right which just makes them the dumb ones.

@@starvalkyrie No. It makes them the overly greedy ones.

These are the ones who got caught taking rich people's money. Had.they just stuck to ripping off the poor they'd have suffered no consequences. Shkreli was brought to prominence for his drug gouging, but it wasn't illegal. His legal troubles came when he ripped off his investors.

Just wanted to say you have a cool profile pic

The system is made for the greedy ones.

The list has 4 people on it lol.

@@GerardoAguilar1 What did he steal?

0bsolete-X Do you honestly need a list? Here’s a few off the top of my head and in no particular order, I’m sure if you cared to check you could find more. His fraudulent university. $25,000,000 settlement. Misappropriation (stealing) of funds from his now closed down charity. $2,000,000 in fines and $1,780,000 of remaining funds distributed by the courts to charities. Refusing to pay contractors despite work being carried out to specification. Attempting to use his office to gain a personal advantage by extorting a foreign leader. Emolument clause violations = stealing from the American tax payer. Using his golf club visits to put money into his businesses. Making Pence and others use his clubs as bases despite them being more expensive, further away or both than numerous other hotels. Air Force pilots and crew using one of his Scottish hotels instead of cheaper and more convenient alternatives. Attempting to get the G8 to meet at one of his failing Florida golf clubs. To date his golfing trips have cost the American tax payer in excess of $120,000,000 which to some people is a lot of money and could’ve been used in a far better way.

@@thechumpsbeendumped.7797 don't try to use facts and logic with anyone that's asked that question. They obviously ignore the fact that the bloated pos has been on a 50 year grift. It's impossible to accumulate anywhere near a billion dollars without malfescence that ranges from monopoly to downright criminal behavior.

deancj1 I pretty much knew he was just trolling, and a month later and no reply confirms he had nothing.

When the mass of the population, including those who hold the money, are scientifically illiterate to the point of being distrustful of scientists (not to mention outright disdainful of anyone who tell them things they don't want to hear), it's actually not that difficult to get away with.

A professor’s opinion isn’t needed to sell ‘cures’. Which is one thing wrong with our system.

well that is also a skill - use it for good or for bad that's different

Because professors are readily available to be hired to analyze and research every investment opportunity...

@@MihaiRUdeRO if they would get 10k$ for every inquiery, which is a fraction of millions of $, they might not want to do anything else ever again

Folks gotta eat. You're not supporting them, so they have to find the ones who will.

meta

@@tdsims1963 F2P games are the most disgusting practice of milking money from people with addictions(called whales), be it gaming or gambling. If you saw the tactics they use and the money they make you wouldnt equate them to "folks having to eat" but to the blood sucking millionaire vampire scammers in this video...

Sinner among the saints. Could have been a lot worse

When I was nine I found a magazine that I believed featured pornography for women. I had thought it was the women's equivalent to Playboy, or Hustler. I found it in a dumpster where I would look for discarded items to throw into my neighbor's yard. But anyway, flipping through this "magazine" I found a photo essay on some nice twin blonde young men who were photographed together engaging in some hilarious and fun behavior. One twin put the other's penis in a hotdog bun, complete with yellow mustard on top, and pretended to take a bite. Lots of things like this. But one vignette featured the two twins in a position that found one on the other's back, both smiling, eyes on the camera. Sidebar photos revealed a closer look where the twin's penis, who was on top, was midway into the other twin's butthole. "Wow"I thought. "That's kinda gay" I just assumed that they ran out of ideas and this was the next logical step that they took, not wanting to disappoint the photographer. Later in life I would learn this magazine was for men who liked to do that kind of thing. I didn't really know what gay or homosexual was. Anyway, I'm putting things from my childhood together and I would love to find this magazine. I believe it was called Blue Boy and featured the twins on the cover buttfucking.

Theranos is just two letters away from Thanos.

One of the first people who looked into the organization was a professor who was greek. He saw their sign and was like "This name looks like a weird combination of Thanatos (Death) and Tyrannos (Tyrant). Weird name."

@@paleposter yep same her i thought "why the hell would a medical company name themselves after the god of DEATH"

Great Value™ Thanos

I can’t believe it’s not Thanos™

Except she snapped twice.

