches Titanic model float by...🤣🤣 OOPS !! 🗑° • .🏌️‍♂️

@@1_THE_MAN_1 they were technically sister-ships, Olympic being the Older of the Two, But yeah it was a Titanic Model considering Olympic Never had that Seawater Screen on her A-Deck Promenade. Whilst both Titanic and their Youngest Sister, Britannic, Both did.

To be honest, it’s the idea that counts.

How could you tell?

@@tico360 the enclosed promenade on A deck which was fully open on Olympic, then the number of lifeboats was also wrong, past 1913 Olympic had the entire boat deck covered in lifeboats, not just 4 at the bow and 4 at stern

Not to mention the fact that the propellers are spinning in the wrong direction.

Isn't the dazzle camo also wrong?

@@BNuts Yeah the dazzle camo is wrong. Idk why they only have it at the tip of the bow and not everywhere like it's supposed to be. You're supposed to confuse the whole ships distance not just the tip of the bow. So yes you're very much correct

Those damn enchiladas!! Kills em every damn time in the movies.

In the actual event, Olympic fired on the surfaced U-103 with the multiple deck guns she'd been fitted with as an armed merchant cruiser while charging to ram. U-103 never got a torpedo off as she was unable to flood her tubes in time; she crash dived but couldn't submerge quickly enough to avoid being rammed; she then blew her tanks and surfaced to evacuate the surviving crew. This was cut from the movie because it was felt that showing Olympic continuing on her course and leaving German sailors behind in the water.

@@DesiArcy we said pretty much the same thing, just you went into more detail

@@panzerjagertigerporsche they found the wreck of U-103 and found 3 curved slashed just aft of the conning tower. It was the props my guy

@@fuzzcopter467 It was actually both.

I believe Olympic also has a tragic story. In 1911, she was young and ready for life with a bright future ahead of her. She was happy to have a sister in 1912 but that happiness quickly turns into sadness as Titanic hits the iceberg. Hearing the cries of Titanic over the Marconi wireless, all she can do is listen. The other ships in the area jam up the signal, almost silencing her dying sister. "SHUT UP! SHUT UP! YOU'RE JAMMING THE SIGNAL!" Olympic yells, there was no response from Titanic. The next morning, news breaks out that Titanic, the ship who was believed to be unsinkable has died. With the loss of Titanic, Olympic meets her new sister Britannic. The war breaks out and both sisters serve, Britannic is painted up as a hospital ship. Olympic is fearful of losing her after what happened in 1912. To her horror, it happens again. Britannic suffers a severe injury by a German sea mine and becomes an innocent victim of the war. Enraged, Olympic is painted up in her new dazzle camoflage, she's hungry for revenge. In 1918, U-103 silently stalks Olympic. The submarine opens fire but fails, Olympic spots 103 and turns towards her. Knowing that a German sub was responsible for placing the mine that killed her sister, Olympic angrily rams and sinks 103. After the war, she stands alone. The first of her trio has outlived both of her sisters. The stock market crash wasn't so kind on her either, it rips people's jobs away and causes their money to become useless. In the early 1930s, Olympic gets a refit in hopes of attracting people's attention to her again. Unfortunately, her time has come and people no longer wanted to sail aboard her. White Star Line puts her up for auction to save her legacy but all hope is lost. Olympic, the only one in her family who was lucky enough to survive has grown old. She carried on for her sisters who didn't get a chance to live. With no money and no passengers, she is sent away to the scrapyards. Her silhouette on the horizon makes her look like a ghost of her sisters. In 1937, the demolition has been completed. Olympic joins Titanic and Britannic and has sailed into the mist of time.

​@@everythinghistory6770So well written. I love it. I feel sorry for the ol' girl. She's my favorite ship ever built, and that's saying something. Titanic is famous for all the wrong reasons, and Britannic was never meant for such bitter job with a gruesome end. She and Titanic were built alongside each other, whilst Britannic was built in the same gantry spot Olympic was in. I always saw her with a personality, starting off peaceful, polite, graceful, and friendly, eventually overcome with survivor's guilt, sudden anger outbursts, loneliness, and depression. She wasn't built for war, unlike her main rivals, Lusitania and Mauretania. She was built to compete for size and luxury, not speed, and more importantly, she was DESTINED to have sisters. Titanic's tragic and sudden loss kicked Olympic in the heart really hard. When she returned to Southampton after trying to help her sister, her sadness turned to outrage, and she wanted answers on why it happened with so many lives gone down with her. When Britannic was launched, Olympic's spirit lightened up a bit, saying she might have a second chance with her new sister. But, it was not to be, as the world plunged into sudden chaos, tearing each other apart. When Olympic arrived back in England after dropping off troops, she heard the news that Britannic ran into a mine field. A German mine field. With the loss of her last sister, Olympic was no longer a loving luxury liner, but a vengeful beast starving for battle. After the war, her depression kicked in, even more so when White Star Line gave her two German superliners as replacement running mates. She didn't want replacements, she wanted her own sisters. Finally, the Great Depression hit, and Olympic was actually happy when it was confirmed she was gonna be scrapped. She arrived in Jarrow, her engines were shut down one last time, and Olympic finally reunited with her sisters. Like the end of "Titanic" when Rose reunited with Jack.

