Exactly

True. In the episode I watched he said he learned everything by going through the children's section of the library.

6:50 the video mentions this as well

@@adamamango very briefly like its a passing thing. I think the approach to the video was wrong. In my opinion it should have started with him being exceptionally knowledgeable and then look at scenarios. Traditional approach and money made vs his approach and money made.

Manick N EXACTLY. Technique doesn’t matter in a knowledge game if you don’t have that necessary knowledge to win. He’s still human, so he’ll screw up eventually. Until then, I’m going to continue enjoying his reign.

Ashley Marie We had a rule that you had to play the clue before to get to the next one. In other words, in order to play the $400 clue, you had to do the $200 first.

@@jackshayne1634 that rule truly limits the game. Terrible

Jack Shayne stupid rule!

Alessio Sangalli Not really. Moving from top to bottom allows the teacher to see where the class most needs review. By forcing the class to move in one direction, she can better understand when a majority of students are getting questions wrong and focus her review efforts there.

@@jackshayne1634 not at all. It just gives you that impression but it breaks the game and dumbs it down.

Those aren't charities in Nevada. They're casinos.

@@Ken.- only gamblers?

You can't prove he's done any such thing

@@Ken.- it's not that it wasn't obvious, it just wasn't funny

He just donated to Alex for his cancer

Imagine how many people called in sick...to Jeopardy after seeing him on tv

But he studied for over a year to prepare

that would be my luck... LOL

@@sdazzle2460 he studied for 7 years

lmfao rip. lvl 100 vs lvl 10 x'D !

James Holzhauer goes to Alex Trebek "Now gimme my money biatch!!" xD One smart German mofo for sure :)

An "honor"? It's a game show about making money.

He deserves it tho cause he’s extremely good at answers and he has the strategy

Here let me just not play this game to the best of my ability because apparently that makes me greedy

" I don't want the money" - said no game show contestant ever.

i thought for a long time it was an old timey british contest

It isn't even aired in the UK

cyrilio I was just about to say the same thing, spot on

This is cool! Good luck to James.

Same

let's not go that far, he's simply answering more questions correctly than the other contestants

@@thisperson2517 No he is not. Everyone that wins at Jeopardy does that. This guy brought something new. The results speak for themselves.

I'm going to have to rewatch all his episodes because I SWEAR he said he dropped out of college to gamble professionally.

...men...see what they find beautiful? lmao

@@thisperson2517 so you don’t watch jeopardy. Got it lol.

Yeah. I personally find the game alot more interesting when played this way.

Took people long enough to figure out this was the best way to play the game lol. Tetris masters are much more impressive than that!

That would put someone in the position of actually having the opportunity of being the one to _beat_ James. So, intimidating maybe, but can't imagine it wouldn't be the ultimate test of oneself.

@@GoldenfoxxPrime I agree - you either win huge or lose to only the very best.

IIRC they only shoot for so long each month, so I’m sure it’s reassuring to see two people go in, then the same people come out all day before you go in

uhu.. :'( too sad for words

I think I could beat him. But I don't want to play him.

I don't get it, wdym?

@@jaiminnimavat8493 the way the game host speaks. When he adds extra syllables to a word, it messes the contestants up from buzzing in.

@@diegouy8277 reminds me of when to floor it when approaching a stale red light that you know is about to turn green. In my town we have a countdown timer for the pedestrian walkways and I noticed there is 4 seconds between the time it says stop for the light to turn green. So now when approaching a red light at an intersection which I know is about to be green I know there is a 4 second lag (much like the 'ki-cka') to account for before hitting gas.

@@jaiminnimavat8493 .

and that all depends if he had a good night sleep, making james conrey the deciding factor

Because the staff members on the show, when coaching contestants, actively request that they start from the top and move down. Most people, due to social pressure, will follow that request. James dgaf.

@@GoddoDoggo Also the questions on the top are a lot easier

The stakes are higher right? If your playing at school you probably don't win anything or just a small treat. So the risk is gone. Also I suspect most times you'd play jeopardy in high school, at least in my experience, is as an alternate format to study for a quiz. So instead of six wildly different categories that you don't know before hand you have 6 sub categories of one topic which you studied for. And since you have a better chance of knowing the topic why not go big? But I still agree it's weird that it has taken so long for someone to use the strategy James is, considering how much money and time is spent studying and breaking down the game with people even doing stuff like datamining.

