We should always read scripture with the author's original intention.
Пікірлер: 44
@user-ny6dv3uw5j16 күн бұрын
As a former catholic, only the church had the authority to interpret scripture. Thank God that I read the Bible and found that to be unbiblical
@rebekahbenne169616 күн бұрын
AMEN, Brother!!
@angie-bk1yc15 күн бұрын
I read john Mcarthurs book on nar and postmodernism. It was so good and covers exactly this. A must read.
@montegtaylor16 күн бұрын
The Bible needs to be interpreted by itself.
@josephtyldesley611616 күн бұрын
That's illogical. Books can't read themselves. They're intermediaries! I don't know if that was supposed to be funny, but I found your comment to be delightfully funny 😄
@@josephtyldesley6116I tend to be overly serious. If you didn’t need an actual explanation, just disregard. It is a phrase, a bit over generalized, imo, because it overlooks the work that goes into truly understanding the Bible, but it is also a true statement. The true meaning of the phrase lies in the fact that the Bible is so interconnected that to truly understand a verse or section, you may need to study an entirely different book or chapter and maybe multiple.
@josephtyldesley611616 күн бұрын
@@SingGladness1546 I am, unfortunately, well-versed in hermeneutics. I actually believe this phrase and thinking is slightly dangerous. Joseph, the patriarch, was able to honor God in a foreign land with no Bible... just a handful of stories about God from his fathers. There was no command about adultery yet, but his spirit responded to God when tempted. I find his faith more brave and remarkable than anyone I've sat next to in Bible study. His statement, "you meant it for evil, but God meant it for good" -- a summation of the entire gospel -- was spoken in faith through the Spirit before it was eventually recorded by Moses and became "the Word." Or at least it may seem. The questionable phrase makes us ignore that the process of "interpreting scripture through scripture" is dependent on weak intermediary minds and spirits. Thanks for listening, and God bless you if you made it this far!
@montegtaylor16 күн бұрын
@josephtyldesley6116 I wish I could hrlp you understand in a text. It took a long sermon with multiple examples on how you use the book to understand the book. His point is that we don't stop to try to understand what the author wants us to understand. All these authors would have known from memory most of the scripture and talking to people that also may have most of the scripture memorized. They were not trying to evoke feelings.
@TheJoyOfTheLord77713 күн бұрын
Amen!
@michellegigous891115 күн бұрын
Amen ❤ Blessings brother
@Makeitmakesensejo12 күн бұрын
Rightttttttttttt!!!
@Aramis13 күн бұрын
Amen!!!!!!!
@earlbolden872316 күн бұрын
😎👍😊❤️❤️🙏🙏🙏!!!
@michaelwestmoreland253013 күн бұрын
People whose job is "Tell you what a book means" telling you YOU can't decide what the book means. Job security, one self-righteous, self-serving, smarmy assertion after another.
@user-yh5uq5nd7w15 күн бұрын
Hermeneutics
@inkbythebarrelandpaperbyth690516 күн бұрын
He just smacked postmodernism in the face
@cherylwebb83405 күн бұрын
I am disgusted with people saying, "Well, it just depends on how you interpret those verses..." Like God didn't have something particular in mind when He spke His Word! Dumb da Dumb Dumb 🤪
@ilovemysweeties16 күн бұрын
Hey i have a question. Why did David and other slay tens of thousands after Moses Law saying Thoua shalt not murder?
@josephtyldesley611616 күн бұрын
Simple: the word translated "kill" is in Hebrew "murder." The law says, "you shall not murder, the murderer must be put to death." In the Bible, almost any action is good or evil depending on the context. Jesus affirms the death penalty several times in His ministry. The question is, did David have JUST or RIGHTEOUS cause to kill his adversaries. The argument for that is found in Leviticus. Not all of David's killing was righteous. Hope this helps. God bless you!
@gabrielrodriguez872716 күн бұрын
To Kill and Murder are two things.
@ilovemysweeties16 күн бұрын
Yeah like God wasn't happy when he made Uriah( or whatever his name was ) die in battle
@ilovemysweeties16 күн бұрын
Ok I have another question. Who is "The Lord"? Is it the triune God or Jesus or The Father?
@josephtyldesley611615 күн бұрын
@@ilovemysweeties fantastic question. Will have to think about it. It's a trinity question combined with a linguistic question about the word "Lord."
@josephtyldesley611616 күн бұрын
What are you trying to say?
@montegtaylor16 күн бұрын
Your feelings are not important. When it comes to reading and understanding the Bible.
@josephtyldesley611616 күн бұрын
@@montegtaylor "Can't stop the feeling." - Justin Timberlake from Trolls
@Mojo3216 күн бұрын
@@josephtyldesley6116😂
@garithstelly914516 күн бұрын
Is this 🤔🤡boasting with works about salvation 😂🤔🙏
@WhatYouTalkinBout16 күн бұрын
No
@garithstelly914516 күн бұрын
What this guy thinks about Ray Comfort?
@carolvancleve908814 күн бұрын
This is not Ray Comfort
@garithstelly914514 күн бұрын
Does he support Ray Comfort?I might have this guy confused with some1 else?
@jondstewart16 күн бұрын
Romans 1 is a book many evangelicals and fundamentalists love to use to condemn gays to justify their condemnation of them. But in actuality, it doesn’t apply to reality and real life.
@ChristianConservative63914 күн бұрын
How does it not apply to reality and real life?
@kevinaroca17082 күн бұрын
??
@jondstewart2 күн бұрын
ever know any little boys that were sissies or girls that were tomboys that turned out to be gay as teens or young adults? Did they leave the natural use of a man or woman when they were children?