This sounds like a goddamn nightmare to figure out.
@espantalho938 жыл бұрын
+Jared Stott Why do you think it takes years to make a movie? ;)
@VitalMusic2177 жыл бұрын
It took years at that time. Now they just pay a CGI study to do it.
@HCkev7 жыл бұрын
I hope you don't think CGI is a quick and easy process.
@VitalMusic2177 жыл бұрын
No, but they don´t do it. They pay third parties.
@ricarleite6 жыл бұрын
A computer did all the calculations.
@MachiriReviews5 жыл бұрын
I love that Ian McKellen casually sticks the prop pipe in his mouth even though they aren't filming.
@tittos96515 жыл бұрын
Lmao
@nisms50485 жыл бұрын
Signs of a real actor always in character
@brody-56325 жыл бұрын
They are filming.. you're not seeing the past through a crystal ball
@galihmukti5 жыл бұрын
@@ericcartman1328 hmmm, your comment reminds me of something..
@beastvader5 жыл бұрын
@@ericcartman1328 Is that a reference to The Simpsons or Tropic Thunder? I forget
@inconsequest5 жыл бұрын
This video stopped so abruptly I thought I was about to receive a phone call.
@sweetaple1005 жыл бұрын
Can't relate, nobody calls me lol
@morningcoffee11115 жыл бұрын
Lol
@robin1000120015 жыл бұрын
damn that was funny
@DarkTranqz5 жыл бұрын
Lmfao riiight. I thought an ad was about to play 😂
@Sir-Blaze5 жыл бұрын
Me too
@jessiejames74927 жыл бұрын
why do the actors always get all the recognition. these skilled super craftsmen are fantastic
@guitarman03656 жыл бұрын
all the effects and set design in the world won't make for a good film without the actors to carry the story along. They definitely do need more recognition but that is just the way it is. Craftmans create the world but the actors take us for the ride.
@jordangordon23505 жыл бұрын
Because the actors is all you see unless you go out of your way to find behind the scenes stuff. Casuals don't do that
@LIlbulldog22335 жыл бұрын
The trilogy won in total 17 oscars I'd say that's recognition
@gutenman71125 жыл бұрын
Because normal fans doesnt benefit them . All they need is a good reputation for the movie industries who really appreciated their work .
@pwnmeisterage5 жыл бұрын
How many people line up for movie tickets because a Famous Big Name did the camera work?
@bluekdo5 жыл бұрын
I've watched this 3 times, and my brain still can't figure out how to beat the perception. Absolutely incredible.
@theodorosathanasiadis74897 ай бұрын
To be fair, their explanation does not really make much sense either. They just said "move" a lot and not much more.
@brettb.72356 ай бұрын
Same here, it’s incredible
@timharig2 ай бұрын
Very simple. A closer object seems larger than a further object. If you don't move the camera, then everything is fine. The problem is that when you start to move the camera, the parallax movement of closer objects is faster than that of further objects. That breaks the illusion. To compensate, they moved one of the objects along with the camera to match its parallax to the other object. That way it still looks like they are the same distance from the camera.
@siler72 ай бұрын
Because it's not shown very well.
@arman9175Ай бұрын
@@timharig This is a great explanation, well done
@Kleavers7 жыл бұрын
Now this is movie making and special effects.
@kimblefrost60735 жыл бұрын
th way it shud always b done. lazy generation and theyr use of computer imagery. theatre is going to shit
@jimsanoob5 жыл бұрын
Lol what
@qua44765 жыл бұрын
Here we go again with that nostalgia shit
@DVZM.5 жыл бұрын
@@kimblefrost6073 "lazy generation and theyr use of computer imagery" You are one of those idiots who have zero idea how those things are done but actually think it is easy to do. 👏🏼
@qua44765 жыл бұрын
If you think these computers are making people lazy, you better start sending your comments via telegram to youtube
@realmenheregreen52715 жыл бұрын
Cgi is really really good sometimes but practical affects is just badass
@kiwi22ism5 жыл бұрын
Effects
@tangerinetech53005 жыл бұрын
If you know how to mix the two you can get something indistinguishable from real life
@coolintuitivename49104 жыл бұрын
You will never notice good CGI
@jaimelannister17973 жыл бұрын
Practical effects are so much better cause they don’t age as poorly. With something like Star Wars a new hope all the aged effects are cgi effects added in the special edition while the ones that hold up today were practical effects from the 70s
@itsamealex0072 жыл бұрын
As the hobbit clearly showed.
