The increasing prices have impacted my plan to retire at 62, work part-time, and save for the future. I'm concerned about whether those who navigated the 2008 financial crisis had an easier time than I am currently experiencing. The combination of stock market volatility and a decrease in income is causing anxiety about whether I'll have sufficient funds for retirement.

I completely agree, which is why I think it's important to delegate decision-making responsibility to an investment coach. Underperformance is essentially unimaginable given their specialized experience and education, as well as the fact that each of their skills is focused on harnessing risk for its asymmetrical potential and controlling it as a buffer against certain unfavorable events. Working with an investment coach for over two years, I've made over $1.5 million

How can I reach this person?

Certainly, there are a handful of experts in the field. I've experimented with a few over the past years, but I've stuck with ‘’CAROL VIVIAN CONSTABLE” for about five years now, and her performance has been consistently impressive.She’s quite known in her field, look-her up.

Thanks a lot for this suggestion. I needed this myself, I looked her up, and I have sent her an email. I hope she gets back to me soon.

Its best if you buy growth/blue-chip/large caps stocks only. Also, as a newbie its advisable you work with an investment advisor to help set up a well-structured portfolio.

Apt!! I was self managing but suffered heavy losses in 2022 and i knew i couldn't continue like that, so i consulted a fiduciary financial advisor. By restructuring and diversifying my $620k portfolio with dividend-paying stocks, ETFs, Mutual funds and REITs, I significantly boosted my portfolio, achieving an annualized gain of 30%.

@@SeanTalkoff who is your advisr?

Vivian Carol Gioia is the licensed advisor I use. Just research the name. You’d find necessary details to work with a correspondence to set up an appointment.

Thank you for this Pointer. It was easy to find her handler, She seems very proficient and flexible. I booked a call session with her.

Not a lot of people are able to save that much in a lifetime. But now you are retired and depend on your investment, it’s best you redistribute your capital. To simplify the process, you could allocate your resources with the help of a financial advisor.

I’m closing in on retirement, too, and I have benefitted so much from using a financial advisor. I didn’t start early, so I knew the compound interest of index fund investing would not work for me. Funny how I pulled in more profit than some of my peers who had been investing for many years.

I really need help, please. Can I ask who the financial advisor you work with is?

Sure, the likes of the popular lady vivian jean wilhelm’’ does a good job. Just look up the name, you’d find details on the web to set up an appointment as she offers free consultations from first timers like yourself.

Thank you for this pointer. It was easy to find vivian handler, She seems very proficient and flexible. I booked a calI session with her.

Knowledgeable Investors know where and how to put money during a crisis in order to reduce risk and maximize returns. See a market strategist with experience if you are unable to manage these market conditions

Brent Johnson, who I think is an or the authority on de-dollarization, already said that the dollar will be replaced eventually. The question really is when and more importantly by what? The Fed & US & other governments will do what they need to do to kick the can down the road. The challenges is how should one invest, & what one’s current situation is? I am very interested in what or where should an average Joe should do just so they can get by, & not really get rich.

The market is not necessarily a rollercoaster if you know your way around the market, there are various opportunities in the present market to accrue good profit, If you are not too savvy with the market, just buy and hold on strong companies with good earnings, or consult with advisors on ETFs and actively managed funds.

I've been looking to get one, but have been kind of relaxed about it. Could you recommend your advis0r? I'll be happy to use some help.

There are a handful of experts in the field. I've experimented with a few over the past years, but I've stuck with ‘’Jennifer Leigh Hickman” for about five years now, and her performance has been consistently impressive. She’s quite known in her field, look her up.

Yup. Biggest ponzi scheme

Work for the gov’t. You don’t have to pay into social security and the pensions are often pretty good

@@J3LVN1 "work" for the government

@@thedopplereffect00 Lol, getting a government job in IT was viewed as the golden goose by my college classmates. Per testimonials from a few who got those jobs, there was next to no oversight, no accountability and practically no risk of ever being fired. Basically just show up and don't make waves and you can collect a paycheck indefinitely.

@@thedopplereffect00 what Chungus said. Insane job security & often little to no micromanagement if you can just come in and do the bare minimum

Thats commendable dear. You should consider imploring the services of a Financial Advisor so you don't get ripped off in the market. They provide personalized advice to individuals based on their risk appetite, placing them among the best of the best. There are bad ones, but some with good track records can be very good.

It's often true that people underestimate the importance of financial advisors until they feel the negative effects of emotional decision-making. I remember a few summers ago, after a tough divorce, when I needed a boost for my struggling business. I researched and found a licensed advisor who diligently helped grow my reserves despite inflation. Consequently, my reserves increased from $275k to around $750k.

Recently, I've been considering the possibility of speaking with consultants. I need guidance because I'm an adult, but I'm not sure if their services would be all that helpful.

Her name is “Vivian Carol Gioia can't divulge much. Most likely, the internet should have her basic info, you can research if you like

I just Googled her name and her website came up right away. It looks interesting so far. I'm going to send a mail to her and let you know how it goes.Thanks for sharing truly!

The increasing prices have impacted my plan to retire at 62, work part-time, and save for the future. I'm concerned about whether those who navigated the 2008 financial crisis had an easier time than I am currently experiencing. The combination of stock market volatility and a decrease in income is causing anxiety about whether I'll have sufficient funds for retirement.