Because starting at the bottom makes it very difficult to understand the clues, besides the fact that you have to answer in a question form, almost none of the question they ask you are simply “what is blank” they are very complicated questions that are easier to understand when you don’t to figure as difficult of trivia along with figuring the question format

@@j.a.6310 You underestimate how motivated some people are by meaningless competitions.

Don't you mean "know the questions"?

@@danielfronc4304 Both. Since a question is the answer. 😉

@@JustTheHighlights Ah-Ah-ah, not at all. If he knew what the answer was, then there'd be no point in the game's host providing it. Besides, it's the writers who formulate the answers. What wins a contestant the dollar value and control of the next category and answer is providing the proper question. I've been watching this game since its inception in the 1970's with Art Fleming hosting it. "I'll take The Jeopardy Game Show Construct for $100. Alex". And the answer is, "Not at all". What is "Does Just The Highlights have the faintest idea of how this game works?". Bing! I'll take Infantile Rejoinders for $100. Alex. "What is..."

@@danielfronc4304 You absolutely decimated this poor man.

@@danielfronc4304 That was quite the response! 😀 The joke I was trying to convey was that his answer to the given problem must be in the form of a question. Therefore a question is the answer.

When they have had very educated non-Americans on, it seemed like the bias towards USA popculture made it very hard for them to win -- definitely an American game.

@@jeffmiller6954 yeah considering it's in America I don't exactly expect to have an equal chance playing at Chinese Jeopardy making references to ancient poetry and grass script.

James would end up teaching them shit they didnt even know xD

I'd give James a 40% chance

He'll still get them all right! Lol

noice

Tbh, he might just be that way around people he's just met! a lot of people only open up once they get to know folks

A lot of these game shows require a little personality to even get in despite how smart or good someone might be.

The most brilliant people are often the most quiet/introverted.

⁠@@r0zugorudooften? Maybe; as a rule, no lmao. Also, how are we quantifying brilliance here? Arbitrary sentence.

Yeah, he was like a machine!

same

Hes the Michael Jordan of Jeopardy lol

Knowing the precise mechanics in a game makes you a better player - that's true for all games.

Joshua Levy aaaaaand also his crazy trivia knowledge. Very few have such a vast repertoire and recall

My friends are nototorious for doing this lmao. We used to play with casual game game then it became super competitive once we found out the statistics, general practices that pros do. It's fun still just a different kind of fun.

Yep. He broke the meta.

Do that in a casino and you might find you’re suddenly missing your kneecaps. Do it in Jeopardy and you revolutionize the game to the point where people think you’re a trivia god. I just wonder when more people take on his strategies how the game will change and if it will be for the better.

Hahaha exactly

I'm pretty sure I would watch a show called Trivia Relaxation Hour.

@@roomdog40 me too, actually :D

Exactly he's playing to win as much money as possible...they make it sound like thats a bad thing

Look, had they NOT lifted that 5-game limit, he wouldn't be here right now. And neither would another Jeopardy! great in Ken Jennings.

it's really a straight forward and brain-dead strategy and i'm surprised with all the geniuses that have been on the show, no one's done it before. historically daily doubles get answered correctly around 80% of the time. any professional gambler would empty his bank account for an 80% chance to double his money. most casinos tilt the odds in the house's favor by single digits for most games, so a +30% chance in the player's favor is practically high way robbery for a pro gambler like james. even if he's wrong he still has a good chance of making a comeback with his aggressive play.

@@oldfrend it's more like 70% of the time but your point stands for sure

He just won the super bowl.

What is I am feeling sad?

Me too. I'm still weeping.

As a 49er fan, I feel ya

So how much did you wager?

more like help it, the way he plays is high stakes and exciting

@@justfantastic2877 It was a joke in that they lose more money obviously...

@@fondren001 probably make a lot more in ratings. and James probably still makes less than trebek.

From Quora: "His last contract was signed2in 2015 for 10 million dollars annually. They actually tape a weeks worth of shows in a day. They tape twice a week. So, in one week they tape 10 shows in just two days. When broken down, Alex makes $37,037 per episode." So James is making more per episode than Trebek at the moment. $78k average. Holy smokes.

I think he actually broke the game now future players will try to study and mimic the same strategy

Lol

ztheg well I mean when he gets over 50k a game

He actually made a joke saying that it was

It depends what parts you find exciting. They mention that in many games his opponent's are unable to catch him at the end because of his extreme lead, so if you value a nailbiting finish you could legitimately argue he is at least reducing the excitement of if not 'ruining' the game.

