@TheWorldOfScience: Space cannot bend or stretch or travel because space is not tangible. Instead of space expanding things travel through space. The theory of relativity does not say that we cannot travel faster than c = the speed of light = 299792458 meters per second inside the vacuum of regular space. Relativity says anything with mass cannot reach the speed of light = c = the speed of light = 299792458 meters per second inside the vacuum of regular space. What is mass? Mass is resistance to motion for example if you are in the passenger seat of a car that is being driven down the motorway at 50 or above 50 miles per hour with your hand out the window you can feel the wind pushing against your hand because the wind is stopping your car from reaching the speed of light = c = 299792458 meters per second inside the vacuum of regular space. There is no atmospheric wind in space to reduce the speed of a spacecraft but there are numerous amounts of gas and dust particles and debris that can both reduce the speed and also destroy an unshielded spacecraft upon impact by causing explosive decompression. The solution is to create a repulsive laser deflection force-field that is made with Nuclear Exciton Polariton lasers from Exciton Polariton condensates for a Polariton Superfluid to deflect minor debris such as gas and dust particles away from the electromagnetic field propulsion spacecraft with the repulsive Polariton Superfluid force-field being emitted directly from the outer surface of the electromagnetic field propulsion spacecraft in all surrounding directions, so that the electromagnetic field propulsion spacecraft can achieve unlimited speed.

See the first presentation of last weekend's Alternative Propulsion and Engineering Conference, KZfaq title: "APEC 12/23: Asymmetrical Capacitance, Warp Drives & Torsion Physics"

Is there a universal time for the entire universe? The answer is- No! According to Einstein's theory of relativity, there is no unambiguous absolute time that applies to the entire universe. Instead, time is a relative concept, dependent on motion and gravity. Different observers in different states of motion or in different gravitational fields may experience different measurements of time. The theory of relativity describes how time and space are related to each other and how they change in the presence of mass and energy. For example, time may pass slower near large masses such as black holes compared to observers farther from the massive object. Therefore, there is no one universal time for the entire Universe, but time is a concept that depends on the context and observational conditions. How does the lack of universal time for the entire Universe affect the idea of the FTL (Faster Than Light) drive? Wouldn't this cause time paradoxes - (grandfather paradox) since there are different times for different observers, e.g. the time of a hypothetical planet orbiting a neutron star and the time of the planet Earth orbiting the Sun and the FTL ship travel? Would this be a trip back in time for either side? The issue of the lack of universal time for the entire universe has important implications for the idea of faster-than-light (FTL) travel and potential time paradoxes. If it were possible to travel FTL, where an object moves faster than light, then according to the theory of relativity, there would be a possibility of violating causality, i.e. sending information or events in a way that appears to violate the established order of cause and effect. For example, if an FTL traveler were to travel from one place to another at faster than light speeds, they could reach their destination before the light they sent out when they began their journey. This seems to lead to a grandfather paradox, where a traveler could travel back in time and prevent the birth of their ancestors. However, due to the lack of a unique time for the entire universe, as well as other theoretical limitations such as the existence of a light speed limit, FTL travel is impossible. There is currently no clear answer in physical theory on how to avoid time paradoxes in the context of FTL travel. My example with a neutron star and our star as objects with different clocks (times) is a good illustration of the phenomenon of differences in the passage of time for observers in different gravitational conditions. According to Einstein's theory of relativity, time flows slower in areas with a larger gravitational field. Therefore, for an observer on a planet orbiting a dense neutron star (which generates a strong gravitational field), time will pass more slowly than for an observer on Earth (which is in a weaker gravitational field). In practice, this means that if we had two clocks - one on a planet orbiting a neutron star and the other on Earth - the elapsed time on these clocks would differ. The clock on a planet orbiting a neutron star will lag behind the clock on Earth. Therefore, if it were possible to travel FTL between these two objects, when the traveler returns to Earth, he or she might notice that a longer time has passed on Earth than on the planet around the neutron star. In this way, the traveler could experience a kind of journey into the past in relation to the Earth and the neutron star. I will give a hypothetical situation with the FTL drive (Alcubierre drive), which does not have time dilation. Some FTL-powered ship flies from Earth to the nearest black hole, where time dilation occurs nearby due to a strong gravitational field. Halfway from Earth to the black hole, this ship stops and sends an FTL signal and another at the speed of light (a signal subject to time dilation) to the vicinity of this black hole with greetings. Then this ship flies at the speed of FTL to the vicinity of this black hole (which generates a strong gravitational field causing time dilation) and from there it receives the signal at the speed of light that it sent itself and then sends a signal FTL, i.e. faster than light (and another one with the same information, but at the speed of light) to the halfway point where it stopped earlier and gave itself the information not to fly to the vicinity of the black hole but to return to Earth, which they do. I'm saying that the captain of the ship wants to deliberately investigate what happens when he triggers a paradox. My example highlights some elements of the FTL paradox. However, it is worth noting that the Alcubierre drive he describes is a hypothetical model and has not yet been proven to be technically feasible. In my scenario, when the FTL ship stops halfway and sends a signal at the speed of light to the vicinity of the black hole, there is a potential contradiction. The signal undergoes time dilation, which means that time on Earth will passe faster than in the vicinity of the black hole. This means that when an FTL ship returns to where it stopped earlier and then receives the signal it sent, that signal may suggest that more time has passed on Earth than has actually passed on the ship. This seems paradoxical because the FTL ship receives information from itself that suggests that a longer period of time has passed on Earth, while the traveler on the ship has not experienced the same passage of time.