Girl power !!! lol

It's not her real voice either, lol. She made it lower and more masculine to be taken more seriously (which by itself is a shame and something that should probably be looked into), but her actual voice is higher.

Worst, it wasn’t even real. Annoying the world on purpose

@@TheMcKenzieHaus Exactly, she needs jail time for that alone

RaidsEpicly It sounds like she has a cold and mucus is still up there. And morning breath.

@@CoffeeRaven , and I wonder if they are going to let her testify on her trial...and if she will still use that fake voice. I am sure her lawyers are telling her to knock off the unblinking stare.

You just proved that retaliation towards capitalism is our kind of capitalism, we're dimmed.

She doesn't belong on this list. Holmes on the other hand should be number one on this list.

She scammed everyone she could scam. Also individuals that she completely milked because they were good trusting people. How wonderful of her.

Why did she get more jail time than Holmes, who deliberately gave patients faulty medical tests? That's much worse in my opinion.

@@MeloraCarabas I dunno, it seems like she only stole from other (actually) super wealthy socialites and luxurious hotels, like a more self-serving Robin Hood; sounds kinda badass to me.

*Yoshi what have you done!?*

Viddy well, little brotha - Viddy well!

"please I pay my taxes!"

Killian wants his jokes back

Please. We know. We know.

Keld Tundraking 😂

Why are we keeping people with Aids alive to spread it? Aids is caught through depravity and being a degenerate. The sooner we stop letting this disease live, the sooner we can get back to curing cancers

Holmes, too, showing people had syphilis & cancer when they didn’t.

Agreed

Some actual research on Shkreli would help. Apart from securities fraud which is not an uncommon occurrence in the finance world, he has been misrepresented. Getting villainized for hiking the price up to industry averages for the rarity of the disease and efficacy of the drug, while pushing far more of the profits to R&D than other pharma companies. It's the big companies insurance that pays for the drugs, where the increase is such a tiny drop in the bucket it makes no difference.

So correct. When society fails to punish the criminals without bias and even reward them. We seal our fate to death and destruction as these criminals rule us as businesses and our nation's leaders.

Good for you.

See Jordan Belford as THE poster child for your comment.

Lying, cheating and stealing isn't exactly a good thing, even if you dress it up as "hustling".

@@MasterAdam100 not everyone wants to do good things even though that's exactly what they say they want.

@The TacomaKid That's kind of pathetic

The TacomaKid Nobody likes an asshole dude so don’t be one.

The TacomaKid are you okay? Why are you trying to flex your view count? Nobody cares.

Sandcastle • Well I mean they’re just paying for a festival. Some people aren’t rich but save up for that kinda stuff and there’s nothing wrong with that. It’s fun to get to party and see bands for a few days, this isn’t faking a rich kid lifestyle it’s a festival that’s how they are.

@The TacomaKidif youre lacking control in your life, the best way to deal with it isnt being a dick. there are people out there willing to sympathize with you and you'll feel better about all of it when you can be honest and constructive about things.

I can't. This is the perfect comparison.

Nazael Rahl oh damn!!!

I think lizards may blink tho

Calling Elizabeth Holmes a lizard person is an insult to all lizard persons out there.

Most lizards still blink though, unlike her...

Normal people like you see through her act. It is the mainstream media and those who want to push a narrative that overlook red flags like this.

John Arken because she woke

John Arken right and it annoys me a lot more than it probably should

BLINKING REVEALS WEAKNESSES BRAH

Can't blink with those giant contact lenses in.

This was going to be my comment. It makes my eyes water just looking at her. I guess I'll always be poor.

@Joseph Underwood my thoughts exactly.

She probably had weaker legal representation.

ikr, if that isn't the argument for moral relativism right there I don't know what is.

No, you are 💯 % correct‼️ She got the shaft because she wasn’t actually a rich‼️ No other explanation can be leveled at someone who did less crime and got more punishment!!

Yeah the audacity of stepping out of her lane. That really gets rich knickers in a twist.

Work both ways

Unfortunately, the video didn't include scam artist Jordan Peterson.

@@Cwitch67 In what way(s) is he a scam artist?

