hahaha

Thanks Michael, just like any experiment, he is still forcefully claiming the one mass at twice the distance, should come out twice as fast. And you are right, he is now ignoring my epxeriments once again. He is only focusing on Ian. I will continue doing this with different levers and different weights, different rubber bands and also springs. When the results are all consistent, well, that must be a sign right? Something that we might call 'proof' perhaps? No matter how many times i will repeat it in whatever way, mine will all be garbage and that one particular experiment done by Stephen is the one and only decisive experiment and proof of!

​@@disparslab326You can never convince a religious zealot that there is no god Dispar. He will continue to claim free energy, as momentum is not energy and he doesn't understand the difference. Today he claimed Ians probes rotating costs energy, yet the hypocrite doesn't find it a problem in Steve's experiment? Have a good one my friend. 👍😊

Apparently, youtube's algorithm has decided to make this video go viral, eventhough that was not my intention. This video (as well as many others) are response video's to a certain person who firmly believes that conventional science is broken, especially when it comes to conservation of momentum and energy. According to this person, kinetic energy is a fable and momentum is only real energy. He has been proposing many different types of experiments that should prove him right, but i have been providing many experiments that prove him wrong and conventional science right. The lever experiment is one of his many experimental proposals .

So his claim is that when you place a 1mass object, twice as far from the fulcrum of the lever, that it will be launched twice as fast than the 2mass object at half the distance from the fulcrum. The truth is however that it will only go 1.41 times faster (square root of 2) theoretically.