Tbh?Wth

@@user-ip4pp1nk9e A Central Powers victory

@@user-ip4pp1nk9e I don't think anybody can realistically argue that liberal democracy has been a positive force for humanity. The elevation of American power and the decrease in European influence has also been incredibly destabilising to the protection of western civilization

@@JustTheFacts45 This is actually not too far out. The German Empire was the most democratic nation in all Europe, ironically even more than Great Britain since Germany had universal male suffrage and allowed the election of local officials and representatives for the Reichstag (basically a parliament.) So yeah, Anglo-led Democracy is kind of a folly and the German Empire's systems not mutually exclusive with liberal figures like Friedrich Ebert being a Constitutional Monarch and moderate Social-Democrat all the way. It is even reasonable to imagine a more cautious approach over longer would've bore better fruits than today's.

⁠@@JustTheFacts45 Countries with liberal democracies have seen more internal stability and economic development than countries without a liberal democracy.

you know austria hungary would have collapsed, and so would have the ottomans?

@@Sebaleroma probably not, if they had triumphed in the First World War, they would have had German support to stay afloat. Berlin would hardly welcome the disintegration of its two great allies.

@@d.m.8465 no, the Austrio-Hungarians would probably last a decade of two longer, ottoman's would have collapsed shortly after the war ended

@@WhoIsAj. No: The Habsburgs were experts in surviving, the empire disintegrated at the request of the United States and France, if Germany had triumphed the Austrian empire would have survived, perhaps as a satellite ally, something similar would have happened to the Ottomans since they were reinvigorated with Young Turks.

@@d.m.8465Austria-Hungary started collapsing near the end of the war, peace treaty wasn’t signed till 1919 and also countries in the balkans basically immediately started attacking eachother trying to get their claims

is that even possible in that mod?

Hoi4 moment

@@utkumat Yes! I did it like this: 4 Heavy Artillery is the meta (much like in Great War and REDUX) if you want to do anything with your military in the 1900 - 1919 start dates due to time-proportional debuffs, but as you're against weak enemies starting up you only need 2 Heavy Arty and 4 Infantries on your template. Begin with Focuses "An Old System for a New Age," and whichever of the following 2 choices depending on how you want your Mexico to swing. I go for "Never Change a Running System" to maintain Non-Aligned. I began by going after Central America and the Hispaniolan nations right when the Boxer Rebellion spikes World Tension, justifying on Guatemala and taking the 150pp "War Propaganda." In Guatemala you just snake into the capital. Pay attention to your War Support and Political Power (abundant in this mod) to go into Partial Mobilization right as you can! Once you justify in Honduras, send 4 of your Cavalries for a naval invasion on the province behind your new Guatemalan front preparing a 2-Heavy Arty, 4 Inf. division to help you punch in case Honduras turns around and fights your invasion. Stopping your first, frontal attack works to stop it though, but you should try to not give them a chance pausing right as you land, sending 2 to backstab their divisions and other 2 into Tenguncinapa. El Salvador is tougher (as usual with HOI4), but nothing you can't manage with another 2-H. Arty division. Nicaragua and Costa Rica are automatic once you have even 1. Before going for Hispaniola. I must mention your production goals since starting the game, abridged. All Mills on guns, swapping for the "modern" 1900 equipment until you've fulfilled the attrition losses of training your starting army. You must delete (demobilize mechanic) 2 of your garrisons just as you're about to cover it, but just take note of the 20-60 you still needed in spite of the new stockpiles. I delete them when I go for my campaign for an extra about 1k guns, but you should try to reach 2k guns for actual Garrison needs. After that, use all your 4 Mills on Heavy Arty. If you justify on Honduras AFTER capitulating Guatemala you should have enough time to start training your 4-2 division explained above so it's ready and nearly, if not fully equipped when you fire into Honduras. You should get enough guns to return on investment on Nicaragua & Costa Rica, so maintain your 4 Mills H. Arty production, using 1 for guns once again if you run low. Once you capitulate Costa Rica, justify on Haiti and Dominican Republic one after the other. Prepare a smart Naval Invasion into Haiti, sending 3 units right into Port Au-Prince to distract their unit so you can land your Arty divisions on the provinces above and below. Once they land, send them to back up your bait forces on the capital. Haiti will surrender in a few days. After that, preferably take the most trained divisions and sent them to the mainland on a Defensive Line or something to train your rookies somewhat on Dominican Republic. They will not be a match for your Arty divisions. After consolidating the weaker nations, do as you wish. Using your starting Cruiser you can go after Ecuador on a hard-fought (preferably 4 H. Arty now) naval landing, go after Venezuela with some preparing time before Tension reaches 50% (due to events it skips from 51 to 49), or wait until the Russo-Japanese War's WT spike to take the fight to Colombia (though Panama will have split, and the US will have guaranteed them. Cancel their war *using the Toolpack mod.* Rise of Nations is full of hard-scripts and ahistorical shenanigans even with Historical.) Just remember to use Naval Invasion a-plenty in Peru to take the capital and Arquepia, one set up with patience to cut up Chile, as they DO have a fleet, constructing 2 Naval Bases on the lower Peru coast supply hubs to launch it, and only use 4-H. Arty divisions on Uruguay since they're tough as nails to break with a Naval Invasion, your only recourse if you don't go for Argentina first (which I don't recommend. WT is too high after that, and Britain or France, occasionally in the Entente, may guarantee.) Other than the above tips, you're set after Centroamérica and Hispaniola are yours! Just remember to pay attention to Trains after a while with 2 Mills on Armored Trains when you start to lack. Good luck on forming the Patria Grande (and pray the US doesn't join the Central Powers like in my case)!

