😂😂😂 lol

😅

Please make video on this

Iran wants to know your location

😂😂

🙏 Your Awesome we tried our best.

Your Awesome too 👍 thanks 🙏

Its not hard

@@vishveshtadsare3160 ah yeah I'm sure you and your grandmother can build one out of the scrap in your backyard yah

... and this now a very crude design. We marvel over miniaturization in our electronics, but nukes did it first!

@@vishveshtadsare3160 The engineering is hard. Getting the focused explosives into the right shape, the thicknesses of the layers around the core, and the fuse timing takes a bit of calculation.

Happy to watch your videos 👍 thanks for your information

One science item that I noticed was Oppenheimer giving General Groves his estimate of 3 kilotons for the Trinity test. Oppenheimer actually thought that it wouldn't work being their very first attempt.

Speaking of history, The fact that the "Christian" West would commit and practice a great many cardinal sins, many of them knowingly, such as centuries-long global; - 'Colonization', - 'Genocide', - 'Slavery', - 'Colonialism', - 'Global Warming', etc which benefits them enormously for centuries worldwide; then they would initiate and take a measure to ban those practices worldwide, and take credit for it. [Note: Today's global warming is caused in large part by nearly two centuries of excessive coal burning, mainly in the West.] Christian European Colonization of, - North America & South America, - Siberia & Far-East Asia, - Australia & New Zealand in Asia-Pacific. 😔 Europe for Native Europeans, Africa for Native Africans, America for Native Americans, Asia-Pacific for Native Asians-Pacific islanders. 🤷

Still curious if they use AI for the voice narration with some of the weird pronunciations.

Thanks 👍

"hours"? Do you have a steam-powered computer?

Seconds, not hours. I wish people would not comment with their unique feelings and personal speculations. Nobody cares if such as you have "total respect". What does "total respect" mean anyway? So - why post?

They did have computers. But your point is not without merit.

​@@GeoffreyFeldmanMA While I understand and identify with your feelings, your approach is probably one that would tend to spread a bit of a negative, overcritical regard for our fellow human beings. 23 people identified with and purportedly enjoyed the sentiment to which you refer. Thus the more appropriate question might be: Why let such a benign expression elicit such disrespect ('No one cares if such as you...)? ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- further reading if you're a reader. if it's some kind of buirden, forget it. "ain't know won gunna reed all that!" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Just fwiw, I've ultimately come to the conclusion that, with the goal of prioritizing disdain properly and homing in on/understanding those who are TRULY making life worse (and curbing their influence vs helping the better influences), it's best to forgive the smaller things that have basically kindly intentions behind them (eg, this op would likely mostly be an expression to simply connect with others about a harmless emotion of being in awe; a positive regard of another). There is SO much ego-driven, incredibly-ill-considered, narrow judgment out there that's PURPOSEFULLY DESIGNED to belittle and spread negativity. So I always try and just silently forgive and forget irritations when people are just being people (sometimes absent-minded, irritating etc). If I work through it and understand that the intentions are essentially benevolent, I kinda' see it as a case of not being one of the 'patient zeros' for transmitting the true irritants in life. Not to mention, when you have the idiots who love the emotional tone of the intelligent harsher-spirited criticisms, they try to emulate this kind of thing (in an effort to exalt their immature egos) and it comes out as invalid criticisms of everyone they disagree with because they aren't smart enough to deliver valid perspectives or content with their emotional expression... smearing vehement ignorance all over the place. I guess I try to identify the intention behind stuff and try to understand what kind of regard it spreads (how des it affect idiots... smart people? average people? youths/immature people? etc)... or not; whatever. I try to save my emotionally-based criticisms (as yours is) for the REAL F'Kers who make things suck in life. sht... loooong.... oh well. take it, leave it. just thought i'd share some ideas about the issue.

Wit Do

Your awesome mate 👍 Thanks 👍

Thanks Nicola Pare we love you guys 🙏

The fact that they are radioactive didn't matter much; they were just metals. As long as you don't exceed the critical mass, you can melt it, hit it with hammers, cut it etc., and it isn't any more dangerous than just standing next to it.

@@jakistam1000 well actually, both uranium and plutionium are heavy metals, thus are toxic - and plutoium is particularly vicious. It sheds, is easily to oxidize, is cancerogenic as faq, produces bubbles of hydrogen inside.

Thanks You👍 Your Awesome

Nah the movie describes what he did very well.

Someone has to take credit when they're able to move from theory to practice, if the original theorist isn't able to do it.

​@@krymsun3134Nope. Oppenheimer's most important contribution was reorganizing the project, and the movie didn't say one damned thing about it.