This is precisely why I like having a portfolio coach guide my day-to-day market decisions: with their extensive knowledge of going long and short at the same time, using risk for its asymmetrical upside and laying it off as a hedge against the inevitable downward turns, their skillset makes it nearly impossible for them to underperform. I've been utilizing a portfolio coach for more than two years, and I've made over $800,000

Mind if I ask you to recommend this particular coach you using their service?

'Carol Vivian Constable, a highly respected figure in her field. I suggest delving deeper into her credentials, as she possesses extensive experience and serves as a valuable resource for individuals seeking guidance in navigating the financial market.

She appears to be well-educated and well-read. I ran an online search on her name and came across her website; thank you for sharing.

Just try to diversify your portfolio to other market sectors, that way your investment is balanced and you don’t get to make so much losses.

I’m a contractor, and my job doesn’t permit me the time to properly analyze my holdings/evaluate stocks myself, so I’ve had a fiduciary actively restructuring my portfolio for the past 7 years now to match the present market condition and that’s how I’ve been able to stay afloat, knowing when to buy and sell…maybe you should do the same.

How can I reach this adviser of yours? because I'm seeking for a more effective investment approach on my savings

“Sonya lee Mitchell’’ is the licensed fiduciary I use. Just research the name. You’d find necessary details to work with a correspondence to set up an appointment.

I searched her up, and I have sent her an email. I hope she gets back to me soon. Thank you

You should hire a CFP to help you diversify your assets to include ETFs/index funds/mutual funds and stocks of companies with consistent cash flows, rather than betting on penny stocks.

Opting for an inves-tment advisr is currently the optimal approach for navigating the stock market, particularly for those nearing retirement. I've been consulting with a coach for a while, and my portfolio has surged by 85% since 2022

Please can you leave the info of your lnvestment advsor here? I’m in dire need for one

*Sharon Lynne Hart* is the licensed advisor I use. Just search the name. You’d find necessary details to work with to set up an appointment.

They made their beds definitely don’t say it’s “harder”

An effective strategy serves as a cornerstone in an investor's portfolio. As the level of risk increases, so does the potential for reward, making it essential to seek advice from experienced professionals for making sound decisions.

Precise asset allocation is crucial, with some employing hedging strategies or allocating to defensive assets for market downturns. Expert guidance is vital for success. This approach has kept me financially secure for over five years, yielding almost $1 million in investment returns.

How can I participate in this? I sincerely aspire to establish a secure financlal future and am eager to participate. Who is the driving force behind your success?

Monica Shawn Marti is the licensed coach I use. Just research the name. You'd find necessary details to work with a correspondence to set up an appointment.

I appreciate it. After searching her name online and reviewing her credentials, I'm quite impressed. I've contacted her as I could use all the help I can get. A call has been scheduled.

Support policies that increase supply

@@SigFigNewton There's plenty of supply, the problem is where that supply is and who owns it.

And someday you'll grow up and be smart enough to fix your YT name! 😂

@@jilbertb This is supposed to be a smug comment? The irony of you lecturing someone on 'growing up' when you haven't done that yourself yet. 😂

​@@SigFigNewtonpeople have been tricked into thinking that corporations buying properties is the problem. Government limiting the supply through regulations is the problem.

With Dems and Neocons in power, none of us will live to see retirement.

How do we afford to spend so much money on Ukraine and Illegals?

@@arthurh5707the Dems are the ones helping solve the problem by preventing the number of working age people from falling too much. Worst thing we could do for the American economy is halt immigration

@@arthurh5707halting immigration would be terrible for the economy. (Dems are the ones helping this problem of the working age population no longer growing)

halting immigration would be terrible for the economy. (Dems are the ones helping this problem of the working age population no longer growing)

The WSJ really wants there to be a recession, plus it can't see beyond the perspective of Baby Boomers. Millennials are both a larger and more productive generation.

I heard that if Taylor Swift retires it could spark a recession. By the way, speaking as a boomer who the heck is Taylor Swift?

They want a recession, but only if Trump wins so they can blame him.

Yeah, its because sensationalism sells

the recession started in 2008, you are in the recession.

Fair. But remember that Social Security check won’t do you much good if you’re working (and dying) in a Russian Gulag or Chinese labor camp.

For a nation protected by 2 massive oceans Military is only for geopolitical reasons

As someone who works in the military industrial complex, I see every day how big a threat Americans face every single day. I know I'm biased, but I do know this for a fact: a reduction in American military spending is a reduction in the American ability to forget about how just unsafe they really are from the enemy. I don't know about you, but I would prefer to not need to get drafted...lotta good retirement money would do me in my grave lol

Red Dawn was a movie dude​@@j10001

@@kingcheezit7the reason why the gov pays people is because no one wants to be drafted. So they incentivize with their pay. But many people would argue if the US began to work with China and Russia away from the rhetoric you stated above @j10001, then we shouldn’t be in this mess. The military did receive a higher budget they themselves did not ask for. If you ask me the Us is in a great geographical position away from great danger.

In 1978, the percentage of your salary paid into Social Security was 5.05%. Now it's 6.2% and has been that way since 1990. They need to remove the income cap completely as a start. You make a million dollars (or more) for a salary, then ALL of it should be subject to 6.2% Social Security, not just $168,600 in 2024.

@@KayKay0314Prepare to be voted out of office then. Your proposal is about as palatable as conscription.

Anybody that touches Social Security (in any manner) loses re-election. It's all about how your opposition can frame you in the media lol

@@starventure No, it's not, it's mostly the wealthy and uneducated that see it that way. The reality is that the trust is going bust because the wealthy have been hoarding their wealth at the expense of workers, which leads to money not being paid into the trust that should be. And to make matters worse, since workers aren't making what they should, it's also harder for workers to save enough to not need the social security pension money.

