I was wondering about that with you being in Japan, and Comcast being an American company. 😅

Probably ranked you up in the algorithm though ;)

At least it wasn't Cumfast...

Comcast is a very well known brand here in the UK.... Oh, Cumfast?!? ;0)

@@FightCollective One thing is for sure. If you got comcast in the us your're not ... You're way more likely to blow a gasket or two trying to reach what they dare to call "technical support" ;)

🙏

True.

Just wait until Brian overclocks his son for more FPS

:)

Eaxctly

The limit is because these devices only offer a 100Mbit/s RJ45 Port on them. So the connection between them might be way faster, but they cant give that to other devices. Thats why he saw 90 Mbit/s max via RJ45/Ethernet on the Laptop. Thats a shame, but good enough for his family, I'm sure.

@@xxcr4ckzzxx840 haha that's so dumb. I had the same issue with a router I bought. The WAN Ethernet Port to connect to the Internet modem was limited to 100 Mbps, but the standard that it used was 5g so they used the theoretical limit of 5g instead of just using what the router WAN port was actually capable of.

@@HoloScope To be fair, they disclose this in their datasheet and in the description of their product. Yes its not instantly obvious and the 900Mbit/s are preferably advertised, but it's right there.

@@xxcr4ckzzxx840 Too bad It didn't say that with the netgear router I bought

@@xxcr4ckzzxx840 it really depends though. Not just the devices even the ethernet cables also can cause a limitation Cat 5E, Cat6 or Cat6A. Its best to always plan out the network your building up. The ports from the router may max out only 100 Mbit/s, since it is the source of the network bottleneck. His laptop at his unit may gain more Speed because the router's wifi maxing the bandwidth via 5G. If the router's ports can give 1000 Mbit/s then replacing the cable to Cat6 or Cat6A from the router to the Access Point CPE should max out what it is telling from it's Data Sheet. It should trickle down to the other unit also The wifi of the other unit if it has a 1000 Mbit/s port should use also use Cat6 or Cat6A to maintain the speed that it is travelling.

Same here man, those tplink things were a pain in the backside. Think the ones Bryan got would be easier to set up and probably better range based on what I've seen.

I have that problem and my wife complains about it all the time... I was under the impression that 37 seconds was enough time for her because it's always been enough time for me.

@@Haywood-Jablomie LUL

It is, it use the default Wifi 5GH wifi -- EDIT: so from channel 149 to 177 is NOT allowed, and channel 182 to 196 need Registration required.. So yeah you right source en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_WLAN_channels

Really! I use more than 10 years now , good quality and good signal

Agreed, except for an early TP-Link Wireless G router with a single antenna that was flakey(most were back then to be fair), which had me on a DD-WRT modded Linksys WRT54G router for a long time, everything I've used from TP-Link has been rock solid from their KASA Smart plugs, routers, range extenders, mesh network routers, USB WiFi Dongles(works great on Linux), and even their USB bluetooth adapters(works great on Linux as well).

oh thanks, yeah sorry i messed up there!

Can answer this one in a question of the day for you brother.

If you smart you can just change the range if the DHCP and you good xD

I'm sorry, what? No, it's not criminal, Todor. He is not *supposed* to turn a single gigabit connection into *two* gigabit connections for *two* different locations. Technically, what *he's* doing in the grey area of legal. Also, there is a very reasonable engineering reason as to why those are limited to 100mbps, and it's stated quite clearly. See this explanation : "The limit is because these devices only offer a 100Mbit/s RJ45 Port on them. So the connection between them might be way faster, but they cant give that to other devices. Thats why he saw 90 Mbit/s max via RJ45/Ethernet on the Laptop. Thats a shame, but good enough for his family, I'm sure." ... the tech is not sub-par, it's *excellent*?! It haven't dropped once. It does exactly what it says on the box. Do you genuinely expect a full gigabit ethernet port on something that extend a signal for 5KM and cost 100 bucks?!! Yes, there IS better tech, that will cost you MORE than a second connection anyway. Stop asking DIY solutions to be high-end. Stop. It doesn't make any sense. Also stop thinking that a company is "criminal" if *you* don't do your research, that's insanely ridiculous. They provide a product that's phenomenal for the price. 100 mbps on 5KM max extension for this money is i-n-s-a-n-e and unheard of. Stop being a snob tbh

@@jas_bataille Lol, first why post an explanation of the 100mbit/s limit on a post that explains it!? Second, how exactly is limiting the lan speed to 100mbit *excellent*? Gigabit is practically standard for almost 20 years now. You'd have to go out of your way to find 100mbit LAN interface on a 802.11ac wifi device. Just take a look at any of the networking brands, even the cheaper ones like TP-Link. Understand that 100mbit LAN does not make sence on a 802.11ac device. Third, what I expect from a product is what it says on the box, how is anyone supposed to get 866mbit/s from this thing?? It's gimped by design. Talk of not doing your research, smh... And the thing about turning a single gigabit connection into two gigabit connections -- where do you even get that?? Almost didn't want to answer when I read it... if you're going to send me another reply written with your hurt feelings, don't bother

Not so much criminal as maybe a bit unclear. Personally, I care more about internal network speeds than I do about Wide Area Network (WAN) speeds. If I get a WAN with 30 to 50 Mbit/s I'm ok with that. I need my internal network to run at or near 1Gbit/s for various reasons. something like this is still good if you need access long distance to your LAN resources but don't need 1Gbit/s internet.

Japan does not allow dual citizenship.

Japan has native giant hornets commonly known in Mass Media as murder hornets.

Very true, but 100Mbps might be all they need with only 2 people in the household, and more so if they are use to a limited mobile data connection.

Agreed it's best to show as little of your network settings as possible unless you are doing a tutorial video, and are going to be changing it later on.

It was more for the Neighbouring WiFi Networks in the area.

also in the video

As a 5820k owner since 2016, the best upgrade path for you is to just get a new system, i had after the 5820k the following CPUs with an RTX 2070: I5 8400, Ryzen 1200, 1400, 1600, 2600, 3100 and lastly a 3300X, mostly for 3D work, gaming and also testing. 5820k is STILL A GREAT PLATFORM, yet the IPC jump with the i5 8400 alone was pretty significant, specially gaming related, i kept my 5820K thanks to the high PCIe bandwith it has that allowed me to add multiple devices, mostly capture cards, and since i have it as a streaming/recording only PC, with a 1650 Super now to get use of the NVENC encoder, it does really well for that up to this day. As for "Cheapest" upgrade, possibly would be getting a Xeon X99 cpu + a better GPU, but since you wont be putting much framerate due of the CPU limitations, you could possibly just jump to play in 1440/4K 60fps if you have a display or TV that can do that. Nowadays my main rig is a 5900X with a 3090Ti and a 42inch LG C2, and its BY FAR, THE BEST EXPERIENCE AVAILABLE NOW. Hope this helps!

@@XxDeViLBrInGeRxX thanks, appreciate the information! The 5820k is still rocking for me with the games I play, was wondering about the future. Now I have some ideas!

definitely is the best option to have direct LOS.

No, you can use it around the globe. Some reviews say, they even extended their wifi to the moon.

On the box it says 10km.

LMAO! Same here. I'd be changing my ex, but would give anything to my daughter.