Wait it's not? Finished the whole video thinking he called them all incels.

@@johnrayordas An Incel who has been arrested is put In Cell :)

You couldn't ask for a better sign to not trust someone lol...

@Gary McMichael If only you crawled out of your hole and saw something other than your echo chamber.

You know she made billions, right? Devos actually did achieve the American Dream. The real one, not the confused and twisted version Carlin and Wisecrack have. Oh Millennials. Always so sure they know everything while at the same time being so clueless about everything. The amazing part is how Millenials are able to maintain this state well past the age all previous generations grew out of it. Anyone can be scammed. For instance, how many people own iPhones?

@HappyLarry, I suspect Gary McMichael IS visiting from a differing echo by coming to a Wisecrack youtube channel. Like myself.

@@jshricks Hey Josh, gen z here. *"Always so sure they know everything while at the same time being so clueless about everything."* It's not about knowing everything; we live in the age of the internet. It's more about knowing how to get information. Like for example... *"You know she made billions, right? Devos actually did achieve the American Dream."* Always seems to be this mythos that if you're rich you"made" your money. If you go to her wikipedia page, you find out very quickly her father was a multimillionaire(company sold for 1.3B when he died), her husband was CEO of Amway. And her husband's father(the Co-founder of Amway) networth was estimated at 5.4 billion. Her networth on forbes is always in relation to the family(the 5.4 billion number), so I'd say the most likely situation is everyone else is piggybacking off Richard DeVos(husband's father). Looks to me like the "she made billions" claim is a little bit of a stretch. And I didn't even need to "know everything" to figure that out. Just had to look it up. Also, yes anyone can be scammed.

@The TacomaKid You're conflating behavior with laryngeal frequency. Also yes, it is "normal". It's not common in women, but there's nothing abnormal about something being 'not average'. Lastly, you're grasping at straws by focusing on the word question. It's irrelevant to what was being asked. Replace it with statement, comment, or reply, and it's still asking you how what you said was applicable. Be denser. I dare you.

@The TacomaKid i thought her baritone was reportedly faked?

She took a little bit to much testosterone

@@nathanlevesque7812 Check the definition of abnormal.

ThatOneAsianBroChick Yeah! I find it fine...people just are getting to critical nowadays...

And Murdock, rofl

He does have an austrian accent

Adam he wasn’t on the board tho

Listened to it too, I couldn't believe that that sh*t can still fly in this millennium.

If you don't 💯% believe that what we're doing at Theranos is the most important thing in the history of humanity *OR* if you are cynical then you can leave right now!

I don't think he realized how engrained he himself is.

Dal Ania, now that’s what I call a solid moral claim!

To bad everyone can be an hero nowadays, no matter how bad they are.

Brandon Ontama Good people are Good People, and only Good People. Bad People can scream, and shout, and lie, That will never make them good people.

Seeing a La Rochefoucauld reference warms my heart. Im not saying that strictly out of vanity, right?

Yeah, she doesn't sound so bad, espescially compared to the others

I think that one is a slightly different case than the others, she is a victim from the things that society is selling us all the time

Michel van der Molen and yet she’s going to spend the most time in prison

You spent too much time around your mother You read like a teacher old lady, not a teacher dude

Compare and contrast

How was Gatsby a scammer?

@@otiagomarques It's implied that he made his fortune through organized crime or bootlegging.

It helps if you don't have to worry about having integrity or scruples. I think because as a society we've become so materialistic and status conscious as opposed to truly valuing oneself and others.

If you're hunting about trump, there's a big difference. You can See the wall trump promised. Ha!

It's not that amazing at all. They have an evolutionary advantage.

Where's the irony? It's a game full of microtransactions, not a ponzi scheme...

Keeping moral relativism in mind, they are respectable in America. In the rest of the world they would be considered war criminals tho.

'Murika! God damn.

What's wrong with Mad Dog?

