I agree, each to there own, problem is, that the effect of that cause, in a world full of prejudice, specially amongst followers of major religions, will most likely give you some bad experiences, especially if you want a approval stamp from others, as the messages I also get from this clip, don't mix in the two things, keep your sexuality private don't push it on others, who you should know are conditioned to believe it is evil or nasty, or they might just be ignorant, unless you do want the effect that follows that action, its like going out in front of a speeding truck running a red light because you got the law or right on your side IMHO sadly the world is not perfect and there are division everywhere, don't be a fool and let yourself become victim to that because of feelings

no

@@user-yv8su2rq1p YES

@@user-yv8su2rq1p Not an argument

Juan Oyola the same

Juan Of Old

=D we don’t force anyone to be in our religion! But thanks for saying this😁😁😁😁

@@-Beauty_Lover- he never said he was forced dumbo

@@MkMk-ty3hm Calm down I was just stating a fact. Like I wasn't even being rude about it and plus this was 8 MONTHS ago.

@purehindustani what does Hinduism say about homosexuality?

​@@santbhindranwalejidefanche8767it accepts them

It’s false lies. Sikhs don’t allow homosexuals

I feel sorry for the your parents..

@@nicksam305 you are nobody to feel sorry about my parents, live your own life and don't care about others 🙏

​@@nicksam305i feel for ur teachers to failed to give u proper education 😢

Khusre cant be Sikh

eww man

Øystein A. Oh man that must be so difficult bro 😔😔

LGBTQ can’t be Sikh 😂😂

@coz4rt472 I guess you don't understand English.

@@kamaldeepsingh2126 im actually born in america and i think you cant read punjabi because our gurus told us to stay in our natural form. lol gays cant be sikh

@@coz4rt472 🇨🇦

@@kamaldeepsingh2126 u dont make sense

Sikh Khalsa Don't misguide people , Sikh Anand Karaj is only between a SIkh man and a Sikh woman and that is the only scenario that it will be considered valid use.

+Sikh Khalsa What about a woman who can't give birth for some medical reason? She is accepted and can get married? What about a couple who can't produce and "give birth to life", how are they any different than a homosexual couple in marriage?

Sikhism at the root, more spiritual. Sikhism is also very progressive and tolerant, so the whole man can only be with woman thinking is not Sikhism. We love people, regardless of their sexuality, gender, race, caste, etc. Foundation of Sikhism is about acceptance. Two gays can raise a child lovingly and God would see nothing wrong with that.

+Jasbir Kaur Villaschi I disagree. Even if it was originally like that, God is accepting and so is Sikhism and would not see anything wrong with two Sikhs getting married with commitment and utmost respect to Sri Guru Granth Sahib Ji.

really you know the mind of Guru ji and Waheguru then why do you need to become a sikh ? A sikh follows the Guru not the other way around .. if that is not palatable to you then maybe you need to find another path. Sikhi is about finding Waheguru and gaining union nothing else. The anand Karaj is the binding of two souls in mutual support to reaching the true Husband Akal Purakh not a moh/kaam driven relationship.

spacekangaroo Agreed. I love my wife with or without a sex life. If our genitals somehow changed to Barbie parts... I wouldn’t want to be here any less.

Are you still alive

Nice to

The more honest answer indeed, per traditional Sikhi (vs westernized Bhajan wishful Sikhism). The clarity is appreciated, so people at least do not leave here mis-led.

Could you show some examples to prove your claims about Sikhism?

@@vulpes7079 Yes, here are some Gurmat based videos from Basics of Sikhi: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/ibd-oMej1tHde58.html, kzfaq.info/get/bejne/ndZjbL2ErZqwfHk.html, kzfaq.info/get/bejne/l62KdrN8nq_cg3k.html, kzfaq.info/get/bejne/asCkaNt1qJ3XgoU.html, kzfaq.info/get/bejne/apx3hpl8kt2sdX0.html