@@allidragon7041 Olympic was a beautiful girl. Your story made me smile. When you brought up the German superliners, I pictured Olympic having a difficult time around them. Its interesting that you written Olympic to be happy about being scrapped where I imagined her being depressed that she wasn't recieving the love and care she once had as ships got bigger and more attractive than her. I wonder how she would feel knowing that if she was spared, the love from the general public would come back to her

Titanic's crack-addict older sister and her prison shank: *"I SEE YOU, YOU KRAUT FUCK! YOU WANNA GO?! **_LET'S FUCKING GO!!!!!"_* I bet Hitler didn't start WWII until later because he was afraid of _her._

​@@allidragon7041 I heard Olympic wanted to hunt down the mystery ship and smack her one for ignoring her sister Titanic in our universe she Olympic attacked the mystery ship nearly killing her the mystery ship had a cracked skull (forecastle deck) causing severe brain damage

I wish there was an actual movie about Olympic (At least this tried to give Olympic the cinema spotlight like its younger sister)

Eh, not yet. This is just a movie with Olympic IN IT(Not even that, since this is just a repainted Titanic). We still need a movie ABOUT THE OLYMPIC.

@@transatlanticnostalgia4655 Olympic in dazzle paint. :)

@@transatlanticnostalgia4655 thats basically what the olympic was, a repainted Titanic.

@@Deavelous Not really. They had several differences. The A deck was open on Olympic, while on Titanic it was closed.

@@transatlanticnostalgia4655 WOAH WHAT A DIFFRENCE !! NO WAY REALLY?

Was about to comment this as well. Is it for the KZfaq video or did the movie actually use pirates of the caribbean music lol

So, to my understanding, it was both. She rammed U-103, but the bulk of the damage came from the propellers impacting afterwards.

Both

This clip, like the 2008 movie Britannic, is chock full of inaccuracies.

Also, I think the U Boat actually hit the Olympic with a torpedo, but it was a dud. They didn't know until she was in dry dock after the war and they saw a torpedo sized dent in the hull

@@ryanhlavaty3680 I could be wrong, but I think that may have been a different U-Boat.

Seems like this is the raw version. I am from Germany and this would never ever seen daylight like this. Even the captain sounds like a netherlands-guy trying to speak german. I am sure it was dubbed later.

Olympic doesn't had any kill count reported from the U-103 incident though. There were reported 31 crew members of the submarine including Captain were rescued by USS Davis.

@@tsr_08h So all aboard the submarine survived? That's really impressive! Usually when a submarine suffers major damage, all hands go down as it's already submerged and just goes down from there without any opportunity for escape.

@@quillmaurer6563 I further read about this incident and It tells that 9 crewmen lost their lives and 31 survived. So yeah Olympic had some kill counts in WWI. Many sources had not discussed about the deaths of these so I seperately searched for it lol.

​@@SQUAREHEADSAM1912 Of course titanic and Olympic swapped their place

@@moonhidoraqueenofthemonste3268 debunked theory. hes talking about how the cgi model for "olympic" is literally just a dazzle colored titanic model.

​@@moonhidoraqueenofthemonste3268 Oh, for God's sake, that theory has been debunked like a million times already. That never happened. The Olympic never sank, and the Titanic is resting underwater. The movie used a Titanic model to depict the Olympic, which is what OP was reffering to

​@@moonhidoraqueenofthemonste3268not that dumb thing. He mentioned about the CGI model being Titanic and repainted in Olympic's dazzle paint.