@RileyGoss5 жыл бұрын
This is how they make Tom Cruise look regular height. Costs studios an extra 5-10 million, but they do it.
@seikibrian86415 жыл бұрын
What do you mean? Tom Cruise is 5'11" -- just ask him. ;-)
@pwnmeisterage5 жыл бұрын
Camera point of view is always at "chin" or "chest" level. It makes everybody on TV or film seem tall and robust, even when they're not. The same way a child sees adults.
@seikibrian86415 жыл бұрын
@@pwnmeisterage Not "always," but "typically."
@jonanderirureta83315 жыл бұрын
That was brilliant
@LacuinFamily5 жыл бұрын
You fool! Hahahaha
@kresh438 жыл бұрын
lotr= shot in the best locations of new zealand hobbit= shot in the best locations of new zealand's computer labs
@BlaneNostalgia5 жыл бұрын
They put so much blood sweat and tears into making the LOTR (Orlando broke a rib, Viggo broke his foot, nightmarish outdoor shooting) I'm actually cool with them taking the CGI route for a change
@MrGizmois7035 жыл бұрын
@@BlaneNostalgia its the difference between a 10/10 perfect film and a 8/10 average....
@thorsten87905 жыл бұрын
@@BlaneNostalgia The Hobbit movies were so mediocre it hurt
@ernestogastelum91235 жыл бұрын
@@BlaneNostalgia Viggo almost lost his life if he hadnt deflected the knife when the Uruk-hai threw it at him on the first movie
@stiimuli5 жыл бұрын
Hobbit was shot on even more locations than LotR. Watch the production vlog and behind the scenes extras. It was a truly massive undertaking.
@cjkalandek9967 жыл бұрын
Without a doubt one of the best practical effects in the LOTR movies. Which is saying a lot, considering the amount of practical effects mixed with visual effects used in these movies.
@nigglebit5 жыл бұрын
I liked that Ian McKellan is called Ian McKellan, but Elijah Wood is called Frodo. In the same sentence.
@111Malefic5 жыл бұрын
Yeah no, that doesn't happen. Listen again.
@lefyre12665 жыл бұрын
I still refer to him as Frodo
@333pinkelephant3335 жыл бұрын
They're using the name Frodo to differentiate between human-sized props and Hobbit-sized props. I guess "Elijah sized props" doesn't click as fast as "Frodo sized props"
@kennarajora65323 жыл бұрын
should've called him the arcade kid from back to the future II.
@TheRealBeatMaster8 жыл бұрын
And this shows why the LOTR movies were so damn good, this shows the passion put in. And also makes you see why The Hobbit couldn't live up in any way.
@kyleespinas47028 жыл бұрын
I think the hobbit had also done that.
@JackPorter7 жыл бұрын
the hobbit movies still showed a lot of passion i think... The problem for that movie is with it being based on a 11 page pamphlet!
@Galigula15 жыл бұрын
Shame they gave Peter Jackson not more time for the Hobbit films.
@Soldier4USA20055 жыл бұрын
@@Galigula1 No. The problem is he made a trilogy (for no reason) out of a much smaller book and it shows. It's nowhere near as well written or developed because it has about 1/4th of the combined material of all of the LotR books and was written for children, culminating in a different style of storytelling. We ended up with story arcs and characters never even mentioned (or barely) in the book, let alone characters actually doing things that directly effect the story. One of the changes was to include Galadriel because there were "too many men". www.thedailybeast.com/the-hobbit-19-changes-from-jrr-tolkiens-novel-to-peter-jacksons-movie
@monke123545 жыл бұрын
What? Because of a visual trick? You're putting way too much meaning into this, the same trick was done with The Hobbit too.