@@singhv5 I meant the SGGS verses. They should be way easier to find and read

@@vulpes7079 Yea, here you go: Bhai Gurdas Jee - Vaar 6, Pauri 8 ਏਕਾ ਨਾਰੀ ਜਤੀ ਹੋਇ ਪਰ ਨਾਰੀ ਧੀ ਭੈਣ ਵਖਾਣੈ। Having one women as wife he (the Sikh) is a celibate and considers any other’s wife as his daughter or a sister. Clearly, a Guru’s Sikh (if male) is allowed only one woman as his spouse, vice versa a Sikh woman is allowed only one man as hers. We can argue and debate that there is no mention of not being allowed to marry within the same gender. However, the word “ਨਾਰੀ” clearly means “woman” and in this Vaar it does not in any way refer to a woman having another woman as her spouse. Lets look at another Vaar. Bhai Gurdas Jee - Vaar 34, Pauri 21 ਨਾਰਿ ਭਤਾਰਹੁ ਬਾਹਰੀ ਸੁਖਿ ਸੇਜ ਨਾ ਚੜੀਐ। Without husband a woman cannot enjoy pleasures of bed. This means two things. It doesn’t say that a woman cannot enjoy a bed without a man, it says “without a husband”. So firstly, a Sikh (male or female) can have a physical relationship only with their married spouse (via Anand Karaj). Secondly, it clearly talks about a woman and her husband, not a woman and “her wife”, not a man and “his husband”. Sahib Sri Guru Amar Daas Paatshaah Jee says in Raag Soohee on Ang 788: ਧਨ ਪਿਰੁ ਏਹਿ ਨ ਆਖੀਅਨਿ ਬਹਨਿ ਇਕਠੇ ਹੋਇ ॥ ਏਕ ਜੋਤਿ ਦੁਇ ਮੂਰਤੀ ਧਨ ਪਿਰੁ ਕਹੀਐ ਸੋਇ ॥੩॥ They are not said to be husband and wife, who merely sit together. They alone are called husband and wife, who have one light in two bodies. ||3|| Here (from my limited understanding so please correct me) ਧਨ refers to the wife and ਪਿਰੁ means husband. Sahib Sri Guru Nanak Dev Paatshaah Jee Maharaj says in Asa Ki Vaar on Ang 473 (one of the most favorite Shabads quoted to teach how Sikhi is about gender equality) ਭੰਡਿ ਜੰਮੀਐ ਭੰਡਿ ਨਿੰਮੀਐ ਭੰਡਿ ਮੰਗਣੁ ਵੀਆਹੁ ॥ From woman, man is born; within woman, man is conceived; to woman he is engaged and married. ਭੰਡਹੁ ਹੋਵੈ ਦੋਸਤੀ ਭੰਡਹੁ ਚਲੈ ਰਾਹੁ ॥ Woman becomes his friend; through woman, the future generations come. ਭੰਡੁ ਮੁਆ ਭੰਡੁ ਭਾਲੀਐ ਭੰਡਿ ਹੋਵੈ ਬੰਧਾਨੁ ॥ When his woman dies, he seeks another woman; to woman he is bound. ਸੋ ਕਿਉ ਮੰਦਾ ਆਖੀਐ ਜਿਤੁ ਜੰਮਹਿ ਰਾਜਾਨ ॥ So why call her bad? From her, kings are born. ਭੰਡਹੁ ਹੀ ਭੰਡੁ ਊਪਜੈ ਭੰਡੈ ਬਾਝੁ ਨ ਕੋਇ ॥ From woman, woman is born; without woman, there would be no one at all. ਨਾਨਕ ਭੰਡੈ ਬਾਹਰਾ ਏਕੋ ਸਚਾ ਸੋਇ ॥ O Nanak, only the True Lord is without a woman. Now notice how clear this Shabad is. The question “ਸੋ ਕਿਉ ਮੰਦਾ ਆਖੀਐ” is put to the men who look upon women as inferior. Why see her as inferior when “ਭੰਡਿ ਮੰਗਣੁ ਵੀਆਹੁ”, when a woman is the one you (you men) are engaged and married to. You men are bound with women “ਭੰਡਿ ਹੋਵੈ ਬੰਧਾਨੁ”. Bhagat Kabeer Jee says in Raag Gond on Ang 872: ਜੈਸੇ ਮਾਤ ਪਿਤਾ ਬਿਨੁ ਬਾਲੁ ਨ ਹੋਈ ॥ Without a mother or father there is no child. In the pangti below, it is clearly stated that the physical relation is between a man and woman, not a man and man or woman and woman. ਇਸਤਰੀ ਪੁਰਖ ਕਾਮਿ ਵਿਆਪੇ ਜੀਉ ਰਾਮ ਨਾਮ ਕੀ ਬਿਧਿ ਨਹੀ ਜਾਣੀ ||

May Akaal purkh waheguru bless you,,

it used to be legal for 2000 years then the victorian morality was imposed on us 1

@@Vastilious it depended on where you were and when, but yes absolutely the ancient world was not necessarily homophobic

no

No Anand Karaj is not allowed for same sex couples. Other than that they are free to live in any society just like anyone else.

As long as* but yes I absolutely agree

Waheguru from a trans sikhi

Waheguru from a trans sikhi

guruka singh, he is his brother