How many American voters do you think make more than the 160k limit? If working class voters weren’t so susceptible to racist dog whistles that have them voting for GOP or corporate Dems removing the cap would be wildly popular bc it benefits all retirees and only involves higher taxes for people earning more than the cap. And I say this as someone who works in tech and earns more than the cap: it should be removed. Why should I pay a lower % of my salary to Social Security than a teacher or nurse?

Pension is a scam luxury

Correct - I got a nice card from SS in 2005 that accurately predicted these reduced payments beginning at a certain date, I was told at age 24 and took note

​@@Kev88-wf8noMy public school textbooks in 2005 told us we'd be out of money and we'd be SOL. I think it's sad if it's to the point you're telling kids in school, that they'd rather leave a whole heap of problems for them, rather than risk asking the rich to pay a little more taxes. Fiscal responsibility died during Reagan era, when he cut taxes the deficit boomed. George Bush Sr knew the only way to be responsible was to raise taxes, and the backlash was bad enough that people voted 3rd party and he lost. Bill Clinton to his credit did try quite hard and in many ways did bring spending in, but after 9/11 we stopped counting and never started counting again. Sad state of affairs we leave for future generations, because we're too entitled to bother fixing it ourselves.

True.

I’m gen-x and don’t expect much if any SS when I retire.

as most investing-related questions, the answer is, it depends.. my best suggestion is to consider advisory management

Agreed, the role of advisors can only be overlooked, but not denied. I remember in early 2020, during covid-outbreak, my portfolio worth around 300k took a slight fall, apparently due to the pandemic crash, at once I consulted an advisor in order to avoid panic-selling. As of today, my account has yielded big fat yields, and leverages on 7-figure, only cos I delegate my excesses right.

@@Greghilton3 this is huge! mind if I look up the advisr that guides you please? only invest in my 401k through my employer for now, but enthused about diversifying my investments for a prosperous financial future

There are several independent advisors you could research. However, I have been working with “Melissa Rose Francks” for almost four years, and we get along great. If she appeals to your judgement, you could continue with her. I support her.

very much appreciated, your response suggests a person of benevolence.. just inputted her full name on my browser, and came across her site, top-notch qualifications! she seems well-qualified

Everyone needs a different stream of income , unfortunately having a job doesn't mean security due to the high rate of tax , one needs to move ahead their expectation, I would recommend refraining from investing in stocks for now. Instead, it would be prudent to consider retaining a portion of your assets in gold. Alternatively, seeking advice from a financial advisor could provide valuable guidance in this matter.

true, A lot of folks downplay the role of advisors until being burnt by their own emotions. I remember couple summers back, after my lengthy divorce, I needed a good boost to help my business stay afloat, hence I researched for license advisors and came across someone of due diligence, helped a lot to grow my reserve notwithstanding inflation, from $275k to approx. $850k so far.

Carol Vivian Constable is the licensed fiduciary I use. Just research the name. You’d find necessary details to work with a correspondence to set up an appointment..

If you follow the news narratives, you've come to see how over the years Bitcoin has proven time and time again it's value against an everlasting dollar depreciation. My advice is not to go all in, but to allocate a good portion into a long term position. The news will keep telling you it's risky, it's volatile, but behind closed doors you will see how institutions and wealthy class buy more and more. If a big crash occurs, buy more, and stocks that the world depends heavily on. NVDA, AMD, Intel. The nervous system of our entire civilization depends on those companies

Be careful, scammers above.

That was my plan too until they closed more than half the hospitals in NYC.....

@@Kevin-zz9nc that sucks bro I hope your doing well

Sorry to hear that, bro. Any chance you could get 5-6 twelve-hour shifts per week (possibly across two hospitals)? I know that sounds brutal, but that’s a pretty typical workload in high-end professional jobs, and it might let you stash away a bunch of money toward retirement for the next 5-10 years. With compounding of that investment, there might be some hope to truly retire someday. It’s just an idea- I know those are brutal shifts! That said, better to do it while you are young so you can have a home of your own and a place to rest your weary bones in old age.

Why not instead accept that you need to save and invest in order to avoid that? 26 is young. You have time. You don't have to sacrifice your future.

Invest in VOO thru Vanguard, in a Roth IRA account. You max that account out every year you will have at least a tax free million dollars by thr time you retire.

Apparently people like nearly destroying each other.

Wasn't the problem first made perfectly clear when the program was expanded to its current use in the 1960s?

It’s not unbelievable at all. Voters are notoriously bad at delaying gratification. They are myopic- this video even says as much by pointing out how many don’t have their own retirement saved. In short any party that pushes this topic will have entitled boomers voting against it, happy to see their kids cover their profligacy and lack of planning. A selfish generation, many believe.

My Econ teacher in 2011 told me I’d never see a penny of it when I got older, he said the solution is to save our own selves and not to count on the feds

@@marioh_flores don’t worry the fed will just print more money and destroy the value of your savings. 😊

Did anyone who contributed to your equivalent social security get anything from that fund?

The SS program is the same thing, but it is government run and the funds are paid out to current recipients and any extra are lent out to the government instead of being invested. The employer has to pay the same tax amount as the employee - 1:1 match. If I had been able to invest my ss tax instead of giving it to the gov't, I'd be able to start taking my max benefit now, and if I had been able to invest the employer portion I'd have 2x my max benefit.