@@colinpetersen1173 Ok Boomer.

@@colinpetersen1173 nah

No she makes sense everybody could watch jeopardy for different reasons. If you watch it to play along it’s no different but if u watch it to see the race of a player catching up, it wouldn’t be so fun watching James games but non the less really cool that he’s that good of a player

They are not "anticipating" when a question (answer) will end. They are watching a series of lights that are lit when a producer presses a button AFTER Alex finishes the "answer". Eventually, a returning player becomes very synchronized with Alex's voice and the producer's finger. A returning champion has a tremendous advantage at the beginning of each new game. Watch how often a returning champion gets the first answer/question right. Of course, it helps that THEY also picked the category...ALL things that can rightfully add to their dominance unless a challenger is REALLY on the ball and ready to go IMMEDIATELY!! (All J! contestants are smart...not ALL are prepared to play the game the way it MUST be played if you want to win...)

No.... The "30th" person in line should be learning his techniques to counter him when they come on.

Dude are u joking that’s just regular jeopardy

I agree! Every contestant knows their chances of winning are next to none. James has had a couple of close calls, so even if he didn't win, he still takes a huge win to his bank. In fairness, allow those folks to return to the show. I'm sure they've picked up on tips on winning the big money.

So just everyone who played when he played

Or just a day where the 3 contestants to beating him get to have a play-off.

Yeah but he was in serious Jeopardy the day before though. Pun absolutely intended.

Ken used to buzz in before he knew the answer because he was so smart. But this guy is incredible

Doesn't do much good to know the answers if you can't buzz in. Let's face it, the guy is skilled as he is brilliant.

I don't know man. Can't shake off this feeling that he's cheating......

After 30 appearances, his AVERAGE is higher than the previous SINGLE DAY record. He broke it.

Imagine you are trying your hardest and you keep losing to someone who looks like they aren't even trying.

@@kaldo8907 it's part of the strategy, make them so mad that they start being bad

he just uses game theory similar to what Ken Jennings did

concars1234 are winners ever retired in this game? If he never loses how long can he continue on with the show?

I wonder how much of a ratings bump they get from these winning streaks and if this translates into more profit than loss.

@@outlawjodiewales9295 Jeopardy did away with the five day limit a long time ago. James can keep going until he loses.

nancy warner or retires

Lol

They actually make 5 episodes a day but release 1 every day a couple months later

@@flexroland Yep, episodes are filmed a few months before they air. The contestants first know how successful James has been in the meeting room before going on stage, when a producer tells the other contestants how much the champion has won. Ken Jennings's run lasted long enough that challengers already recognized him from television by the time they met him.

@@porsche911sbs yes, right now you watch the other contestants try to play against him using the normal top down strategy and they fail. To win Austin's James, you would have to be someone that's seen him play on TV and figured out how to copy him well enough to beat him with the buzzer.

Everyone’s reign comes to an end someday. They probably want to be known as the dragon slayer

He's going to lose tonight ...and try not to be a crybaby about it

. Haha I think I can handle it. 😄

deejo 2 did he lose? I know it’s a lot later but how long did he end up going?

Matteo Giampietro He lost a bit short of Ken Jennings earnings. All in all, I think he won 32 games.

Absolutely. Anyone who complains about a game show is probably a loser. I got kicked out of a full contact Karate tournament for hitting a guy " too hard" when I was 18. The punch was legal and it was the Black Belt division. Afterward his buddy is telling me that I should be more sportsman like as a Black Belt I shouldn't be as aggressive. I'm like I'm a White Belt I bet my instructor I could beat any Black Belt here with just Boxing. Then he got super pissed. I'm like I just beat 2 Black Belts today with like 6 weeks of training in Kempo, if you want to fight too. My whole school ended up getting kicked out, but it was an eye opener for those guys I bet. My point being there is always someone who thinks the traditional way is always the best.

There it is.

What is a Dad Joke?

Canadian actor turned rapper makes THIS claim in his 2013 single of the same name...

As of the last game, he's at over 1.7 mil

I watch him since day 1 and I am still thinking wtf. It is really rare just to see someone hit double digit win streak.

@@stephenhousman6975 He's really smart and knows everything

I never watch jeapordy but it was on during one of his first games and I was amazed. It was like he knew the answers before the questions were asked.