@DaveDexterMusic7 жыл бұрын
"Taken by Isildur from the hand of -" END from the hand of what Gandalf, _FROM THE HAND OF WHAT_
@904austin5 жыл бұрын
Sauron himself
@kos29195 жыл бұрын
The hand of GOBLET OF FIRE
@downfromkentuckeh5 жыл бұрын
DaveDexterMusic WHATS IN THE BOX
@TonyDootjes5 жыл бұрын
Boromir Stark Protector of the Realm slayer of Sauron @Bazza Cuda
@ryanprosper885 жыл бұрын
yo mama
@Oceansta5 жыл бұрын
Incredible. And to think, when you're watching the film you don't even realise what has happened. Cinemagic!
@MrWarhead167 жыл бұрын
I thought it was CGI. So everything midget is just this illusion? Bravo LOTR and Hobbit crew!
@andy86i7 жыл бұрын
for some shots. Also "scale doubles" were used. That is, a midget with a facemask of The hobbit actors, for shots where its far away and it's all of them running etc
@theenglishman5 жыл бұрын
Jessrey Mark Solijon there are some uses of digital doubles for the hobbits, but it’s very rare.
@tacticalchunder12075 жыл бұрын
They used perspective, small people as doubles, and also created two different sized sets and imposed the shots over each other for some scenes. Very clever and will always hold up and look good.
@noscoperbboyy5 жыл бұрын
@@tacticalchunder1207 If you watch the scene in fellowship, where Boromir gets hit by the first or second arrow, you see the doubles for merry/pippin, it's thrown me off ever since lol.
@kapitankapital65805 жыл бұрын
You'll notice if you pay attention that most scenes where a small guy and a big guy are in the same shot, the shorter character will have his back facing the camera. This is because they are using a double who is wearing the costume, and all the costumes are designed to obscure the look of the actor from the back.
@anaalinaama8 жыл бұрын
from this to Ian McKellen crying in front of the Hobbit greenscreen
@CaptainMyCaptain335 жыл бұрын
What’s your motivation??? You have to cry here and make it believable you old English fuck!!! Ok...ok. (Looks around) got it, Whaaaaa this shit fuckin sucks blimey mates ye whaaaa. Manchester United! Whaaa.
@TheBusbyBabes5 жыл бұрын
CaptainMyCaptain woah bro not cool
@Necromancer02255 жыл бұрын
Ikr , would it kill Peter Jackson to use forced perspective once in a while? Poor Ian
@thesalanian5 жыл бұрын
They couldn't use the same techniques because they shot all the hobbit films in 3d, that was the studio, not Jackson. He did his best with literally no prep time and constant studio interference when he never wanted to direct the movie in the first place.
@TheBusbyBabes5 жыл бұрын
@@thesalanian wheither you shoot in 3d or not has no impact on using props or cgi
@zmejgorynyts5 жыл бұрын
This is so amazing that even after it's been fully explained I'm still not quite sure how it works
@JamieR19885 жыл бұрын
It's quite hard to believe that LOTR was made between 1998-2001 Waaaay before the advancements we have in video technology today. Truly amazing work they did on that first film
@dps8125 жыл бұрын
I always wondered how they did it without CGI. Michelle Gondry has used these technique in certain shots of movies and music videos. But doing a whole movie based around this technique is nuts. Another reason to love LOTR
@ImA4RONxD8 жыл бұрын
These guys are geniuses
@spencerallison3196 Жыл бұрын
I love the technics of these films. It really make you wonder if it might've actually been easier to hire 4 shire hobbits, a dwarf, an elf, 2 guys, and a wizard.