the new order more like the old order

sounds a llitle bit roblox rise of nations

Edgy af.

@@Samuil-iq6ebbro Germany and Austria weren’t bad Ottoman Empire was, after the war Austria would’ve probably democratized as Karl the emperor was a progressive and hated war Germany wanted too stop all the wars and be the protecter of Europe from foreign ideologies like communism and other ultra nationalist ideologies

@@5nhyfiery Lmao 🤡☝️. Starting the war, invading Belgium, Septemberprogramm, Polish Frontier Strip, Unrestricted Submarine Warfare, Brest-Litovsk etc..

@@Samuil-iq6eb looks like we got the french simp here

@@Samuil-iq6ebthe Austrians started it and the Germans escalated it

Egy hatalmas csalódás hogy nem győztük le a pökkendi csigazabálókat!

Lmao u would have been in a way worse position xd. The Hungarian elite would have continued to utterly abuse its rural population

@@Boretheory atleast we would get to have our land. That's what matters to me

​@@attilaabonyi8879based

@@attilaabonyi8879 it would have still been reduced but not to such a big extent

Das Beste Ende🇩🇪🇩🇪

Ich stimme zu Herr Kaiser! Lässt uns zurückkehren zu guter deutscher und preußischer Tradition.. Weg von diesem Nazi terror.. Wir waren einst ein Land der Dichter und Denker. Der Wissenschaft, des Handwerks, Der Kraft und des Stolzes! Heute sind wir ein Land der Vollidioten und verblendeten. Möge Tradition, Geschichte und tiefe Kultur in unser Land zurückkehren. Wir haben die Welt geformt mit unseren europäischen Brüdern. Deutschland, aufrichten! Gott mit uns.. ⚫⚪🔴 🇩🇪🇩🇪🇩🇪

Ja!

Ein besseres Ende hätte man sich nicht vorstellen können. Hand in Hand mit Verbündeten in Frisch erobertes Territorium einzumarschieren... Dafür gibt es keine Worte, ein Gedicht müsste es mindestens sein.

As if "French honor" had ever been a thing.

@@charmyzard Well, True

@@Blorp858Yeah only True for people who dont know history

@@soppal_1697 Napoleon was amazing don't get me wrong but after him the french are really incompetent

@@Blorp858 not really napoleon III even if he lost very largely against prussia still defeated russia did well in the economy defeated austria (and at the same time it is thanks to him that italy is unified ) then the third republic which defeated Germany during the First World War with little land aid during the Second World War certainly we lost the first time against Germany only and only because of our generals (the French soldiers have also distinguished themselves by saving the buttocks of the British expeditionary force in Lille where they resisted 4 days surrounded and outnumbered by lacking heavy equipment and without tanks and by only surrendering once their ammunition was completely exhausted and in Dunquerque where they constituted the main defense) moreover a German general made a report to his staff saying: the French soldiers attacked in numbers of 10 to 1 and even succeeded in advancing, Hitler himself said that the French soldier was the second best in Europe (after the German of course but this remains a major concession due to the fact that Hitler did not put the northern countries before the French) and despite all the liberation and in Italy, where the French constituted the main force in Italy, in the south of France and we even managed to take the fuhrer's lair in Bavaria, without forgetting that the French played a very important role in North Africa. then after the Second World War we have the French nuclear program (the first truly independent in Europe since the English needed the Americans and even today they cannot launch nuclear bombs without the agreement of the United States) result today France is the most independent country in the European Union with the most powerful army in Europe (European Union) active participation in all operations in the world (notably the fact that France has secure all of the Sahel, a huge region in Africa with only 5,000 men where the African armies of 6 countries have not succeeded) A not bad economy, the nuclear bomb, a most powerful arms industry in Europe after Russia (but not for long) the top 3 in world arms exports and on the way to becoming 2nd ahead of Russia