@@gokulgopan4397 dude it is a white star lines cover up Olympic and titanic are exactly the same (same size same interiors) both ship swap names by white star line and when Olympic (Titanic) sank by iceberg the company is able to get a ton of insurance money because JP Morgan is a bad person and he quit at a last minute before titanic (Olympic) even departed and rare photos and pictures of titanic before departure shows long black mark and invisible damage meaning its not titanic and the owners of both ships commit insurance fraud to get money hence a ton of employees from cunard line are onboard the ship and none survive and today's people believe titanic sank but white star line is lying about it and a actual truth is titanic did not sink and Olympic is actually her (titanic) and so the rms Olympic changed its name to rms titanic hence hiding its original name behind the fake name and rms titanic changed her name to rms Olympic thus hiding her original name behind the fake name if you read or see theories you will believe that the real rms Olympic is resting in the sea floor while the real rms titanic get to live an 24 year career [if you don't believe me I'll be absolutely insane and mad]

that was Titanic model sadly

She was scrapped in 1935. She was the same length as the Britanic and weighed less than the Britanic. The SS Imperator was longer than both of them.

Biggest ship in the world once Titanic sank in 1912.

WW2 started in 1939, The Olympic was scraped in 1935. After the ship was retired their were originally plans on saving the Olympic for summer cruises for a short while, but this idea was abandoned and she was put up for sale. Among the potential buyers was a syndicate who proposed to turn her into a floating hotel off the south coast of France, but this came to nothing because of the great depression. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RMS_Olympic

@@givenfirstnamefamilyfirstn3935 they’re the same model and size titanic was just heavier due to a few modifications

@@eternalemperorvalkorion750 Heavier and greater water displacement means more hull volume submerged in the water. Bigger to a diving gannet, smaller to a flying one.

Also Olympic: And since I'm here, I'm getting some revenge

@@user-mi8ef4qd2k for the Lusy and Carpathia

Self defense that submarine's scheme back fired "You got your stern kicked by a ocean liner haha haha

The critical hit wasn't ramming head on, it was the propellers slicing the sub open. Thus both Olympic's and Britannic's propellers have kill counts.

@@chornobylreactor4 Imagine how much the other U-Boats laughed when U-103 told them the story... That was really embarassing

@@user-mi8ef4qd2k U 103 had the whole planet laughing at him because he just got his stern (butt) kicked by a passenger liner

@@chornobylreactor4 Ships are mostly referred as "she", not "he"

It shook a bit

Titanic's stern

sub was on the surface to fire torpedos. subs at the time didn't spend alot of time under water due to battery time and oxygen levels.

There's so much mythos about Titanic, much of which is false. Many believe that she was one of a kind and truly revolutionary, rather than a second of three and only slightly larger (by some measures, identical by most) than her older sister, which in turn was only marginally larger and soon exceeded by other ships of the era. Or that had Titanic not sunk we'd still have her today as a museum ship like the RMS Queen Mary, unaware that a nearly identical ship was scrapped.

Not HMS (His Majesty's Ship), the designation for wardships, but HMT (Hired Military Transport), the designation for troopships.

She was known as HMT not HMS😂

I've also heard that historians believe Titanic might have had a three-blade central propeller, but aren't certain - definitive documentation doesn't exist and the propellers are now buried in mud. All depictions of all three ships seem to be based on a single photo of I believe Olympic's propellers that show a four-bladed central propeller.

@@quillmaurer6563 In 2007, historian Mark Chirnside found a document in the archives, which indicates that a 3-blade central propeller was installed on the Titanic. It was installed to test its performance. Since the Titanic sank, the results of the 3-bladed central propeller were unknown. Therefore, in 1913, a 3-bladed central propeller was installed on the Olympic. It turned out that the 3-bladed central propeller pushes the vessel better, but at the same time creates more vibration. Therefore, in 1919, a 4-blade central propeller was again installed on the Olympic.

​@@format2000channel ..Does this mean. .4 bladed propeller create less vibrations but pushes the vessel a bit slower?

​@@quillmaurer6563the are Harland and Wolff documents and turbine engineer's notebook (Stephen Pigott, John Brown and Co) that clearly shows the propeller specifications. It was a 3 bladed one.

she ( The Olympic) did it multiple times and didn't sink like her sister ship which kind of did it ( The Titanic )

Funny enough they ended up finding an undetonated torpedo lodged in her hull after the war.

Get into the torpedo tube. Flood it. Open the front hatch.

I don't know much about WWI subs, but WWII and modern subs would do an emergency blow of their ballast tanks. All their spare oxygen would be blown into those tanks, pushing the water out of them. Of course it doesn't work if the sub is too flooded, though

They blew their tanks.