@birderjohn33965 жыл бұрын
Take two mirrors, put one where Gandalf is supposed to look and one where Frodo is supposed to look, and face them at each other. Now the actors can look each other in the eye.
@Frankie2012channel5 жыл бұрын
It doesn't work like that. You would need MULTIPLE mirrors at exact angles for them to LOOK each other in the eye. The best they could do using your example, would be to show the side of the other actor's head.
@birderjohn33965 жыл бұрын
@@Frankie2012channel No, two would work.
@tilmanrotationalinvariant22575 жыл бұрын
or u simply use a screen, just saying
@TorrenFilms5 жыл бұрын
You most likely would not be able to do this as the mirrors would probably bounce unwanted light across the set, ruining the DOPs work
@Absolutely_puck_fakestine5 жыл бұрын
With all the lighting used on a set that wouldn't be possible.
@hypersapien8 жыл бұрын
When ever something in life ever looks too large or too small, I always tell my friends "Maybe they lord of the rings'd it".
@DV-zv4ox5 жыл бұрын
Best trilogy of all time. Nothing will ever top LotR
@LuckyNumber485 жыл бұрын
Fifty Shades
@deldia5 жыл бұрын
Fellowship is very nice. The last hour of return is awful.
@mailtoameyeveryday5 жыл бұрын
Avengers....
@tilmanrotationalinvariant22575 жыл бұрын
@@deldia well then u didnt get it...
@deldia5 жыл бұрын
Tilman Rotational Invariant didn’t get what? That hour of my life back? Yeah
@eternapesadilla23555 жыл бұрын
Is this why insects are small?
@keremdelialioglu21975 жыл бұрын
They are bigger if you look closer
@eternapesadilla23555 жыл бұрын
@@keremdelialioglu2197 and if you whisper they can understand you
@Adam-wc6cf5 жыл бұрын
@@eternapesadilla2355 And before you know it, they're 5 meters tall and is currently taking over the world
@gearz25705 жыл бұрын
@@keremdelialioglu2197 woooosh
@GryphonWyng4 жыл бұрын
I really want to live in this world where insects are human sized, but every time you look at them they're being rolled away on little dolleys to make them look tiny.
@noptic9 жыл бұрын
I still don't get how this shit works. It's literally like magic. Fuck sake.
@zamirstuff9 жыл бұрын
+noptic That's why is called Movie Magic :D it's beautiful
@urmo3458 жыл бұрын
+noptic when you watch movie there are more shots that makes you scratch the head, like the very beginning of LOTR where gandalf meets bilbo, not only height difference, but bilbo is movinf behind and front of gandalf figure and is taking items, hat and staff, from his hands.
@Miatpi8 жыл бұрын
+urmo345 Maybe you already knew it, but they filmed them separately using motion control cameras and blue screen.
@urmo3458 жыл бұрын
ut bilbo is movinf behind and front of gandalf figure and is taking items, hat and staff, from his hands.Miatpi
@ericd77098 жыл бұрын
+Miatpi Not separately - look again at 0:36
@prabhulprabhul92504 жыл бұрын
I'm too lazy to even understand it. I really appreciate their hard work
@carador92862 ай бұрын
Anyone who comes up with such ideas and implements them in this way more than deserves the Academy Award.
@willkilla10 жыл бұрын
2:05 smokin the pipe lol. He is gandalf irl
@jayspencer88934 жыл бұрын
Wow. This is beyond incredible. I’m Legitimately mind blown by the level of technical skill and basic knowledge it takes to pull this off so well. for the last 15 years I’ve been watching the entire extended edition trilogy at-least 5-times a year but I’ve never watched the bonus features. all this time I thought it was computer tricks. This is ingenious. Gives you goosebumps.
@KHH5956 жыл бұрын
I just pulled out my old LOTR dvd and watched it and I was wondering how the heck they did this specific scene. So glad this was the example they used. I wish they still worked this hard and made this sort of quality. It's so much better than CGI.
