I applaud your epic skills.

6:54 That went from Cheering To yelling To screaming To broken windows To an elementary school shooting

6:54 I love how cary just dosent care and just keeps talking calmly

6:54 children laugh then start being shot at and for some reason glass is breaking. Thanks, cary.

CodeBullet should write an AI that uses Machine Learning to solve this!

4:50 The words moving places to become “Poo Lover” absolutely killed me

Me: *barely knows the alphabet and has to count letters constantly and quickly loses my place when counting if I don't focus enough* Also me: "Ah yes, this game is perfect for me!"

What it is interesting is for the top row you can normally just drag in and then systematically put in place the others (like slide down A to F in the next row over then have A one above F and then slide F into the same column.

*gets 4 of the same color on one side* You know, I'm something of a cuber myself.

Cary: Isn't this just a slider puzzle? Me: *looking at cary's attempt at solving 15 slider puzzle* Cary: I'm done! Me: *looks over to the loopover* WAIT WHAT

I managed to get a pretty nice 1:37 attempt on playing loopover for the first time, on a full scramble. I have never solved any kind of rubik's cube before, and i messed up the alphabet several times, but I'm happy with the result. thanks for the challenge mate

That video got me into speedcubing, thank you, Cary!

9:29 *Y E S, N U T*

Me: *chuckles* Teacher: whats so funny? Me: nothing My brain: *Cary kidnaps human*

im rewatching this video after 4 years. When i first watched it i didnt know how to solve a rubiks cube. I was so surprised to see you using the roux method, then i remembered i learned it because of you and completely forgot that was the reason lmao

3:25 He is not joking that is actually how you memorize Blind folded!

“It’s good to do them AFAP” ... “Uh, yeah let’s just move on”

4:49 top ten anime betrayals

This is the first carykh video I ever found out about! It’s because I was super interested in Rubik’s cubes at the time.

I tried it before watching you try and had a totally different approach. I use CFOP (boring I know and I'm still slower than you, 14ish average) and had a layer by layer approach and used a simple commutator for the last step. I find it interesting how you, a Roux solver took a block building approach and I, a CFOP user, took a layered approach. Makes sense but super cool! Great video and game!

Man, this video takes me back. I saw this when it was new, and it got me into speed cubing. Also, I learned CFOP so get rekt Cary

are we just going to ignore the 6:57 audio clip?

Thank you so much for gifting the world with this!

Honestly the most impressive thing is that not only is Cary a speedcuber, and is also a Roux cuber

9:38 4th line is "yes no"

Me in 2nd grade 6:59. War , war never changes

4:47 bro the way he executed that joke is amazing

4:50 I don’t know if this is a good thing or not but that is unironically one of your best jokes

1:10 is perfect, so much information made so readable in such a concise way. Time is displayed overlaid so its readable, tells us where to buy the cube as the song does the "where'd ya find this?" gives us the song name as well. 10/10

So we're all just gonna gloss over "Cary Kidnaps Humans" huh

That's some pretty cool rubiks square

years later and i still play this on occasion

12:17 OOOOOH Cary didn't solve it optimally!! He moved it 3 to the right instead of 2 to the left. He wasted 1 move!!! Cary is such a noob at this game. smh

I aint no expert in dimensions or nothin, but I aint too sure thats a cube. Maybe you should play Bookworm Adventures Deluxe to gain some intelijents.

2:07 “If you can learn how to type, you can learn how to cube.” That can’t be right. *years later* thanks for helping me learn how to cube :)

Gonna resume it for you: when you use an even amount of layers loop over, each time you do any move it changes the "parity state" of the cube, given that it is normal parity when solved, and scramble moves count to change parity. Also when you do two move like right right it count individually each one to the parity state

Another reason ROUX is better: ROUX’s steps go from 1, 3, 2, 4! It’s so much more edgy than CFOP!

6:54 Ya a say!!! Screaming Broken glass Screaming intensifies

Bro i never knew your name was "CARY KIDNAPS HUMANS" Its so beautiful

4:20 lol I understood that joke I love it

1:55 " join the rouxvolution" is the funnier thing i heard in my life ( im french, roux means readhead in french)

6:57 is this a sign?