@@Arcfire21 Apart from participating in the illegal Iraq invasion, here's a specific example: "In May 2004 Mattis ordered the 3 a.m. bombing of a suspected enemy safe house near the Syrian border, which later came to be known as the Mukaradeeb wedding party massacre and resulted in the deaths of 42 civilians, including 11 women and 14 children. Mattis said it had taken him 30 seconds to decide whether to bomb the location. Describing the wedding as implausible, he said, 'How many people go to the middle of the desert to hold a wedding 80 miles (130 km) from the nearest civilization? These were more than two dozen military-age males. Let's not be naive.'"

He was being sarcastic about “respectable”

Marie Curie, Ben Franklin, Louis Pasteur all changed the world without being hustlers. Get your head straight. There is huge difference between great people and criminals. How stupid can you be not to make that out?

@@ssa6227 I'm guessing you're medically unable to realize the commenter you're responding to is mocking her words, NOT defending her...

@@ssa6227 you're also naming people way outta this era

He's Indian though. You're not allowed to say that about people of color. You can still say it about white people tho

@@stephenfiler3204 Like every brown person I know wants to punch that dude lol

What about Jared Kushner though?

@@tommybazar He's a close runner-up. Sadly, it's a contest where no matter who wins, we all lose.

Stephen Filer I’ll take tour turn

I don't "distrust" them but it truly makes me think that, in order to get to that level (and even if you get there by doing/providing something good for the community) you HAVE TO loose your own values and morals to some degree, and turn a blind eye to shady shit all the time; that's the only way those already on that circle would let you be one of their own.

Right? Less than scum should pioneer living on the sun and get out of my ecosystem.

@@eurekamreum5458 That's part of it, but the rabbit hole is much deeper than that. And that's more than enough for me personally to never go near that line of thought and or curiosity, because if one is remotely that curious, their desire for the unknown overwhelms them to the point of achieving what they neither intended, nor desired in the first place, so it's best to leave good alone imo.

That’s because you’re not dumb and actually think critically about the situation.

someone finally said it. I'm sick of seeing all my favourite KZfaqrs promoting the same predatory cash cow

Agreed. However, they need to pay their bills, and we all know Adsense doesn’t pay bills unless you get millions upon millions of views.

@@torquatoLucas Can't tell if you're arguing semantics or for the morality of including in-game purchases in games. Either way, when a developer markets a game as free, they do so with the knowledge that A) the game is designed in a way that encourages the player to spend money and B) there is (in most cases) no defined upper limit to the money one can spend and the profit devs can reap. The "how will the poor devs feed their families?" argument doesn't excuse the fact that these games are like capitalistic fish-nets. Most players are small fish and have the self-control to regulate their spending but others don't and can become addicted. This business model cynically preys on these individuals. In the face of such blatant predation, debates over whether or not they fit the textbook definition of 'scam' or 'gambling' are irrelevant. In regards to your last point, the only reason mobile games are unanimously considered to be inferior is for the simple reason that the people who make them are merely part of a gold rush to make as much money as they can, as quickly as they can. There is little to suggest they are passionate about the products they pump out, more about the bank they can make. I would suggest simply selling whole games for a set price (what a novel concept!) with add-ons released at a later date or something of that nature. But obviously that doesn't happen as much because it isn't as lucrative, once again demonstrating the moral and creative inferiority of the mobile games industry as a whole and the system that perpetuates it. Do you personally profit off of this economy? Or do you just like playing devil's advocate to the nth degree? Because your comment reads an awful lot like a guilty self-justification.

The problem is capitalism dude. No Gamers are not some oppressed special minority. At least not more than any other consumer. Yea my games are ruined too. Repeat after me: Fuck Capitalism.

@@Bvggerffpls The games are free, with ingame purchases, which is made pretty clear most of the time. So you know what you get. And if you feel like you can't play a game properly without paying and really don't want to pay, then move on and stop playing that game. No one is forced to play these games or pay for ingame purchases. With almost every other product or service you have the choice. Don't blame companies for selling you stuff that you don't need, but only yourself for buying it. And of course there are some people that spend more money for certain things. But again, those people make the concious choice of paying. Because tricking them into paying, would be actual fraud. And also of course they do want to make profit, and the higher the better, because they are companies, that is how companies operate, they need money to pay their employees and invest in company/future projects. And to say that the mobiles games industry is morally and creatively inferior to the games industry doesn't make sense, since the games industry also uses ingame purchases, bacause, as you said, selling a game for a set price isn't as lucrative, because game production can be really expensive and selling a game for the normal price wouldn't be enough to finance a lot of triple A games. If you don't like games with ingame purchases, then don't support them. Because you don't have to play any game you don't like.