@@ryanhlavaty3680 Would that work with huge gashes in the exterior hull (my understanding of most subs is the exterior hull has the ballast tanks and the pressure hull is inside that) sliced by Olympic's propellers? I'd expect the air to just come right back out. Maybe enough ballast tanks are intact to float? I also recall reading that research submersibles have ballast blocks on the bottom that can be jettisoned in an emergency, which should allow the submarine to surface even if ballast tanks are flooded. One I even recall had steel balls held in place by electromagnets so the ballast would be dropped automatically in case of power loss. Do military submarines (historic or modern) have a similar feature? The sub in Das Boot apparently didn't, they were unsure if they'd be able to surface by blowing their tanks but succeeded in the end, if they could have simply jettisoned ballast blocks it would have been much easier.

@@quillmaurer6563 those slashed bulges on the sides of the sub are fuel tanks. Ballast tanks are inside the hull.

You know what's utterly ironic? Olympic's port side propeller was actually Britannic's while the one on the starboard side came from Titanic.

You'll love the story of the RMS Carmania.

@@vintagethrifter2114 what happened with her?

In the Royal Navy salutes are rendered palm downward to conceal dirt and grime. In the other armed forces it’s palm outward.

@@vilo_h5541 Most major navies follow the RN salute.

Not the Only. Olympic’s panoramic windows at stern in B deck had a larger lenght than Titanic’s. Her bridge had less height, her B deck was wide open, etc.

​@@jeffhouston7585 Sim, Sim, acho que diretores e Produtores deveriam conhecer mais os Navios que eles querem usar em Seus Filmes, no Filme do Titanic de 1997 e na Novela do Britannic de 2005 os Produtores e Diretores das duas Produções foram bem Fiéis aos projetos Originais e a aparência desses Navios. Como uma pessoa que é apaixonada pelo Olympic, acho que o pouco de Vislumbre que nós deveríamos ter dele em um possível filme deveria ser fiel ao Navio Original, muito triste isso. Yes, Yes, I think directors and Producers should know more about the Ships they want to use in Their Films, in the 1997 Titanic Film and the 2005 Britannic Soap Opera, the Producers and Directors of both Productions were very Faithful to the Original projects and the appearance of these Ships. As a person who is passionate about Olympic, I think that the little Glimpse we should have of him in a possible film should be faithful to the Original Ship, very sad.

​@@jeffhouston7585 Sim, Sim, acho que diretores e Produtores deveriam conhecer mais os Navios que eles querem usar em Seus Filmes, no Filme do Titanic de 1997 e na Novela do Britannic de 2005 os Produtores e Diretores das duas Produções foram bem Fiéis aos projetos Originais e a aparência desses Navios. Como uma pessoa que é apaixonada pelo Olympic, acho que o pouco de Vislumbre que nós deveríamos ter dele em um possível filme deveria ser fiel ao Navio Original, muito triste isso. Yes, Yes, I think directors and Producers should know more about the Ships they want to use in Their Films, in the 1997 Titanic Film and the 2005 Britannic Soap Opera, the Producers and Directors of both Productions were very Faithful to the Original projects and the appearance of these Ships. As a person who is passionate about Olympic, I think that the little Glimpse we should have of him in a possible film should be faithful to the Original Ship, very sad.

There is another problem in this film too, which is the way in which Olympic sank the U-103, here in this scene Olympic sinks the U-103, scratching with his propellers making the water enter, but in reality the way in which Olympic sank the U-103 was totally different. Olympic entered a Perpendicular Route to U-103 and sliced it in half.

Probably would have caused some damage, but the propeller blades are probably much tougher than the sub's outer shell (not the pressure hull) so damage was likely minimal. But those on board certainly would have felt something, if not vibration from a damaged propeller they certainly would have felt it whacking the sub. Would have scared the piss out of anyone not knowing what was happening, but probably those on the bridge who were intentionally ramming the sub would have been celebrating a pretty definitive and brutal kill. Which brings up another question: Which propellers killed more people, Olympic's (on purpose) or Britannic's (by accident)? Titanic's don't have a kill count, at least not directly.

they are brother and sister

​@SS Burgundy Productions but this model is the Titanic, just repainted, you can see by the upper deck being open for only the rear end, while the Olympic's upper deck was open the full length of the ship. The lifeboat count is also a factor.

Imagine if you're just chillin' in the Atlantic and then the Titanic of all things turns up, rams you and wrecks your boat.

@@MajoradeMayhem well I wouldn't be overly joyful

Exactly, and from the starboard view we see of the ship, her lifeboat count of 16 boats under davits is identical to the count on her maiden voyage. In reality, by the time Olympic was carrying US Troops across the Atlantic as shown here, her decks were completely filled with lifeboats, barely room to even stand on the deck.