12:35 I don't know what kind of ordnance hit that ship, but watching the ship nearly jump out of the water was very impressive!
@alphaadhito Жыл бұрын
QUICKSINK, a naval version of 2000 lb JDAM designed for.. well quickly sinking a ship Here's onboard footage, its really insane how quick that is: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/aZ2hd6uKnsiafJ8.html
@kilianortmann9979 Жыл бұрын
US Navy Quicksink 2000lbs JDAM, modified with a new seeker and possibly new fuze and guidance logic.
@b0bl00i Жыл бұрын
Torpedo Mk48. From Navy Sinkex
@kilianortmann9979 Жыл бұрын
@@b0bl00i Not a Torpedo, the bomb is visible, coming in from the top left.
@gerfand Жыл бұрын
@@b0bl00i its not the torpedo test you thinking about, that used an Old Oliver Perry frigate. Both end up in the same way (breaking the ship kell) so they look similar
@patrickweaver1105 Жыл бұрын
Best explanation available anywhere.
@theasianchannel2000 Жыл бұрын
Great content as usual sky, very well explained.
@tunisiandom9318 Жыл бұрын
If the Kinzhal is not Hypersonic because it can't maneuver at hypersonic, then the F-35 is not 5th gen because it can't supercruise. There are over 100 MiG-31in storage, Russia operated 100ish upgraded (BM model) interceptors, the K modification is executed on stored cells, not withdrawn from active duty interceptor fleet. The Hypersonic speeds achieve 2 goals: - Indetectable to current Radar tech. - Reduces reaction time: let's say it has a range of 1000km in quasi ballistic trajectory so most of the flight the missile is guided by Inertial guidance (which we know can already be very accurate, for most area targets). in terminal phase (50km) it slows down to high supersonic speeds on a high altitude flight (25-30km) to get optical terrain matching and Sat guidance (at mach 4 that's 20-30 seconds for trajectory correction), and then still dive down on the target at a Mach 5+ speed. it greatly reduces Air Defence reaction time, Radar lock will be lost once again and the maneuvers will be able to avoid any missile launched in the 20-30 seconds "slow" flight phase.
@JayzsMr Жыл бұрын
A normal ballistic missile also flies hypersonic and they have been around for a long time . Either the hypersonic term means something new or you can drop it all together
@jsbfe9395 Жыл бұрын
That's the correct answer. Most analysis tend to disregard the fact that the missile can slow down and then accelerate again. Why is this so hard to understand?
@Veldtian1 Жыл бұрын
Thank you.
@tunisiandom9318 Жыл бұрын
@@JayzsMr a normal ballistic missile does not maneuver. a normal ballistic missile accelerates, goes up. when it's speed reaches 0 (gravity and air resistance) it goes down in a predictable trajectory. neither Iskander nor Kinzhal are ballistic. he said it clearly, quasi-ballistic. which means it can fly a flatter trajectory with capability of mid course steering. that's why Russian S-300 been taking down Tochkas but no Ukie S-300 took down an Iskander.
@JayzsMr Жыл бұрын
@@tunisiandom9318 but then they don't fly hypersonic. Hypersonic maneuvering and targeting is the problem and the two solutions are scram jet or glider vehicle . The Kinzhal is neither and not a true hypersonic missile
@AC_702 Жыл бұрын
Your videos are very good!
@impaugjuldivmax Жыл бұрын
cheap putin's propaganda
@mdroman4327 Жыл бұрын
American defination of of hypersonic missile is a missile that can fly faster the mach 5. Russian defination of of hypersonic missile is a missile that can fly faster the mach 5 and also can manuver in the atmosphere. Non of this definition has any condition about initial or terminal speed of the missile. So, this is hypersonic according to definition of both side. If a missile can reach its terminal phase then it's too late to intercept.
@studiobauhaus7740 Жыл бұрын
@@ASS_ault that's a lie
@piotrd.4850 Жыл бұрын
Kindzal - air launched Iskander - INF compliant Oka.
@topiasr628 Жыл бұрын
It's not a bad idea really. Make a missile that can reach the maximum allowed, strap it to a plane, and let the plane get it within the window
@agentepolaris4914 Жыл бұрын
@@topiasr628 indeed
@umu8934 Жыл бұрын
Well said 😺👍
@piotrd.4850 Жыл бұрын
@@topiasr628 I know. I've been saying that this is unusually low-key and pragmatic for Russians employment of already available platforms. I wonder will we see air launched GMLRS/PrSM or even ATACMSs dropped from C-27Js/C-130s
@Unb3arablePain Жыл бұрын
It's not a "true" hypersonic in the sense that it incorporrates evasive maneuvers and scramjet technology, but being a very fast missile traveling 3500 m/s makes it extremely difficult to intercept with most Air Defense systems. Not impossible, especially with a straightline trajectory, but diffuclt nonetheless.
@Horizoneng Жыл бұрын
True story
@SewTubular Жыл бұрын
I'm sure the definition of what properties a missile must have to be a hypersonic missile will change over time, but the most important features are: Does it work ? Can it defeat air deference systems ? Can it destroy the target ? I suspect that these missile attacks will have to be coordinated with other types of missiles and dummy missiles in order to overwhelm an air defense system. Given how high value these AD systems are, the cost of launching 30 missiles to destroy the system is still probably worth it. ( especially if the AD area remains unprotected for several days )
@dudedude4034 Жыл бұрын
It’s funny to read your pathetic comments guys….(((. " extremely difficult to intercept " (. Nope….Impossible to intercept would be correct….Or you can tell us wich ADS is capable to intercept Kinzal…?
@ctcole77 Жыл бұрын
@@dudedude4034 the Patriot has shot down many Russian fascist Kinzel "terrorist" weapons.
@elpupusero Жыл бұрын
You are so ignorant as F,,, hypersonic it is already in use by Russia while china still in test mode and 🇺🇸 fail to perfect the technology
@Tom-mo2dr3 ай бұрын
Well done ! Top shelf debrief .
@klardfarkus3891 Жыл бұрын
Kinzhal has much greater capability against hardened underground bunkers than other types like cruise missiles.
@mukhtarovsergey Жыл бұрын
M8 you better close the comments, otherwise there will be a lot of idiots from both sides
@SkyshipsEng Жыл бұрын
Oh, you had to see the comments on the Russian channel
@youkingoftube1122Ай бұрын
@@SkyshipsEng Привыкай) Хотя, если ты вырос в России то знаешь какая у нас публика)
@Siskiyous6 Жыл бұрын
The effect of the US losing a Carrier would be one of great interest to watch. I think with enough of these area denial is a serious possibility.