Tbf, as a German I still think that it was right that you got Posen and Westprussia back. Excluding Danzig. Because most people in those regions were Poles.

@@citywokbesitzer6834 Yes, looking at the Weimar borders, it was a perfect representation of where Poles and Germans lived, its sad that we would have never gotten those lands, but I think it was definitely better than other outcomes like we have today, where ethnic cleansing made us have borders where half of our land area was mostly never inhabited by Poles until Stalin did the forced migration process which killed nearly one million Poles, and 500k(ish) Germans aswell. In the end there was no great outcome of the Second World War on the eastern front, 30 million had died and was forever stuck in a stagnant economic, and quality of life, and authoritarian communism didn't help either.

​@@RownosccPoland shall have its revenge one day

I have to disagree with you on two points. First, historical precedent. As you most likely know, in the late 1700s Austria, Russia, and Prussia carved away at Poland-Lithuania's territory. Sure, Prussia isn't Germany, it was only a part of Germany. However, it was probably the most important entity of Germany even before unification as it held massive military and political sway over Northern Germany. There's a reason why Prussian ideals were adopted across much of Germany, and there's a reason why the allies wanted to destroy any semblance of Prussia after WWII. If Germany is supposedly a protector of Poland, then one would think such a policy would extent to Prussia since Prussia, as previously mentioned, was one of if not the most important nation within Germany. However, the Prussians would instead join in on the carving up of Poland, not only taking the regions that would form the border that existed between Russia and Germany in 1914, but the Prussians went so far as to take much of central Poland. From 1795 to 1806, Poland's capital was Prussian, not Polish. Then we have to consider the fact that Germany was keen on expanding its territory and influence across Europe. If Germany simply wanted to be a sovereign and independent nation, then it would've focused upon being friendly to much of Europe, kept itself out of colonialism, and focused mostly upon civilian growth. Germany did none of this. I'm not just blaming Wilhelm II here, there is good evidence to suggest that Germany's aggressive and expansionist policies go all the way back to the early years of Germany. The concert of Europe may have guaranteed peace, but it most certainly guaranteed that any future war would've been devastating as any war between any two European powers would drag everyone in through a combination of alliances, and a heaping dose of nationalism. This also meant that if Germany won such a war, they would be able to secure massive swaths of land for themselves. This led to Germany focusing heavily upon building up its military capabilities to fight off its foes as well as expanding its colonial ventures in order to secure rare resources as well as keep as many fronts open to tie down's Germany's enemies. Remember, there's a reason why Germany began a naval arms race with Britain, secured itself land in Africa and Asia, and made plans to fight a world war years in advance. Then there's my second point, which may seem small but is way more important to my argument. The following quote comes from the Smithsonian's visual history of WWI. Although its important to realize this is by no means a highly detailed text, its also important to remember that the Smithsonian is one of the biggest and most reliable sources on history in the world. The quote I am referring to comes on page 203 in a subsection titled "Germany's New Order". The following section describes Germany's internal situation from 1916 onward as military and political power and Germany began to shift towards Generals Hindenburg and Ludendorff. Within this section there's is a subsection labeled "Conquered Territories", and what it has to say about Germany's plans with its Eastern territories is not only creepy, but it also pays a striking resemblance to Germany's policies in WWII. The quote reads as follows: "One of Lundendorff's initiatives was a program of Germanization, sending German teachers into local schools, in preparation for the future mass arrival of German colonists. General Hans Von Beseler, the Governor-General of German-Occupied Poland from 1915, proposed a scheme to shift two millions Poles and Jews out of a broad strip of Polish territory bordering Germany and replace them with German settlers - a program that had become official German policy by March 1918." This quote gives a better understanding of why so many officials from the German Empire would find themselves within the Nazi party; not only condoning their policies, but accepting them full on. If a people are removed from their land, and their culture swept from the hills, are they really being protected? Remember, the policy that was mentioned in the quote became Germany policy near the end of the war. Suppose the Germans won. I leave you here to reflect, and to think.