@@ryanelgar2299 No, he knew the answers after they were asked.

Lol right? Every time I’ve played a version of jeopardy you start at the bottom and hunt for the daily double

Ikr. Every time I play Jeopardy my class allows goes for the bottom to get the most points.

It tends to make for bad television. Once 98% of the money is taken, the tension is gone and nobody cares who gets the last few $400 clues. The Jeopardy! staff wants that to be the exciting part of the show, not an anti-climax.

We always do this too, but the issue is we don't know the answers bc our teacher sucks

relatable af

Brad is the best ever. Why include Austin instead of him? He's whooped Ken time after time and won millions more than him, despite not having the privilege of slaughtering regular opponents for dozens of shows in the regular season.

Ken would be destroyed, James vs. Watson 1v1

neosapiens I know brad personally, he’d be a TERRIBLE host, he’s so annoying and weird

I agree with the others, Austin is a really likable guy and fun to watch and may have the chops to bet a lot, but he's not won nearly enough to be successful against James. Brad has a better shot, but I agree with Logan - I am honestly thinking the only player to beat James is Watson.

I want Trebek's mustache

I'm guessing he missed the final jeopardy, and the 2nd place contestant doubled his/her money?

@@joshodom9046 James was ahead by about $6000 going into Final Jeopardy. They both got the Final Jeopardy question right.

I could be wrong, but didn't James start out the episode with getting his first question/answer wrong and being $1000 in hole immediately? That was a sign to me that this particular episode was going to be different. This episode happened before the recent 2-week break for the Teacher's Tournament.

@@ZJCitricAcidGraf.E.T. I think you're right

search "james holzhauer almost loses"

Insert 21 game show scandal theory with Jeopardy.

I can be aggressive if I don't know. I'll probably lose but I can still do it.

Ken Jennings barely won most of those games, James dominated most of his wins.

Well this theory was put right to bed with the GOAT tournament. KEN JENNINGS IS THE GREATEST OF ALL TIME!

Professional gamblers either A: cheat within the rules or B: lose.

@@JoshSweetvale Cheating within the rules is just finding loopholes

@@gandangamberify No.

Yes idiot

wrong. pro gambling is real. all about pushing odds over time.

It seems obvious that you'd want to accumulate as much money as possible, collect all the high-tier rewards you can, not waste time on idle game host chitchat. I've always (mistakenly) assumed that the winning players aren't playing stupid strategies - that there must be a reason (in the rules) they work their way up through the low-tier trash - but I've also never been interested enough to bother studying the rules in detail, lol.

It's interesting to know now that the behind the scenes they actually tell the contestants to start at the top. That explains a helluva lot about the way people play this game. I wonder if they tell people on The Price is Right that if they're selected to run like batshit crazy fools up to the contestant's row and never stop acting like a kid on a sugar high afterward, too.

Alex gets annoyed when they do start with the highest ones

LOL. WHY? Let him be annoyed. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

There's actually some strategy in saving the high-dollar answers for later. If you have confidence in being able to rack up money and control the board, the later in the round you get the Daily Doubles, the more betting capital you have. To use an extreme example, if the very first "Answer" you picked was a hidden Daily Double, then the most you can bet is something like $1000. But, if the Daily Double was the very last "Answer" left on the board, and you had $10,000, you can bet up to $10,000. So you want to get the DD early, but not too early, if you want to make huge cash. If you want to win with no regard to your winning total, you probably just want to get the DD to make sure your opponent can't cash in on it.

John "components"

@@johnsjohnson lol thanks. If he destroyed the jeopardy 'components' that would be fun to watch to!

I mean, he is _exploiting_ them, and that's pretty close

It is all fun and games until a person bankrupts a show :)

not fun for me. I want others to have a chance too . Let them limit how many times a contestant can win or how much they can win..

yeah, his knowledge base is unreal, almost as if he has a photographic memory. Even then some of the categories would weed that out. I have not seen a category that he is poor in.

He is a savant, not borderline

@@cessnaking2000 I believe he does have photographic memory. If I recall correctly, he told a story where he's gotten banned from casinos for counting cards with enormous amounts of decks in black jack

most of the shit on jeopardy is learned throughout grade school, but everyone forgets it because its largely useless in everyday life

@C. Michael sounds like some asshole never payed attention in school. a large portion of jeopardy questions can be found in geography, history, and social studies books ranging from 1st to 12th grade.

