是的😂老外不懂

because it was a man made famine by mao and could have been fixed easily even sooner

Wait Muhammad Qasim from doing that again

@@knahdogg5769 STOP TALKING BULL CRAPS AND NONSENSE. Worry your own country problem first 😂😂😂😂👎👎👎👎!!!

​@@knahdogg5769funny you don't mention the centuries of Man Made famine that the communist were finally able to break, unlike any others. Almost like you have an agenda.

👍🤝🏻

I honestly do too as long as they behave well. I understand the United States has always been far from perfect, but the injustices Chinese citizens face day-in, day-out is a major concern. Their ethics are questionable to say the least, but at the end of the day, all of my disdain for China is completely regarding their government.

⁠@@navetaylor Why do you think the chinese are facing injustices and the ethics are questionable ？Kindly clarify by giving evidence

​@@navetaylor what an easily manipulated person.😂😂😂😂😂

@@navetaylor What you need to concern is your own ethics, at least clean up your mouth and speak with facts and logics.

they used to do that under Deng Xiaoping. Today the Chinese are working for thir own enslavement.,

Thank you brother. On behalf of all the good Chinese people, I would like to express my heartfelt wishes to your country.

huge fan from China. I love your music.

The ratio of the Brain weight/size and the Body weight/size determines the smartness of a person.

Xi stands on the shoulders of giants but takes all the credit. China spent decades laying down the ground work, building relations with other countries, and growing the economy and Xi just swept in and claimed the credit for China's successes.

Dengs China shows what Mao _could_ have done if Mao wasnt such an egotist. Instead of growing China's power he did nothing but try and crown himself the new emperor under a different title.

Sad to say, China wasted 30 years while the West had advanced since 1949's Communism under Mao totally shut themselves from the outside world for Capitalism was viewed as 'evil'. In 1979, Deng opened up China and the Chinese were surprised to see ' variety is the spice of life'. Hence, the saying 'it does not matter what colour of the cat, as long as it can catch mice'

Tiananmen Square was a failed CIA color revolution. that's why a lot of the participants end up in US, Australia, or else where.

In China, if you ask the local elders when China became rich, they will say Deng Xiaoping, because when Deng Xiaoping did not come to power, many people in China were hungry.

Deng Xiaoping is by far a greater leader than Lee Kuan Yew. The stage he played on and transformed was not comparable. And he went through personal turmoil and misery while LKY did not. He directed 1B people spread across millions of Sq Kms. He governed people of all creeds and literacy levels while LKY basically governed impoverished illiterates who fled to Nanyang. Not saying LKY wasn't a great man. He was but not in the same league as Deng.

@@n.c9653 If there is no LKY, who would Deng look to for advise?

@@n.c9653 Lee Kwan Yew is a legend. Don't praise Deng, he did some worst things too particularly during that [REDACTED] in 1989 and his open economic reforms is a ruse for him to look more sympathetic to the mainland Chinese people.

Three good friends, DengXiaoPing LeeKuanYew dan ChiangChing-kuo(Taiwan's 2nd Presiden). They all led their people to prosperity.

The Chinese are always respectful to the greatness of Persia

@@syu2003 but not respectful enough to call them "Iran"? "Persia" was a name given to Iran by the Greeks and it's just a name that stuck well into the 20th century but it's never been the name of the country, even in ancient times they used names that sounded like "Iran".

It is not because Chinese don’t respect Iranian, we don’t know you prefer to be called Iran. In China, people think Persia is more ancient and sounds more romantic ❤

@@yys6253 similar story with many Anglo countries. They associate "Persia" with the countries imperial days and associate "Iran" with the modern day theocracy but ironically the name "Iran" is the ancient name. The name "Persia" is Greek and comes from the name of an Iranian province, Persis, but it's name "Iran" was always its name.

😊 17:58

What is SWCC stands for?

Deng Xiao Ping seemed to know where China's future lies ahead...from Western colonisers' greed and great demand for cheap labor. True to his vision, China will rise from the abyss of exploitation to become a world superpower.

Neither does Xi Jinping, that Hu Jintao "incident" is a nothing-burger cooked up by Western media... Deng Xiaoping and Xi Jinping actually have a lot more in common than most people recognize. Both are visionaries who are not afraid to tackle the big problems of their time head-on, unlike most of their colleagues and contemporaries who follow the path of least resistance. The main difference between Xi Jinping and Deng Xiaoping is simply that the two are facing very different challenges in a very different political/economic/social/technological setting. That's why it's such a bad take when Western analysts contrast Xi Jinping with Deng Xiaoping by saying that the latter was reform-oriented while Xi Jinping allegedly is not. Actually, both are reform-oriented, it's just that different reforms are needed today compared to 40 years ago...

Strong leaders dont need to brag and dont need to demand respect, it's given to them willingly, while weak men need to demand worship and force respect. Same reason why a mastiff doesnt need to bark to get your fear and/or respect while a chihuahua does nothing but bark and snap its teeth.

Impossible, because your culture does not produce such talent, if you want to change come more foreign students

@@ponyma6304 what do you mean by "your culture does not produce such talents"?