@@perniciouspete4986 what are you talking about he spent an hour organizing it lmao

Glad your Brother liked it 😁 Your Awesome

Thanks 👍 Your Great Too

Thanks 👍

Plutonium 239 is much more responsive to stray neutrons. The gun approach would have failed to bring the two components together before the energy released busted the assembly apart. A fizzle.

The movie was based on the book, "American Prometheus." That book deals with Oppenheimer and his life and not the science of the Project. That's why the science was tangential to the story of Oppenheimer in the movie.

The problem is KZfaq algorithm We do not get Views when we make Videos that are not Trending 😔

@@Aitelly oh! Thanks or reading my comment I hope you will one day

Not an expert on radar, but I think the old curved radar has a centralized antenna, so it need a curved dish to reflect the signal to the target direction. The flat panel are phased arry radar, they have many small T/R units that can control its signal direction to a certain degree without physically rotating. Those units can either spread out the signal to cover a large area for search, or combine its power and focusing on a single target to get precise tracking for weapon guidance. The mechanical radar can also perform the same tasks by constantly rotating for search mode, or gimbal lock at the direction of the target for tracking. The biggest advantage for the phased arry radar is, they can switch between the those two modes at very rapid speed, because they dont need to physically rotates. This allows them to have much higher performance in a mode called Track while scan(TWS), which means the radar tracks mutiple known targets, while maintain the ability to detect new targets, which is great for situational awareness on the battlefield.

Unfortunately you have to find somebody else that likes making videos out of love and passion not just quantity of videos for profit

@@thecloneguyz no ai telly is a great you tube channel i love this channel because it's the only channel that reads my comment and replies to it Unfortunately we need money to make these type of content

Yes, a research and development engineering manager, so you can't help being a pain in the ass. You're forgiven.

Yes agreed 👍

Ok understood 🙏👍

Thanks 👍

God bless you too my friend 🙏 We love you Guys.

The plugs were automatically pulled out when the bomb dropped. They were connected to the plane inside the bomb bay by wires. As the bomb dropped out of the plane when the plugs reached the end of the wires connecting them to the plane, they were pulled out fully arming the bomb. The green plugs separated the arming circuits from the explosives. When the red plugs were put in that gave continuity to the explosives and tests could be run to verify circuit operation. When the red plugs were pulled out, the arming circuits were fully armed in the bomb.

Thanks 👍

Thank You So much. We love you guys

Fusion is the power of stars, not fission. Think H-bomb versus A-bomb.

Thanks

Light-water reactors use low-enriched U235, they rely on water as neutron moderator to slow the speed of neutrons and enable a sustainable nuclear chain reaction. Nuclear bombs use a chain reaction of fast neutrons in pure uranium/plutonium, a lump of U235 in subcritical mass won't undergo fission, hence no heat.

You did not understand the principle of operation of the reactor. Fresh nuclear fuel will not heat up, but spent nuclear fuel will, since spent fuel contains a large number of short-lived isotopes that actively decay, releasing heat.

Yes

One without knowledge in physics clearly doesn’t need to know how to build an atomic bomb, if they cared enough they’d acquire at least a bachelor in physics

Why? The Japanese were killing 120,000 to 240,000 people per month in the countries they controlled at that time. Are Japanese lives somehow more valuable than the people's lives who died in the Japanese occupation? The ONLY ending to the war with fewer casualties is if Japan had accepted the Potsdam Proclamation sent to them on July 26, 1945. They chose to continue the war. The results of Hiroshima and Nagasaki are a direct reaction to their rejection of the call for them to surrender.

So was James Tuck who suggested the two-part shaped charges (explosive lenses) with fast and slow explosives that Kistiakowski then worked on. The entire project was a collaboration among a lot of very smart people and not singular events by one person alone. Robert Serber proposed implosion in the "Los Alamos Primer" which everyone coming to work at Los Alamos had to review. Serber's first lecture was in March 1943, long before Kistiakowski worked on the Project.

The early days at Los Alamos would have been an amazing time to be part of for any scientist or engineer. So many bright minds working collaboratively on one goal and having an almost unlimited budget at their disposal. It all happened a few years before I was born, but I love reading about all the different people and the many ideas they each brought to the table. Thankfully this era of Los Alamos is well documented and makes for much good reading today. I got to visit Los Alamos in 1982 and give a talk about interactive computer graphics. I still vividly remember flying into an airstrip on the top of a nearby plateau in a de Havilland Twin Otter and then getting escorted around like I was royalty. Sadly no pictures of the trip though (cameras not allowed).