@jasonsearle462110 жыл бұрын
That. Is phenomenal.
@funkydozer5 жыл бұрын
My favourite scene using this illusion (apart from the kitchen table scene) is Gandalf and Frodo in the cart in Hobbiton. Totally seamless and believable.
@mycroft165 жыл бұрын
I love that scene in the extras... the way they had to build the cart is ridiculous. Half of it Hobbit sized, half Gandalf sized, right next to each other, on a moving cart, with tracking cameras. I remember watching in theater and wondering how they did some of these... there was no way green screen compositing would have worked and matched up seamlessly.
@elizabethefraim31606 жыл бұрын
clearly filmmaking takes a lot of innovation, creativity and even some math/physics! so cool!
@menamgamg5 жыл бұрын
These movies are timeless. There's just one small scene that comes to mind that looks a bit off now, almost 20 years after they were made. Incredible!
@viktorvondoom91192 жыл бұрын
This is one of those things that once you've chosen to do it in one scene, you just have to repeat it in all other scenes since the ratios otherwise would not make sense. Sounds like hell! Respect
@StarTrekOnlineLive5 жыл бұрын
2:01 “Gandalf” utterly on his role sucking his pipe whilst none cameras are roling.
@kennarajora65323 жыл бұрын
as wise as a wizard.
@BardicLiving6 жыл бұрын
This is one of my favorite special effects in the movie.
@delphinbringsby67685 жыл бұрын
This is simply one reason why these films will be cherished for many, many years to come.
@CheeKiatTeo2 ай бұрын
I swear it must have been an absolute privilege to be a part of the LOTR production, Everything, from the music, to the cast, to the cinematography to the enormous battles, they're all beautiful.
@CaptainFram8 жыл бұрын
This is the real magic right here.
@Funkroza10 жыл бұрын
Way better than The Hobbit, imo
@Eoinster9 жыл бұрын
That's not opinion. It's fact.
@Eoinster9 жыл бұрын
Aaron Watson Don't be an *? Find a single person in the world who prefers the Hobbit. It's not subjective, it's an objectively better trilogy in every way. Is it not a fact that The Godfather is a better movie than The Last Airbender?
@USFighter9 жыл бұрын
Eoinster I like the hobbit equally as much as LOTR... Now it's opinion.
@Eoinster9 жыл бұрын
Hated Out Yo I like Troll 2 as much as Citizen Kane. That doesn't make the opinion valid.
@luf4rall9 жыл бұрын
Eoinster you said "like", which makes it your opinion.
@nickclark38832 жыл бұрын
20+ years later I finally got around to finding out how they did it👏
@mickmaxtube5 жыл бұрын
Like my girlfriend once said, " I liked it but it could've been longer. "
@shaunl4465 жыл бұрын
Sounds like a lot of work for a quick shot. the attention to detail in these movies is impressive
@bayufadhilla86855 жыл бұрын
From now on, everytime I re-watch LOTR it will never be the same Damn the hobbits were actually talking to air lol
@kennarajora65323 жыл бұрын
there were a couple of scenes where the hobbits are talking to each other, there, forced perspective wouldn't be necessary.
@daftoptimist4 жыл бұрын
Oh my God, I had no idea this kinda stuff was involved, it all looks so seamless I barely thought about it. Practical effects never cease to amaze me.
@sainsburyshopper5 жыл бұрын
The sheer amount of effort that went into making these movies is astounding.
@guardianofthegalaxy20515 жыл бұрын
2:22 the shadow of his right hand (holding the tea pot) suddenly appears near the cup. One second before, there was only his left hand shadow.
@emptea44372 жыл бұрын
This is what will always separate this absolute masterpiece of a movie from playstation cutscenes that are being passed off as movies these days
@Aaron-up8mk2 ай бұрын
Even after they explain the trick at length, it’s still seamless on scene. These are the men who built my childhood.
@DragonDePlatino9 жыл бұрын
Maaaan, making movies back then must've taken some real creativity. Nowadays, people just throw money at blockbusters until everything's done with CGI.