@@sanctuslex478 : Debunking the theory of Relativity’s Time dilation claim part 1: Some of the concepts of Quantum mechanics and some of the concepts of the theory of Relativity are accurate. The majority of the concepts in the theory of relativity are false and the theory of relativity is worthless garbage that has been imposed upon us by the parasitic elite that want to hide some knowledge from the majority of the general population of the people of our planet Earth and protect the monopoly profits of the energy industries that sell fossil fuels. The theory of Relativity is wrong because time is determined by the observation and measurement of the speed of objects moving through space based upon cycles such as one year is the time it takes for a planet to orbit around its star. Time is determined by the observation and measurement of the speed of objects moving through space based upon cycles and different objects move in space at different speeds. Some objects travel through space faster than other objects. Some planets orbit around a star quicker than other planets because the closer a planet is to its star the quicker it orbits its star and the further away a planet is from its star the slower the planet orbits its star and that means that some clocks MUST be faster or slower than other clocks. The theory of relativity has nothing to do with GPS (Global Positioning System). The concept of Space-time is false because space does NOT have clocks. The concept of Space-time cannot exist because space does NOT have clocks. Time is an illusion that has been invented by human beings. Time does NOT really exist because time is an illusion, instead different cycles exist in nature and our clocks are based upon some of the different cycles that exist in nature. Our clocks are also based upon the different time zones that we human beings have invented that are based upon the movement of objects moving through space at different speeds in the fashion of cycles in nature. The illusion that is known as time is determined by the speed of clocks and some clocks operate faster than other clocks. Illusions are based upon perceptions and interpretations. The creation of time by human beings is also arbitrary because who decides that the clocks should go faster by an hour in the spring and summer of each year? Also who decides that the clocks should go slower by an hour in the autumn and winter of each year? An individual’s perception of time is determined by the time zone that the individual has existed in for a long period of time. Different time zones can cause the inhabitants of those different time zones to have different perceptions of time. The concept of 60 seconds in a minute and 60 minutes in an hour comes from he Sexagesimal system of base 60. The concept of the second is derived from a 30 degree swinging pendulum with a length of 1-meter. The meter was originally derived from dividing the Polar circumference of our planet Earth into 40 million equal parts. Time is known by the measurement of clocks and without clocks on a spaceship how can an individual that is travelling close to c = the speed of light = 299792458 meters per second inside the vacuum of regular space know what the time is? The idea that time slows down when an accelerating object approaches the speed of light is false because the speed of clocks vary depending on the time zones that the clocks were programmed from. The Gravity of a planet is created by both the planet’s star in a Magnetohydrodynamics style with a spinning dynamo plasma core that creates an electromagnetic field and the planet’s electromagnetic field is created by the spinning dynamo of the planet’s core in a Magnetohydrodynamics style. The speed of a clock’s moving arms is also determined by the electromagnetic fields of the planet’s atmosphere similar to how a magnetic compass is influenced by electromagnetic