@@persononyoutube8666 Thank you for telling me this, though I do have some comments. I'm guessing in your first point the lands you're referring to are the lands that Prussia had before the Napoleonic War. The only issue is that the Weimar lands are about the closest thing to dividing the Poles and Germanic people that live in Eastern Prussia, except for a few border regions like Poznan which have a somewhat large minority of Germanic people, and of course Danzig, which was obviously always Germanic. But back to what I was saying, any lands outside the Weimar borders (except Danzig) were never really ethnically German except for a few minorities, keep in mind those lands were the lands partitioned by Germany to connect East Prussia to Pomerania and the rest of Germany and still show that on a ethnic map of Poland and Germany in 1920, and yes I did look up if Germans in Poland were forcefully migrated after WWI (like what happened to them after WWII) and I couldn't find much, so go for disproving me on that. For your second point though, reading more into the Act of 5th November I'm disappointed in myself for being so ignorant, I've never even heard about it, and I'm honestly so disgusted, I guess its just been hidden in history because it never happened, thank you though for pointing it out to me, I'll try to educated myself more before making controversial statements like this.

This needs to be heard.

True

😡😡🇷🇺🇫🇷🇬🇧

Me too 🇹🇷🤝🇩🇪🇦🇹🇭🇺🇧🇬

I agree The allies were very shitty in the first world war. Not to compare with the second world war. The British blockade killed many more civilians than the German submarines. The Germans even warned in public newspapers that they will attack certain civilian ships and that the US people should beware as they will attack this ship. Initially, the Germans even gave the ships plenty of time to evacuate. But they had to stop that later as it made them very vulnerable to consistently saying where they were attacking to protect civilians. The Germans attacked civilians in Belgium because the Belgian soldiers disguised themselves as civilians to surprise the Germans. The Germans didn't just invade Belgium. They asked beforehand if they could go through peacefully. You have to see this war from every side as there was no good or bad. Just like before the war. The Germans felt attacked from all sides. Just as Russia was rearming, it was over. The USA was not "neutral" either, as is often said in American schools. Most American settlers were German, yet the US consistently supplied the Allies and broke their neutrality. They tried to ban German language and culture. Every piece of German was removed. Although the settlers had nothing to do with the country politically. For the fact that the Germans made the USA more or less great by producing the largest families in the USA or inventions like jeans or the beginning of the gold rush, they were hated and sometimes even chased away. Not a single president stood up for this group of Americans, who really did something for the country with their working-class mentality. Allied propaganda made everyone in the world hate the Germans. All the great powers allied against the Germans and yet the Germans almost won. It was a period of weeks. If the usa had entered the war a few weeks later.. it would have been dark for the allies. Despite the British blockade, which left the Germans without supplies and one planet against them, the Germans almost won. Shows how overpowered they are. After the war they were held responsible for everything. But we're talking about the bad bad Germans. Don't get me wrong, the Germans screwed up too. But they also had to fight against a planet. That doesn't justify the actions, but makes it more understandable.

​@@frontgamet.v1892As a Hungarian, I agree. We fought on the same side, and I do not see the Germans as the bad guys, it is more like the British or the Franche, because of the peace terms, and the blocade, and the unfair colonizaton. I do not understand, what we did hungarians to get the worst peace in all of the central powers, but it happenned. We can not go along with this peace in 100 years. It is the most brutal peace what country can get, except annexation. Thats why we hate the French people as hell, because they were forced these borders, to get new big (friendly) countrys. I hope some day they will get a peace dictate that will lose there 2/3 land and 1/3 of the population of there historical borders for 100years, and I am not thinking about french guyana or something.

​@@frontgamet.v1892and the allies started the first great war too!

​@@Ussonan-Foderation2016What about Poland, we didn't start two world wars because we are good I know this cause I'm from Poland 🇵🇱

​@@frontgamet.v1892Belgium said no. Germans invaded. Good guys my ass...

This absolutely would NOT have prevented a second World War. The Central Powers would have been just as harsh on the Entente as it was the other way around. We saw exactly how this worked out in our world, with dictatorships rising to power in the defeated countries.