@Aurumai6 жыл бұрын
To be fair, CGI --when not overused-- is a great tool for cutting the costs of filming certain scenes which would otherwise be impossible, either because of financial or technological constraints. There are many films today which use CGI in such extremely effective ways that the audience has no idea it's even there. In a lot of cases, there's really no reason NOT to use CGI since you can create a photorealistic scene for a mere fraction of the price of shooting in reality.
@BierBart125 жыл бұрын
@@Aurumai A shame so many CGI artists either suck at what they're doing because they only studied it because they thought it would be all easy, fun and games or aren't given nearly enough time because companies want to cut even more costs
@Aurumai5 жыл бұрын
@@BierBart12 Not sure I really know what you're talking about. Most of the CGI in super popular movies today is top notch, albeit *waaaaay* overdone.
@benmcdonnell855 жыл бұрын
Aurumai Ye CGI allows for creating things in films thats just not possible practically, but Its a miss-conception though that CGI is cheaper then shooting practically.
@nuke975 жыл бұрын
airlockengage back in the days?? How old are you all? The LOTR movies had plenty of CGI put in use. This was just a tasteful choice of getting something done.
@KellyCannondeBorda10 жыл бұрын
STuff like this is fascinating - but then again, it's kind of like magic, I don't always want to know how it's done.
@josegenuino57069 жыл бұрын
For me it's just makes allof this more incredible
@RIDDICK09119 жыл бұрын
José Genuino same. Knowing that it was a purely practical stuff makes it ever more awesome to behold.
@michaelharder97375 жыл бұрын
I am in awe of the skills applied in making such excellent movies.
@Iron-guy-fly5 ай бұрын
This was so seamless people didn’t even think about it at the time. TFOTR and TT should have won Academy Awards for this stuff, deserved it just as much as ROTK.
@jordangordon23505 жыл бұрын
All that just to have the camera be moving for a few seconds talk about dedication
@30AndHatingIt5 жыл бұрын
That’s why practical effects work gets more respect, it’s insane the amount of blood sweat and tears got poured into these films. Another great piece of practical effects work, Star Wars, they took 8 MONTHS to make something like a 10 second piece of footage.
@mycroft165 жыл бұрын
The wow effect from people who know about forced perspective is another reason they do it. The moment when peers realize, wait... this is forced perspective, but holy crap the camera is moving... how the hell did they do that?!
@merisonola5 жыл бұрын
"Do not take me for some conjurer of cheap tricks!"
@kennarajora65323 жыл бұрын
"I am not trying to rob you! I'm trying to help you."
@ErizotDread5 жыл бұрын
I don't know why, but I find all of the forced perspective stuff just SO impressive! So genius!
@Ken-fh4jc10 ай бұрын
Because it looks so good and will always look good. Today it would be all CGI and look like shit.
@redblueice5 жыл бұрын
I'm starting to see where this big mobile spending goes. Amazing, I had no idea so much work went into this scene. Bravo
@josremery5 жыл бұрын
The harder/technically more difficult methods always ALWAYS yield better results.
@DVZM.5 жыл бұрын
Believe me creating this with cgi would have been a thousand times more difficult at the time they filmed the movie.
@sim4fun5 жыл бұрын
I use it in photography, very clever to use it in live action.. a lot of head scratching I bet..
@davidcooke8005Ай бұрын
10,000 hours of effort for a 3 second scene that could just as well have been shot in 10,000 other ways, but they went with the hardest one.
@caffenefree5 жыл бұрын
I love this because I dont have any idea what any of this means but you can tell these guys are excited about having figured this out and that makes me excited.
@UnwrappingByMimiKoteng5 жыл бұрын
Moral of watching: 2:26 It worked!
@Bulltardwin5 жыл бұрын
Ha, I always thought they used real hobbits
@jonio2145 жыл бұрын
I can't even wrap my head around this. Genius!