fields. Another reason for Time dilation being false is that the artificial gravity that is created by the electromagnetic fields onboard a spacecraft MUST be the same or similar to the speed of the gravity of the home planet of the occupant or occupants onboard the spacecraft to prevent the occupant or occupants onboard the spacecraft from being crushed or having their muscles stretched out too much. Because the artificial gravity that is created by the electromagnetic fields onboard a spacecraft MUST be the same or similar to the speed of the gravity of the home planet of the occupant or occupants onboard the spacecraft the clocks onboard the spacecraft should move at the same speed or similar speed as the clocks that are on the home planet of the occupant or occupants onboard the spacecraft. On our planet Earth the speed of gravity is 9.8 meters per second squared. Out in space the speed of universal gravity is the same as c = the speed of light = 299792458 meters per second inside the vacuum of regular space. We cannot have literal time travel because history only exists as memories in the minds of individuals that remember events of the past. Regarding time travel events of the past cannot be changed because the events of the past can only be recorded and observed and interpreted to a limited degree by an observer or a multitude of observers. Interpretations of past events may vary from the point of different observers. Time is an illusion that has been invented by human beings and that means that time dilation is also an illusion. Time does NOT really exist instead cycles exist and human beings have invented clocks to measure the various cycles of nature and the measurements of the cycles of nature by human beings with clocks is called time. Some clocks are faster than other clocks depending on the accuracy of how they were designed to measure the cycles of nature. The theory of time dilation is a misinterpretation of a space traveller that has dematerialized and entered Hyperspace but has failed to rematerialize at the chosen destination similar to riding a train and missing your stop and the result is the traveller may NEVER find the chosen destination due to being trapped in Hyperspace or lost in space and time. It is NOT impossible to travel faster than the speed of light = c = 299792458 meters per second inside the vacuum of regular space but it is very dangerous to travel faster than the speed of light Because we will NOT be able to control our synthetic Dyon propelled spacecraft after we have dematerialized and entered Hyperspace. All of our commands MUST be given to the artificial intelligence that controls the Quantum computers and monitors the life support systems onboard the synthetic Dyon propelled spacecraft long before the speed of light is approached by the synthetic Dyon propelled spacecraft so that we can avoid getting trapped in Hyperspace and lost in space and time forever after we have used the effect of Quantum tunnelling to break trough the light speed barrier and dematerialize. If an electromagnetically propelled spacecraft breaks through the light speed barrier while attempting to jump into Hyperspace without dematerializing so that the electromagnetic propulsion spacecraft and its occupants or occupant can pass through physical objects in space then the risk is taken of accidentally crashing into other physical objects in space and if an electromagnetically propelled spacecraft breaks through the light speed barrier and is able to successfully dematerialize for the purpose of passing through physical objects in space and avoid crashing into physical objects in space but the electromagnetic propulsion spacecraft and its occupants or occupant fail to rematerialize at the desired destination then the electromagnetic propulsion spacecraft and its occupants or occupant would get trapped and lost in space and time forever.

