lots of people do

It was designed by John Moses Browning.

@@jessejames8900 No it wasn't. And if you're referring to it being a recoil-operated pistol, then JMB 'invented' Glocks, USPs, SIG P220-series, etc etc.

Elaborate.

No. Glock is

@@MrMountain707 That's like comparing a pinto to a Ferrari.

92FS is no Ferrari. Buy a CZ if you want a Ferrari. Glock is like a Toyota Land Cruiser.@@Sandhill1988

Glock is the best at AD’s to the leg 😅

No. Walther PPQ is.

you mean the 92x and the m9A4.

@@lsruler those models are contemporary to the 92xi, the 92gts is slightly newer.

@@lsruler I'm still upset that they're no longer selling the 92d lol.

@@Beardman770 I'm upset that they don't sell the brigadier model anymore

Reliability impeccable?!?! Are you talking about the M9?? Because I carried them in the service and I have to be honest, I have a very very low opinion of them. Every one I carried had massive reliability problems, including the brand new one I was issues *including after a break in period. I even purchased my own mags to try to see if the problem was the GI issued mags, it wasn't. They are smooth shooting, but anything but reliable.

@@rickyspanish9002 I trained over 26,000 Infantry soldiers and 10,000 DEA Agents on how to use the M9 Beretta in combat. The only M9 malfunctions I saw during my 27 years of military service was caused by messed up magazines. What I never liked was the 15 pound double action pull and the 7 pound single pull. Both are way too heavy. The factory sights also sucked. I recommend modifying both if you every must carry one. Thank you for serving our great nation. Be blessed.

@@IRONFOX6-fy5se I know the mags were a big problem, especially the non-OEM ones. (Magazine issues are the leading cause to most weapon malfunctions IMO) I'm surprised you never ran into any other issues in all those years however. I certainly encountered failures to eject and failures to go into battery on the M9s I carried. I think the trigger pull, especially on SA isn't terrible for a general issue service weapon. Like you said, heavy, but I found them to be fairly smooth. For a seasoned shooter, or for someone carrying one as their primary duty weapon I can absolutely see the advantage of dropping in an enhanced trigger. (I always do for my personal glocks) I also agree about the sights, but thats something I find true about most factory sights; just as the trigger, I automatically upgrade them.. I also than you for your service to our great country.

@@rickyspanish9002that wasn’t a problem with the gun. That was a problem with the cheap mags the military was buying for a while.

"Suuurrreeeee..... "

Maybe using the wrong ammunition?

@@jessejames8900 used the ammo the army gave me to use, m882 ball, mfg'd by Winchester, the only authorized ammo to use in them...

A bit of both probably

No super fantastic plastic pistol will ever top it.

Mosin Nagant is a better

No one asked

@@YorkyYT That hurts 😆

Vegetato camo - it's just a copy of Canadian CADPAT with 2 colour changes.

@@eddietat95 thank you!!

​@@eddietat95Vegetato is not a copy (it isn't a digital pattern) and has little to no similar colors to the CADPAT

What soldiers were they?

@@jessejames8900 surely you can tell me the biggest customer who used this platform

One bull, or two cows

Like everything no reason to just wanted to

politics

Because someone thought they're smarter than John Moses Browning.

Because the m9 is garbage.

The PX4 is nice, but if you want a great shooter check out the Cougar. Basically a PX4 without any of the polymer components. They're hard to find because no one gets rid of them, one of the smoothest shooting pistols ever.

And what is the Walther a copy of?

Hahaha exactly!! Kinda telling when your elite troops and private contractors universally don't choose the M9

You have small hands, maybe a .32 ACP?

Munchinland?

Your people must be small.

And exits immediately

...orf you go...

I'm glad to see there is atleast one person in the comments with a gentleman's taste. Chin chin!

💯

Yeah but its not.. dont get me wrong, love the 1911, but it has a fair share of issues and there are far superior pistols... And on service for 110 years? With whom?

​@@rickyspanish9002the United States Army

@@jessejames8900 might want to check your math friend. The army phased out the 1911 in the late 80s. I never saw a single person carry one while I served in the 2000s.

So the us army using it for decades? Idiot.

Who uses a pistol in combat? It's a sidearm after all. It's supposed to be carried a lot, shot a little .... if things go as planned, it would never need to be used in anger at all.

Doesn't that make it to many soldiers a completely serviceable and useful weapon

You do know that "the locking block and slide failures" haven't been an issue for close to 40 years, right?

You know it had a low round count before failure and parts replaced

Better than what? Hi Point?

Hell no

A nice gun. Looks very impressive. How does it compare?

@@alanmcmillan6969 Well out of my own experience. In the 80's the Swedish Armed Forces tried several guns for a new service gun. In the end it was down to a few like Glock 17, Sig Sauer P225/226, Beretta 92. Sweden at that time had an abundance of 9 mm called "9/39B" for their submachine guns. The only gun that stood the test and with a guarantee of 50.000 rounds was Glock, the Beretta was simply not up for it. I can just give an example of guns using the Swedish "9/39B". In Doboj Bosnia in 1996 when I was stationed at the BdeHQ a Danish Major got some of the Swedish 9mm, I do not know how but at the firing range his gun cracked into pieces giving him a nasty injury in the hand when shooting it. Sure he used an old Neuhausen pistol that at the time was Danish service pistol. In 1997 an American officer used the same ammo in his M9 Beretta. Later he found cracks in the metal and the gun was done. I've used the Glock 17/ 19 as a service weapon for a good +30 years and so it's a bit unfair maybe for me to say this since I've not used the Beretta 92 for as long. However I have been deployed alongside troops since the 80's to 2014 and used the Glock in every environment there is from arctic to desert and jungle, the Glock is as reliable as it gets. That's the short essay ;)

Maybe Glok never heard of Bereta! I think Bereta even older as a company

@@Happy-wb8gi So the older the better? I said it as a joke that they've never heard of Glock but as for the use of Service Weapon Glock surpass Beretta 92 for a reason. Second and sorry for this but it's "Beretta and Glock"

​@@Happy-wb8giBeretta is the oldest firearms company in the world and they have prided themselves on making some of the best quality and top-notch weapons even during world war II Italy was not known for having a great arsenal but anything that came out of from Beretta was some of the best and was highly regarded as a great war trophy