I heard in the AU higher education is automatically loaned and not required to be paid back until you reach a certain income threshold which is then automatically deducted. Smart move.

It is confusing to most Americans, but the problem is overblown. Social Security had a surplus as a result of a "baby boom", they had more money coming in for retirees than anybody knew what to do with. That surplus was never going to last, and was always going to be depleted. We don't really want the population issues that China and India have seen, should the USA have continued on the Baby Boom path. This is no reason to panic. There is just the normal red tape of politics of managing how Social Security should be taxed and spent. American 401k plans are a different subject. An entirely different deep dive.

They have a similar thing in Korea but I think the amount is one month's salary for every year you work. Unlike the US, the money is in your name only---no giving out loans---and you're enttitled to all that was paid in under your name.

Thank President Reagan who started raiding the trust fund for tax breaks, etc.

Why won't you just have kids tho?

The Boomers definitely put tons in. The problem is the government raiding the funds. Reaganomics gave us not just the "IOU"s from raiding Social Security but also started up the taxing of certain amounts of Social Security; In essence, taxing us twice on the same money.

1 Boomer is worth 10 Z-ers

​@@beecee921anything used from the trust fund must be repaid and will be repaid. At worst money will be created to balance the debt. Blame general government overspending instead.

Google the amount gov has borrowed🤣🤣😂😂....its 2 trillion$$ if invested like it should be the interest alone could pay out citizens on SS

It would be interesting to see how things would be if minimum wage was constantly getting artificially increased by politicians.

I still get a pension at my job 🎉

LOVE JESUS FOR ETERNAL SECURITY! ST JOHN 3:16! ❤️✝️❤️

@@joshua511 It's been years since anyone would go to work for minimum wage. Supply and demand and businesses competing with each other for workers have set the price of wages at different skill levels for years.

They knew this 20 years ago, kids. Blame the Republicans Reagan, Bush, Clinton, Bush for stealing 2 TRILLION from the SS fund to use on our military!

high school teachers aren't the smartest lot.

As an individual, it is your responsibility to invest in your retirement via your company's 401k or 403b plan or by opening up an Individual IRA and funding it to the maximum allowed amount annually. It is important to remember that no one owes you a living, so it is crucial to plan and save for your future. Social Security is only intended to cover 30% of your retirement expenses, and it is estimated that out-of-pocket medical expenses for a retired couple aged 65 will be $315,000.

@@randy74989 401(k)s are subject to market downturns, you're best off getting a pension .. there's a reason why companies hate pensions = it's good for the people but not their pockets

yes, no political party wants to try to sort it out as initially, unpopular decisions will have to be made. which means losing votes and getting removed from power. So would you do what's right and lose or don't do anything and hope that when the 11th hour comes, the opposition is in power during that 'term'?

This is the worst take I've ever seen. If politicians never robbed SS we all would have more than enough money to fund it and then some.

So they should make you pay into something you’ll never collect from? Just be born, grind, die? I doubt anyone would object to that at all lol

3 legged Stool and SS is ONE...😁😁😁😁

You misinterpret average lifespan. Average lifespan includes infant and childhood mortality. Once reaching adulthood, the average lifespan is and was much longer. Since most people do make it to adulthood, the average person did collect SS when the program first started.

The average post-childhood lifespan was not significantly shorter than it is today.

Well um you see humans were suppose to procreate and leave behind a younger generation to foot the bill. Instead some of these people went the other way and thought pets can be children.

Zoomers are in the golden economic age right now. You can start a very successful business with a fraction of the resources needed 4 decades ago, plus you have information at your fingertips. Stay off the silly TikTok videos and go build something.

😂😂 u forget the fact boomers have had strong impact on politics if anything it just shows they never cared about it their whole life or something would have been done, but now younger generation are supposed to care ?

The government is in charge, that's why we are here now.

Boomers still dominate politics, especially now as retirees when work and kids no longer distract them from TV and voting. If anything things will first get worse because their voting consistency will attract more political attention to their expensive terminal benefits at the expense of everything else the government needs to budget for.

True, It has never been easier to understand how to build your money after retirement than it is right now with the inflation, when you may study and experience a completely variegated market passively by employing a successful portfolio-advisor. The impacts of the U.S. dollar's gain or fall on investments, in my opinion, are complex.

With the help of an experienced coach, I made some changes in my investments. I started with $321k, and now I have more than $750k by investing in stocks, ETFs, and bonds. I think housing prices won't go down much until there are more houses available.

How can I reach this adviser of yours? because I'm seeking for a more effective investment approach on my savings

"The American family is collapsing and American young people can't afford to have children anymore because they're loaded with overpriced student debt and housing is too expensive. It's hollowing out the middle-class work force. What do we do?" "Start shipping in millions of gang members from El Salvador to replace the children working Americans can't afford to have." -literally you, actually thinking you have a good idea

Exactly

Immigration is the best thing to happen to an economy since technological advancements

I think what people are kept from understanding is that immigrants supply more than they demand. Because I was born here, this country had to support me during my unproductive preadult years

​@@SigFigNewton The equator is expected to warm by up to 3.3 C before 2100. If you think this "migrant crisis" is just a moment in time, you need to wake up. In the next 75 years the Rio Grande and the Mediterranean are going to turn into World War Z.

I think biden already remived the cap above a certain income

The US overall has one of the flattest tax bases of all for this reason. The wealthy simply do not pay the taxes that just the tax brackets look like. In reality, once you're in the higher wealth areas, you stop paying a higher proportion as taxes, even when you get into the millionaire region.

