Where is part 9

@@fireabassefa670 Just released!

In my honest opinion Caesar isn't the actual reason the republic fell....the true reason the republic had fallen was due to bad government working and the senate not willing to do what should of been done for the republic and people of Rome.

I feel you

All my homies love Julius Caesar

Facts

Same

Hahahaha real shit

Looking forward to more good work. And I'm sure it will be there.

Nice to know all ages think about Rome constantly

You're a top bloke man, hell yeah

He killed Rome.

​@@F40PH-2CATno he didn't

@@F40PH-2CAT you have to cut the weeds for the flowers to bloom

@@F40PH-2CATI dig F40phs you must be a Illinois man

It's funny that he held the same lived in that district on there eye's and can't see that it never changed Rome still serves the same god's they are just pretending Jupiter/Saturn is the sone of god and sadly leading millions in sin...

​@@nekmewxelagrowing6432Jupiter was their king of The Gods. Just cause they dont worship the Abrahamic God Jehovah aka Allah doesn't mean they're sinning.

@@brandonselitetv1436 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣yes it means they are sinning

@@danielating1316 to ur God yes. But They worshipped Jupiter. Not some Poor carpenter like Jesus or a fat lazy King like Herod.

@@brandonselitetv1436 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣so the mythical Jupiter is better than historical figures? You must be incredibly stupid.

Rome forever:)

That series was the best👌 Still wondering where Titus Pullo and Caesarion were going in the last scene 🤔

​@@KnowledgiaAlthough , not that it matters . He wasn't born on the 1st of July , he was born on the 13th of July . ♑️✍️🇸🇯🇦🇺

Thanks

Thank you

Learned this in the HBO serie's "Rome"

I know that you took it from Asterix and Obelix but great chief of Gaul really existed and his name was Vercingetorix

You really gonna be the *achkuatlly* guy huh..? Lame, rations reduced by a third.

Who me? @@cjclark1208

Do not forget Ambiorix.

@@cjclark1208I thought it was interesting he wasn’t saying it in an annoying way

but Mark Antony, Octavius are the only ones we rly care about

no who does that?

N..no Thats Charlemagne

"Who will tell me that is not murder, who will tell my legions who love Ceasar as I do that is not murder"

And even before the Marian era, there was the perpetual conflict between the Optimates and Populares and their precursors, the Patricians and conservatives who wanted to preserve the status quo vs the Plebians and liberals who wanted to change the status quo. The Gracchi brothers for example advocated for Plebian land reforms and more rights for Rome's Italian allies...but were assassinated by Roman senators who thought their legal actions were both too radical and unconstitutional. And from the beginning of the Republic, the Plebians started with very little rights and had to fight for their rights over and over again. The Plebians had their "Secessio plebis," where they would withdraw from the city, go on strike, sometimes riot, and in [rarer] cases would launch a military revolt.

Aureillian assasinated Gallienus. Tried to dump Sol Invictus on everyone. Dwstroyed part of Alexandria Library. By his time Rome was nearly finished anyway. Diadochi of Ptolemy, Selucia and Makedonia as well as Ancient Greecw was where real magic and history of life was at not Late rome which Constantine and Alexander Severus desteoyed!

That's because he's the Senate

Reading the title and staring at the thumbnail how the arrows pointed at Gaul it gave me an impression of how he obliterated Gaul

I love history. ;)

I don’t think so given that 235 BC was the immediate aftermath of the First Punic War.

@@LuisBrito-ly1ko after Christ of course. Ad it was a misspelling. I correct

He had a chance to restore order to the Republic, instead he refused to share power that opened the door for a 2nd civil war during the 2nd triumvirate which of course allowed Octavian aka later as Augustus to become the first Roman Emperor. Rome was so fed up with the conflict during the fall of the Republic that they were willing to live under an authoritarian system for a "Pax Romana" Very important moment in history, I cover it in my courses and videos I make as well.