@patrickweaver1105 Жыл бұрын
Only if you're hoping to see armageddon.
@willwozniak2826 Жыл бұрын
@@patrickweaver1105 great point!....it wouldn't be interesting to watch are Carrier sink.
@cockatoo010 Жыл бұрын
US carriers have a lot of air defenses arround the strike group. The AEGIS combat system (and its missiles, mainly SM-3 and 6) on board of the ticos and arleigh burke are even more capable of intercepting ballistic missiles than patriot I'd think it would take a lot of work to deplete or decoy the air defense for a Kinzhal to get past a strike group worth of AEGIS-guided missiles
@umu8934 Жыл бұрын
That would be interesting hitting a aircraft carrier battle group with a Kinzhal hypersonic missile that is nuclear loaded would be amazing news to see in the current era(ㆁωㆁ)
@patrickweaver1105 Жыл бұрын
@@umu8934 Again only if you really want to die in a nuclear war.
@Veldtian1 Жыл бұрын
The updated Foxbat in black looks so siiick.
@1DEADBEEF1 Жыл бұрын
Fantastic video - thanks
@xalekcey Жыл бұрын
I didn't understand. You say that the rocket flies at supersonic speed. When launched from an aircraft, the rocket achieves a greater range and, accordingly, greater speed. But why do you end up saying that this is not a full-fledged hypersound?
@SkyshipsEng Жыл бұрын
In the video, I said that the missile accelerates to hypersonic speed, but it does not have an engine running the entire flight, which is why it quickly loses speed. It can hardly call a hypersonic missile that flies at such a speed only a small part of the route
@JayzsMr Жыл бұрын
Can't manoeuvre and lock on target in hypersonic speed . Ballistic missiles also fly hypersonic and have been around for a long time . The really new thing is a highly manoeuvrable hypersonic missile Which the Kinzhal is not
@xalekcey Жыл бұрын
@@JayzsMr But the "Dagger" maneuvers at hypersonic speed. The meaning of a hypersonic missile is to overcome the enemy's air defense system at hypersonic speed. The dagger does it. The dagger maneuvers at hypersonic speeds and overcomes the air defense system. Therefore, I do not understand why you call this missile not hypersonic. The missile overcomes the active air defense zone at hypersonic speed.
@JayzsMr Жыл бұрын
@@xalekcey no it does not , watch the video
@xalekcey Жыл бұрын
@@JayzsMr The video says that the rocket is maneuvering.
@maus3454 Жыл бұрын
Good explaination. More than just a mini documentary
@charliewilson3528 Жыл бұрын
My wife says im hypersonic also 😮
@lanzortiz3199 Жыл бұрын
Well at least it's you, good thing your wife doesn't have a hypersonic mouth or a hypersonic slap. 😂
@DirkLarien Жыл бұрын
:-)) yyyeeeh it depends on at which stage of the "fligh" you are supposed to be hypersonic ? :-D
@goodlife6277 Жыл бұрын
Your wife says the Same about me...
@28ebdh3udnav6 ай бұрын
How so? Very short, full of action, and over hyped? If yes, I am too. The thing is, my 2 inches is like this missile. Precise, accurate, and in very short action.
@Rick8191-tv8pg5 ай бұрын
Russia missile strikes yesterday. 25% where hypersonic. Ukraine targets 400 miles away in less than 3.5 minutes
@williambarry8015 Жыл бұрын
SKY congratulations on how much your english has improved.
@peterazlac1739 Жыл бұрын
My understanding is that the Mig31 has the ability to guide the missile to the target including maneuvering it. The evidence that it hit and destroyed the patriot system in Kiev suggests that so far there is no defense against it. The Mig31 is the aircraft being used in pairs to destroy Ukraine aircraft without even entering Ukraine airspace with the first firing the missiles from high altitude and the second guiding it to the target since Mig-31s can share targeting data and control of missiles though they can also be controlled by the Dome radar system.
@alexlo7708 Жыл бұрын
I wonder hadn't the patriot seen the missile before being hit.
@user-jj2dk5ew9j Жыл бұрын
mig 31 is manufacture in 1980 and they tall to us is nothink now...!
@HaoSeeN Жыл бұрын
@@alexlo7708 no, don't worry, not one "Dagger" flew to the Patriot . no, don’t worry, not one “Dagger” flew to the Patriot, the Patriot stood at the Zhuliany airport - the osinters did geolocation and bought pictures from commercial satellites in the morning of that day, the positions of the Patriots were dug out there - but there were no craters or other traces from strike, most likely the Patriots changed positions after interceptions
@HaoSeeN Жыл бұрын
Greetings from Ukraine . you have no idea what's going on here. During the takeoff of the MIG-31. An air raid alarm is announced - on the streets of the siren, SMS comes to the phones. Regardless, the MIG-31 fired a rocket or not, or it has a training flight. From the moment of takeoff to the arrival of the rocket, it takes 1-2 hours, depending on which part of Ukraine he fired at (these planes are on distant airfields so that nothing accidentally arrives at them - and they are constantly monitored from Ukraine) When the MiG-31 takes off, a set of measures takes place from air forces and air defense forces, for example, the transfer of aircraft to alternate airfields, including "airfields on the roads," I will not tell everything to the detriment of my country. So you can be calm. Daggers do not hit Ukrainian planes on the ground, those that are serviceable - there are those that rot for 20-30 years at airfields without engines, sometimes their RF and shows how successfully "destroyed"
@tontontonic Жыл бұрын
kzfaq.info/get/bejne/b82bn6thnpvTaac.html evidence of the destroying of the Patriot. He fired all his missiles, but never shot down the Kinzhal.
@xenon5 Жыл бұрын
It is quite an interesting weapon, however, as you said it has some drawbacks that may make it not as successful as some people think. But I think that an idea of air launched ballistic missile is quite interesting and definitely has some uses. I only wish it had bever been used in real combat, as with any weapon, but world is not always so pleasant
@Casper1907 Жыл бұрын
It was, in Ukraine and they took it down. So ,it is not so unstoppable.