@@letsburn00you don’t “just stop” paying taxes at higher levels. The income they generate is apart of their business and they deduct their expense

@@ryantetreault3447 no, I mean that for social security there is a cap. Overall, accounting for sale taxes, the tax rate in the US is very flat, with the rich not really paying that much higher a rate.

Theyre talking about the SD tax cap​@letsburn00

Tell that to the ones who haven’t retired yet because they can’t afford to

Or they don't want to @@chrippin

@@chrippin OK, why is this relevant here exactly? Wil lthey suddenly be able to en-masse retire in the nearest time, and if so, why?

Neither of my parents are retired. They have to work in their 70's to support my recovering addict single mother sister and her two kids with ADHD who can't read.

@@chrippin tell that to the millennials and gen Z that have been robbed of a future by these people. We don’t care. Lift yourself up by your bootstraps, boomers.

This is amazing, I'm curious, how did he do it? Was it real estate? Or he was a market enthusiastic?

Haha, investing enthusiast? Not really. Our family got introduced to a financial consultant about four years before my dad retired. That was what changed things, and I think my retirement will be on the right track.

Please could you guide me on how to get in touch with your consultant? My funds are being eroded by inflation and I seek a more lucrative investment strategy to effectively utilize before I consider retirement

impressive, I'll definitely check it out, I buy the idea of employing the services of a financial consultant because finding that balance between saving and living requires counsel. Who do you work with ?

No doubt being financially free and not having to worry much about health care and other expenses after retirement cannot be overemphasized, making smart plans and setting up diversified investment portfolios is quite essential.

This is the right attitude

We definitely won’t get it in 2060. If we do it’ll be a meaningless amount

@@thedopplereffect00except you can die at any moment and you won’t be able to use it.

When did you join th3y got rid of the high 3 pention a few years ago. An switched it for a social security light pension. Basically only a set percentage that you decided to put in. Even if you do 30 years it will eventually thw retirement moeny will run out

25%-30% in 401k is way too much, invest in more liquid assets

I think what they mean is that for years SS took in more money than it spent. The extra money was invested in US Treasury bonds. Now SS is redeeming the bonds to pay out benefits.

@@At_the_Gardenhe has a point though. Almost no private retirement fund is running with an non diversified 100% bond portfolio, and yet we are stuck with that in the social security trust fund

@@jmagicd9831 That was put in place to prevent any monkey business with the investment of the fund as it would have been the single largest institutional investor on the planet.

@@mylifeisajoke1 I know that, that’s the government doesn’t belong in the wealth management business to start with, and yet we are forced into an investment that doesn’t make sense . (I’d say bad investment but that means something else in this context)

You misunderstand what SS is. It is NOT an investment. It is straight payment from workers to retirees, nothing more. The amount taxed over the payout was just another tax, used to fund everything else in the government.@@jmagicd9831

When I was a kid that’s what I thought social security was

Uh no and mind your business. On stolen land

So essentially you are forced into savings inaccessible until retirement. We call that "Social Security" and pays monthly comparable to your fortnight (converted to monthly). But many of us prefer to have additional money at retirement -- what we call 401K. That part is not forced.

Mandatory 401k taken as a percentage of your paycheck would be better in my opinion than the ponzi like structure of Social Security There are also products like annuities that pay you when you retire. Is it really the government’s job to take care of all the old people? Or is it up to us?

@@WillpowerCinema or how about instead of telling people how they have to use their money you let them keep it and deal with it themselves

Been there, done that, not going back. That's what we had before Social Security and the Great Depression saw poverty rates among senior citizens soared to over 50%. Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it.

So those of us forced to pay 12.6% into FICA for decades are completely screwed as long as you get all your money, right?

That’s what corporate tax cuts and loopholes will do for you 🤷‍♀️

@@KhanJoltrane UK Corporate Tax rate is lower and their politicians spend money like drunken sailors, too. People like you are the problem. "If only gov't was bigger, they could do more good". No, tax rates should be so low that gov't departments have no choice but to only keep essential staff and have to justify every single dollar they spend.

34 trillion in debt, time to pay up.

Hard to keep policing the Globe when the rest of the Globe is catching up. I mean who tf in the USA wants to work harder than the Chinese and Indians. You go to most of the top US based fortune 500 companies like Google, Meta, Apple, Microsoft, Tesla and most of the workers are already Chinese and Indian immigrants even in the USA...

Or, we just need to charge more. "Nice cargo route you have there. It'd be a shame if something happened to it." ;)

wrong

That could potentially backfire if its not invested properly, which being realistic its unlikely to do so. The best approach would be to just put it into the SP500 and have enough cash/bonds for when the market is on a downturn.

Higher return, higher risk.

But then the government would have had to pay more for the money they sent abroad for "gende studies" . ( sarcasm) Given the tremendous wealth of this country in oil unerring federal land et. A sovereign wealth fund would be wonerfull.

There's also the cap on it. After 129000 dollars in income you don't pay in to the SS tax anymore. It's a huge amount of money that's not taxed on high income earners

yea except do you really trust our government to be responsible with a market fund, which would undoubtably become the largest on the planet?

Thank the boomers. Gen x, millinieals, ans gen z will suffer greatly while we all paid for benefits for boomers only to get nothing ourselves

I've just looked up her full name on my browser and found her webpage without sweat, very much appreciate this

It's unexpected to come across her name here. She understands every beginner’s intention and fix you to a trading course that matches your capacity, she knows her stuff! Her advice has been invaluable to my trading journey. Definitely worth giving a shot!