Yo your my fav youtuber and I’m a cuber and i never knew that

Thanks to this video I can practically solve all the puzzles in Chuzzle Deluxe.

6:54 that went from 0 to 100 very quickly

Cary kicks hills (Carykh)

Love how the human that you kidnapped is still on-screen when your character is on-screen.

Using your explanation, i was able to solve it in 4:01.244 for my first time.

Can't even do 4072x4072 to utilize (almost) all 16 million colors.

3 thousand word essay on speedcubing methods, beware: In the world of professional speed cubing, CFOP rains supreme. However, in a trinity of efficiency, ZZ and Petrus have the ability to alter the landscape of cubing permenantly. CFOP is used by Felix Zemdegs, one of the world's greatest. CFOP is so commonly used, because it is a learnt as a gradual increase from the "official" beginner's method, by gradually improving already known methods. This contrasts the other 2, which to most, appear to be unconventional and challenging. When a beginner quickly finishes a layer with CFOP, they can easily see the acheivement then and there. CFOP, or cross f2l, oll and pll, is by far the most researched method. This allows more efficient methods to be discovered. Furthermore, It translates easily to 4 x 4 and 5 x 5. This is likely due to the fact is does not require knowledge of the internal way the cube functions, no block building of Roux, or edge orientation with ZZ. Thus, although it is extremely algorithm dependent, it is easily manajed. First, a cuber solves the cross. This is almost the exact same as the beginner method, thus easy to learn. A common issue, amongst many cubers, is a focus on one colour, instead of pure efficiency. Furthermore, CFOP relies heavily on the inspection stage, with a cuber expected to think forward atleast 10 moves, during 15 seconds, an incredibly arduous task. After the cross, A cuber will insert edge-corner pairs into there areas in F2L. This is initially learnt intuatively, however, as one progresses, one must think of the necessary next akgorithm, whilst completing the initial one. After this one transfers to OLL, or orienting the top pieces. There are over 50 algorithms, with increasing learning often initially slowing, before enough practice has occured. Also, there are hundreds of further algorithms, if one wants to transition to a smoother pll, however, the recognition of which algorithm to use is of the upmost importance, as the incorrect one will end the solve. This overrealiance on algorithms found in CFOP contributes to the fact, in top cubers, most solve times are up to luck, although this is obviously an issue in other methods, simply a smaller one due to the flexibility. CFOP has a higher move count then the other strategies, which is why many believe that ZZ can change the game. ZZ uses an alien intuitive technique known as eolining. First, a cuber must orient every edge in the cube, whilst this is initially time consuming and move inefficient, it eventually gains extreme efficiency. At the same time, a cuber builds up a central line from the edge DB and DF. From here, the rest of the cube can essentially be completed with only U, L and R moves, rotationless. This is of course advantage for a multitude of reasons. Most cubers are quicker with these slices, as opposed to internal M moves, this also translates to OH extremely well. With F2L, a cuber must complete 10 different peices as opposed to 8, due to the LD and RD peices being incompleted. There is also significant switching between L and R moves, difficult for the beginner, although, often easy with enough practice. Finally, the users reaches the top layer. Given all edges are oriented, it gives many possibilies for efficiency, which CFOP somewhat lacks in easiness. These include COLL and EPLL which when combines (and with fewer cases if one wants total efficiency) makes ZZ A, essentially a 1LLL, wiith 493 cases, which is extremely doable. For this reason, I personally believe someone using ZZ with ZZa could transform the cubing landscape permenantly. However, ZZ does come with numerous disadvanteges. These include an extreme reliance for introspection, which is offputing for many cubers. The unintuitive EOLine which offputs the majority of beginners, albeit becoming natural and easy after a long time, and the L R switching, which is again unnatural. Despite these flaws, I am completely on board with the possibilty of ZZ user with ZZa being able to beat Felix Zemdegs or anyone with CFOP, it is simply currently unpopular. Likely equally unpopular, Petrus. First, a cuber builds a 2x2x2 block in the cube. Then this is expanded to 2x2x3 block, this can be done with many different strats, but is somewhat intuitive. After this, a cuber orients the remaining edges, in a similar fashion to ZZ. After this F2L can be completed by only turning 2 sides, which is obviously extremely efficient and quick. In Pure Petrus, A cuber will create a 1x2x2 block which is expanded to 1x2x3 to finish F2L, when done with the efficient 2 side movement, the top 4 edges will orient automatically, this is due to the bulding of the 1x2x3 block necesitating full edge