I am litterly shocked to see how talented you all are in comment section. God bless you all

Most people don’t comprehend the speed of light speed. you can travel around the earth in 1/3 of a second at light speed. Basically teleportation at that point. And still take 2 1/2 million years at light speed to get to the next closest galaxy. It boggles the mind!

@@courtney-rw8ch Perhaps the reason any aliens rarely visit Earth is because the technology to easily travel inter-stellar is the preserve of extremely advanced species, maybe most species go extinct before they get to that level.

You do not need to travel 4 years to get to the nearest star if you travel at lightspeed because your time stops, so you will get there in zero seconds. Only seeing you from earth it looks like you need 4 years.

@@reinholdvink2654 that is all theoretical.

@@reinholdvink2654 +1. You have the correct knowledge of special relativity. Unfortunately, lots of people here don't know what length contraction is.

As I understand it the "bubble" around the ship is impervious.

yes and no probably

@@allenmunich2816 Ha Ha! Perfect =]

Well, this is fairly complex stuff. The short answer is that it CAN prevent you from striking objects, however, the "objects" that this bubble will prevent the craft from striking would have to be relatively SMALL. If a PLANET or anything that is LARGE happens to be in the "flight" path would certainly be run into and there would be nothing left of the craft. It would require the creation of an "anti-collision" technology that is equally incredibly difficult to create, let alone, making the two systems work together.

It doesn't actually work. It is a manipulation of Einstein's formula and Einstein hated quantum physics. QF say that if you create a warp barrier (or a wormhole) Hawkings Radiation starts to build up infinitely and disrupts the Warp Field/Wormhole. Also, to reach lightspeed you need three solar masses worth of energy, so even if it did work, we couldn't use it.

Scientists took inspiration from lots of things in Star Trek, eg communicators leading to smart phones, so warp drive would just be another such invention inspired by Star Trek.

No! 60 years ago.

Correct!

🤔 Something like dilithium crystals What a concept and all we need to do is watch Star Trek and we’ll know where to find them . LoL 😂

Yes. Apparently, Scientists have found a way but cannot figure it due to the lack of knowledge of the universe, it's called vacuum energy, while it is an endless form of power it is still hypothetical

Element 115 made hold a key if we find a stable isotope.

The exotic substance already exist.. It's called ANTIMATTER. Next question is how to create a chamber strong enough to contain the explosive force when antimatter mixed with matter and channel it into kinetic energy like inside our classic propulsion rocket engine. 😅

Simple we are in the equivilent of a warp bubble, not experiencing acceleration yet on a planet moving very fast around a star moving fast around a galaxy moving away from some galaxies faster than C. Also warping space is not about movement but shortening the distance. To experience relativistic effect you would have to accelerate to C inside your bubble which is not being sugested. As such even Alcuberie is confused about this.

It creates logic inconsistencies only because what we (scientists) know about science is about at least a billionth of a billionth percent of what science is!!! We only think we understand these things because of our (scientists) arrogance. We haven’t even chartered more than 10% of the oceans so what makes you or anyone else think you know the possibilities that exist in this entire universe??!! Insane!!!

Lie

Uh, who was this wise man? Does that mean I can run a four minute mile (I’m 73)?

@@zz-nc5kx Sure can! They say that age is just a number. If you workout, eat right, and fix your mind to challenge yourself, I bet that you can accomplish it. Barak Obama set out to become America's first Black President against the odds of racism in this country. That Didn't Stop him from accomplishing his goal and I'm quite certain that people around him said that his quest was impossible.

Whoever he is, can he tell us how to get out of paying taxes and not go to jail? My name's not Hunter

@@windrider65 Is it Donald Trump?

Except... how does one even do that? Bend space, that is....?

See * Element 115

Are you OK? Warp drive is just completely nonsense BS. Warp drive will never exist, because it is some fictional stupid made up.

Did you not pay attention to Elon when he said how much energy was needed to warp space?

​@@zz-nc5kxI doubt if he watched the whole video.