YOU MUST HAVE ENOUGH FUEL UNITS!!!

What scam?

Still hasn’t been proven to be a scammer

@@jlupus8804 Not a scammer, but at the same time has used a LOT of smoke and mirrors to give off a certain appearance and rode the fake it till you make it principle pretty hard

KNOWLEDGE!

I hate Rich people. I want to be rich. These scammers are my heroes . They are Dishonest but they tried to make thier American Dream a American Reality. The next scammers will learn from thier mistakes and not get cought.

Well, there is no objective morality.

It would make more sense if he included Caroline Calloway in here.

@ThoughtCrime Guess so. But I tried Being "Healthy" for a moment and I felt like throwing stuff. I didn't feel like, Me. Felt Like my Skin was crawling. Like That scene from Robocop 2 when OCP tried to make Murphy into a good influence for the Children. Robocop literally Fried himself to get that shit out of his head.

@@Gfish17 I minority of scammers will always get caught. The trick is to scam small, I think.

Love his videos :) But yes, not everything was overly expensive and therein was part of the problem. If you're going to market this event to the high class, the prices need to reflect that across the board. Tickets for as low as $500 or $1000 for a trip to a private island isn't going to cover operating costs at all unless hundreds of thousands go. He couldn't even afford to cover the entertainment (and realizing that, the entertainers wisely dropped out); that should've been the sign to call it off.

@@BewareTheLilyOfTheValley so this scam failed because of poor financial acumen? I didn't even think about that but it makes sense. He could have priced it like a low volume high margin item.

@@BewareTheLilyOfTheValley the guy who thought of it must have been immaculately stupid to think he could afford to run the festival he wanted to with the tickets at that price

Electric boogaloo

You missed it. It was last weekend. It started pretty well but then my mom came home and made everybody leave. People are demanding refunds for their $2700 tickets but the small print clearly says there are no refunds.

i totally see it! amy just looks/is a bit older.

I live in Scottsdale and I've seen that lunatic around. They definitely share a certain...deadness in their eyes lol.

Jeffrey Williams you’re so right!!!!! Crazy Amy!!!!

Me too. Wasn’t her husband got imprisoned or something

@@syndicaterx Yes. For tax evasion, I think.

lio marvel Except it’s not a crime (just immoral imo) :/ But unfortunately...that’s capitalism for ya: things people literally need to live are sold for profit. People aren’t what matter to Big Pharma; profit margins are all they care about. I don’t understand how people like that sleep at night, honestly.

That ignores how many other things the masses couldave chosen as the next rising trend. They also clearly address this to a degree in the vid, its no different than the long speculation over human interest in serial killers.

The only reasonable stance

You are overthinking too much... They are humans... that's better, don't you think?

I think there is somewhat of a morbid admiration of them, even if people don't want to admit it. People like to think they could become wealthy some day. I feel like on some level, scammers are a distortion of rags to riches success. People like the idea that with enough hard work and skill, they become millionaires and want to emulate that success. I think people do get some sense of satisfaction just from knowing that even if they don't have honesty, or even skills, they can still play make believe until they get that lifestyle.

I wonder how she feels about John Conner...lol.

Lizard people

@@br8745 There's actually no doubt in my mind that she's a terminator. Lol.

Detroit Become Elizabeth

@@bkr1895 LoL. But even those androids display more emotions than her.

He's looks like emo Peter Parker from Spider-Man 3.

Just going to play Devils Advocate for the sake of it here but with all that money you don’t need to look good to impress anyone

@@murraysaucedo897 True. However I was making no point beyond making fun of his haircut.

Yup, and in the same video calling people who play fortnite weird...

@@Matt-km7ly I noticed that this particular Wisecrack video contained more emotive, divisive language than some of their other videos like 'douchebag' and 'punchable'. I'm probably just imagining things but it did strike me as odd

@@Bvggerffpls Well remember what the video is about. It could be to reinforce/feed the theme.