@JustWasted3HoursHereАй бұрын
When I look at their rig it looks like it wouldn't work right, but it does. Kudos to the people who figured this out!
@stgm9 жыл бұрын
From the hand of who!? Don't leave me in suspense!
@scabbardfox4768 жыл бұрын
Sauron.
@WertzOne10 жыл бұрын
And now in The Hobbit they have "Gandalf" crying on a green room regretting taking the role back for such shitty cash grabbing trilogy.
@themesongman001710 жыл бұрын
You're wrong, just saying!
@joacareface10 жыл бұрын
WertzOne Think he meant the "cash grabbing trilogy" part.
@guitarman03656 жыл бұрын
no he was crying because he is mostly a stage actor or a personal actor that thrives on being around the people he is supposed to be in a scene with. He had to do most of his scenes completely alone giving the illusion he was talking with others. That for him was incredibly lonely, and stressful as an actor without having others to play off of.
@RaiceGeriko5 жыл бұрын
I don't blame him. And it's not really a lonely, thing I don't think. I think it just doesn't come out as authentic when you are supposed to be in dialogue with someone, and no one is there.
@mycroft165 жыл бұрын
You should probably realize that they did extensive use of green screen on LOTR as well. When Gandalf first enters bag end they used different sets and compositing. Bilbo and Gandalf weren't even in the camera together. It's not like LOTR didn't use CGI and green screen. The Hobbit definitely eschewed practical in favor of CG though and that is a shame. Though if you ask me a significantly larger problem is the ridiculous changes to the story.
@morganminecraftlegion91015 жыл бұрын
That's a pretty creative solution to a difficult problem. Perspective is a powerful tool when used correctly.
@felixtla933 жыл бұрын
This is what love and care for a film and look at it? It doesn't look fake and it still is beautiful than the horrendous CGI
@grovenn5 жыл бұрын
Why is everyone shitting on CGI? Half the time you’re watching something with CGI you don’t even know it because it is done very well. I’ve been learning for four years and have still barely scratched the surface of what is possible. It’s an art of its own and has made things possible in film that would never be possible without it. Don’t get me wrong these practical effects are really cool and interesting but I don’t think a lot of people understand that the only reason CGI “saves time” is because HUNDREDS of people are working on it simultaneously and sometimes are even half of the crew
@Megafauna17 жыл бұрын
re:View brought me here.
@lotsatoast2 ай бұрын
you can plainly see it's so much more fun and joyful in this clever way of doing it than just doing green screen with all the actors separated. that B roll of ian mckellen breaking down on the hobbit green screen set haunts me.
@Gabbababschwab5 ай бұрын
Most amazing trilogy ever made and the compassion that went into it, if only peter jackson made more... id absolutely melt if i heard hes making silmarilion
@HeyCrabman145 жыл бұрын
It would have looked like crap in CGI! This was the time where CGI looked wonky!
@mishmashmedley5 жыл бұрын
^cough^ _Legolas_ ^cough^
@jonathanbirch2022Ай бұрын
Gollum looked wonky? I don't think so.
@Moncho_Ай бұрын
Nowadays we only got forced inclusion
@RaiceGeriko5 жыл бұрын
These movies really did showcase some next level film wizardry. It simply boggles my mind how someone spent the time to figure all of this out.
@BucketheadStudios5 жыл бұрын
Truly the genius of film makers, love this stuff sooo much!
@morgoth96799 жыл бұрын
CGI destroys cinema! LOTR best! Modern movies all CGI....boring.
@HexadecibalVJ7 жыл бұрын
The thing about CGI is it's best when you don't notice it's there. Properly done you can produce some simply stunning work with it, but the minute you notice it, it destroys the illusion.
@RemixedVoice7 жыл бұрын
Adam Hickam The minute you notice practical effects it destroys the illusion too.
@HexadecibalVJ7 жыл бұрын
Very true. I think people are just more hypersensitive to cgi artifacts now though. A blend is always best. Throw the eye for loops.