@@EliteJax4180 I'm not pretty sure but what I'm sure about is that the people definitely needed the Kaiser because they were not ready for a republic. Maybe a victory with a couple more years German Empire COULD have prevented the 2nd WW or at least would have made it less terrible

@@justanaviationguy11Hmm, not gonna lie, I am of the opinion that WW1 was such a large mess that a second one was inevitable. No matter who won, I doubt that WW1 doesn't cause conflict in the future. And while you say it could make it less terrible, by that same process, it could also make it MUCH worse. In the end, we'll never know.

@@EliteJax4180 there would likely be a second war, but it would almost certianly be much smaller and with a lot less doing genocide. and everything after that would be much more peaceful and stable

@@kaiserfranzjoseph9311 Absolutely not. Monarchy and messy diplomacy caused the first World War. We can blame it on Serbian nationalism, and sure, not exactly wrong. We could also blame the massive scale of the war on Germany. We could blame Russia, hungry for a victory following the hell that was the reigning Tsar Nicholas. But in the end, the 1st World War was caused by messy diplomacy in Europe and unfortunate decisions by reigning monarchs. Even with a German victory in World War One, all that would do is stir up French and English radicalism, as we both know the designs Germany had on French and English colonies. In the end, WWI was a shitshow, caused by reigning monarchs and extreme nationalism shown on all sides, and no victory, whether it be Entente or Central Powers, could've navigated the mess that was the years between. Now, regarding the genocide of WW2... I promise you, there almost certainly would've been another World War as brutal if not moreso as a direct result of a Central Powers victory in World War 1. The extremes that brought Germany to its knees before fascists would've been repeated in both France and Britain, and who knows what happens as a result. Though, we will never truly know how a timeline like this goes. Maybe I am alright. Maybe I am dreadfully wrong. In the end, a Central Powers victory in WW1 can only be speculated upon, and I just don't see it ending any more positively than an Entente victory. I will give you one word that led to the hells that were WW1 & 2: Ambition.

Funny joke

yes, but not for all,

Edgy af

@@WhoIsAj.your begging for someone to ask you why but I still want to know your logic

@@RatFrier2.0the German empire already had many of the policies of nazi Germany it just didn’t apply them because it didn’t have territory or population to do it to. They already committed genocides in Africa and were racist towards the Poles. I 100% predict that when Wilhelm would have gotten older his mental sanity would have worsened especially considering how unstable he was as a monarch

The Cyndicalists are too busy slaughtering the borguasie

I see, you're a man of culture as well

and socialism might just win!

Germany helped and support the Bolsheviks

Turkey Is not central and not european😂

@@roderik3059 Turks are not Europeans anyway I showed ww1 germans and their allies

​@@roderik3059The Ottoman Empire fought with The central powers dumbass

@@roderik3059they are, read a history book, but they are Eurasian not European

@@the_mariocrafter They are not Europeans in culture, race, religion and anything. So no, keep crying but don't falsify History.

The "monarchic" side of the war.😂

@@Samuil-iq6eb for real

Why? Germany would have imposed minor economic and military restrictions because they wanted a united economic union in Europe. This is essentially a monarchical EU

​@@thegreatestoctopus9739 After such a bloodbath you can be sure they wouldn't have let France rearm. Brest Litovsk treaty pretty much give a glimpse of what fate awaited the allies if their capitals were taken.

@@cpp3221 not exactly true. Sure rearming might not have been allowed, but that's not necessarily bad, and it won't be to the extent that the entente forced upon Germany. Also Brest-Litovsk was originally pretty good, only Poland and the Baltic's as well as neutrality in Finland and the caucuses, it was only when smarty pants Trotsky fucked up things hard that Germany occupied Ukraine, Belarus and Georgia

@@thegreatestoctopus9739 Brest-Litovsk original plan was still destroying hundreds of years of imperial construction. Let's not ignore that neutrality of area of a country basically means "you do not have any sovereignety here, if I decide to, I can do whatever I want here". That initial version still sounds a lot like Versaille. A new defeat would just have condemned France to be a third rate power with only it's history left and more territories lost. Once again, Germany would have made sure to dominate in the long run after such a long war. Which is everything but France's interest. A more industrialized and populated Germany against a weakened France would just have created a unilateral type of relationship. The kind of domination which would have given us a French Hitler maybe, at least, the radicals idea which would have arisen inevitably from the defeat wouldn't have been good for France in the long run. I'd say, honesty I'm more happy about the timeline we got that a lost WW1.