They beat the actually existing so called free market at its own game. Every single corporation tells lies in their advertising and marketing.

False. Any profitable company is a scam in essence. To make profits, that is, the difference between costs and revenue become positive, you either make revenue grow more than the costs (making customers believe things are worth more than they cost to make) or driving costs downward (usually involving making workers think their work is less valuable than it is).

@@Bermeslivre That's actually a really interesting idea, so I'll give you a thumb's up. However, companies are able to utilize *efficiencies of scale* that allow bargaining power when purchasing supplies & labor and when advertising & distributing. No one consumer can make such economies of scale. However, there are such things as consumer blocks (such as the Affordable Care Act exchanges) which bring together the bargaining power of many consumers in order to force lower healthcare prices. So, your idea is interesting, because it encompasses imperfect information. But even if consumers had perfect information, they'd be fighting economies of scale and opportunity costs (perhaps they can make more money driving for Lyft than they could save by making their own bottle of aspirin).

The free market is for idiots. Just ask the banks who get bailouts for fraud.

@@ianj705 The question is: how can a market remain free when every player in that market wants it to be as un-free (in their favor as possible? The answer is government regulation.

J P Lol same tbh

Screw up enough test results and you might not get half, but you’d cull a bit. “Treat the patient, not the test result” likely would save most of them though.

No, you may not.

Stop liking Robin Hood then.

Robin Hood didn't CON the rich, he robbed from the rich who robbed from the poor. Not exactly the same thing. It's like hating Edmund Dantes from "The Count of Monty Cristo" for getting back at the rich and powerful for imprisoning him. These parasites don't come close to comparing to Robin or Edmund.

Shes like the failed prototype. Zuckerberg is the Pro model

If this were my channel, that would be the best compliment.

Mezzerz I know what he’s essentially saying. I use moral relativism all the time and actually feel that this is the the only honest approach to morality. There is no absolute morality. But now that I have a name for that concept I ask myself why I do it. I assume it‘s to avoid confrontations or to keep a door open to behave in a way I might have considered to be immoral at some point in time. Also I’ve been accused of being a-moral and this does not fit my self image at all. Fantastic food for thought!

Anything is easy to do if you have no shame. Don't try and look at them through your perception of life because it's confounding. It's hard for people to understand the cluster B mentality as much as it's confounding for them to try and understand empathy or the feeling of shame.

@@brianwalsh1401 The existence in most people and lack of human compassion in a few others does create an impassible barrier of comprehension as to how the other side manages to somehow function.

He mentioned this as well. He pointed out the example of talking about politics with a random person outside your social group versus talking about the people in this video. That talk of politics has a very risky chance of devolving into chaos while everyone, no matter what side your on, can feel comfortable pointing and talking about these people.

Plus, the real reason why we enjoy watching them tumble is jealousy that they did something immoral that you didn't and got away with it while becoming extremely wealthy.

You aren't disagreeing with the video, though. Personally I think it's both. I actually admire the girl who pretended to be an heiress. In the spirit of moral relativism you can despise Holmes and admire McFarlane if endangering lives is where you draw the line.

💯

He said, "in cell number 1", not incel.

@@billwang8502 r/whoosh

"Incels r bad ppl" lmfao

@@dvt1393 r/Ihavereddit

Bill over your head bro

Nope.

@@Gfish17 *Yep How tf is that not devilish?

Easy no paranormal powers were involved.

Well, neither morality nor the devil exist as anything other than social constructs.

I've watched the Exorcist and I'm convinced Elizabeth Holmes is possessed by the devil with that unnaturally low voice.....along with that unnerving unblinking stare, I bet she can rotate her head thru 360 degrees too.

Fuck capitalism.

we assume they worked hard to get where they are and the ones that do deserve respect for going from nothing to everything but scammers and asshole bussiness men who dont repspect there customers dont deserve any repect

They can buy whatever they want, don't have to worry about bill collectors and people underestimating them.