Perhaps if the ship is travelling in a warp bubble the state of that bubble remains constant the bubble itself would deflect anything external to the bubble.

That's why you need a forward deflector shield at all times, to deflect space debris before it can hit you!

Thanks for watching ❤️

Totally! Light speed is nothing on the cosmic scale.

so teleportation only way and I sent my teleportation experiment testing in vaccum to all country space agencies and universities

Warp factor 2 will get you to proxima centauri in 5 months. Slow but we get to see new things. A red dwarf star system up close. Drop some communication arrays and takes some pictures then come home

​@@TheMegamanDX or keep going to see what's out there.

When u travel at lightspeed time as we know it will stop. Your lifetime will become infinity. U can travel to the edge of the universe and time will not pass. Remember the faster u move the slower time passes. But on earth time pass normally so when u return everyone u knew will be in their graves or inside cryochamber

Thank You ❤️

@@TheWorldOfScienceCo Is there a universal time for the entire universe? The answer is- No! According to Einstein's theory of relativity, there is no unambiguous absolute time that applies to the entire universe. Instead, time is a relative concept, dependent on motion and gravity. Different observers in different states of motion or in different gravitational fields may experience different measurements of time. The theory of relativity describes how time and space are related to each other and how they change in the presence of mass and energy. For example, time may pass slower near large masses such as black holes compared to observers farther from the massive object. Therefore, there is no one universal time for the entire Universe, but time is a concept that depends on the context and observational conditions. How does the lack of universal time for the entire Universe affect the idea of the FTL (Faster Than Light) drive? Wouldn't this cause time paradoxes - (grandfather paradox) since there are different times for different observers, e.g. the time of a hypothetical planet orbiting a neutron star and the time of the planet Earth orbiting the Sun and the FTL ship travel? Would this be a trip back in time for either side? The issue of the lack of universal time for the entire universe has important implications for the idea of faster-than-light (FTL) travel and potential time paradoxes. If it were possible to travel FTL, where an object moves faster than light, then according to the theory of relativity, there would be a possibility of violating causality, i.e. sending information or events in a way that appears to violate the established order of cause and effect. For example, if an FTL traveler were to travel from one place to another at faster than light speeds, they could reach their destination before the light they sent out when they began their journey. This seems to lead to a grandfather paradox, where a traveler could travel back in time and prevent the birth of their ancestors. However, due to the lack of a unique time for the entire universe, as well as other theoretical limitations such as the existence of a light speed limit, FTL travel is impossible. There is currently no clear answer in physical theory on how to avoid time paradoxes in the context of FTL travel. My example with a neutron star and our star as objects with different clocks (times) is a good illustration of the phenomenon of differences in the passage of time for observers in different gravitational conditions. According to Einstein's theory of relativity, time flows slower in areas with a larger gravitational field. Therefore, for an observer on a planet orbiting a dense neutron star (which generates a strong gravitational field), time will pass more slowly than for an observer on Earth (which is in a weaker gravitational field). In practice, this means that if we had two clocks - one on a planet orbiting a neutron star and the other on Earth - the elapsed time on these clocks would differ. The clock on a planet orbiting a neutron star will lag behind the clock on Earth. Therefore, if it were possible to travel FTL between these two objects, when the traveler returns to Earth, he or she might notice that a longer time has passed on Earth than on the planet around the neutron star. In this way, the traveler could experience a kind of journey into the past in relation to the Earth and the neutron star. I will give a hypothetical situation with the FTL drive (Alcubierre drive), which does not have time dilation. Some FTL-powered ship flies from Earth to the nearest black hole, where time dilation occurs nearby due to a strong gravitational field. Halfway from Earth to the black hole, this ship stops and sends an FTL signal and another at the speed of light (a signal subject to time dilation) to the vicinity of this black hole with greetings. Then this ship flies at the speed of FTL to the vicinity of this black hole (which generates a strong gravitational field causing time dilation) and from there it receives the signal at the speed of light that it sent itself and then sends a signal FTL, i.e. faster than light (and another one with the same information, but at the speed of light) to the halfway point where it stopped earlier and gave itself the information not to fly to the vicinity of the black hole but to return to Earth, which they do. I'm saying that the captain of the ship wants to deliberately investigate what happens when he triggers a paradox. My example highlights some elements of the FTL paradox. However, it is worth noting that the Alcubierre drive he describes is a hypothetical model and has not yet been proven to be technically feasible. In my scenario, when the FTL ship stops halfway and sends a signal at the speed of light to the vicinity of the black hole, there is a potential contradiction. The signal undergoes time dilation, which means that time on Earth will passe faster than in the vicinity of the black hole. This means that when an FTL ship returns to where it stopped earlier and then receives the signal it sent, that signal may suggest that more time has passed on Earth than has actually passed on the ship. This seems paradoxical because the FTL ship receives information from itself that suggests that a longer period of time has passed on Earth, while the traveler on the ship has not experienced the same passage of time.