Same... I thought it was fascinating to watch him play!

The word smart has lower standards today sadly. You are looking for genius.

@m norton buswell Always nice to see someone so encouraging and kind as you!

Yeah, take the big #s off the board, and take comeback opportunities away in the same stroke.

Daily double betting is just your confidence, if you are ahead bet high. But picking the bottom first takes the first guess away from your opponent so, an obvious advantage.

Honestly kinda obvious, surprisinged this hasn't been the strategy for decades

Exactly, I thought everyone knew about this strategy

...I’m 30. It sounds like the three of you must be young. Old people are really stupid. Like I’m stupid, yes, but people from my parents’ generation and before are *really* stupid (generally). When it comes to most basic things we can figure something out relatively quickly and easily.

@@edh6532 especially a gambler.

Difference in risk. Here you're betting thousands of dollars. At school, you're losing maybe one or two extra credit points.

Bro there are people who know how many cloves of garlic a youtube food channel has minced.

@@kaldo8907 wtf legit? hahahahha

@@alxuria Yeah man, people are crazy.

Also, after he answers a question correctly, he quickly goes to the next question, so that he has more time to answer more questions throughout the game. Notice that most other contestants take a second or two to decide where to go next. James moves quickly, and that gives him the chance to answer maybe 2-3 more questions over the total game.

@@randyjordan5521 Absolutely, and seldom adds any extra banter or little jokes. I've noticed a couple times when Alex has given the one minute warning, James goes into hyperdrive, which for him is a breeze as all that's left at the end are the lower dollar answers.

....and what is "exciting" about that??? When there's no competition in any sporting event, I turn the channel.

@heehee mefunny LOL absolutely! Here's hoping he'll be hangin tough for a while.

@@sportsmediaamerica If you were watching someone approach the sport in a way that changed the game and setting a phenomenal set of new records, you'd change the channel? He's like the Michael Jordan or Mike Tyson of Jeopardy.

meow bastard ...

I literally can't wait until this stupid "literally" term goes out of style. Literally. *barf*

You literally do not know what literally means.

@@Fete_Fatale You literally don't know what sarcasm is. :D

@@RavenMaven you literally thought my 'literally' comment was directed at you? Oh dear - literally.

There have been people in the past that usually start at the bottom but they didn't attack the board as aggressively and they didn't answer with anywhere near his accuracy rate so it didn't do them much good. It's a good strategy but you have to make sure that you can buzz in and you have to know the answers. It's about all the elements working together.

Same. It is bad that I find pleasure in seeing the hope slowly drain from his opponents' eyes as the game progresses? They all start out so optimistic but then they get absolutely slaughtered.

@@davidb5205 It's like being a rookie boxer and realizing you've been put in the ring with a fresh young Mike Tyson

Projekt:Kobra I have no idea what you’re talking about or how you brought your political views into this, but you most certainly have little chill.

gxtmfa Yeah, if anyone could be called an @$$hat, it’s him.

@Projekt:Kobra Sometimes I forget that people like you really exist and then I read hilarious nonsense comments like this where it just sounds like you're talking to yourself about fuck only knows what. Man, it just makes me glad I don't waste all my time on the internet anymore.

@@newq haha I thought the exact same thing when I read that

@Patric Parton I mean...he someone managed to vent his anger about "virtue signalling sjw sleazebags" in a video about Jeopardy strategy, so if it's any consolation, it's the weirdos and buggers angry about every little thing who don't seem to like Trebek. I feel like for most people, Trebek is solid. Not god's gift to man, but not horrible really. Just very neutral and safe.

KaoruKat he has to be exceptional, not just good

@@stevesung573 I'd argue his playstyle means he only has to be pretty good rather than great. Ken could probably beat James in a straight Quiz Bowl format but James just plays big against regular plebs. I'm wonder how well hisstyle would work against other great champs who had time to prepare for him? Not as well, I'd imagine.

@@kvltizt I'd argue that playstyle doesn't really mean shit, and I'd be right.

@@jeremyc9593 Then explain why an entire video was made breaking down his style for me?

@@kvltizt You ask that as if there's never been a pointless video made in the history of mankind.

it was really really unfortunate how Emma beat him. she was unworthy and got lucky with finding those daily doubles. I will say though that she did understand she had to be really aggressive in her play style to beat him and she also did very well in the recent tournament where James beat her twice in a row

@@jayquoproductions Once in a row, because first game he gave himself a nice cushion but second game Emma had more than him.

