Pleased to see CSIS and these “Asian law” scholars and observers unhappy with the proposed legislation.
@fatdoi0035 ай бұрын
as if your own country don't have national security law..... then why charge and convict those Jan6 people?
@wongcy7134 ай бұрын
We don't know how HK will use article 23. But the world had seen how US had used its national security laws for a wide range of issues Why don't CSIS the unofficial mouthpiece of CIA enlighten us on how is article 23 vs US security laws.
@benombati65015 ай бұрын
CIA propaganda at it again😂😂🤡🗑️💩
@user-zn5nx4uj3p5 ай бұрын
CIA moved its operation Taiwan now. Thank god HK will not become the next Ukraine, but Taiwan is at risk
@ladylizabeth4 ай бұрын
Wrong law at the wrong time Tom? Obviously you are as ignorant about Article 23 as you are in the National Security Laws that are legislated in other countries. I encourage a closer examination of Article 23 to appreciate its intent and structure in relation to similar laws elsewhere.
@LuisRios-pw4ig5 ай бұрын
More tools to assert total control of the city is clearly one of the objectives; but, what is wrong with that? It is a Chinese city, is it not?
@asdf839175 ай бұрын
Based on Sino-British joint agreement , HK is using one country two systems. Hong Kong should be have their own law that different from China. If the "control " is actually protect the fellow citizens and its government , it would be OK; but now the government using this to take away basic human right.
@jackytang36835 ай бұрын
one country two systems by joint agreement,but one country is conerstone for two systems, if there are chaos or problem disputed ,China central goverment has all rights on HK by basic law and China constitution@@asdf83917
@qingzhou99834 ай бұрын
@@asdf83917 This is all because people in Hong Kong failed to write their own National Security Law according the Basic Law. But people in Macau did that long time ago. And everything has been fine there!