Nice to see this here, Flora Elkin's understanding of market indicators is impressive. She knows exactly when to enter and exit trades for maximum profit. her siignals are top notch

Over the years, I've been a part of numerous trading programs, sifting through a barrage of information. Yet, nothing has come close to the sheer clarity, depth, and precision of Flora's insights. It's akin to finding a diamond in a coal mine.

The process of trading can be complicated when you have limited knowledge. However, with the right strategy and setups, you can be successful. That's the whole point of investing

The American public are not that intelligent. Look at our elections. It's horrible for those of us with IQs above room temperature, but that's not very many.

And let the ultra rich opt-out of the mandatory withdraw from SS.

SS is self-contributory

Easy fix… raise full retirement age to 75 years old

@@HQSCJIPZRIP to your political career. AARP will send the flowers and a FU card to your service.

Only to be scooped up instantly by corporations that turn them into short term rentals... I see no light at the end of this tunnel.

Wont be a housing crash if everyone is waiting on the sidelines to buy it. It will be a crash when most people (including you) will lose their job

@@stevechrollo8074 Bingo, prices can only crash if people are forced to sell en masse.

I paid more than three buttons for my small house.

@@jeffreymitchell4904 there is; boomers are not immortal

they're more people that you people.

As stated by many people and most businesses -- businesses do not pay taxes. If their "business taxes" go up, they collect more money from their customers (e.g. YOU) and pass that to the government. Remove all business taxes, rewrite tax code to redefine what constitutes taxable income. Then corporations and businesses can no longer claim "no taxation without representation" -- the bribes to crooked politicians will grind to a halt quickly.

That's the fix and get more people back to work

Exactly!

And when those people retire - they get larger SS checks. So that is a fix that will last a couple years and then lead to even bigger problems.

And also foreign military "aid"

That’s a dangerous idea, the only reason there are more wars and provocations from everywhere is the shrinking military gap between US and let’s say China Russia. Military needs to spend not because they need to make more wars, but they are a deterrent for the world peace. If you don’t have carrier groups in Asia as deterrent, Taiwan will be gone tomorrow, Ukraine will be gone tonight. Yes US military is very inefficient due to focus on R&D for the “edge”, but they need more money so world peace can be maintained. I know y’all mean good and want peace, same here. But never forget who you are dealing with, without US maintaining peace, say goodbye to the world you live in.

We'll just have to tighten our belts and make do with only 11 nuclear-powered floating airports, instead of 12.

​@@dr.z8378most people don't understand this. But also, fellow democracies should also up their military spending so they're not solely depending on the US and making one country pick up the tab. The US should lead and convince others to do this.

@@danzwku Germany is already doing this, the current chancellor Olaf Scholz basically permitted 100 billion Euros for the Bundeswehr (which is a lot for modern Germany)

But the situation will be much worse when you DO retire.

U r assuming u will be healthy enough to work until the day u die, and u will always have a job that supports your lifestyle.

You better hope you don’t run into any health issues either, that would force you into early retirement.

Or an accident. @@NotLikeUs869

I’m a high income earner how is that fair to me ??

@@dantheman6607 @bill33371 isn't smart enough to know that there is also a top limit on how much SS will pay as a monthly benefit.

@@dantheman6607because you for some reason collect more from social security despite needing it the least

Raising the SS cap will not make one bit of difference.

@@dantheman6607 Easy -- you pay more into SS while working. And when you retire - by law, you would be entitled to be paid proportionally higher benefits. In the end - raising the income cap would make absolutely no difference in the Social Security shortfall and would be an absolute waste of time and effort. But these 'just tax the rich' people just can't seem to grasp that reality.

Rely on yourself. Rely on your own income and investments. Do not rely on Social (in)Security or the government. You will be disappointed every time.

​@@Mavryck_Tha_Myghty While I agree in spirit, this is impractical for many poor people.

like youll have a choice

The military gets $800 billion a year. Social Security is $1 trillion, Medicare is another $1 trillion. Military spending isn't taking away from old person benefits; old person benefits are taking away from military spending. And guess what: China has no old age pensions, you rely on your family; meanwhile, they're building more ships than us. And don't think social welfare is more important in the grand scheme of things than military affairs; 2,000 years later, we remember the military exploits of the Roman Empire, which explain why Western culture is the way it is today. But do you even know what the cura annonnae was?

@@pablononescobar Notice I said “one of the first steps”, not the only step. Several other measures are also needed, as you mentioned. But remember the $800 billion/year refers to direct spending. The indirect spending is far larger than that - check yourself the stats. Glad you mention the Roman Empire. One of the common causes of empire collapse is military overspending, which shifts resources from several other sectors of an economy and channel to single industry cluster. Look how much the US has spent in endless wars only in the last 25 years in name of “security” and now we live in a far unstable world. Read Paul Kennedy’s Rise and Fall of the Great Powers and Gibbon’s The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, classics that support my view.