@josephboustany4852 Жыл бұрын
@@Casper1907 if you are referring to the strike on kiev I respectfully disagree the Ukrainian state *claimed* to have taken down 6 kinzhals And the Russian the Russians claimed they only fired 1 or 2 (honestly can't remember) And they somehow took out 5 launchers I don't believe either statement it's clear the Patriot battery was damaged otherwise the Ukrainian state would have shown pictures of a perfectly intact patriot in addition the American MOD itself claimed the Patriot sustained some damage (and *if* I remember correctly the American MOD claimed the sustained damage was minimal) As far as the Russians claims are concerned it would be literally impossible for 2 missile's to take down 5 separately placed launchers My verdict is that the Patriot took an unknown amount of damage yet it is unbelievably impressive considering the Ukrainians fired *over 30* defense missile's (I say defense missile's because there's no way for us to know if that entire barrage was patriot or a combination of multiple systems working together)
@quannguyenhong39816 ай бұрын
@@josephboustany4852 also you can see the "downed" Kinzhals pics from Ukrainians, it does NOT look like a Kinzhal
@Sierra.alpha. Жыл бұрын
Hi Sky, could you please make a video about the HESA Shahed-136 too? There is little info available about this drone on the web and most of them are totally wrong. I can be of help of course about this particular topic if you need any. Cheers and thanks for your great content.
@aryapatel1932 Жыл бұрын
Last time I was this early my dad was still with me
@incelhindufreak1706 Жыл бұрын
Is he in hell now
@rajatdani619 Жыл бұрын
Did u get the🥛?
@bishop51807 Жыл бұрын
❤
@anasevi9456 Жыл бұрын
Killjoy is an incredibly apt name for this missile; given what it does to NATO solutions to difficult problems.
@flyerkiller5073 Жыл бұрын
Good name. I like it)
@baomao7243 Жыл бұрын
Killjoy was here
@James-May Жыл бұрын
Such a Killjoy when it was shot down by a Patriot; as they were expecting it would be difficult to shoot down, but it wasn't. Millions of dollars developed all for an easy kill. So yeah...a killjoy.
@gelinrefira Жыл бұрын
@@James-May Haha how much did the CIA pay you to spread shit?
@anasevi9456 Жыл бұрын
@@James-May lmao, sure thing buddy.
@gtr1952 Жыл бұрын
I'm not really a tree hugger, but it sure would be better if we all spent money on making the world a better place rather than new ways to blow thing up. I'd like to think we left the world a better place for our kids, then some times it seems like things never change. 8(
@Veldtian1 Жыл бұрын
Have you ever disagreed with someone on an issue and they just wouldn't let it go?
@riccccccardo Жыл бұрын
That’s mankind for you destroyers of life.
@user-jt5sm9kp7j Жыл бұрын
But blowing things up is more fun than planting trees)
@ylstorage7085 Жыл бұрын
@3:24 "1.6Km/hour" I mean, an electron in a metal wire is only a few meters per hour, so 1.6km/hr is still impressive.
@SkyshipsEng Жыл бұрын
km/sec. My bad
@RustedCroaker Жыл бұрын
"Km" means Kelvin * meter. Case matter
@ylstorage7085 Жыл бұрын
@@RustedCroaker does Kelvin * meter have any physical meaning at all
@RustedCroaker Жыл бұрын
@@ylstorage7085 In thermal conductivity. But usually it written m*K. W/(m*K) for example
@janstankiewicz9816 Жыл бұрын
Thanks, I was about to point it out myself, but there's no point since creator of the video acknowledged the goof up.
@gerfand Жыл бұрын
13:25 Yes, simply yes.
@RS-xx9ve Жыл бұрын
13:36 "experts from social media and KZfaq". 🤣🤣🤣🤣
@SolarMoth Жыл бұрын
this is an interesting strategy.
@timbaskett6299 Жыл бұрын
As an "outside observer" I wouldn't be surprised about a dual profile missile system. One that is high supersonic/hypersonic in its first stage and has a reduced observability and maneuverable second, final stage.
@kitten-inside Жыл бұрын
If it's low and slow, it becomes easy to counter using existing systems -- like e.g. drones and regular cruise missiles are. Only hyper fast *while* manoeuvrable at the same can truly hope to beat modern AAA. By "existing", I naturally mean 30 years old systems like the Gepard or Patriot. Current day stuff is based on lasers. Not pointing lasers, missile destroying lasers.
@Mikiis-tu6zp Жыл бұрын
I really love and enjoy the effort of the West supporters trying to make all Russians weapons as bad as it's possible. Now kinzhal is not hypersonic missiles? Does maybe Avangard is hypersonic or those are aslo not, does zircon is or not? Well, let's be honest, americnas struggle to produce anything similar. Russians tanks also suck hard, but hey, they withstand few hits by a javelin and usually the crew survives, while leopard is being pierced by a $20k drone. Enough said? So, we understand. Everything Russian' sucks like by default, while everything americnas is perfectly good. Yes, perfectly good but when on the battlefield refusing to be as good as presented before.
@gheorghedoja8723 Жыл бұрын
From the outside we cannot say too much about Kinzhal; we can just wait, observe and evaluate it's effectiveness after the war. This is because in wars, development of countermeasures are somehow accelerated by the need. So, I will revise the video next year to see what's new and express my opinion.
@johntaylor3298 Жыл бұрын
It was tested in war conditions in Syria and the bunker that the narrator never mentioned in Ukraine was that not only did it destroy the ammo depot it pierced about 150 metres underground of a nuclear bunker that had high value targets of Ukrainian and NATO commanders that the west kept very quiet about. Russia would not waste the dagger on an ammunition warehouse when it can use other missiles. This missile has struck fear into all of them, especially because of its penetration depth of destroying a nuclear bunker. The narrator either didn't know or conveniently left that bit of info out.
@user-jj2dk5ew9j Жыл бұрын
dont warry next year you will no express nothing.
@TheKakan13378 ай бұрын
@@johntaylor3298 Just look at the Chinese hegemony, Russia 🇷🇺 sold out its sovereignty signing the BRICS agreement. The clowns in the state Duma have sold their industries and land to Chinese entities. They even made the Russian duma illegally confiscate EU companies and factories inside Russia 🇷🇺 that then got transferred to China.
@hedgehog31806 ай бұрын
@@johntaylor3298 The narrator left it out because you just made all of that shit up. Like pray tell which “high value” Ukrainian and NATO commanders were killed considering not a single one has been reported missing or dead? Is this some sort of desperate cope for all the Russian commanders that were killed by HIMARS? Commanders that have actual names and faces and were acknowledged as dead by Russia as well.
@marcbjorg4823 Жыл бұрын
The KH-47 is really a bunker buster or nuke delivery device. Forget hitting a small target.
@colinmartin9797 Жыл бұрын
Didn't the patriot easily acquire and knock them out of the sky this week? Or was that a different missile system it slapped? If it was, 1970s us tech is still just toying with apparently the best Russia can throw at it. The javelin showed that already.