For me Austro-Hungarian Empire was one of the most normal countrys in this war

What do you mean?

The only difference in our world and this world is that democracy isn’t ensured to survive

​@@brenrmad6282 Much better, because this way we save ourselves from many problems that modern democracy has.

​@@Izco06 much better because the nazis Would not exist

Hear, hear!

How many times do we have to teach u this lesson, old man

@@mavcaguila I'm not old, also why do you mean 'we'. Last time I checked we are stronger and you have numbers

Bro is next painter

bro what do you think france and the UK would be saying in this ending

but yeah it is sad the Kaiserreich is increasingly conflated with Nazism these days, especially in germany

...that secretly moved amunition to Britain

@@chronotaurus and Russia doesn’t give af if we send Ukraine aid?

@@Am3rican_Empire Russia is quite atomized society to speak for all of it with someone Russian

Or never sent mexico the message to fight usa

Lol, Germany was doomed from the start. The US didn't determine anything in the war.

True I was also thinking about that when I first saw the flag from Austria Hugary

The allies were very shitty in the first world war. Not to compare with the second world war. The British blockade killed many more civilians than the German submarines. The Germans even warned in public newspapers that they will attack certain civilian ships and that the US people should beware as they will attack this ship. Initially, the Germans even gave the ships plenty of time to evacuate. But they had to stop that later as it made them very vulnerable to consistently saying where they were attacking to protect civilians. The Germans attacked civilians in Belgium because the Belgian soldiers disguised themselves as civilians to surprise the Germans. The Germans didn't just invade Belgium. They asked beforehand if they could go through peacefully. You have to see this war from every side as there was no good or bad. Just like before the war. The Germans felt attacked from all sides. Just as Russia was rearming, it was over. The USA was not "neutral" either, as is often said in American schools. Most American settlers were German, yet the US consistently supplied the Allies and broke their neutrality. They tried to ban German language and culture. Every piece of German was removed. Although the settlers had nothing to do with the country politically. For the fact that the Germans made the USA more or less great by producing the largest families in the USA or inventions like jeans or the beginning of the gold rush, they were hated and sometimes even chased away. Not a single president stood up for this group of Americans, who really did something for the country with their working-class mentality. Allied propaganda made everyone in the world hate the Germans. All the great powers allied against the Germans and yet the Germans almost won. It was a period of weeks. If the usa had entered the war a few weeks later.. it would have been dark for the allies. Despite the British blockade, which left the Germans without supplies and one planet against them, the Germans almost won. Shows how overpowered they are. After the war they were held responsible for everything. But we're talking about the bad bad Germans. Don't get me wrong, the Germans screwed up too. But they also had to fight against a planet. That doesn't justify the actions, but makes it more understandable.

yeah, the germans also screwed up allying the hellhole that is austria hungary@@frontgamet.v1892

It’s a sing, called house of the rising song, this is the German remix, it’s a English song

It is for many Europeans

Well I am a Anglo-Irish and I don’t mind this as the German Kaiser and King of Britain didn’t absolutely despise each over so Britain would have had reparations and loss of empire but it wouldn’t be as harsh as Germany hit it

as a Ukrainian this is the best ending for me

@@Gidochrome yeah, if we won ukraine was going to be independent too 😔

As an Italian, this is the worst ending ever

It was nothing 😊

Dam it we would have better tech and a stronger generation z

@@Italy66790 Also no nazis or holocaust

Kaiserreich

@@Italy66790fr gen z today is awful, im sad I’m one.

loop

The man in the high castle

I don't know about world war 1, but if you want to see a beautiful universe where the Germans won, there is a great series for you . I wrote above that you should defıniteliy watch it and give the series a chance.

Both germany winning ww1 and ww2 are good ending

I wouldn’t inflict Paris on my worse enemy.

No he didnt, original is by Ayden George

It’s just off of Google lol

@@thatnorthcarolinian can u do a one hour version of this please? its really good and I dont wanna keep replaying it lol

@@bobminon439 u can right click on the video screen and click on the replay video and then its going to keep replaying until u exit out

@@JM-gs8lg lesgo thanks

I think it's from Napoleon Total War Great War Mod, Indeed the graphic Is the same of the game

I think its literally off of google lol

@thatnorthcarolinian Ok, the German uniforms look more ww2 uniform