@@jayquoproductions She wouldn't have known who he was when they filmed. They film months before the show airs... the episode James lost would have filmed around 2 months before the first one he won was aired. She didn't know his play style, unless someone from the show told her. But, she had also studied the show before, so naturally played more aggressively than the average contestant (just not as long term successfully as he apparently).

He lost because by chance he didn't build up a big enough bank so doubling his money in the Jeopardy round on its Daily Double didn't increase his bank that much. Emma found both daily doubles in the Double Jeopardy round and answered correctly so built up an uncatchable lead going into Final Jeopardy.

@@linda1lee2 He played the game like an aggressive gambler and lost like one, that's all there really is to it.

MysticOceanDollies yeah Sam here, I was actually surprised that most people don’t...

gotta get those points before the other team does !

MysticOceanDollies the stakes are a lot higher when playing for thousands of dollars in cash.

Sounds like you and your classmates are lots of fun!

Boba Fett You’re on crack man 😂

He's got a pornographic memory!

@@MICHAELSMITH-ys8ek did you mean "photographic"

RoachDogg Junior 😂😂😂😂

@@MICHAELSMITH-ys8ek hold up

Play aggressively, you mean?

Same. Always start from the bottom. Of course I've never played a mock Jeopardy with daily doubles. And we were stuck on teams.

iced fire same except our teachers usually would throw in a daily double and this is exactly what we would do. Always start on the big questions and jump around for the double. They’re acting like he’s cracked some secret code when the reality is the guy has common sense, good betting sensibility, and is incredibly knowledgeable about trivia

Who didn't do this in school literally every class that would have a mock Jeopardy everyone did it.

Same!

German origin. Holz means lumber or wood or timber. This guy's surname means lumberjack

@@jaimedelgado7529 He's a lumberjack and he's okay

@@Copyright_Infringement Jahn Holzhauer

@@jaimedelgado7529 That smile could take down a tree on it's own.

Well if you translate his name word for word it would be "James Woodbeater" :D

LOL

Damn I didn't get the reference Nope nvm just got it 👍

Yes please xD

James is Watson... The backstory is a LIE! LOL

I hated the Watson episodes. Wasn't impressed one bit. So what if a computer can be loaded with every possible question/answer and can beat a person to the buzzer.

TAS reference... A man of exquisite taste I see.

TAS is pretty saturated now

the S in TAS means speedrun, so "TAS" it self is enough. I'm a nerd, lol.

Except fun to watch

Given how long before airing these shows film (three months), no one who went against James would have known who he was. Unless the crew warned them, they had no idea what they were up against.

@@brch2 When you get to the contestant's green room, and you find out that the returning champion is a 5-day winner, or 10-day winner....or more...you know you're in trouble. They didn't know WHO he was...but they knew WHAT he was. Now, imagine actually SEEING Ken Jennings on TV...and then arriving as a contestant, and finding out HE"S STILL THERE!!!

Genius? Not likely. There is a huuuuuuuuuge difference between memorization of trivia questions and analytical skills and deductive reasoning. He may know a fuck ton about trivia and in all likelihood have terrible math skills.

@@tylerkeller8869 You can't deny his retention rate is abnormally high. Geniuses aren't gifted in all areas either, only a select few.

@@tylerkeller8869 don't be jelly

sarai3180 there is no god

He's the first person to be brave enough to play with that playstyle, Ken Jennings even said he wishes he had bet more on doubles after seeing James play. So really his game play is quite amazing because no one else is willing to put so much on the line.

Yes he has to be knowledgeable to win but he's up against other smart people. His ability to get to the buzzer quickly secures his ability to get the answer.

@@spazmaticaa7989 that's true. No point knowing the answer unless you can hit that buzzer first. The two are equally important.

Optimal strategy does help him earn fat stacks though.

In short, there are several vital skills in order to amass big winnings in Jeopardy, and James seems to have mastered all of them. Other guys have deployed some of the skills; Ken Jennings was a beast with the buzzer and the knowledge, but he didn't employee winning strategy. Other guys, like Arthur Chu used strategy correctly, but weren't quite as skilled in knowledge or buzzer. Would be great to see a Tournament of Champions for which the greatest champions in the show's history who are still available to compete went against each other.

Ken Jennings the GOAT.

Doris Kickham is fake try make rational people

Oh, I wondered why I loved his face!