@flyerkiller5073 Жыл бұрын
The Patriot defending Kyiv is one of the most modern versions of the system. So we can’t say that this is the 1970s tech. The details of the interception are unknown. Both sides of the conflict make unrealistic statements
@danielthuku8192 Жыл бұрын
It's not impossible to intercept it, it's just that the radar has to be pointing in the same direction at the correct time to give the system the best possible chance at intercepting it. Millenium7 has a great videos explaining the problem with intercepting hypersonic missiles.
@freak94able Жыл бұрын
@@flyerkiller5073 they are known and they didn't intercept any. 2 launchers were destroyed and 1 system was damaged. Now the US isn't allowing Ukraine to use patriots since this is the first time in history that not one but two patriot launchers got destroyed as a result of missile strike and 1 system was damaged so they're investigating and all patriots are shut down until the investigation goes on. If you don't believe it then just look at the Saudi oilfields protected by multiple patriot systems getting decimated with Yemeni drones and you think now suddenly they can shoot down mach10 cruise missiles? If you believe that I just can be sorry for you
@cmanlovespancakes Жыл бұрын
@@freak94able bs😂
@freak94able Жыл бұрын
@@cmanlovespancakes okay now first check how a huge oilfield burns down protected by famous patriots and when the US claims that 1 was "damaged" it means its destroyed and since 2 was destroyed by direct missile hit they're pulling out. Its even on the news ROFL
@mnztr1 Жыл бұрын
AFIK Russia has MIG-31's in reserve that can be upgraded to replace the ones converted for Kinzhal. They should also find a way to use their glide bombs with MIG-31
@user-cx6ry7lo1s Жыл бұрын
I don’t know what to think about this rocket, because I don’t know anything about it. I can only judge by the video from Ukraine. The Ukrainians filmed the flight of the Kinzhal. I had a question, how do they know that this missile is a Kinzhal? Watching the video removed all the questions. The rocket flew at a foreseeable height, appeared from behind the right horizon and disappeared behind the left horizon in a matter of seconds. It was impressive speed. The rocket itself looked like an oblong ball of light. It became curious what speed it is, at least approximately. I watched various videos with other Russian missiles flying over Ukraine. The speed of the Kinzhal surpassed dozens of times. After the video of the Kinzhal flying, other missiles seemed to fly at the speed of a moving car. They also say that the Patriot in Kyiv was destroyed by the Kinzhal. I don’t know if it was Kinzhal, but I think that any other Patriot missile would have been shot down. Here, the Patriot fired 32 missiles towards the Kinzhal flying towards them, and as a result, Kyiv lost one Patriot system. Be that as it may, the Kinzhal is an effective weapon and, as far as I understand, it is very variable.
@olegkrasko89287 ай бұрын
ukraine claim that 100 of 45 kinzhal`s were intercepted, but dead nato commanders not agree with this claim.
@nice_gamerlb33025 ай бұрын
I want to inhale what you’ve inhaled
@poes13145 ай бұрын
😂 what a idiot
@Victor-vj5ds27 күн бұрын
And you guys claim russia destroyed all patriot systems only to lose aircraft to them the next week.
@timaz1066 Жыл бұрын
Especially in current times it’s sad that these weapons ever have to be developed. And I wish politicians would wake up and let everyone live in peace.
@daddyandy9591 Жыл бұрын
This is not the first time I have encountered these errors. The practical ceiling of the MiG-31 is 21,000 m and the dynamic ceiling is 30,000 meters. And the payload of the MiG-31 is 5,000 kg. Therefore, it is incorrect to say that a 4,5-ton Kinzhal missile is launched from 15,000 meters.
@alexlo7708 Жыл бұрын
With load equipped , the max alt was dropped.
@daddyandy9591 Жыл бұрын
@@alexlo7708 , perhaps but not twice from 30000 to 14500 m and the weight of the rocket is 4000 - 4500 kg with a maximum aircraft load of 5000 kg.
@codece172-ak2 Жыл бұрын
I like the analysis that characterizes the Kinzhal as a weapon for special purposes. Actually, the name "Kinzhal " means "Dagger", i.e. this weapon was created namely for special military operations. The Kinzhal will probably never be used as a part of multiple rocket launcher or as a doomsday rocket (the Russians have another weapons for that). Allegedly the Kinzhal was applyed at the Kyiv airport to destroy a Patriot battery ~ a month ago. It was like a demonstration that Zelensky had no reasons to rely on an effective air defense system in the war with Putin.
@user-cm1uu6zq3k Жыл бұрын
Патриот, просто является патриотом России ❤Установка старая, хуже чем С 300 🤷Новые патриоты на Украину не поставляли.
@amazin7006 Жыл бұрын
😂 Kinzhal is worthless, it's an unguided ballistic missile. Its only use is hitting mountains and civilians
@hedgehog31806 ай бұрын
It was fired at a Patriot battery but no Patriot systems were lost and sattellite images show that it simply missed by several hundred meters. Kinzhal simply isn't an effective long range weapon in the Russian arsenal because of the lack of intelligence as well as its poor accuracy and the need to launch it at extreme ranges to preserve the precious few launch platforms Russia has, which negates the advantage of speed by giving an enemy plenty of warning time. The fact that it can only be launched by Mig-31s basically means that whenever a Mig-31 is spotted you can just safely assume it's about to launch one since the plane is essentially obsolete in all other roles. This is why Russia has mainly been relying on Shahed-131 drones in order to try to overwhelm Ukrainian air defenses, though the issue of intelligence still persists.
@codece172-ak26 ай бұрын
@@hedgehog3180 I got the impression that there is no more point in talking about the Ukrainian air defense system at all. Strikes by Russian long- and short-range drones, cruise and ballistic missiles of the Kinzhal type, MLRS and glide bombs have long become part of the life of Ukrainians from Kharkov to Lvov. Moreover, the citizens of Ukraine themselves are not to blame for this; - Soviet systems were sold out before the war or lost during the last 2 years of open conflict with Russia, and foreign supplies are completely insufficient and do not include truly modern types of weapons. Patriot, by the way, is not one of them. This system discredited itself in 2019 and then in 2022 during missile attacks on Saudi Aramco. Yet, recently it showed himself well when a transport plane carrying Ukrainian soldiers returning from captivity was shot down in the sky over Belgorod. Here, the Patriot worked flawlessly. ((
@DilbertMuc Жыл бұрын
Well, the video seems to be quite old. Now that the Kinzhal has penetrated the most modern NATO air defense umbrellas in Kiev and other places in Ukraine without any problems it seems that Kinzhal is going into mass production. There are still hundreds of Mig31 mothballed after the collapse of 1990 and their frames have only a small fraction of airtime lifetime spent. So, Mig31 is supplied in abundance from the stocks and upgraded to newest electronics. 🤔
@CaptainHightop Жыл бұрын
The Kinzhal hasn't penetrated the most modern NATO air defense umbrella in Kyiv. Every single Kinzhal launched at Kyiv since Patriot systems have been deployed has been shot down. Kinzhal is 0-11 against modern NATO air defenses.