He made deals with VAMPIRES to co create a SIS Tom where they erected an army ROW MAN SOL DIERS who were armed and ordered to go to commoners doors and TAKE BY FORCE INFANTS AGE 3 YEARS AND YOUNGER FOR THE VAMPIRES AGREED PAYMENT 👁 AND CESAR WAS ABLE TO ATTAIN ALL THE WEALTH OF THE COMMONERS AND STAY IN PERPETUAL CONTROL OVER THE COMMONERS 👁 THIS IS STILL THE SYSTEM IN PLACE. AND PEOPLE WONDER WHY KIDS STILL MISSING AND THE TAXES IS SO THEY DONT COME TO YOUR HOUSES AND GRAB GOLD AND ASSETS BY FORCE BUT THOSE DAYS COMING BACK COVID WAS TO CATALOG KIDS VIA TECH TOOLS CUS CHINA DONT TRUST AMERICA LEADERSHIP AND TO GET RID OF MOST OF THE ELDERS WHO HAVE THE WISDOM TRUTH TO SHARE 👁

It’s truth recorded 3 BCE vampires after kids 3 years and younger and them existing since 230,000 BCE KNOW THE PLAYERS first

Not the best for he wasnt the best

It’s not about money to vampires it’s about LIFE and eternity aka “IMMORTALITY “ AKA -->OUR LIGHT BODIES OF THE MOST HIGH WHOLE SPIRIT People on the other hand are mostly after material possessions 💰 MONEY TOOL VAMPIRES CREATED TO TRICK AND TRAP POOR SOULS👁

He could not have. It is easy to visualize a battlefield position. It is harder but just as important to visualize a political position. He had no capability to keep his enemies from hating him and plotting against him. He could not placate them enough to prevent assassination attempts. Powerful empires today such as Disney simply do not experience assassinations because they practice panem et circensis with religious zeal. It is imperative to concern oneself with not being assassinated. He was good enough at conquest but not good enough at not being assassinated.

Every dynasty has its origin and its founder... ;) And even if someone was born into a royal family, it doesn't mean that they had it easy- Some were not born as heirs/successors, others were born into a very impoverished and small kingdom and created an empire out of it. Philip II of Macedon, for example, accomplished more than Caesar...a completely unheeded figure today. He created a world empire (which Alexander only took over). At the time of Philip's youth, the Macedonian kingdom did not even exist - it was a small occupied territory that did not have much importance (wealth, culture, advancement).... after the death of Philip II, it was the most powerful state in the world. Similarly, Cyrus II was born into a royal family - but it was also an insignificant and vassal state, and Cyrus turned it into a world empire (and there would be more such examples). BTW Hannibal was not a king (and there were plenty of great military leaders - non-royal - in history), not to mention that Hannibal was born into one of the most prominent Carthaginian families and the leader of society at the time. And there is not much to admire about Napoleon.

Hannibal, Caesar, and Napoleon were all essentially nobility from rich families though. Not that the first two aren't two of my favorite people in history, but they weren't exactly common folk. A common man wouldn't have 50K to give pirates for his freedom so he can leave and hire an army to come back and kill them lol. North African peasants weren't being brought into the temple by their general father so they can swear a blood oath to destroy the Romans (Hannibal). They were definitely bad ass people though.

@johndarcangelo6893 ok but my point is there were a lot of nobility, not just born with a claim to be king. At most it could give them is a start, but to turn it into being one of the most powerful people in the world is just insane. As much as I like Alfred the great or Alexander, they were succeeded into it. Still had to claim it and hold it but the difficulty is wayyy different. Like Octavia is a Caesar with a head start and he became the best empire ever in Rome imo

@@johndarcangelo6893 Well that was after he achieved something though. The video literally said Sulla stripped him and his family of everything and had to leave among the lower classes of Rome when he could return. So…

@@LuisBrito-ly1ko His Maternal family was still wealthy and their connections and influence are why he was ultimately spared and given opportunity later on. It's not like he was thrown out into the wild. I'm not hating Caesar I'm just saying the common man didn't have his opportunities.