orientation, thus when it is completed, this necessity will be met. After this, unconventionally, the user will Permutating the Corners of the last layer, then orient them. Finally, the cuber will permutate the edges, which will require swift algorithms. It has the same advantage for the last layer as ZZ, given the orientation, to make 1LLL extremely viable. For the begginner, it is far more intuitive to block build, and requires less algorithms. The Petrus method also uses far fewer moves than CFOP, thus increasing efficiency. However, the high intuition levels comes with a huge disadvantage. Thinking is practically non concious at Proffesional Speedcubing for 3x3. Thus, unless it becomes more popular, and strategies are created, as like what happeneed in 2003, it will likely stay unused. Furthermore, in the Edge orientation stage, recognition of cases is a drawback to beginners, as is block building, thus will again stay unused. While not as favourable in my eyes as ZZ, I do see the benifits of Petrus, especially for a non algorithm heavy method for beginners, which in my oppion is where it should stay. COLL will become more common, and cubers will make it ubiquitious. COLL will be more advantagous in ZZ and Petrus, and that is the only chance for their rebirth. If they dont beat CFOP then, they never will. Due to this, the most likely path is that elements of ZZ and Petrus will be incorporated into CFOP in certain cases, in which knowledge of those elements will be examples. For example, X cube, is born of Petrus, utilizing the block building, but during the cross element of freidrichs. Knowledge of this case, and far more importantly, the experience of how to quickly incorporate this edge pair in to a 2x2x2 block without affecting the cross, is the opening stage of Petrus. Furthermore, Petrus’ use of blocks is extremely prevelant in methods for larger cubes, like 4 x 4 and 5x5. One method of solving is to create blocks, akin to Petrus, and solve it almost identically. Whilst ZZ’s Edge orientation appears useless, in 4x4, the entire initial stage involves centre fixing, and then orienting the edges, akin to ZZ, knowledge of how to do this, and experience of it is helpful. ZZ also utilizes mainly U L and R moves, making it the ideal strategy for OH. Both methods have significantly lower move counts, and are often used for lowest move, in which CFOP is scarcely used. Furthermore, ZBLL, originating from ZZ and Petrus, is being learnt by people across the board, and is likely going to lead to the next stage of world records, once it is universely learned. Although CFOP reigns supreme, numerous smaller methods can be utilized, as mentioned above. Many methods involve orienting a permutating the top layer, whilst solving F2L. This includes the Winter and Summer variations.These were invented by Mats Valk, besides the winter, and are a subset of VLS. There are 432 algorithms to learn, including mirrors, which is a significant amount, however any method of improving world records is a superhuman method or luck. Given this, extreme methods are needed, and we are reaching a stage in which one must balance recognition and algorithms. Methods to improve recognition, such as some sort of quick flash card challenge which has hundreds of buttons and 0.1 seconds is necessary. This of course is almost impossible. However, is the speed gaming world, such methods are necessary, and given the prevalence of actions 1/30 of a second, it is possible, and to beat the battle of algs vs recognition, is the next step. CMLL, a method in Roux, is used by Feliks Zemdegs. CMLL has only 42 algorithms, and will always eb faster than COLL. However, in honesty, there are 2 strategies that will improve almost all cubers. Colour neutrality, and improving your look ahead. Most people start with a certain colour, and plan with that, as opposed to essentially colour blindness, looking for the most efficient solution. If one has colour neutrality, it will often reduce the moves by up to 3. This is more important than a simple 3 moves, due to the fact it will let you lookahead and plan 3 more moves during the F2L stage. Furthermore, If one practices blindfold cubing, the lookahead needed is immense, thus it would be useful for almost all, due to the fact ones planning happpens so quickly. Furthermore, 3x3 cubing is reaching a stage where in improvement is almost completely up to luck and chance. I would recommend that anyone looking to inovate a cubing feild dont start 2x2, the extremely luck based solution, or 3x3 which is so popular, it is practically impossible to control improvement. Rather I recommend improvent of other feilds, like OH, least moves, 4x4 and 5x5, which arent up to the miniscule improvement stage. However, in the feild of 3x3, there are so many conflicting strategies, its hard to remember the most basic and importants one. Practice transitioning from different moves. Practice look ahead, and finally practice algorithm recognition. And of coruse Zeroing. The most important algorithm. Remember to practice your zeroing daily. Zeroing is the most important moves. DO zerioing. Zeroing zeroing zeroing.