@DilbertMuc Жыл бұрын
@@CaptainHightop Sure, the Patriot systems just self destructed as can now be seen on satellite photos. Last night, some dirt cheap Geraniums finished off what was left on the airfield. 😅
@CaptainHightop Жыл бұрын
@@DilbertMuc You are really hitting that copium hard, Orc. The Patriot systems in Ukraine are still fully intact and operational. There is video of the Kyiv battery shooting down more of the Orc terror missiles targeted at civilians from just yesterday. I guess you are huffing that Orc propaganda hard huh? Just like how Russia supposedly destroyed every HIMARS system in Ukraine, yet not a single one has been lost. Or how Russia claims to have destoyed western MBTs before they ever even arrived in Ukraine. You Orcs are pathetic. 15 months into your 3 day "special operation" and you have over 200k dead orcs, over 3000 lost tanks, 7000 lost APCs and you still can't even capture the Donbas!
@SkyshipsEng Жыл бұрын
Patriot is a modern and effective air defense system, but I would not say that it is the best that NATO has. Hundreds of MiG-31s are indeed in storage, but their components are in short supply - they cannot simply be repaired and returned to service.
@DilbertMuc Жыл бұрын
@@SkyshipsEng No need to. In another documentary they showed how the older bombers TU-160 and Mig-31 are stripped to the naked metal skeleton and are rebuild with brand new electronics, cables and everything else. Even engines are switched to modernized ones. Russia keeps all their old stuff, just in case of need. In the West, old stuff is actively destroyed or sold off to third world countries, just to get rid off it and buy new toys, a proven strategy of the MIC in Washington.
@peanutgallery4159 Жыл бұрын
Never thought about stealth missiles, hmmm, if they can't find'm how could they possibly be shot down?
@100-pc-notbot Жыл бұрын
well... it appears that the US Patriots are able to smack the Kinzhal to ground pretty effectively,
@scarecrow108productions7 Жыл бұрын
@minutlight over one city!! There's like a small group spreadout elsewhere! Cope harder copium man!
@bigmungus4864 Жыл бұрын
Source- trust the western news they totally don’t report what their told from the governments who also lie their no different from Russias lies 😂
@mrseriousman100 Жыл бұрын
@Minute Light but RUSSIA has not provided any evidence and the next day the same battery continued to operate…?
@ni9274 Жыл бұрын
@Minute Light The first Kinzhal they send on the patriot was shot down, there is evidence. The damage to the patriot were absolutely minimal
@nagantm4417 ай бұрын
Yet they can't shoot down kh-22? Makes no sense
@briancrawford69 Жыл бұрын
Im sure Russia has tons of money and resources to mass produce thus right now. They have to worry about just getting regular shells and missles
@starbase218 Жыл бұрын
I appreciate you making this video from a purely technological/capability/military point of view, but I have trouble staying that dispassionate considering that I met refugees from Ukraine.
@justinthehedgehog338811 ай бұрын
Thank you for clearly explaining the difference between a ballistic missile and a hypersonic missile. I have to keep explaining this to people; now I can just show them your video.
@jburt56 Жыл бұрын
The bottom line is that it works.
@user-fr9go5uc2z Жыл бұрын
the most adequate comment. I agree with you.What difference does it make what it's called if it flies faster than all rockets
@DefinitelyNotEmma Жыл бұрын
6:10 Yesss, give me that Foxhound goodness. I can never get enough of the MiG-31
@dphlon3374 Жыл бұрын
Thank you!
@agentepolaris4914 Жыл бұрын
What other plane could be adequate to carry the Kinzhal?
@SkyshipsEng Жыл бұрын
Tu-22M3, maybe Tu-160 and Su-34
@agentepolaris4914 Жыл бұрын
@@SkyshipsEng Thanks for replying! And personally, I think SU-34 is the best for the role. Using any of the Tupolev's seems too risky. Great Channel, I just subscribed.
@danielthuku8192 Жыл бұрын
I don't think the Flankers will achieve the optimum range for the Kinzhal. I've heard reports that it's launched at 65000ft at M2.5 by the mig31. A flanker cannot achieve that speed and altitude. While it's also can be launched by Backfires, it's low speed of about mach 1.6 fully loaded means that Russia is currently only launching them using the mig31 with the Tu22 launching the kh22s.
@agentepolaris4914 Жыл бұрын
@@danielthuku8192 I see, thanks for the input
@little_error295 Жыл бұрын
@@agentepolaris4914 why the tupolevs can just launch them from Russian airspace
@gino3286 Жыл бұрын
Hi thank you for the very interesting video I read somewhere that at some point of its trajectory an hypersonic missile becomes invisible to radars because of its speed There was also a technical explanation about plasma that i did not understand I wonder if this is true and when it occurs I guess that in the last part instead when the missile slows down it should be visible to radars There is something very fascinating about stealthiness to radars To be able to hit without being seen is something magic And this would provide an exceptional advantage Of course
@umu8934 Жыл бұрын
IMHO the Kinzhal is a modern advance version of Iskander missile, but as some says its not a true hypersonic in its nature is still in hypersonic in a sense that it's difficult to intercept because at a high speed of beyond mach 6 in its atmospheric trajectory path long range radar can't locate it.... The tip of the missile is being envelope by plasma field, when its nearing to its target it'll slow abit down but still near to mach 5 when descending and the enemy radars will be still having hard time to calculate its trajectory of target.... The radar or enemy cant only know it if it hits it's target and see the destruction.... US already admitted its hard to intercept and the Kinzhal hypersonic ghost of Kyiv by Klitschko is just a propaganda so the Ukrainian force would not loose hope to holding up themselves fighting for Ukraine (≧▽≦)
@ni9274 Жыл бұрын
there is proof that a Kinzhal was intercepted, the wreck was found and identified, the US also confirmed it. The fact that Russia lauched 6 Kinzhal at one patriot and it wasn't destroyed is another evidence that many Kinzhal were intercepted.
@rollog1248 Жыл бұрын
Pretty much everything you said was wrong. It's amazing you can be so sure of yourself when you are so wrong
@RS-xx9ve Жыл бұрын
@@rollog1248 No one cares what American propagandists have to say.
@maximme Жыл бұрын
US is using Ukraine as a test bed for its missile defense. A very useful test bed.
@agentepolaris4914 Жыл бұрын
Every country is using ukraine for that.