Glad you enjoyed it. Thank you 😃

Thank you! 😃

Yes, absolutely correct! You wouldn't have time to react to objects ahead because you’d encounter them before their light could even reach you.

Yeah, that's probably a good thing...we don't deserve to travel ftl!

I hate to say you’re right we can’t even stop hating each other 😢

True!

​@@TheWorldOfScienceCoNot true. My understanding is that the original Alcubierre drive required both negative energy and an amount of energy equivalent to that of all the masses in the observable universe. However newer approaches have both removed the need for negative energy and reduced the energy requirements down to the energy equivalent of the mass of Jupiter. Of course that amount of energy is still unfeasibly large for a civilisation such as our own however having reduced the requirements that far in only a decade or so we can hope that it can be reduced further.

Let just say it requires the energy's of the whole solar system to travel 100lightyrs

Well amateur (note the spelling), perhaps you should take a freshman course in Physics.

@@zz-nc5kx Oops, sorry about the typo, I think I'm a bit long in the tooth to be going to Uni' again! But you are correct with your suggestion?

@@peterpocock9062 You really don't need to take a course, just simply do a little research on General and Special Relativity in order to understand that it takes an infinite amount of energy for any object having mass to reach the speed of light. And as far a the Alcubierre Drive model, that is simply an abstract mathematical model that cannot be realized because it requires negative (as opposed to anti) matter.

That is why you expand space behind you at the same rate you compress it in front of you thus preserving the distance between your starting and ending points.

Yep. You're right. Look how far we've come with the airplane and the car in 55 years. But trips to the moon have become a thing of the very distant past.

I'd imagine you would brake by just turning off the warp drive which would stop you instantaneously. Navigation though would be a problem as the warp bubble would prevent you seeing where you were going. One solution to that though might be to turn the drive on and off repeatedly for short intervals and to take bearings every time the drive was turned off allowing you to make course corrections as you go.

I wonder if the kid will still be watching KZfaq or if there's a new platform by then!

Are you mentally OK? Warp drive will never ever exist, because it is just fictional made up BS. In 2100 almost everything will be there around as you can see now.

Nope, what he meant is space is stretching back like for example they bend space or stretch

It is concentrations of mass or energy which bend/warp space-time. Mass/energy tells space-time how to bend and the bending of space-time tells matter how to move.

Wake me up when they can manufacture anti matter in bulk

The ship remains stationary but the distance to the destination is reduced (and at the same time the distance back to the starting point, Earth, is increased). Since the ship remains stationary the crew will not experience time dilation.

Ref?

@dcolb121 No ref really...just a thought I intuitively believe from years of hobby reading many science articles, books, papers, patents and thinking on energy, freq and vibration.

Thank you so much ❤️ Currently, we don’t have any WhatsApp channel. However, you can join our telegram channel - openinapp.co/telegram/d9437