@hazeddon7 жыл бұрын
Morgomir I hope you realize the irony of criticizing CGI for destroying cinema while praising lotr, a movie that won an award for one of the most photo realistic CGI characters at the time.
@MrMhtmht5 жыл бұрын
2000ish: Man this movie is so great, even with low technique the movies were produced perfectly 2019: Man if this movie doesn't bash on white people it won't be accepted by Hollywood
@heberfenderful5 жыл бұрын
Truly amazing, throughout the whole analysis I was amazed at its product but confused in the process, must of taken some physics and a keen eye to make this illusion
@TheOrangeRoad3 жыл бұрын
This has to be revolutionary, never nor heard anything like this before. Peter has always been heavy with practical effects, but this is a different level
@bruceU5 жыл бұрын
this is actually incredible and wow, what innovative filmmaking to solve this problem practically.
@Headbangerr-en2cc7 ай бұрын
This is true genius. No CGI, just brilliant creative people.
@Kalle725 жыл бұрын
Those were the days... When CGI augmented “real” special effects and camera trickery. In this case CGI wasn’t even used! I often think about this “moving forced perspective”. I had TLOTR extended versions with all the bonus content, and I was absolutely amazed.
@JudgeEomer2 ай бұрын
I've known how they did this kind of trickery for years now, but every time I watch, it's completely unapparent and my suspension of disbelief remains intact.
@bp567892 жыл бұрын
I've seen this video many times. Still blows my mind.
@chiwhiner2 жыл бұрын
I understand the perspective that because cg can do pretty much anything now, there is no point into putting this much effort, time, and money into practical effects. The audience will just assume it is cg anyway. To me the classic example is the shot of Dorothy exiting her house in the Wizard of Oz - they had to use a sepia-painted wall with a stunt double wearing sepia-toned dress & makeup to accomplish it. Nowadays anyone can achieve the same effect with their iPhone in seconds. But it is sad how much of the magic & awe of the movies has been lost. There are uses of cg that still floor me - de-aging of actors (or reconstruction of dead actors), but even these technologies are available for people to play with on their phone.
@Utilitarian1015 жыл бұрын
Serious respect to those involved in figuring this out. To hell with over-reliance on CGI.
@saltyninja3 жыл бұрын
I still only understand half of what they're saying here but these people are geniuses. The fact that they did so much with practical effects and camera tricks instead of always relying on CGI has meant that these movies are 20 years old but the visual effects still look amazing.
@queazy034 жыл бұрын
THIS IS FRIGGIN GENIUS!!
@miracbaverozturk46315 жыл бұрын
Wow! Now I know why did they look like, they don't look each other in the eye. Amazing!
@mvpandrew935 жыл бұрын
Never could get into this series, but this is art, that was amazing to watch.
@mycroft165 жыл бұрын
If you ever get the chance, get the extended edition dvd set and watch the extras. No film has ever put together a better set of extras. There are literally hours upon hours of this stuff. How they scout for locations... how they decide costume looks, how they pre-viz, how they storyboard, how they do sound effects. And I'm not talking the usual dvd 2 minute fluff pieces. These are like documentaries. Also, the audio commentary tracks are priceless. There are 4 of them with different groups of actors, or director/tech etc. The stories and things they talk about are incredible. There were things they put in sets that will never be seen on camera, but were there for the actors to see and feel it was real.
@moringaottawa Жыл бұрын
the video I never knew I needed but absolutely do ❤
@The_Curious_Cat5 жыл бұрын
Holy amazeballs! This is amazing!
@cosmotect5 жыл бұрын
Wow, this is done SO WELL I can't see it even after being told what the trick is
@drhassoon5 жыл бұрын
WOW, I never thought it was done this was. Very impressive!!
@luigouvea3 жыл бұрын
Brilliance at its BEST!
@md.siamrezaakash72205 жыл бұрын
The amount of work that went into the movie amazes me.