@@greekenderman2005 In my view, the political system in Western countries like your country cannot produce such leader as Deng, unleash you change or reform your system close to China's. Under your democracy and freedom, leaders must be elected through one person one vote. So the candidate must satisfy the immediate or instant requirements to get elected and cannot give long-term plan for the whole country, coz the new leader may overturn the previous' policies or plans very easily. Then the political engine may idle/ tick over. That's why western democracy is not welcome in China. It looks like procedurally democratic, but quarreling without a conclusion.

@@greekenderman2005 I am not bragging our system is so good. Frankly we also don't think our is very good, far from perfect. But ours can get things done but sometimes not so procedurally democratic as yours. The common people only want concrete benefits and they don't care too much about the political prodecures. We also have procedures, but some are internal operation. This is true. However, our leaders are not down to earth and have already abandoned the idealism as of now. They make long term plans for the country and also care about the daily affairs especially the people's livelihood. Our government is not perfect truly. Not so transparent, also some are corrupted. But people care about their lives more.

@@greekenderman2005 when Deng was in power in 1980s, he was making plan for China , which would span four generations until 2050s. His very words: I can't live until then, but I am responsible to make the plans for the people and the country then. His three-step development strategy is: from 1980-1990, addressing the people's problems of food and clothing; from 1990 to 2000, making people reach the “better-off level” for the people's livelihood; from 2000 to 2050, with 30-50 years of hard work, making China basically realize the modernization, close to the level of a moderately developed country. Deng cannot imagine the global situation will dramatically change in the new century and also can't imagine China will develop so fast. No one has predicted this. Even in 2002, in the 16th national congress of communist Party of China, the national statistics bureau gave the new leadership the report and predicted that China may surpass Japan in 2030 in GDP and catch up with US in 2050s or longer time. However, we surpass Japan in 2010 and now is running after US. These are all beyond Deng's plan but generally the party and government is still following his plan, only making his plan more detailed and feasible through concrete policies. His plan is down to earth and practical.

HIS EXPERIENCE IN FRANCE HAD GIVEN HIM A BETTER VIEW OFTHE WORLD THAN MAO WHO NEVER WENT OUT OF CHINA.

Deng was a comunist hardliner when he was in Paris, he was a firm supporter of strong bonds with the Sovjets for decades and did participate in the Great Leap as a vivid supporter of Mao. Only at the end of the Great Leap he started criticising Mao when others already did before him. Nothing of his opinions that changed had anything to do with France. ALL His Changes were inspired by "what did Empirial China do better before the Revolution?" that is literally the entire point of this documentation

Rwanda is the cleanest city in Africa. They are emulating Singapore. Keep out corruption and improve on education.

it is china long culture even during imperial dynasty, king needed to do his duties not because he is king. he got to answer the people and “heaven”, if the king against it, be prepared to be overthrown! 😂😂😅

Africa would be better off looking to other countries for advice and as role models, China's growth depended heavily on a single party state and cult of personality to grow and to maintain the power of the state there were heavy sacrifices. After the revolution Mao did the same thing that the Japanese did in the Imjin War and invade Korea to kill off all the young skilled warriors so they couldnt destabilize the newly formed empire, and he did similar to Stalin with the Holodomr and starved people into submission to him to maintain the power of the party. Mao also industrialized China through heavy support from the USSR for decades and was pretty shameless about stealing from them at the same time (Chinese IP theft is nothing new). Those are all things that most African nations would struggle to do and there's hurdles that many African countries face that China never really did like heavily divided and varied languages and religions and ethnic groups, not to mention serious problems with tribalism in some places. China has always been a very centralized power whereas there have been few centralized African governments that werent foreign powers ruling over Africans so they need to craft a state pretty much from scratch while the CCP had the benefit of a culture already accustomed to and expecting a centralized state, there was already a social contract in place of people willing to sacrifice prosperity and liberty in return for stability and peace.

You don't understand the Chinese. They don't care about monuments or having their faces printed on money or having a warship named after them. Same like lky

Deng Xiaoping was very low-key. Mao Zedong asked the Chinese to say "Long live Mao Zedong", while Deng Xiaoping hoped that the Chinese said "Hello, Xiaoping".

china does honour him. just not worship him. that’s all.

Deng was a great leader, and not promoting a personal cult is one virtue among others. I believe Deng personally witnessed how a leader could so easily gain an inflated ego and was wary of going there himself

"So, you get capitalism money to take care of the population". Can you guess who Deng was speaking to?

Xi is the man that will destroy what Deng had built.

@@The11061984 LOL, Xi built what Deng wanted of China to become. A global economic power and a China fully modernized and educated to compete in the global world. Xi made Deng’s dream for China come true. Take your anti-Xi/anti-China US propaganda narrative horse-blinders off. China is surpassing the US in just about everything it takes on. The US is a declining outdated nation ill prepared for the 21st century. Xi made Deng’s dream come true. GO XI! GO CHINA!! THABK YOU DENG for planting the seed for China’s future

True

@@Overwatch120 It was a far cry from today's Shanghai port

he is. mr xi bring china to next level of strength and prosperity. 🎊 🎉

@@fannyalbi9040 Yes, President Xi is China's best leader. I hope China can overcome US sanctions, in particular sanctioning China's chip and high tech companies.