@flyerkiller5073 Жыл бұрын
Every warzone is a test bed for the military tech
@sski Жыл бұрын
Officially 'Hypersonic' or not, the Kinzhal has been doing amazing work in the SMO. The recent hits on warehouses full of NAFO junk and mercs, C&C complexes, and energy concerns have done much to slow the AFU Spring/Summer/Fall/Winter/Spring Counteroffensive to a dribble. And OH! I would love to catch a ride in one of those MiG-31K's. All the way up as far as it could go to edge of space. Those machines are amazing! Thanks for bringing this video out. You have great scenes in this video of the machines. Спасибо!
@simpmaster7995 Жыл бұрын
RUSKI Bot.
@maciek_k.cichon Жыл бұрын
This amazing work is still part of stalled Muscovite army with funny little gains since April last year.
@simpmaster7995 Жыл бұрын
@@maciek_k.cichon Kyiv in 3 Days!!!!
@simpmaster7995 Жыл бұрын
Bakhmut by Tomorrow.
@piotrd.4850 Жыл бұрын
Well, at time 20k USD could buy you ride on MiG-25 which is close enough.
@billcarpenter52715 ай бұрын
Thank you Sky !
@piotrd.4850 Жыл бұрын
17:55 - one would think, that uprgrade of guidance kit on already existing missiles with equal speed, greater range and twice the warhead would be more reasonable course of action.
@SkyshipsEng Жыл бұрын
It’s a half-measure, but this can be done, in theory
@Ske444417 күн бұрын
What about if you sent 60 billion supersonic nuklear missiles at one aircraft carrier at the same time would it overwhelm anymissile defence?
@Saszynski Жыл бұрын
So if the missile takes all the needed data from the "AVACS" system (donT know how its called in Russia), and MiG is just a carrier without radar, shoot down the AVACS and problem seem to be sorted. Yeah, I know that the flying radar can be miles away from the attacked area, but isnt that Russian term of "lost missile"?
@DennisMerwood-xk8wp Жыл бұрын
The Russians have high-powered active jamming of JTIDS-MIDS-Link-16 emitters. High-powered active jamming of satellite navigation receivers over large areas. High-powered active jamming of L-band AEWC-AWACS and surface-based search radars at long ranges. High-powered active jamming of guided munition command data links over large areas. Completely, neutralizing the USA's use of AWACS for their detection.
@hedgehog31806 ай бұрын
@@DennisMerwood-xk8wp Jamming AWACS isn't exactly a great strategy for guiding a missile dependent on AWACS.
@DennisMerwood-xk8wp6 ай бұрын
@@hedgehog3180 Huh? Want to try that again my friend?
@AmerBoyo Жыл бұрын
Another good video! Certainly a weapon to be weary of in any case.
@henthust9784 Жыл бұрын
At 11:46 he mentions that the Kinzhal strikes speeds of Mach 10 or more, after explaining that hypersonic needs to be going at above Mach 6. As to how something going 4 Machs more than the hypersonic boundary is NOT YET Hypersonic 😮😮😮😮😮! It's easy to sense that the narrator is Western and the weapon is Russian, without asking.
@constellation-sj8xn Жыл бұрын
The missile slows down as it descends to it's target, it only reaches mach 10 a few seconds after launch
@studiobauhaus7740 Жыл бұрын
@@constellation-sj8xn who gives a fuck if it slows down a bit if it hits speeds of Mach 10 or more and can maneuver so cant be intercepted? You westerners are the biggest bullshiters.
@csk4j Жыл бұрын
Will you do Zircon as that is also big in news?
@SkyshipsEng Жыл бұрын
There is very little information about the Zircon. I'm afraid the video about it will be 90% fanfic. I'll create it when we learn more
@ijoseluis Жыл бұрын
High precision weapons are needed when precise targets justify their high cost. It was this ever since.
@zazaza5295 Жыл бұрын
All Kinzhals were successfully intercepted by ammo depots, heavy weapon warehouses and by one SAM battery. - Ukraine
@simpmaster7995 Жыл бұрын
"...And all of it is in dream of Russian Trolls."-Ukraine.
@EnglandLention Жыл бұрын
Poem ; Station MIR fallen into Earth. Vladimir you are in my heart.
@madanbisht6 Жыл бұрын
Make a vdo on tsircon missile
@SkyshipsEng Жыл бұрын
It was difficult to make a video about the Kinzhal - there is very little information. There is almost no information about Tsircon
@madanbisht6 Жыл бұрын
@@SkyshipsEng but can u explain me what's the basic difference between these two
@shahpharmacia Жыл бұрын
Nice information
@studiobauhaus7740 Жыл бұрын
So its not a true hypersonic missile cause you changed THE DEFINITION OF WHAT A HYPERSONIC MISSILE IS SINCE YOU CANT MAKE ANY HYPERSONIC missiles ..RIGHT?
@AniMageNeBy26 күн бұрын
I feel it a bit biased (in a pejorative way) to consider the kinzal as well as the iskander not hypersonic. There seems no objective reason for it, if "above mach 5" and "maneuverability" are the criteria. Then anything that matches those conditions, should be considered hypersonic. That "it can't maintain it's highest speed for long" has little relevance; nowhere is it' stated that it needs to have mach 5+ the whole way of it's trajectory. In fact, the author himself acknowledges that *every* hypersonic missile - from any country - needs to slow down to zoom in on the target and hit it. So by that standard, when applied consistently, no hypersonic missile exists in the world, and what's more: it *can never* exist, because ALL those hypersonic missiles slow down below mach 5 at some point in their trajectory. I'm only applying logic here. That's the consequence of arguing that a missile that doesn't keep it's mach 5+ speed up shouldn't be considered a hypersonic missile. It seems to me that the author wants his cake and eat it as well. He acknowledges no missile can maintain 5+ speeds, yet says those that fall below that speed on any given time on any part on it's trajectory, can't be considered hypersonic. Shouldn't that rather be reversed? Isn't it that any maneuverable missile that CAN reach above mach 5+ speeds, shpould be considered hypersonic? Being able to reach that speed is on of the main charateristics of hypersonic flight, after all, not that it needs to be hypersonic from begin to end. Because taken that to an extreme, than no airplane would ever become hypersonic neither, since they would fly a large part of their flightpatch below mach 5+ as well. Thsi makes no sense. IT's the ability to reach that speed that counts, not how long to maintain it. So... He arbitrarily decides they're not hypersonic because they don't maintain a mach 5+ speed long enough, but fails to give any indication what is "long enough" and what objective criteria he uses to determine a time that is long enough. Let alone he gives any arguments why maintaining that speed should be considered necessary to be considered hypersonic in the first place. Is 30% of its flight-path at mach 5+ "long enough"? 40% ? 51%? 66%? He does not say, nor gives arguments why one given percentage should count as enough, and another not. He doesn't even explicitly say how long of the time it flies does an iskander or kinzal is actually above mach 5+, and how much longer it would need in hios book to be considered hypersonic. Since the start and the end of ANY hypersonic missile won't be hypersonic, using the same train of thought and reasoning as the author, one could, thus, argue no missile can ever be called hypersonic. Using such convoluted criteria is not only highly arbitrary, but also quite nonsensical.