@@ResetToZero3210 You still did not question my main point: a government's primary role is security, not to subsidize the living expenses of its citizens. Rome's welfare system (the "cura annnonnae," or grain dole) was a cynical attempt by elites to buy off the masses; it's conquests reshaped culture to the present. And you focus on the "fall" of what could be called the Classical Roman Empire. The Eastern Empire survived for another thousand years. Its welfare system was outsourced to the Church, monasteries and such, while the State was largely centered on the military (understandable, given it was surrounded by Goths, Bulgars, Arabs, Turks, Crusaders, etc.). It fell, not to military "overspending," but to infighting. Indeed, the great defeat at Manzikert came about after years of REDUCED military spending. (See the works of John Julius Norwich for a good narrative of Byzantine history.) And while I grant you that not all military spending ends up useful, the massive investments the US made in WW2 proved most useful. Why has there been peace in Western Europe for 80 years, after centuries of rivalry among Britain, France, and Germany (for most of that time, Prussia and/or the Habsburgs)? Because there last spat in 1939 ended in a decisive victory--for the US, which then corralled them into an anti-Soviet alliance. By the time that threat collapsed, the three nations had gotten so used to cooperating that the idea of a geopolitical rivalry among them was all but extinct. America's investment in the Navy in particular in WW2 defeated Japan, turning it into a base from which the US could box in Russia's only significant Pacific port, Vladivostok, and turn the Pacific into an American lake, safe for international trade. And what of the detriment to investment that comes from taxing the earnings of those who are young and still in the workforce, and redistributing to the non-working older generations?

SS is independent of the federal budget. You want to turn it into a welfare program?

@@SandfordSmythe It is independent of the annual appropriations process, but that does not make it outside the "budget," or more appropriately, outside the bundle of money the federal government spends in a year. Social Security and Medicare taxes are included in overall federal revenue, alongside individual income taxes, and SS spending is counted alongside all other federal expenditures. Who categorizes them this way? The US Treasury Department. (See fiscaldata.treasury.gov/americas-finance-guide/). And SS already IS a welfare program--it's not defense spending, it's not highway spending, it's spending directly related to people's livelihood--their welfare. Constitutionally, it falls under Congress's power to collect taxes for spending on the "general welfare of the United States." US Const. Art. I, sec. 8. But Constitutionally permissible does not meant fiscally advisable.

You’d see millions homeless if you do that…MILLIONS

“Stolen” lol

The way the left has been winning the war of ideas, our overlords will probably go the opposite way in order to buy votes. They'll tax actual working people to the bone in order to expand the SS system from a retirement pension into a full blown UBI system.

how are old people suppose to survive 60% of seniors rely on social security

@@carieyoung1111 where’d you pull that out of? And obviously I don’t mean stop paying for the people who already paid into the service. I’d forfeit what I’ve already paid in just for the privilege of not needing to pay any more money in. That’s how bad the investment return is. The money I put in would be worth 2-3 times more invested in the stock market rather than just letting it sit in treasury bonds. They squander the money on terrible investments.

SSI is not SS. Social Security Disability is a separate fund, and it is doing much better than retirement.

@@SandfordSmythe Yes, separate pot of money. But not like our government has *never* mixed them up before.

@@bigdog8008 You have to explain what you are saying."Mixing" means what?

@@SandfordSmythe Exactly what it sounds like. There have been many cases of the US government "robbing Peter to pay Paul".

Yup. US gov borrows over $1T/year. Has $34T in debt. Pays ~$500B/year in interest alone. More money must be borrowed

We already are paying for it with debt.

We're paying for a surplus, with debt, and the solution we are expecting is to pay for that debt with more debt. Debt just being taxes. So we are planning to tax generations upon generations for the crime of the US having a baby boom.

Right in-law just passed Agent Orange @ 74. His Dad was 92 😝😝😝

Low wages, high cost of housing and food. What money?

DUMBBELL, THAT’s how it’s been set up, for 80+ YEARS!!!

Before Social Security you had about half the elderly people in the country eating cat food out of the can for dinner. As a society, we agreed that wasn't right.

So you are completely fine that everybody ahead of you was forced to pay 12.6% into FICA to pay those ahead of us and have that completely stolen because of your "why should the young pay". And then you will have an insufficient amount saved up, demand financial help from the next generation or end up eating cat food.

@@cteal2018and what do we get? If you can afford to move to Florida and buy convertibles, you don’t need anything.

And when they retire - they will equally be allowed (by law) to retrieve higher amounts back out of the system. This would gain us nothing.

@@bigdog8008… That is not how the bend points work…. The higher earner is in the third bend point the system would gain greatly and the high earner would still increase their benefit slightly…..

That would be great in an ideal world but we don’t live in an ideal world. We live in a world full of morons who would waste away all their money if left to their own devices, which is why SS was created in the first place. If SS payout is to stop tomorrow, we would have a situation that would make the current SF homeless problem to look like a molehill in comparison.

But why do we pretend that the federal government has responsibility for our retirement planning? Everyone is responsible for their own health, their own diet, their own education, and retirement savings should be the same. SS lulls people into a false sense of security, b/c they think it’ll all work out and be enough, but it doesn’t.

​@@duerf5826so have an intelligence test that determines whether or not you have to pay into it? Might work.

​@@duerf5826you're absolutely right

It’s actually legally a hollow promise. A court decision stated that there is actually no requirement in the SS law for the government to ever pay you anything. The only thing that makes them pay is politicians afraid of getting voted out.

That’s not enough.