@@alexsmith2910 anarchism monoarchism and communism are worse because they all end in one person or group having everything and everyone else having nothing with regulated capitalism youll have a group having more then everyone else but almost everyone has something and can become something and at minimum will always have a voice be it there vote or there wallet

@@wilmagregg3131 regulated capitalism is fine, problem is that people are deregulating

Seth has spent years trying to cover it up...

I think the so-called problems of moral relativism were overblown in this essay so that they could bring up some related topics they wanted to shoehorn in. Moral relativism is often blown up to be some kind of boogeyman - particularly by evangelical conservatives.

@@MagicAndReason Moral relativism is a real issue in the US right now with the whole oppression olympics (black lives matter, LGBT, feminists, affirmative action etc...), if you add political correctness on top of that I believe OP has a real point contrasting moral relativism with the unifying moral absolutism. And the boogeyman are the depicted crooks

manu de hanoi OK well, first of all, anyone who unironically uses the term "oppression Olympics" is already an asshole in my book. But I suppose you could say there is a type of moral relativism between evangelicals and humanists, where evangelicals believe that LGBT & women should have less rights and humanists don't. And I suppose you can say there's more "moral relativism" when conservatives get cranky about political correctness because it asks them to talk about minorities & women in ways that don't support racism & patriarchy. Um... I guess you can also say there's moral relativism between humanists & evangelicals because evangelicals see no value in the scientific process as it applies to their foundational predicates (ie the supernatural). Conservatives tend to make a bigger deal out of moral relativism than most. But in truth, there's a lot of overlap between people who think the Earth is 6,000 years old and those who think it's 4.3 billion years old. I suppose moral relativism is a crisis to conservatives who believe that only certain classes of humans deserve full rights. I don't know what you mean by "And the boogeyman are the depicted crooks."

A Steve Jobs themed sex robot.

Dude from 16:45 that whole walk she didn't blink at all

I'm really attracted to her

Stupid people love them.

I think very few actually respect them, but lots of people begrudgingly respect their audacity

A person respects a rattlesnake, when they hear it's rattle. The recognition of danger posed by a creature, of it's ability, is a form of respect. Not the formal kind, with the social gestures we are obligated to; there's no rules structure, like there would be with two individuals who are equally protected by morality and law. Now these people, they're tricksters. The "threat" they pose, that intrinsic danger, is deceit. It is, by it's nature, unknown to it's victims. It's a rattle you can't hear. Can only pick up on by observation and attention. They have this power, and therefore merit respect, in an amoral way. You can still condemn something that can merit respect, however. They are not mutually exclusive concepts.

@@tonylawson2222 I understand what you mean, respect is something earned, however, maybe people respect them because they worked really hard for their plans, and had an ideology (which was somewhat justified). However, these people are described (in the video at least) in a way that made it seem like they were just doing it for the sake of doing it, so it seems illogical to respect them, it's the same way you don't respect a psychopath. E.G I understand people who respect Darth Vader, he had a troublesome childhood / early adulthood, so he worked with all his might to eradicate whatever harmed him, he went through pain and suffering to get to his designated destination (or, the rattlesnake looks scary for self-defense, it rattles to fear its enemies, and hides the fear it has), but the video just describes these people as greedy and unrelatable scums of the earth who just happened to beat Mario because they played it on easy mode.

@@cipher8400 I see our difference, on this matter, as a matter of context. I'd say we are the NPC's in that easy mode Mario game. I try to keep my position in mind, being human and all. I'd also say it's possible you've got more of a positive, complimentary, or empathetic, concept of "respect" than I do. I would not, personally, say a person's moral character has any bearing on whether or not they can be respected in some quality, that they might have ability worthy of respecting from one's own position. Not that there's anything, necessarily, wrong with your way of viewing it. I just have my own.

ejeckk fake it till you make it

Does a term being old make it outdated? I'd disagree.

Adriaan Sluijs He was ‘crucified’ because people find for-profit healthcare morally reprehensible, particularly extreme cases of such blatant profit-chasing (at the expense of people’s well being, I might add). That’s what he was doing btw; upping his profit margins. People like him are perfectly happy with the way the system works (it **benefits them**, after all). People like that don’t give a fuck about us poor and middle class people. As long as they can use their obscene wealth to make ***even more money***, they don’t give a shit what happens to anybody else.