@lk9650 Жыл бұрын
AiTelly made a video about Kinzhal and they think it's a 2 stage missile.
@SkyshipsEng Жыл бұрын
Such a theory exists. But, I think they would not do such a scheme. It is very difficult to implement and reduces the parameters of the warhead. In addition, there is evidence that the missile falls on the target entirely
@ketelin4285 Жыл бұрын
@@SkyshipsEng I agree with you . The only good thing about that theory is that the schematic predates the war . The evidence is strong or look like a M117 with recent made up schematics fo fit them ? Honest question , i'm just not in the business to be fooled by anyone :)
@cherrypoptart2001Ай бұрын
Judging my the recent events in Ukraine, i never understood how they claim to shot down multiple Kinzhals but are having a hell of a time with dealing with basic Iskander strikes , thats like someone being able to do algebra but not solve simple multiplication
@quintvanblitterswijk616228 күн бұрын
Yeah, and every may the 9th I saw a super duper army parading and they said all the vehicles presented where so much better than any other Western alternative. In the meanwhile the russian arms industry is losing clients like Mr. Beast loses credibility. Tldr: The patriot is better than the kinzhal.
@cherrypoptart20012 ай бұрын
I heard the underground bunker in the first clip was actually design to store soviet nukes and withstand the blast of a nuke. If true thats some scary underground bunker busting power for something strictly relying on kinetic power
@TheOldnic Жыл бұрын
It's capable of drinking thousands of litres of vodka , capable of imitating a tourist , ...
@how2preventnextplandemic76 Жыл бұрын
Can they sink carriers?
@KSmithwick1989 Жыл бұрын
Probably not, RIM-161 (SM-3) has an inception speed of Mach 13.2. Fleet protection is built to be extremely effective. As they're expected to be targeted by strategic missles, such as ICBM.
@how2preventnextplandemic76 Жыл бұрын
@@KSmithwick1989 I was asking for hypersonic missiles, not ICBM. Yes, ICBM seem not to be a big problem.
@KSmithwick1989 Жыл бұрын
@@how2preventnextplandemic76 What I'm going at, is hypersonic objects such as Kinzhal is slow by comparison. When you consider a destroyer picket can hit objects in orbit. It's basically overkill for most threats coming from high altitude.
@how2preventnextplandemic76 Жыл бұрын
@@KSmithwick1989 We will see what is the truth soon - I guess. They want war.
@hedgehog31806 ай бұрын
Sinking a carrier would require first finding it and that is difficult when Russia lacks any real reconnisance and intelligence assets. The most up to date information Russia would have is by spy satellite but they only have enough spy satellites to get images of an area every two days on average and carriers can obviously move very far in two days and are some of the fastest ships out there. This is further complicated by the fact that the US has several options for shooting down LEO satellites, so in all likelyhood in a war scenario the US would just shoot down any satellite before it passed over a carrier group. Then there's also the issue of launching the missile, the downside of it being air launched is that the platform can easily be shot down and these Mig-31s would effectively be blind sitting ducks since they have no radar, of course they'd have escorts but there are no Russian aircraft that stand a chance in an engagement with F-35s.
@spaced4448 Жыл бұрын
3:24.. hypersonic at 1.6 km/h ? I knew I was hypersonic 😂
@John-wd5cb Жыл бұрын
You just made a video with the Jane's data about both missiles and it is an already known fact that they don't export the Kinzhal. Therefore Jane's hypothetical data are not accurate.
@MakedonskaAkropolaMKD Жыл бұрын
Again - not a word of Kinzhal penetration parameters! What incomplete report is this?
@frankgaleon5124 Жыл бұрын
What do we know obut its penetration parameters?
@MakedonskaAkropolaMKD Жыл бұрын
@@frankgaleon5124 - Yeah, no one gives the missile characteristics when it hits the target!
@ash7604yaman Жыл бұрын
Iskander meaning Alexander the mecodonian who with his army reached from mecodonia to India and was defeated by the Indian elite forces that shook the living day light out if the mecodonian army and the mosquito had the better of him he didn't take his malaria tablets his body was taken to Egypt where Egypt was the high schools of learning like modern day Stanford universities education is highly appreciated by the world for physics astrophysics and sciences and mathematics is educated Indian mathematics is educated there using the zero in calculations out of this arrived the devolpment of computers for human progress, production, industrial revolution and knowage for space exploration that is the greatest achievement India has given to the world thank god for king Harsha of India when China and India shared knowledge of mathamatics , sciences and art flourished , astronomy, religion, spirituality , temple building, nuclear power for rockets was already devolpment in progress but Germany took the formula books from India and the swastika was used by the Germans in gaining engineering knowledge and Adolf Hitler tried taking over the world but failed but Germany healed and the devolpment didn't ceased as Germany products are highly appreciated by the world through out the Islamic world ,Japan, Italy also learned the art of engineering , Baghdad Iraq had engineering knowledge that's why Saddam Hussein's a former puppet of Rome was deafeted by Norman the American German general and he was ordered by the king of Saudi Arabia to hang Saddam Hussein for invading the kingdom also Kuwait which was part of Iraq created by the Roman imprilist powers and no weapons of mass dustruction was found after the gulf war planned by the coalition forces where American forces lead the way to Baghdad as tikrik the home town of Saddam Hussein his own country man betrayed him and he was hanged for commiting genocide of the Shia Muslims fighting the Sunni Shia war for a decade planned by the Roman imprilist powers for weapons sells in the conflicts where the bankers made a lot of money by charging the governments interest on the loans what a world we live in and now Corona virus devolpment created by the Chinese American lab. technicians for the enriching the drug companies which caused further genocide through the god's earth who knows what next these beasts of the earth are upto 👮👮👮👮🇺🇬👩👩👦👦🤑👹👹👹🕋😂😂😏😠😠🤕😷🤧😈👿👽🎃☠️🤡💀👀👶👨👨👧👨👩👧👧👨👩👦🤱RIP. those of passed away through genocide, oppression,wars ,corona virus ,aids,std,under Roman imperial powers.