@@19MAD95 Exactly ~10,000 baby boomers are retiring daily this year. Calculate that number and Covid deaths mean nothing to SS. No one should have expected to live off Social Security. It was set up to replace ~25 to 30% of your expenses. You were supposed to save, save, and save some more while you were working and downsize your living costs before you retired. Americans were spoiled by credit cards, easy money, and near zero interest rates since 2008.

and most of those who died dont have retirement benefits😂...so doesnt matter aside from it's small population. Many people who died in covid are working people who's supposed to contribute

A statement based on zero basis. “The government” is is, the citizens. The Social Security concept was started to solve extreme poverty. On the way to today, the “us” elected to federal office successfully adapted to central influences from party leaders which were influenced by money grabbing policies. The GOP’s cut taxes from corporations and rich people. The GOP endorses self wealth. Joe and Jane’s income is taxed up to a certain amount. Why? Corporations do not pay any more than as required. Answer: make all income levels pay SS taxes and the same for corporations. It’s easy to point the problem.

Medicare is enormously efficient compared to private health insurance

Then go live in an island, you can't escape taxes

That would be my choice. Full refund with interest and I could retire today, not decades from now

@@thedopplereffect00I’d let them have my existing contributions and 100% opt out of any future benefits just to be able to keep my 6.3% going forward. I could make a nice nest egg over the next 20 years with it.

@@franciscodanconia4324 it's actually 12.6%, your employer could give you their half too

@@thedopplereffect00 nah the employer half would still be paid in to cover at least some of the payments to current retirees and those close to retirement.

Pensions are stupid to begin with. It's other people investing your money. How about you learn how to invest in low cost index funds yourself instead of playing the victim.

You have literally no idea what the budget looks like.

@@twelvecatsinatrenchcoat It seems like the government doesn’t know what the budget looks like either.

@@A1GA56N They know. Knowing isn't the problem on their end. Broken incentives are their problem. Ignorance is yours.

So if they don't make any money one year, how do you expect them to pay taxes?

Yet Again... businesses don't pay taxes. When their taxes go up, they become 'tax collectors' and pass the costs to their customers --> *YOU*. Why is this so hard for many people to understand?

Smart. I’m tryna be like you, invest as much as I can and be as frugal while still living comfortably

You realize we have been paying into ss our entire working lives xiphoid2011??? That's my damned money, I earned and was paid by ME and all wage earners

Yeah. Half of those at or approaching retirement haven’t saved for retirement is an incredible statistic. I have very little sympathy for those who soley rely on it to survive in retirement. Maybe too many were counting on pensions and that’s just “how it was”, but I don’t think younger generations are too different.

I believe we all contributed to this problem whether directly or indirectly So we must all make Sacrifices towards a solution.

Tax all income from any source equally whether its a person or corporation and no deductions or tax write offs.

There are no SS taxes. Period. It is FICA -- not a tax but a payment into YOUR "Federal Insurance". If you remove limits on those putting money into the insurance then you also remove the limits on those pulling money out of the insurance. This gains you nothing.

@@raybod1775 Close. But delete corporation and business taxes entirely! Those are simply passed through to the user --> *you*. Instead, tax all money that actually gets paid to a human or used by a human. As long as the business does nothing with the money, it isn't taxed. But since a business is not human - it cannot enjoy this tax. And since the business would no longer be taxed - they can no longer claim "no taxation without representation" which is used to buy off both Democrat and Republican politicians. Then - complete rewrite on what justifies income. For example - private jet for business use? Sorry but you can only write off the already established government per-diem airfare rate. If you get to use a private jet - great! But you can only write off the established rate of one air plane ticket -- the rest of the cost of the flight including cost of plane, fuel, pilot, etc is considered income and a taxable item. And the human (not the company) pays that tax. Also massive bonuses to CEOs paid as 'stocks' so they don't pay taxes? Sorry - that is now pure income with taxes due. And pay again on the difference when the stocks are sold. Many other loop holes to plug. But - both political parties benefit greatly from this and neither will fix this.

⁠@@bigdog8008… The way the bend points are set up if you remove the cap you end with more going into the system ….The third bend point is where the top dollars come out…. This would help the system greatly while still allowing the high earners to gain some benefit.

Agree but you don't cut that massive amount of public spending without rearranging the economy in a major way. Arms manufacturers were very smart to spread their factories around many different congressional districts, held by members of both parties, making any loss of jobs helped by a sitting congressman or woman a perfect way to lose their seat.

I also agree that we should cease foreign aid/loans/money to Ukraine, Israel, Europe, etc in priority of putting America and her citizens first

As nice as that sounds, it isn't very realistic and wouldn't be worth the trade offs. Firstly and of course most importantly is that we're safe, no country in history has ever been as safe as the US is today. It's quite reassuring to me that unless I volunteer to go to war, I will never have to. And that goes the same for you (I'm assuming your American) and everyone else. The second reason and a very big reason as well is that $800b doesn't just fly away to never be seen again, almost all of it is spent INSIDE America and paying American WAGES. Tens of millions are employed by not only the US Department of Defense but also the contractors that produce our military equipment. Reducing or Entirely stopping military spending will cause the largest unemployment crisis in history, not to mention almost all these lost jobs are people who are highly educated and some of the best in the US. And another third reason that should be mentioned as it's also extremely important, is the technology that the US military provides to civilians. A massive one being GPS which we all use today. Not to mention the Internet was created by the US military, Duct tape was created by the US military during WW2. and many, many, many, many, many other technologies that every single American uses today.

Not to mention the fourth, very important reason. The military is pretty cool

Chinese troll? No, eliminating military spending would not solve all of our problems. If there's anything that the war in Ukraine shows us, or the aggressive posturing from China in the South China sea against the sovereign country of Taiwan, it's that we still live in a world with aggressive countries with strong territorial desires. Freedom isn't free, and the most dangerous thing to the United States and our interests would be giving up our means to defend ourselves or our allies/ trading partners, etc.