The sound of the speedcubing is ASMR

I'm impressed!

c - cary k - knows h - hthat twow is being delayed longer and longer

Cary: It's called loop over because the rows loop over! Alternate Universe Erno Rubik: It's called turn over because the sides turn over!

i enjoyed watching the sliding block windows 7 puzzle widget thing

Never knew one of my favorite KZfaqrs is a speedcuber

Technically, loopover is a Rubik’s torus (doughnut shape).

Clickbait title, this is clearly a 2D Rubik's Torus.

Man is a BFDI character💀

I played this when it came out and trust me this game is SICK

Would be cool if you added a feature where you could have a pixel art for the solved state!

0:06 “Cary, please let go of pence-pence” -Matchstick

4 years later and I still think cary kidnaps humans is really good at solving rubix cubes

I've played loopover so much that it's sort of a classic game to me now--not that i was ever into speedcubing it, I was more a "watch the pretty colors make a nice picture" kinda cuber lol

Hmm... Rubik's cube videos, coincidentally as code bullet makes Rubik's cube videos... HMMMM?

4:50 Me laughing a lot at this goes to show how mature I am

I am playing on 6x6 and I just have squares 30 and 36 in reverse order. Could you please tell me how to fix this? Thank you

Happy 560K subs!

14:40 congrats on helping the armless contestants, Cary!

I understand the purpose of using letters, to distance this from that game ‘15’ however numbers would be far more intuitive. Perhaps add numbers as a settings option with letters as the default

Dont worry never give up always try again Cary.

You've been cubing for 10 years longer than ive been alive

9:30 *"NUT"*

9:38 YESNO

thanks for having the bfdi mouth animation

12:23 only 5 and 4’s

Im dedicated enough to spend 1 hour on a 20x20 loopover puzzle. 8000 moves, and the end result was worth it

Am I the only one who thinks that cute human needs to be saved?

0:19 The Primary school ppl like myself: allow us to introduce ourselves

1:53 the other cfop acronym made me think of rigor mortis (stiffening muscles, usually after death)

Cary kills haters

"I'm looking for 69 and it's really hard" - this just made my day :D

I came to this video, knowing nothing abt cubing. But now i came back with more knowledge and this is ez

Roux is actualy good for 3x3 but for 5x5 an above the M moves is a lot more harder to do than R and U moves

3:10 the things in cary's brain are um, interesting

I wanna hear about parity

This vid got me into speedcubing

I love the ‘ok stop that ‘

6:54 sound effect please?

I feel bad for z it was left out it's all alone. I

I like how he keeps the K.H. (Kidnapped human) in the background most the time.

I watch bfdi/bfdia/idfb/bfb/tpot and I also like speedcubing so the fact that Cary is a speed cube shocked me

I am a speedcuber *asia intesifies*

4:55 This reminds me of the game "Chuzzle"!

Wow, It Is The First Time Where He Actually Links The Software He Made

The cheers to screams had me laughing 💀

6:21 i started paying so much attention to the number puzzle that i didn't even notice he solving it, and when he finished, i was like: *wut dafuk happened*

9:43 have anyone else noticed “YES”?

The loop over world record would be the luckiest scramble ever where it somehow solving itself

Bro was a cuber since the year of the buildings