They made a Video about the Problems of the Republik before Caesar 9 days ago

Well Caesar himself already transform Rome into empire (he was key, and that transformation stopped with his murder). Octavian "only" continued and sucseed Caesar in his endeavors...except that Augustus never OFFICIALLY established a monarchy and did not become a monarch. Whereas Caesar was clearly on his way to becoming king. And so, over time, a new title was established as a REPLACEMENT for the king, the hereditary name/title caesar and augustus or imperator. In my opinion, it is also a common mistake not to count Caesar among the emperors... when even the title of emperor and the empire itself came about through him. Why is Augustus more ceasar (emperor) than Ceasar, when even Augustus wasn't de iure emperor? 1. Caesar created an empire - but it last for a while because he was murdered. De facto he was already king, and he organized/led the state already as an empire - but he wasn't king de iure, he did not have enough time to do it officially (he wanted the people, the army or, better yet, the senate to declare and accept him as king). 2. After his death, it looked like the restoration of the republic but Octavian and company defeated the republicans and established a triumvirate that ruled until 33 BC (and the struggle for supremacy until the 27 BC). After that Octavian de facto established empire and became monarch/imperator.

⁠@@niketesambrosiosdelagrece2266 That’s not a fact, that’s an assumption. One that can easily be dismantled by the fact that Caesar didn’t need the title of King or Emperor and never really showed interest in it. He wasn’t King de Facto either because he could not treat the position of Dictator as hereditary as written in the Roman Constitution that he respected except for the length of his term as Dictator. Also, also, “Imperator” was a title that meant Master of the Battlefield given to generals by the troops. It was not something that meant king or ruler of a realm yet ( that interpretation will be born during the Empire ). So, no. He was not an Emperor, and should not be counted as such. Otherwise you should count Lucius Cornelius Sulla as one as well, and there you will be essentially equating Dictator to Emperor, which are entirely different things. - Also, Octavian didn’t became Emperor either. His actual title was Princeps ( root word for Prince ) while Augustus was a given name that meant “The Illustrious One”. Over time both Augustus and Caesar would become actual monarchic titles. Though he does count as a monarch because he treated the position as hereditary and the Republican Institutions were only a facade, something that was different in the case of Caesar as Senate was still the main body that made laws. Hence why he’s considered the first Roman Emperor by historians, even though he never actually held the title with the meaning that it will get during the times of Emperor Caracalla.

@@niketesambrosiosdelagrece2266 As for why Augustus is superior to Caesar, that has to do with Diocletian as he designated the title of Caesar to be “Junior” to “Augustus” during the formation of the Tetrarchy, as the Caesars would be heirs to their respective Augusti.

Thank the humble Agrippa for much of Octavian’s success, that man was loyal asf.

@@cjclark1208 Thank you for the recognition my friend

It was actually called Albion

Lol. They treated him well simply because he was important and because of his charisma. Had he been a pleb, they would have either killed him or treated him like a dog. Not to mention, tell that to the citizens who literally inherited his fortune and his property in his testament and benefitted from the much needed reforms that the Gracchi Brothers ( Tribunes of the Plebs ) were assassinated ( by the senate ) for almost a century prior.

She had heard or been told of the prophecy by the haruspex that he would be killed So she was having nightmares of it

I should say shell, Creaser had too much power (the sanet was mere poppet show)

@@abgarsargsyan6448 I agree, by the time caeser came to play king, the Senate's already effectively allowed two emperors to rise prior. Good old greed and self interest broke the Senate long before Caesar did.

It’s called history of the Roman Empire, we haven’t even started😂

@@gheddafiduck8239 i just meant will the videos be uploaded like always in about 4 months or will we finally see it more often

@@R2A97LB next video in 7 months I bet

@@gheddafiduck8239 he liked ur comment so its unfortunate true...

Back then the Romans sometimes would elect one man to be a tyrant for a limited amount of time. Mostly in hard and dangerous times.

Spamming emojis makes you look like you got a shovel up your skrop sideways 🎉

@li53cz3k it's a well known fact that in those days, Brittan was connected by land to Gaul, and was later separated by George Washington.

Glad that I’m not alone in that thought…I notice the same mistake