@mcal27 Жыл бұрын
I realise the Mig-31 has high performance, but I would have thought it was needed (especially these days) in it’s original role? It’s well known that Mig-31 had played a major role in keeping the Ukrainian Airforce limited in use/effectiveness. Could not Su-34 handle Kinzhal Sky?
@SkyshipsEng Жыл бұрын
In fact, the Su-34 seems like a logical carrier for this missiles, but it is mute, not yet said. Apparently, now the missile is being adapted for the Tu-22M
@mcal27 Жыл бұрын
@@SkyshipsEng thanks Sky. I’m sure Tu-22M can handle the job just fine also. 👍
@mcal27 Жыл бұрын
@@SkyshipsEng Just my opinion but I think Mig-31 (and Su-25) deserve to be put back into production.
@mcal27 Жыл бұрын
Well reports today that Su-34 was used for a Kinzal launch for the first time… Happy the Defence Ministry heard me! :) I honestly think those Mig-31K airframes will be needed to support the rest of the 31 fleet, so this is a good move.
@marcdunord Жыл бұрын
ic, skyships took a look at the rocket, recognized the iskanker shape, and lazily concluded it must be same old plus mig31-launching, i.e., an iskanker with correspondingly altered+extended trajectory. Lazy as skyships is, he did not even do the little google research needed to find the published research on how to i/o to the interior of plasma-shrouded hypersonic bodies and arrogantly concluded that such i/o is not possible, missing out on the most likely scenario which sees kinzhal being blind but with trajectory randomly altered and then brought back on target by external guidance that geolocates the rocket in real time based on its radio and IR emissions, a scenario which would allow kinzhal to hit with full 12-mach kinetic energy and only requires a materials-science breakthrough to give it protracted resistance to friction heat.
yes yes yes... and yet, Patriot takes them out as flies with the newspaper...
@NineSeptims Жыл бұрын
Patriot was damaged as a result.
@user-sn1bz4nw9i3 ай бұрын
The vintage analog cockpit instruments in russian planes look ridiculous in 21 century
@kaischmidt730 Жыл бұрын
getting that thing off the ground using a supersonic jet sounds prohibitively expensive.
@bechirjano3976 Жыл бұрын
in this video , at 3'.23" you are saying that the speed is 1.6 km per hour ;;;; big mistake ;;;;;;;
@SkyshipsEng Жыл бұрын
km/sec
@leonawdisho6609 Жыл бұрын
Hey Sky . I just wanna mention one thing . Minute 3:25, you said 1.6 km per hour . I believe you mean 1.6 km per second .
@SkyshipsEng Жыл бұрын
Yes it is. My mistake
@leonawdisho6609 Жыл бұрын
@Skyships Eng it's all good sky Still an amazing video as usual . Thank you for your time and effort. ❤️
@bill-nn1vp5 ай бұрын
what about avanguard and zircon..?
@Ricklyplinth Жыл бұрын
Around 3:28 you say per hour when you meant second i believe
@Julian13o11 Жыл бұрын
Please make a video about the AAV-14 soviet submarine hunter plane
@aitorbleda8267 Жыл бұрын
One note: the chinese do have missiles that can be "launched to the zone and find a cool target", and that is a game changer, if it works properly.
@stekra3159 Жыл бұрын
How does it work? well 6 of them not very well against Patriot pack 3
@TheRGFury Жыл бұрын
Kinzhal slapped the shit out of the Patriot system 😂
@ni9274 Жыл бұрын
The first Kinzhal they send on the patriot was shot down, there is evidence. After that 6 Kinzhal were fired to the Patriot and weren't able to destroy it, it's fair to assume they were all intercepted even if we don't have the proof at this time (It will come soon enough).
@xprettylightsx8 ай бұрын
A certain western country has infiltrated and literally annihilated the Kinzhals (USSR)country of origin. 😂
@BMD7657 ай бұрын
Lockdown kid 😂....go and check how the patriot shoot down Russian so called modern missile kinzhal..
@TheKakan13378 ай бұрын
The Kinzhal was so successful that the makers of said weapons were sent to penal colonies!
@sergiodesouzajunior3962 Жыл бұрын
Compro 70.000 unidades para a força aéria brasileira
@Jmpd11176 ай бұрын
Hipersonic is no match for the speed of lasers. That idea was born to fail.
@ClaudeMagicbox Жыл бұрын
Ok, but according to what you said there will never be a "real" hypersonic missile as you intend by the term that the missile flies at >Mach 8-9 until the target... because of the plasma cloud rendering it "blind" I don't understand your reasoning, if Kh-47M2 flies hypersonic (>Mach 10) and slows down to turn on aiming devices in the final stage towards the target it's simply the only way a hypersonic missile can work based on what you said yourself
@DennisMerwood-xk8wp Жыл бұрын
The Russians have this sorted Claude. Think not at your peril my friend!
@hedgehog31806 ай бұрын
The Kh-47 doesn't slow down to aim, it slows down because it can't maintain hyper sonic flight in atmosphere for very long because it uses a rocket motor and not something like a ramjet.
@maemilev Жыл бұрын
Those explosion footage are iskandar missiles not kin
@amazin7006 Жыл бұрын
They are the exact same missile. The only difference is Kinzhal can be mounted to a MIG
@miamaxim7662 Жыл бұрын
3:24 come again! 1.6 km/h ?
@sonnytaylor7521 Жыл бұрын
Surely an error in magnitude; he meant 1.6 Km per secoond.
@cblawrence6468 Жыл бұрын
What about the zircon?
@tomc.2808 Жыл бұрын
Could they make more - without western electronics ???
@GreatUncleBuck Жыл бұрын
3:24 About 1.6km per hour? Sounds not right to me but hey... I'm not a rocket scientist.
@SkyshipsEng Жыл бұрын
km/sec
@RealNotallGaming Жыл бұрын
what mean hypersonic? more then MACH5 and is not related to seconds into hypersonic range so everything can fly 1 sec at MACH5.0 is called hypersonic .. so simple
@frankgaleon5124 Жыл бұрын
Why they did't use the Tu-22 for the missile initially? I think this is better solution
@flyerkiller5073 Жыл бұрын
Perhaps, the Tu-22M greatly reduces the missile performance. Top speed M2, ceiling 13 km
@frankgaleon5124 Жыл бұрын
@@flyerkiller5073 And what about the Su-34 or Tu-160?
@flyerkiller5073 Жыл бұрын
@@frankgaleon5124 They are even worse. I don’t know, how they will apply the Kinzhal to the Tu internal bomb compartment