@@zhangruyi3153 u don’t have to hope. hope is for hopeless situation. mr xi is doing it now and china people will make it happen. chinese has a simple proverb 愚公移山，自強不息then can move the mountains 🏔

westernization bad for china

Only 4 inventions in 5000 years in history

​@@chitchat3838 if you don't open your mouth nobody knows that you are that ignorant

I AGREE. BOTH DENG N SUN YAT SEN LIVED FOR THE GOOD OF THE PEOPLE. NOT FOR SELF ENRICHMENT. ADMIRATION FROM THE PHILIPPINES.

its the middle class that faces persecution. the poor get freebies and sc/st atrocity act. despite 300 schemes if they are not able to lift themselves out of poverty then it needs some introspection. stop lying.

He followed the Singapore model, sending thousands of China Civil servants to Singapore for training.

Yes, he took advice from Lee Kuan Yew who is equally great ❤

HE LEARNED MUCH FROM LEE KUAN YEW. BUT HE ALREADY HAD THE DESIRE BEFORE HAND IN HIS HEART TO CHANGE N IMPROVE CHINA.

❤

U N I SHOULD BE PROUD OF BEING DENGISTS.

No. Greatest of all leaders of china....Chairman Mao . without his full scale foundation and pillar. Deng is nothing.

不知道你们为何有这种救世主般错误的观念

Modern china from 1949

NOT ONLY IN CHINA, BUT CHINESE ALL OVER THE WORLD WHO ARE INFORMED ADMIRE N RESPECT DENG. AS I DO WHO LIVE IN THE PHILIPPINES.

THANKS FOR UR SINCERE PRAISE. IT MADE ME SO PROUD OF MY CHINESE HERITAGE. I M HALF CHINESE, HALF FILIPINO.

MAINLAND CHINA WAS VOTED INTO UN BY AFRICAN NATIONS THAT WERE INSPIRED BY THE SELFLESS CONTRITION OF MAINLAND CHINA IN BUILDING A LONG RAILROAD IN AFRICA. WHICH FORMER COLONIAL EUROPEANS NEVER DID.

是的，这个视频很明显的价值观输出，试图证明资本主义才能使得一个国家富强，但是邓小平是坚定的社会主义支持者，国家的根基绝不动摇，因此89年让赵紫阳下台了，杜绝了资本主义在中国生根。

the video talk about corruption, the shadow of capitalism. how corruption consider as “glorification”?

perhaps like superpower india?

Or probably India

Were you there ??

What "massacre". TAM?? During that time there were no smartphones. It was easy for Western media to tell lies without need of video footage proofs.

@@chitchat3838 Were you there?

gives china a fxckin break u islander mentality peasant.

Another great leader

Those things would’ve happened with or without Mao in power. Demographic transition model is what causes it

+ green revolution

Produce your own

China wouldn't be a supper power today if it wasn't for him. He was the greatest thing that ever happened to China and its people.

Because Mao founded the state itself.

In China there is no such thing as Mao Zedong Airport, Deng Xiaoping Stadium or Hu Jintao Expressway

@@nmew6926 That's true. And you don't see their wives or sons go on to be heads of state, etc. Nepotism is rife in countries like USA and Japan. Nothing is based on merit. You get voted because of your family connections.

Interesting

They are both Hakka Chinese!

@@charttrakarn3438Yes. Very smart people 😂

Boxd evfm

Agreed. Plus, Americans will suddenly think Deng Xiaoping is pure evil after hearing he was the leader during the 1989 Tiananmen protests

Mao united China and set up a New China but Mao make a Big Mistake by imposing a Cultural Revolution during the 1960s. That was the Terrible Damage that Mao has caused to China going Backwards again

@@nathanwu6296 With all do respect I understand that the CCP internet minders are well versed about what happened in Tianemen Square, the great leap forward and the cultural revolution and the harvesting of human organs for profit.

Deng was also working for Mao and Deng was the one who solved the starvation, not Mao. Mao fired Deng several times and within those periods when Deng was temporarily fired starvation also came back several times because of Mao's principles that did not work. That's why Mao hired back Deng because he knew Deng can solve that problem. Unfortunately you don't have enough historical understanding about this issue. Mao's principles for farmers created the starvation. Before that period there was no starvation.

They start the documentary in a very stereotypical way by stating that millions of Chinese died of starvation under Mao but this happened within the first decade of Mao's rule. Lots of Chinese also starved to death in the decades preceding Mao's rule and one should not forget that the US and other Western countries instituted a blockade against the People's Republic of China and refused to sell China grain. And while millions of Chinese did starve to death in the early years of Mao's rule, it should also be mentioned that hundreds of millions of Chinese were born under Mao's rule, and not just born but grew up well-fed and well-educated. These Chinese born and educated under Mao were the ones that Deng could later rely on and leverage in pushing to make China the factory of the world. There's a reason why this boom happened in China and not in India with a similar population where most children were malnourished and many could not read and write.